Crespi Artifact Collection

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

lokiare

Nov 14, 2012 22:43:26
An old priest was given gifts by natives containing treasures from all over the world supposedly found in a cave. Its a long read, but you can scroll down to the pictures to get an idea of what it is. Proof of intercontinental trade in ancient time?
#2

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 14, 2012 23:15:05
An old priest was given gifts by natives containing treasures from all over the world supposedly found in a cave. Its a long read, but you can scroll down to the pictures to get an idea of what it is. Proof of intercontinental trade in ancient time?

Ancient intercontinental trade Pffft...
#3

jetshield

Nov 14, 2012 23:55:03
Everyone knows that the dinosaurs had international and intercontinental trade.
#4

The_Silversword

Nov 15, 2012 1:01:23
Well it was easier for them, what with one big super-continent and all.
#5

jetshield

Nov 15, 2012 1:42:44
Pangea is a myth. Continental drift is a theory based on pseudo-science. Dinosaurs build and sailed boats to other continents.
#6

lokiare

Nov 15, 2012 2:45:58
See this is why you can't have nice debates. You go off topic and talk about reptilians and illuminati in any thread I post in. I have never mentioned the reptialians or the illuminati. That's all on ya'll.

Now back to the topic at hand. Artifacts found in a cave in south america brought to a priest as gifts. Which come from around the world...Smile
#7

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 15, 2012 7:15:49
See this is why you can't have nice debates. You go off topic and talk about reptilians and illuminati in any thread I post in. I have never mentioned the reptialians or the illuminati. That's all on ya'll.

Now back to the topic at hand. Artifacts found in a cave in south america brought to a priest as gifts. Which come from around the world...

I've already answered your question.

An old priest was given gifts by natives containing treasures from all over the world supposedly found in a cave. Its a long read, but you can scroll down to the pictures to get an idea of what it is. Proof of intercontinental trade in ancient time?

Ancient intercontinental trade Pffft...
#8

Ragnar_Lodbrok

Nov 15, 2012 8:52:38
This is true. Maybe they're responsible for the decline in pirates.
#9

lokiare

Nov 15, 2012 15:34:57
See this is why you can't have nice debates. You go off topic and talk about reptilians and illuminati in any thread I post in. I have never mentioned the reptialians or the illuminati. That's all on ya'll.

Now back to the topic at hand. Artifacts found in a cave in south america brought to a priest as gifts. Which come from around the world...


There is no debate to have. There wasn't any intercontinental trade between the Americas and Eurasia-Africa in ancient times. 



Then how did egyptian and middle eastern artifacts get to south america?Smile
#10

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 15, 2012 15:48:52
See this is why you can't have nice debates. You go off topic and talk about reptilians and illuminati in any thread I post in. I have never mentioned the reptialians or the illuminati. That's all on ya'll.

Now back to the topic at hand. Artifacts found in a cave in south america brought to a priest as gifts. Which come from around the world...


There is no debate to have. There wasn't any intercontinental trade between the Americas and Eurasia-Africa in ancient times. 



Then how did egyptian and middle eastern artifacts get to south america?

Do I really need to explain it to you for a third time?

#11

Mad_Jack

Nov 15, 2012 18:21:02

Then how did egyptian and middle eastern artifacts get to south america?


 FedEx.

#12

lokiare

Nov 16, 2012 1:41:24
Yes, natives that were dirt poor, saved all their money up and bought expensive gold artifacts from around the world and then donated them to this 'nice' priest. Yep, that explains it...Smile
#13

lokiare

Nov 16, 2012 2:27:49
Yes, natives that were dirt poor, saved all their money up and bought expensive gold artifacts from around the world and then donated them to this 'nice' priest. Yep, that explains it...Smile



Who says it really was natives behind this? Or that they aren't lying? Or that the donation actually happened and it wasn't the priest who collected this stuff and invented the story? Who says any of this story is true?

For a guy who thinks doctors want to keep people sick to make more money, you are very trust worthy on certain issues.



Ok, so the dirt poor priest bought the stuff on E-Bay... yeah still not buying it. How about a real explanation and please take a moment to actually look at the pictures in the PDF and possibly read up on the time period and the circumstances around it...Smile
#14

ADHadh

Nov 16, 2012 3:54:08
See this is why you can't have nice debates. You go off topic and talk about reptilians and illuminati in any thread I post in. I have never mentioned the reptialians or the illuminati.


What kind of conspiracy nut are you then? A blind and dull one it seems.
#15

lokiare

Nov 16, 2012 10:10:37
See this is why you can't have nice debates. You go off topic and talk about reptilians and illuminati in any thread I post in. I have never mentioned the reptialians or the illuminati.


What kind of conspiracy nut are you then? A blind and dull one it seems.



Or prehaps I'm not a conspiracy nut at all. Perhaps I just don't trust known liers and blindly take everything on faith like most people. Perhaps I require some evidence and proof of things before I blindly trust them.

As to how do I know about the guy I saw the video that someone recorded of him showing the artifacts off to a reporter.

#16

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 16, 2012 10:35:50
Or prehaps I'm not a conspiracy nut at all. Perhaps I just don't trust known liers and blindly take everything on faith like most people. Perhaps I require some evidence and proof of things before I blindly trust them.

Aren't you the one that's always linking Allex Jones articles?
#17

lokiare

Nov 16, 2012 20:46:07
Or prehaps I'm not a conspiracy nut at all. Perhaps I just don't trust known liers and blindly take everything on faith like most people. Perhaps I require some evidence and proof of things before I blindly trust them.

Aren't you the one that's always linking Allex Jones articles?



Alex Jones usually has good citations to back up his articles. When he doesn't I usually ignore his stuff...Smile

I do my own research too on the articles they post over there...Smile
#18

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 17, 2012 12:23:20
Or prehaps I'm not a conspiracy nut at all. Perhaps I just don't trust known liers and blindly take everything on faith like most people. Perhaps I require some evidence and proof of things before I blindly trust them.

Aren't you the one that's always linking Allex Jones articles?



Alex Jones usually has good citations to back up his articles. When he doesn't I usually ignore his stuff...Smile

I do my own research too on the articles they post over there...Smile


Dude, that was the funniest thing I've heard in a while. Thanks, I needed a good laugh. 

#19

bone_naga

Nov 17, 2012 16:56:31
Your link wasn't working, but from some of what I found...


Unfortunately, many of the artifacts were destroyed in a fire in 1962 or later when the church was restored. Also, many were lost or wound up with treasure hunters. After Father Crespi passed away, the remaining artifacts of the original collection were removed and made inaccessible to the public. Some may still be stored in the cellar archive of the church Maria Auxiliadora.




The age and origin of these items is still unknown today. Father Crespi never tried to classify them. The picture motifs are strange, their meaning not understood. These objects show the pictures of an unknown culture.

So according to this source, the objects weren't classified, thus they aren't actual proof of intercontinental trade, and since they seemed to have disappeared, there's no way of knowing.
#20

lokiare

Nov 17, 2012 23:05:07
Your link wasn't working, but from some of what I found...


Unfortunately, many of the artifacts were destroyed in a fire in 1962 or later when the church was restored. Also, many were lost or wound up with treasure hunters. After Father Crespi passed away, the remaining artifacts of the original collection were removed and made inaccessible to the public. Some may still be stored in the cellar archive of the church Maria Auxiliadora.




The age and origin of these items is still unknown today. Father Crespi never tried to classify them. The picture motifs are strange, their meaning not understood. These objects show the pictures of an unknown culture.

So according to this source, the objects weren't classified, thus they aren't actual proof of intercontinental trade, and since they seemed to have disappeared, there's no way of knowing.



Yeah, strange that they would all just disappear like that, after he died, after they were photographed and video recorded...Smile
#21

lokiare

Nov 17, 2012 23:06:12
Or prehaps I'm not a conspiracy nut at all. Perhaps I just don't trust known liers and blindly take everything on faith like most people. Perhaps I require some evidence and proof of things before I blindly trust them.

Aren't you the one that's always linking Allex Jones articles?



Alex Jones usually has good citations to back up his articles. When he doesn't I usually ignore his stuff...Smile

I do my own research too on the articles they post over there...Smile


Dude, that was the funniest thing I've heard in a while. Thanks, I needed a good laugh. 




Its not polite to laugh at your own ignorance...

He does cite sources for nearly every article, that you don't know that just shows what you don't know...Smile
#22

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 17, 2012 23:17:48
Or prehaps I'm not a conspiracy nut at all. Perhaps I just don't trust known liers and blindly take everything on faith like most people. Perhaps I require some evidence and proof of things before I blindly trust them.

Aren't you the one that's always linking Allex Jones articles?



Alex Jones usually has good citations to back up his articles. When he doesn't I usually ignore his stuff...Smile

I do my own research too on the articles they post over there...Smile


Dude, that was the funniest thing I've heard in a while. Thanks, I needed a good laugh. 




Its not polite to laugh at your own ignorance...

He does cite sources for nearly every article, that you don't know that just shows what you don't know...Smile



"Sources," right. I got yah. /Wink-wink, nudge-nudge. ;) 
#23

lokiare

Nov 18, 2012 3:15:06
Or prehaps I'm not a conspiracy nut at all. Perhaps I just don't trust known liers and blindly take everything on faith like most people. Perhaps I require some evidence and proof of things before I blindly trust them.

Aren't you the one that's always linking Allex Jones articles?



Alex Jones usually has good citations to back up his articles. When he doesn't I usually ignore his stuff...Smile

I do my own research too on the articles they post over there...Smile


Dude, that was the funniest thing I've heard in a while. Thanks, I needed a good laugh. 




Its not polite to laugh at your own ignorance...

He does cite sources for nearly every article, that you don't know that just shows what you don't know...Smile



"Sources," right. I got yah. /Wink-wink, nudge-nudge. ;) 



Yeah, this article has around 7 sources from the Washingtons Blog to Bloomberg. First article I clicked today. It helps if you don't discount everything because someone else shouted "conspiracy theory" at the top of their lungs. It would be best if you actually, I don't know, read the articles and make up your own mind instead of spouting the same drivel you hear from the TV...Smile
#24

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 18, 2012 3:31:43
Yeah, this article has around 7 sources from the Washingtons Blog to Bloomberg. First article I clicked today. It helps if you don't discount everything because someone else shouted "conspiracy theory" at the top of their lungs. It would be best if you actually, I don't know, read the articles and make up your own mind instead of spouting the same drivel you hear from the TV...Smile

Except that it's always Alex Jone the one that is shouting "conspiracy theory" at the top of his lungs.

#25

lokiare

Nov 18, 2012 8:26:00
Yeah, this article has around 7 sources from the Washingtons Blog to Bloomberg. First article I clicked today. It helps if you don't discount everything because someone else shouted "conspiracy theory" at the top of their lungs. It would be best if you actually, I don't know, read the articles and make up your own mind instead of spouting the same drivel you hear from the TV...Smile

Except that it's always Alex Jone the one that is shouting "conspiracy theory" at the top of his lungs.




Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile
#26

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 18, 2012 11:58:46
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile

You double check facts? Shouldn't you be double checking the claims made to determine if they are facts? I get the feeling you don't know what a fact is. ;)

#27

bone_naga

Nov 18, 2012 17:28:10
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" class="mceContentBody " contenteditable="true" />


How so? Name some of his conspiracy theories and predictions that have come true. I seem to recall talk of martial law being implemented around elections. I've checked a lot of his "facts" and found them to not be facts at all. So share something with us. Show us a time where he was right on the mark.
#28

bone_naga

Nov 18, 2012 17:32:58
Yeah, strange that they would all just disappear like that, after he died, after they were photographed and video recorded...


Nice way to deflect what I said.

First of all, they didn't all disappear right after he died, nor are they believed to have all disappeared to the same place.

Two, the artifacts disappearing doesn't prove your case. There's lots of reasons for them to disappear (and some were said to have been sold or stolen), like the fact that they are probably valuable. So while it may be strange, it does nothing to support your claims.

Three, it doesn't change the fact that the sources I found suggested that they had not been classified and in fact were of unknown origin, which runs counter to your claim that these were identified as coming from different continents.
#29

lokiare

Nov 19, 2012 8:04:09
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile

You double check facts? Shouldn't you be double checking the claims made to determine if they are facts? I get the feeling you don't know what a fact is. ;)




I get the feeling you don't either. If it can't be checked its not a fact. If it can be checked it doesn't hurt to do that.
#30

lokiare

Nov 19, 2012 8:05:14
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" class="mceContentBody " contenteditable="true" />


How so? Name some of his conspiracy theories and predictions that have come true. I seem to recall talk of martial law being implemented around elections. I've checked a lot of his "facts" and found them to not be facts at all. So share something with us. Show us a time where he was right on the mark.



He only said if Obama lost or the storms hit us hard they would do that. See sometimes you have to pay attention to what he says...Smile
#31

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 19, 2012 8:06:35
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile

You double check facts? Shouldn't you be double checking the claims made to determine if they are facts? I get the feeling you don't know what a fact is. ;)




I get the feeling you don't either. If it can't be checked its not a fact. If it can be checked it doesn't hurt to do that.

Except you make the assumption that it isa fact even before you check it. Thus you have a biased point of view about that claim.

#32

lokiare

Nov 19, 2012 8:06:57
Yeah, strange that they would all just disappear like that, after he died, after they were photographed and video recorded...


Nice way to deflect what I said.

First of all, they didn't all disappear right after he died, nor are they believed to have all disappeared to the same place.

Two, the artifacts disappearing doesn't prove your case. There's lots of reasons for them to disappear (and some were said to have been sold or stolen), like the fact that they are probably valuable. So while it may be strange, it does nothing to support your claims.

Three, it doesn't change the fact that the sources I found suggested that they had not been classified and in fact were of unknown origin, which runs counter to your claim that these were identified as coming from different continents.



Several archaeologists visited him and examined his collections. They stated that much of it looked to have come from different parts of the world. I don't know if any kind of carbon dating or anything like that was done, but its likely that they were...Smile
#33

lokiare

Nov 19, 2012 8:07:51
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile

You double check facts? Shouldn't you be double checking the claims made to determine if they are facts? I get the feeling you don't know what a fact is. ;)




I get the feeling you don't either. If it can't be checked its not a fact. If it can be checked it doesn't hurt to do that.

Except you make the assumption that it isa fact even before you check it. Thus you have a biased point of view about that claim.




Yes, and then I check it and if it isn't a fact I no longer think its a fact. See how that works...
#34

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 19, 2012 8:09:05
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" class="mceContentBody " contenteditable="true" />


How so? Name some of his conspiracy theories and predictions that have come true. I seem to recall talk of martial law being implemented around elections. I've checked a lot of his "facts" and found them to not be facts at all. So share something with us. Show us a time where he was right on the mark.



He only said if Obama lost or the storms hit us hard they would do that. See sometimes you have to pay attention to what he says...Smile

I'm sure the people affected by hurricane Sandy thought it was a mild weather occurance that brought a refreshing wind and light showers.

#35

lokiare

Nov 19, 2012 8:11:08
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" class="mceContentBody " contenteditable="true" />


How so? Name some of his conspiracy theories and predictions that have come true. I seem to recall talk of martial law being implemented around elections. I've checked a lot of his "facts" and found them to not be facts at all. So share something with us. Show us a time where he was right on the mark.



He only said if Obama lost or the storms hit us hard they would do that. See sometimes you have to pay attention to what he says...Smile

I'm sure the people affected by hurricane Sandy thought it was a mild weather occurance that brought a refreshing wind and light showers.




No, but they got to vote by email, so thats ok...Smile
#36

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 19, 2012 8:14:47
No, but they got to vote by email, so thats ok...Smile

So what you are saying is that Alex Jones was wrong? Yeah, I can agree with that. ;)

#37

lokiare

Nov 19, 2012 8:20:15
No, but they got to vote by email, so thats ok...Smile

So what you are saying is that Alex Jones was wrong? Yeah, I can agree with that. ;)




No he said they might try it. He didn't say they would absolutely do it. Just keep on misconstruing what everyone has said eventually everyone might get tired of arguing with you and go away...Smile
#38

homicidal_squirrel

Nov 19, 2012 8:26:41
No, but they got to vote by email, so thats ok...Smile

So what you are saying is that Alex Jones was wrong? Yeah, I can agree with that. ;)




No he said they might try it. He didn't say they would absolutely do it. Just keep on misconstruing what everyone has said eventually everyone might get tired of arguing with you and go away...Smile

Ah... I see, so if I said that Aliens were responsible for the crespi artifacts making it across the ocean, you'd be fine with that because I didn't say aliens definitely were responsible?

#39

zombie_babies

Nov 19, 2012 9:36:03
Hey guys, check this out:

#40

zombie_babies

Nov 19, 2012 12:38:19
Looks like a old chain letter. Burn it.



Already did.  He sent me this today so I figured I didn't need to hold onto that other thing anwyay.

#41

zombie_babies

Nov 19, 2012 12:52:32
Nah, it's nothing that mysterious.  I guess he gets the stuff from this one table that's run by a blind black dood what once knew a rabbi who got excommunicated or something.  I'm not sure I believe it, though.  With the variety of stuff it's got to be aliens, you know?  Or at least reptilians.
#42

zombie_babies

Nov 19, 2012 13:02:58
I ... I think I know that girl.  M ... mom?   
#43

lokiare

Nov 20, 2012 6:40:56
No, but they got to vote by email, so thats ok...Smile

So what you are saying is that Alex Jones was wrong? Yeah, I can agree with that. ;)




No he said they might try it. He didn't say they would absolutely do it. Just keep on misconstruing what everyone has said eventually everyone might get tired of arguing with you and go away...Smile

Ah... I see, so if I said that Aliens were responsible for the crespi artifacts making it across the ocean, you'd be fine with that because I didn't say aliens definitely were responsible?




I would want some proof and at least not have it be disproved easily...Smile
#44

lokiare

Nov 20, 2012 6:41:32
Hey guys, check this out:

#45

lokiare

Nov 20, 2012 6:43:42
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" class="mceContentBody " contenteditable="true" />


How so? Name some of his conspiracy theories and predictions that have come true. I seem to recall talk of martial law being implemented around elections. I've checked a lot of his "facts" and found them to not be facts at all. So share something with us. Show us a time where he was right on the mark.



He only said if Obama lost or the storms hit us hard they would do that. See sometimes you have to pay attention to what he says...Smile

I'm sure the people affected by hurricane Sandy thought it was a mild weather occurance that brought a refreshing wind and light showers.




No, but they got to vote by email, so thats ok...

So you think Sandy was made by the military to help Obama commit fraud during the election to turn a blue state... blue?




Yep, that's exactly what I said... oh wait no its nothing like what I said... See this is why we can't have nice discussions around here. Everyone is so busy making insulting, stereotypical, disparaging, ridiculing quips that no one bothers to respond to what is actually said...Smile
#46

Robin_Hoodlum

Nov 20, 2012 7:34:28
Yeah, strange that they would all just disappear like that, after he died, after they were photographed and video recorded...


Nice way to deflect what I said.

First of all, they didn't all disappear right after he died, nor are they believed to have all disappeared to the same place.

Two, the artifacts disappearing doesn't prove your case. There's lots of reasons for them to disappear (and some were said to have been sold or stolen), like the fact that they are probably valuable. So while it may be strange, it does nothing to support your claims.

Three, it doesn't change the fact that the sources I found suggested that they had not been classified and in fact were of unknown origin, which runs counter to your claim that these were identified as coming from different continents.



Several archaeologists visited him and examined his collections. They stated that much of it looked to have come from different parts of the world. I don't know if any kind of carbon dating or anything like that was done, but its likely that they were...


Yup.
It's true.
Facts are things that are likely.
#47

Robin_Hoodlum

Nov 20, 2012 7:36:16
Actually no. He shouts facts and then comes to conclusions. I don't necessarily agree with the conclusions and I double check the facts. However most of the time he's pretty close to the mark...Smile..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" class="mceContentBody " contenteditable="true" />


How so? Name some of his conspiracy theories and predictions that have come true. I seem to recall talk of martial law being implemented around elections. I've checked a lot of his "facts" and found them to not be facts at all. So share something with us. Show us a time where he was right on the mark.



He only said if Obama lost or the storms hit us hard they would do that. See sometimes you have to pay attention to what he says...Smile

I'm sure the people affected by hurricane Sandy thought it was a mild weather occurance that brought a refreshing wind and light showers.




No, but they got to vote by email, so thats ok...

So you think Sandy was made by the military to help Obama commit fraud during the election to turn a blue state... blue?




Yep, that's exactly what I said... oh wait no its nothing like what I said... See this is why we can't have nice discussions around here. Everyone is so busy making insulting, stereotypical, disparaging, ridiculing quips that no one bothers to respond to what is actually said...


People are responding to what is said.
And giving it the ridicule and insults it deserves.

Don't get rile sugar, just because most of us don't buy what you're selling.
#48

zombie_babies

Nov 20, 2012 9:14:25
I don't know what is it?



The note attached said 'Qumran scroll' or something but it doesn't matter.  I burnt that thing.  I did keep the Inca mask, though.  I mean, gold, right?  There ain't gonna be no value to cash soon enough.  If dood wants to keep sending me gold from back in the day, I'm a' gonna keep right on hoardin' it.  ;)
#49

ADHadh

Nov 20, 2012 14:37:44

But you did say that the military weaponized weather back in the 60-70s and that SAndy could be such an weapon. (you had links full of "facts" about that)

You do imply that voting by email is to facilitate fraud to get Obama reelected.

New Jersey is a blue state.  

Where did I go wrong? 


Well, for starters, you sound surprisingly sane.