| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1ShiftkittyOct 18, 2009 19:07:31 | I tried and I tried, but everytime some movie comes on TV that is based on Lovecraft IT SUCKS! Ten minutes into "The Dunwich Horror" I turned it off. I can't believe I lasted that long. There were a couple of others, the names escape me, but only one was even remotely watchable and it was only because I couldn't find anything better to do with a dreary, rainy day. The others were pure cinematic sewage! I swear the budgets for them was like $1.39. The acting was bleaugh! I've only read a couple of Lovecraft's stories and enjoyed them (just not as a steady diet), but surely the books aren't as bad as the movies, are they? |
| #2Ragnar_LodbrokOct 18, 2009 21:15:48 | Welcome to modern cinema. Please ignore the Micheal Bay trash-flicks and the prevailing excuses for "acting". I direct you to newspaper movie reviews, where you can find any remaining high-quality movies. Re: Lovecraft Movies: Yeah, looks like a few hacks sometimes try to translate great works into a new medium... and in the process give Cthulhu another reason to keep sleeping. Or to wake up. Hard to tell whether he'd want to ignore them or destroy them. |
| #3RUMPLESTIXOct 18, 2009 21:22:37 | I think something that should be realized is that basically all sci fi channel (ugghhh!- SyFy) movies are made to be B movies. The Dunwich movie annoyed me because of the rapid fades/blackouts within scenes rather than in scene cuts. Plus, the good guys defeated some sort of elder power at the end and that just simply isn't lovecraft writing. The bes tthat can be achieved in a real Lovecraft setting is that either a.) the minions are defeated and thus the designs they were supposed to bring about for their evil powers are thwarted or a human can become a pawn in a battle between two powers and thwarts one with the aid of and at the behest of another. Personally, I liked the Dagon movie. Have you seen it? But, it is about the only one of the movies that I have liked although I liked the original Reanimator movie as a cult classic. Something else to remember is that the original stories were written in a period when there were many unexplored places left in the world and both computers and cell phones did not exist. Including cell phones in elder evil horror movies changes things around a bit... |
| #4RUMPLESTIXOct 18, 2009 21:34:00 | I liked Cast a Deadly Spell. I thought it was very entertaining. |
| #5ADHadhOct 19, 2009 6:10:16 | Every time I see the name "SyFy" I just can't stop laughing. Really, that's one of those names that have a meaning in different language (in this case, Polish), which makes it hilarious. |
| #6awesome_dudeOct 19, 2009 8:00:07 | I sort of liked Dagon. |
| #7ShiftkittyOct 19, 2009 8:36:17 | That SciFi channel stuff isn't even "B". What's lower than "Z"? (Hate the name change, too. What? We're too stupid to know how to pronounce "sci-fi"?) |
| #8voidraitheOct 19, 2009 8:38:24 | I agree Dagon was actually not bad. |
| #9mynameisjakeOct 19, 2009 10:15:16 |
What does it mean in Polish? |
| #10The-Mage-KingOct 19, 2009 10:22:13 |
I was thinking about asking that... |
| #11sallaOct 19, 2009 11:18:35 |
They changed the name because 'Sci-Fi' was too generic and couldn't be trademarked (copyrighted? service marked? whatever). |
| #12joni-sanOct 19, 2009 12:27:50 | That SciFi channel stuff isn't even "B". What's lower than "Z"? (Hate the name change, too. What? We're too stupid to know how to pronounce "sci-fi"?) Well, in the Nordic languages we have Å, Ä, and Ö. |
| #13Cpt_MichaOct 19, 2009 12:48:07 | Syfy movies aren't even that. They are horrible spaces between commericals that make you bite your nails in anticipation for the next Viagra, or tampons commerical. |
| #14ShiftkittyOct 19, 2009 12:51:47 | Well, "Syfy" reminds me too much of Syufy, which used to be a theater chain or else a popcorn supplier to a theater chain. And they ran decently entertaining movies. |
| #15marmalangOct 19, 2009 12:59:08 | I wanted to like Dagon...I'd heard a lot of good things about it. I ended up having the same problem with it that I do with tons of other horror movies: it seems like the main characters are determined to make the stupidest possible choices at all times. The Dunwich Horror is good with me because I think it's fun and corny and it has that mind-blowing combo of psychedelic Hammer-Horror sets, lighting, and FX. It also has one of my all-time favorite opening credit sequences. As a Lovecraft adaptation, though, I agree that it's not so good. I've seen some others like Re-Animator, The Resurrected, and Call of Cthulhu, but I haven't liked any of them even as films except the HBO movie, Cast a Deadly Spell. That one stars Fred Ward, Julianne Moore, and David Warner, and it's a hard-boiled detective story set in the 40's, except it's a 40's in which everyone uses magic. Everyone except the main character, detective HP Lovecraft. It's a wacky, gory comedy that I cannot fully describe. It's not on DVD, but I've seen bootlegs for sale on eBay, not that a law-abiding person such as myself would ever recommend such a thing. If there has ever been a straight adaptation of Lovecraft that works, I haven't seen it. They always want to modernize the story, and even if they don't, they take away the awesome quality his stories have, where you feel like this madman has latched onto your lapels and is pouring out the bizarre story of his cursed family tree to you. Or else that it's you wandering through these dark crypts and verdant swamps and vertiginous towers looking for something, only to find something else that's so horrible your brain can't even comprehend it. The literary qualities just never carry over. |
| #16mynameisjakeOct 19, 2009 13:13:28 | If you want to enjoy SyFy movies, especially those produced by The Asylum, then you have to 1. watch them with friends, 2. be in a chemically altered state of mind, and 3. watch them on a recorded medium so that you can skip the commercials and pause at the unintentionally funny parts. I consider them all to be best enjoyed in the tradition of Mystery Science Theatre 3000. What's not to love about a giant ape on a mysterious island that the characters refer to as "He Who Must Not Be Named" (for copyright reasons, one supposes), or when characters refer to being "this deep in the forest, beyond help," when a paved road with traffic on it is clearly seen (and heard) in the background? |
| #17awesome_dudeOct 19, 2009 13:25:14 |
And in the real Nordic language: Á, É, Ý, Ú, Í, Ó, Ð and Þ. |
| #18ShiftkittyOct 19, 2009 14:07:37 | How do you pronounce the names of those letters so I can more accurately describe such films to my friends? |
| #19ellorinOct 19, 2009 15:26:05 |
As an alternative from all those Nords, may I suggest the Omega (Ω)? Nothing can be lower than that . |
| #20CentauriOct 19, 2009 16:00:37 | It was by pure happenstance that I happened to catch the very end of The Dunwich Horror. I saw "Al" from Quantum Leap blasting something with what someone else called Force lightning, and being attacked by something that faded in and out of view. In that moment, there was a lot of potential, but then that was swept away. |
| #21cherubaddonOct 19, 2009 16:06:43 | Also, I heard that Sphärentor, a German RPG internet community - I don't know if you've heard of the "forbidden 40k movie", Damnatus - is adapting Colour Out of Space. I believe to have read that on their site at some point. If it continues in the vein of Damnatus, well... the plot was kind of the weak point there, but Lovecraft did it for them here. Other than that, the horror was actually fairly originally done, and the Special Effects were downright awesome for a fan production. If you have a chance to see it, do so. At least there's some hoping for a real Lovecraft movie. |
| #22Tony_VargasOct 19, 2009 17:00:11 | One obvious problem with adapting Lovecraft is his tendency to evoke horror via non-descriptions. 'Alien geometry' gets across a feel, but it's nothing you can put on film. You can't do Color out of Space, because you can't put a color no one's ever seen before on the screen. So the adaptation necesarily loses a lot of the impact of the original works, and departs radically from them. At the Mountains of Madness is one of Lovecraft's best stories, and one of the few where he deigns to describe things in more nearly concrete terms. Considering what DelToro's "Pan's Labyrinth" was like, I think we can have high hopes for it. If he actually has the oportunity to complete it. Is it even officially in pre-production, or is still just something he'd like to do? People have been wanting to make Princess of Mars since the 20s, and it still hasn't happened. ;) |
| #23owls_and_more_owlsOct 19, 2009 18:31:25 | There's a really good adaptation of Call of Cuthulhu that I think a college made. It's made in the style of an old silent film, and is about as close to the book as you could ever possibly get. My brother and I netflixed it, and when it was over, we just sort of looked at each other, amazed. It was so cool, we watched it again the next night. |
| #24awesome_dudeOct 19, 2009 19:38:44 |
The movie was announced as a project for, like, two years and now it seems it's been delayed indefinitely in favor of (and this may piss you off) The Hobbit. Warner Bros were hesitant to finance the project because it didn't have a happy ending and there was no love interest for any character in the script, so it's basically in limbo right now. |
| #25ShiftkittyOct 19, 2009 20:13:09 | If you can't force an obligatory sex scene in, nobody wants to fund it, it seems. |
| #26Tony_VargasOct 20, 2009 3:41:03 | Antarctica is not exactly conducive to that. Though I suppose you could throw in a hentai shoggoth... |
| #27ADHadhOct 20, 2009 7:50:45 |
"Syf" (plural "syfy") probably comes from the word "syphilis", but it's colloquial meaning is "dirt", "grunge" or "something of really bad quality". |
| #28zombie_babiesOct 20, 2009 8:26:27 | Well then. I'd say that's more than apt - barring the occasional cashew in the turd (SG, BSG, etc). |
| #29ShiftkittyOct 20, 2009 8:56:51 | Terrible image! LOL I tried to watch the current Battlestar Galactica, but I'm too fond of the old one. I just couldn't accept the changes. I liked Stargate the movie, and probably could have enjoyed the TV series, but they started with all these different "Stargate" shows and it turned me off. It's not like I have much time to devote to TV anymore, anyway. |
| #30zombie_babiesOct 20, 2009 9:01:07 | The new BSG was really good, IMO. SG1 and Atlantis are best after the first couple of seasons. Be ready for a much less serious deal than the movie, though. They have some seriousness to them, but overall they're shows that don't take themselves too seriously. And that's why I like 'em. SGU is a more serious Stargate - so far. There's not exactly enough out there just yet to get a real feel for the show, but it's pretty good so far. A re-imagining of the franchise. The pilot was great, the first episode was 'meh' and the third was pretty good. Overall, a decent waste of time if you've not got better stuff to do. Thank OTTo for DVRs. ;) |
| #31Cpt_MichaOct 20, 2009 11:03:25 | BSG is really good. Just stop at the end of season 3 and you'll be fine. Season 4 and 5 are good too they just don't fit the rest of the show. The New stargate is pretty good. Thankfully. I needed a new scifi show after Eureka became the Fail Bag of Fail. (In other words what you expect from the Scifi channel) |
| #32zombie_babiesOct 20, 2009 11:34:40 | What? Eureka pwns! It's just a silly show about fake stuff. And it delivers. There's nothing serious about it. |
| #33_jayne_cobb_Oct 20, 2009 11:36:35 | I tried to watch the current Battlestar Galactica, but I'm too fond of the old one. I just couldn't accept the changes. That cos you are at the mercy of the most potent force in the universe, a force so powerful that it has actually convinced millions of people that ABBA is a listenable band, a force that increases in strength as one gets older, a force known as "nostalgia". The original BSG was a piece of crap, a disco-era relic best left on the scrapheap of the past alongside sequined bellbottoms and acrylic platform shoes. Don't get me wrong I loved it when I was a kid, but kids are stupid. The key is not to let the feeling you had for it then cloud your judgement of it now. In truth the best thing you can do if you wish to hold on to affections for films and TV of your youth is to never, everr watch them as an adult. The new BSG is, by a wide margin, the best drama on U.S. TV in the past decade. Do yourself a favour and give it a fair shake. It may help to go watch the original BSG first. Once you see how truly, unbelievably, almost unbearably god-awful it is (likely around the scene when they are sitting in the space-disco watching the four-eyed disco dancers) you will begin to appreciate how the people repsonsible for the new series did not so much polish an old turd as magically transform it into a 40 karat diamond. |
| #34zombie_babiesOct 20, 2009 12:01:03 | Umm. That. ^^ |
| #35ShiftkittyOct 20, 2009 12:10:44 | I probably wouldn't have minded it if they didn't make some characters get a sex-change operation. They should have gone with new characters. I believe they have James Olmos as Adama? While I like Olmos, I don't see him as Adama. It wouldn't have been unthinkable that Starbuck, Apollo, and others finally reached the end of their lives and a new generation is trying to survive this trip in an aging ship. Of course, you'd totally have to "Pam Ewing" the whole "Galactica 1980" turd. |
| #36Cpt_MichaOct 20, 2009 12:26:08 |
Says someone that evidently missed the entirety of last season. |
| #37zombie_babiesOct 20, 2009 12:31:52 |
Just watch it knowing it's a different show. Forget the past and enjoy the present. This new show doesn't invalidate the old. Sit down and keep that thought in the back of your mind. 'I'm seeing BSG for the first time.' I think you'll like it. And, if you can't be bothered to watch for whatever reason (and I do mean whatever reason), that's a-ok, too. Cuz it's just TV after all. :D
I not only watched them - I still have some on my DVR. It's a fun show. Honest. Don't think too much - that's the key for Eureka. Just goofiness and cool effects. For me, in this particular case, that's enough. If Stargate tried something like Eureka, though, I'd be irritated. The good news is Eureka isn't that type of show. |
| #38Cpt_MichaOct 20, 2009 12:40:43 | I dunno last season seemed devoid of cool effects (rather instead just lame ones), and a distinct lack of the same kind of humor the first two seasons had. Instead, they just inserted lame romance plots and derailed the show with lame romantic humor. |
| #39zombie_babiesOct 20, 2009 12:45:28 | I thought it was funny. Sure, it's a bit formulaic (dumb sherriff solves what genuises can't - every episode) until the season finales/premiers but I don't care. I watch that show to relax my brain and it does just that. |
| #40_jayne_cobb_Oct 20, 2009 13:30:22 | I probably wouldn't have minded it if they didn't make some characters get a sex-change operation. They should have gone with new characters. I believe they have James Olmos as Adama? While I like Olmos, I don't see him as Adama. It wouldn't have been unthinkable that Starbuck, Apollo, and others finally reached the end of their lives and a new generation is trying to survive this trip in an aging ship. Of course, you'd totally have to "Pam Ewing" the whole "Galactica 1980" turd. The new BSG isn't a remake, it's a do-over. They've taken the same premise and gone their own way with it. It isn't a case of "WTF?!? Starbuck is a girl now!" but rather "This Starbuck is a woman". Trust me, Kitty, get past your reservations and give it a chance. Really, what's the worst that can happen? If you still don't like it all you've lost is a few bucks and a few hours on a DVD rental. This… is to this…
what this…
is to this…
So say we all. |
| #41Cpt_MichaOct 20, 2009 13:52:47 | How dare you Jayne! Down to the bowels of the internet with Adam West! *Flames campman to the end of all time.* How dare you post that picture in the same thread that a dark knight screen appeared in?
Or even in the same post! |
| #42ShiftkittyOct 20, 2009 17:20:35 | I probably wouldn't have minded it if they didn't make some characters get a sex-change operation. They should have gone with new characters. I believe they have James Olmos as Adama? While I like Olmos, I don't see him as Adama. It wouldn't have been unthinkable that Starbuck, Apollo, and others finally reached the end of their lives and a new generation is trying to survive this trip in an aging ship. Of course, you'd totally have to "Pam Ewing" the whole "Galactica 1980" turd. I did give it a chance. I watched one of the earlier episodes. It just didn't appeal to me because I felt the characterizations were wrong for my tastes. I'm not saying anyone who does like it is a dork or anything. I'm just saying that I don't care for it. Normally I don't judge a show based on one episode alone, but this was one of the times where I saw enough to say "It's not for me". I'm not one of the "Loyal To the Original Crew" Trekkies who refuse to accept that the Enterprise has had and will have other captains than Kirk. (My brother is one of these.) I don't say that the new BSG isn't BSG simply because it isn't the old BSG that I remember. It is BSG. It's just not a BSG that I care for. |