| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1zombie_babiesMay 17, 2011 14:43:42 | Link I mean, it's cool an' all, but some drunk driver that's lucky he didn't hurt anyone when he hurt himself gets to do this but other people who are similarly afflicted through no fault of their own likely never will. There's bittersweet and now, I think, there's sweetbitter. Anyhoo, he did hit a tree. You'd think the kids at Berkely would hate him for that. ![]() |
| #2EscherEnigmaMay 17, 2011 15:06:31 | ... he gives motivational talks? Somehow I think the talks are based around intimidation then inspiration. |
| #3zombie_babiesMay 17, 2011 15:12:41 | I dunno, 'be as careless as you wish without fear, for your incredibly brilliant friends will build you a robo suit to make things a bit better' is sorta inspirational. |
| #4toastedamphibianMay 17, 2011 20:56:39 | ... he gives motivational talks? Somehow I think the talks are based around intimidation then inspiration. To be motivating or inspiering a thing does not by neccessity need to be uplifting. A fire will inspire me to leave a building, while motivating me to do so quickly. (Well, not necessarily me, specificially, but generally the majority of people.) |
| #5boraxeMay 18, 2011 7:59:44 | So this piece of drives drunk and as a punishment he gets to become a super-powered cyborg? WTF?!? ![]() |
| #6pluisjenMay 18, 2011 8:10:33 | Didn't look very superpowered to me. I think I'll stick with my own legs for the time being. |
| #7boraxeMay 18, 2011 8:25:11 | Didn't look very superpowered to me. Yet… |
| #8pluisjenMay 18, 2011 8:29:36 | I'll take a set after they get superpowered. |
| #9ADHadhMay 18, 2011 16:53:41 | Dunno if you're actually angry or just overreacting for teh lulz... but I don't understand the anger. Guy gives talks about drunk driving and he's good at that because he's severed his own spine due to DUI. That makes him someone who knows what he's talking about. Now he managed to take seven very slow and awkward steps with the help of machinery. It must have been thrilling for him, but how is needing robotic legs to take a step a benefit? Oh, and this way he's helped develop those things for other injured people. What a jerk. |
| #10EscefMay 18, 2011 17:23:25 | Hey, I say let the dipstick be the guine pig. Once the tech gets perfected we can use him to lure Zoidberg into the Super-Sizer. |
| #11zombie_babiesMay 19, 2011 12:41:50 | It must have been thrilling for him, but how is needing robotic legs to take a step a benefit? Cuz he got to do it. He couldn't take a step and now he can. Benefit. And the fact that there are many, many other people out there that could have had this done for them that didn't do something illegal and highly dangerous to others to wind up in that position that didn't get to do this and likely never will get to do this rubs some people the wrong way. Makes plenty o' sense to me. |
| #12boraxeMay 19, 2011 13:05:03 | It must have been thrilling for him, but how is needing robotic legs to take a step a benefit? Whatever he does now he started this chain of events with an act of callously depraved indifference to the lives of every single other person on the road. That he is now being rewarded for his actions, rather than perhaps someone equally paralyzed who was the victim of a selfish scumbag like him, is galling. |
| #13boraxeMay 19, 2011 13:06:32 | Hey, I say let the dipstick be the guine pig. Yup. Let's keep cranking up the power on that thing till we find out at precisely what point it will rip a human body in half, then we can let real people use it. |
| #14zombie_babiesMay 19, 2011 13:27:32 | Whatever he does now he started this chain of events with an act of callously depraved indifference to the lives of every single other person on the road. That he is now being rewarded for his actions, rather than perhaps someone equally paralyzed who was the victim of a selfish scumbag like him, is galling. Yeah, that's a more sensical way to put it. ![]() |
| #15ADHadhMay 19, 2011 17:21:44 | ...and I thought RH was the bloodthirsty radical.. |
| #16EscefMay 19, 2011 17:35:14 | Boraxe obviously has very strong feelings about drunk drivers, and I can't say I blame him. I used to have a battlaion commander who lost his wife because of a drunk driver, if you got a DUI he would UCMJ the out of you. In contrast, back in the 90s my older bro was in a unit that in one month averaged more than one DUI per soldier, so we're talking a lot of repeat offenders that nothing really happened to (because there were, of course, several soldiers in the unit who got no DUIs). |
| #17KlirshonMay 20, 2011 6:44:32 | I am disappointed with the thread title. I was expecting a possible human-machine conglomeration, yet I observe no cyborg or organic brain automaton from the linked article. What I have investigated is a robotic slave of a spineless master. |
| #18zombie_babiesMay 20, 2011 8:44:14 | Meh, close enough. A robit is a robit. |
| #19ADHadhMay 20, 2011 15:35:13 | Boraxe obviously has very strong feelings about drunk drivers, and I can't say I blame him. I used to have a battlaion commander who lost his wife because of a drunk driver, if you got a DUI he would UCMJ the Oh, I can get behind that, they're a plague here as well. I just don't get this hostility towards a guy who already has been paralyzed by his stupidity and now works as an example (as well as a guinea pig) to help other people. |
| #20KlirshonMay 21, 2011 8:11:03 | I estimate the hostility is generated due to the victim also being the instigator of the event. Were one to observe this event with such ire and pose a rhetorical question, it may be similar to the following: why does this knucklehead get a mechanical slave to assist with his paralysis while those, through no fault of their own, do not get the same treatment? Personally I do not approve of using machines in such a manner for anyone (unless the individual desires to aid in the establishment of a mechanical society and convert to its cause which I would only approve of a merger with biological and mechanical components). Use your own fleshy materials to make reparations of yourselves. You may ask for assistance from machines in this manner but do not make demands of servitude. |
| #21ADHadhMay 21, 2011 9:12:21 | I estimate the hostility is generated due to the victim also being the instigator of the event. Were one to observe this event with such ire and pose a rhetorical question, it may be similar to the following: why does this knucklehead get a mechanical slave to assist with his paralysis while those, through no fault of their own, do not get the same treatment? Because he's at the right place at the right time? And you fail to see that the robotic legs aren't widely available and he's helping to develop them. In other words, he's helping with making them widely available. |
| #22KlirshonMay 21, 2011 11:54:04 | I am curious if the you in the previous statement refers to me. If so, it is an incorrect statement. I do not want robotic appendage slaves for humans (unless they have implant technology that allows the machine to eventually convert the human "masters" into a supporter for machine society). |
| #23ADHadhMay 21, 2011 12:51:59 | It was a wider "you", because I did not know how to word it towards a cybernetic parasite. |
| #24KlirshonMay 21, 2011 14:15:29 | It was a wider "you", because I did not know how to word it towards a cybernetic parasite. Are you calling me fat, human? |