| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1EscherEnigmaAug 14, 2009 12:33:02 | Article Here So apparently EGM (Electronic Gaming Monthly) got canceled, so they decided to replace the remainder of their reader's subscriptions with copies of Maxim. At least one mother is upset over her 12-year old son getting a copy of Maxim in the mail, especially since the notice to opt-out of this switch was delivered with the first issue of Maxim. Anyway, I personally think this sounds like a rather poor judgement call on the part of whoever is in charge, and more then a bit skeevy on the company's part. A little amusing, sure, but it's quite understandable why someone that had an EGM subscription might not be happy with this at all. |
| #2Cpt_MichaAug 14, 2009 12:48:00 | Well, most mag subscribers are actually in their mid 20s and are male to go with it with videogame mags. So for most people really this is a non issue. *and yes I do know women that read Maxim... actually they read it more often than I do... go figure* Also, really why be offended over maxim shipping out? Is she not more upset about what is played on TV? :P The option to opt out of a subscription is pretty much always sent with whatever default mag they decide on. As far as I know it's standard practice. And actually before this even, they had the option to Opt Out before they finally went out of business. I remember reading about it in Game Informer and IGN, about how EGM customers could switch out their subscriptions early to a mag of their choice. So really it's Mommy's fault for being lazy. or her kid's fault for not telling her. |
| #3EscherEnigmaAug 14, 2009 12:55:10 | Also, really why be offended over maxim shipping out? Is she not more upset about what is played on TV? :P What makes you think she lets her kid watch whatever he wants on TV? Seriously, the standard answer for parents complaining about violent video games, movies, things on TV, etc. is "control what your kid watches. Don't let them do whatever they want, be a parent and not a door-mat". This... walks all over that. |
| #4Cpt_MichaAug 14, 2009 12:57:55 | What makes you think she lets her kid watch whatever he wants on TV? I have a hard time feeling any sympathy when EGM made every effort already to give their customers advance warning. *shrugs* It's not EGM nor Maxim's fault people ignore things like this especially when they reiterate the point months in advance of it happening. |
| #5EscherEnigmaAug 14, 2009 13:00:41 | /shrug I really don't know how much advance warning there was. The article I read made it sound like the first notice was with the replacement. I do not know if there were articles or discussions inside the last issues of EGM itself stating that the subscriptions were going to be replaced with Maxim, or how someone could cancel. Online only isn't enough (it was a print magazine) really, so I don't put much stock in you hearing about it on IGN or Game Informer. |
| #6Cpt_MichaAug 14, 2009 13:08:31 | Game Informer is a printed magazine. I'm pretty sure if they heard about it, then EGM probably published it along with posting it on their website. The article didn't specify Maxim that I read, however it did say you could replace it with a Subscription of your Choice before the magazine's final issue, and you would get your new subscription from that point on. They even gave the address, and phone numbers of the people you could contact in order to get it set up. |
| #7owls_and_more_owlsAug 14, 2009 13:56:42 | Yeah That happened to me too. It was a dumb thing to do, and I immediately sent it in to get my rebate. Maxim is a really stupid magazine. |
| #8KillerGMAug 14, 2009 13:59:53 | OK, so first I saw "KGM" and "Maxim" in the title, and I was ![]() Then I saw it was EscherEnigma and I had to read again. ![]() Anyways, another article linked in that article says this: Subscribers' first replacement issue, "[...] comes with a note that subscribers can instead opt for a pro-rated refund for the balance of their EGM subscription." And: While mammaries for exclusive Mario pics may seem like a fair trade to some EGM subscribers, it's important to note that the magazine is replacing a videogame periodical with a young readership. The magazine's trademark saucy pictorials and articles are almost certain to rub unaware parents the wrong way. So, it seems that there was little warning. Not to mention that, if the mom has approved the magazine, why would she read every issue? That seems a bit ... over-controlling, even in the whole "protect your kid" kind of way. I mean, I let my child watch Word Word on PBS, but I'm not going to watch every episode, and if one of the episodes featured Sheep getting gunned-down by Pig, I'd be plenty ****** - it certainly wasn't what the show was presented as. Or, if it was suddenly replaced with Law and Order: SVU with little warning, I'd be annoyed. :P http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/92428-Ex-EGM-Subscribers-Get-Boob-Filled-Severance-Package And this made me laugh: who aren't quite sophisticated enough for Penthouse I didn't notice anything in Game Informer (the only game magazine I get). I think it's dumb. It's probably a "great" marketing idea, but it's stupid. STUPID!! I don't care about marketing. I get enough of that BS justification for stupid ****. If I get a magazine for GAMES, I'm not paying for a magazine for SIDEBOOB! ![]() |
| #9Cpt_MichaAug 14, 2009 14:01:23 | What about almost but not quite fullboob? |
| #10KillerGMAug 14, 2009 14:03:35 | What about almost but not quite fullboob? Despite some of the pics from current video games, I'm not buying it for that, either. I'm not buying Game Informer for any kind of boobage. :P |
| #11Cpt_MichaAug 14, 2009 14:06:30 | Despite some of the pics from current video games, I'm not buying it for that, either. My GI subscription ran out two months ago. And I'm too broke to renew it. I miss my discount on used games. *shakes fist frustratedly* Which really sucks considering all of the GOOD games are going to be coming out soon, and my economic situation doesn't look to be on the road of improving any time soon so I can't even afford to look at pretty pictures in a magazine now..... |
| #12KillerGMAug 14, 2009 14:15:50 | Thank God for the internets! |
| #13ranadielAug 14, 2009 14:17:48 | I have a hard time feeling any sympathy when EGM made every effort already to give their customers advance warning. *shrugs* Advance warning? I recieved no such thing. I recieved a notice along with my first issue of Maxim.......Incidently I recieved my second issue of Maxim today despite the fact that I mailed them the opt out a while ago. *sigh* |
| #14toastedamphibianAug 14, 2009 21:39:01 | Advance warning? I recieved no such thing. I recieved a notice along with my first issue of Maxim.......Incidently I recieved my second issue of Maxim today despite the fact that I mailed them the opt out a while ago. *sigh* Thou shalt recieve maxim and thou shalt enjoy it, so saeth the publisher! |
| #15dirtyfrankAug 14, 2009 22:22:34 | Despite some of the pics from current video games, I'm not buying it for that, either. Is that because you can get all the boobage you need from the mirror and for free? :P Now I know why that Maxim has been sent to me for a while. I thought it strange but never felt like looking into it. I just started tossing them aside and throwing them away when they came. |
| #16KillerGMAug 14, 2009 22:26:45 | Is that because you can get all the boobage you need from the mirror and for free? :P Maybe. I do so enjoy my boobs more than other people's. But it's more likely that it's because I don't find sexual arousal in other people's boobs. Now, if Game Informer wanted to send me GQ or Men's Health instead ... Actually, I'd still be annoyed. I want the games, dammit. :P |
| #17EscherEnigmaAug 14, 2009 22:28:33 | I'm pretty sure the only time I'll be in front of a mirror looking at breasts is if my sisters are still spinters in twenty years and want my help checking for a lump. But hey, I hear other people like staring at breasts in mirriors. So good on them and all that jazz. Just make sure the mirrors aren't on your shoes. |
| #18owls_and_more_owlsAug 14, 2009 22:31:16 | Maybe. I do so enjoy my boobs more than other people's. Now we have to make sure PigKnight doesn't come in here... |
| #19subsistcyberAug 14, 2009 22:32:46 | The conversations are so much more fun at night... |
| #20owls_and_more_owlsAug 14, 2009 22:33:39 | It's the OTT... After Dark. |
| #21dirtyfrankAug 14, 2009 22:34:15 | OTT: Adult Swim Kids, out of the pool |
| #22KillerGMAug 14, 2009 22:34:26 | *shrugs* |
| #23owls_and_more_owlsAug 14, 2009 22:36:35 | It's like when my cats get the night crazies. |
| #24pigknightAug 14, 2009 22:36:47 | I sense a disturbence in the force... *Looks at KGM's post* It makes sense. Meh. |
| #25KillerGMAug 14, 2009 22:38:42 | I don't get what that's all about, but whatever. |
| #26dirtyfrankAug 14, 2009 22:39:42 | Maybe I should look at my side boobage in the mirror..... ![]() |
| #27pigknightAug 14, 2009 22:40:34 | I don't get what that's all about, but whatever. I think they were expecting me to post something pervy about the fact that you like your own boobs. |
| #28owls_and_more_owlsAug 14, 2009 22:41:15 | I think they were expecting me to post something pervy about the fact that you like your own boobs. Can you really say that our expectations were unfounded? |
| #29pigknightAug 14, 2009 22:42:06 | Can you really say that our expectations were unfounded? Teehee, you said boobie. :P |
| #30subsistcyberAug 14, 2009 22:42:18 | Personally, I been trying to get rid of my man-boobs. So far, so good. :P Cant have them bouncing around during my Police Academy training. |
| #31EscherEnigmaAug 14, 2009 22:45:56 | The EE has no boobs, but does have a killer chin stripe. |
| #32pigknightAug 14, 2009 22:46:55 | Is that a ponytail? |
| #33EscherEnigmaAug 14, 2009 22:48:05 | No, it's a killer chin stripe. |
| #34pigknightAug 14, 2009 22:50:11 | No, the thing on your chest. |
| #35dirtyfrankAug 14, 2009 22:50:27 | Male side boobage or GTFrankO! :P |
| #36subsistcyberAug 14, 2009 22:51:07 | That's awesome. |
| #37dirtyfrankAug 14, 2009 22:54:24 | No, you're awesome. |
| #38subsistcyberAug 14, 2009 22:55:46 | No, you're awesome. :embarrass |