| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1pigknightJul 10, 2010 19:32:33 | It's a place for the top 10 high scores. Post to get in on the comp. I'll update it occasionally. 1 - dirtyfrank 22,085 2 - pigknight 19,059 3 - Zombie_Babies 14,603 4 - EscherEnigma 13,292 5 - ToastedAmphibian 11,464 6- Cpt_Micha 11,185 7 - 8 - 9 - 10- P.S. It has to be at least 5 digits. |
| #2dirtyfrankJul 10, 2010 19:56:17 | High scores for what? |
| #3pigknightJul 10, 2010 20:11:32 | Post count. |
| #4dirtyfrankJul 10, 2010 20:17:21 | Is being on top good or bad? |
| #5pigknightJul 10, 2010 20:22:16 | I think that depends on you. ;) |
| #6EscherEnigmaJul 10, 2010 20:26:14 | mwar? |
| #7jigokuroJul 10, 2010 20:27:11 | A guy named Raving_Dork has 5 digits, but his account was in someway glitched so it shows 6k. Its really around 11k |
| #8dirtyfrankJul 10, 2010 20:41:31 | Ya know pigknight i seriously would have thought that you would have caught up to me by now with my absence from the forums. Since you didn't the forums must be that dead. Or at least the OTT. |
| #9pigknightJul 10, 2010 23:10:25 | Ya know pigknight i seriously would have thought that you would have caught up to me by now with my absence from the forums. Since you didn't the forums must be that dead. Or at least the OTT. I've gotten into MMOs and working on my own tabletop. |
| #10Robin_HoodlumJul 10, 2010 23:22:45 | Can I count all my banned accounts? |
| #11pigknightJul 10, 2010 23:43:59 | Well...I would say yes but the CoC says no. Hoodlum, you just got COC BLOCK'D! |
| #12Cpt_MichaJul 10, 2010 23:49:29 | ZB is over me, or he was at one time. and I think I'm right behind him on post count. His post count is pretty close to EE's I think. |
| #13Robin_HoodlumJul 11, 2010 0:06:27 | Well...I would say yes but the CoC says no. Ahhhh.... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ![]() |
| #14dirtyfrankJul 12, 2010 4:22:38 | ![]() |
| #15The_SilverswordJul 12, 2010 5:17:10 | As soon as I post 10,000 more songs in the now playing thread, I'll be in there! |
| #16zombie_babiesJul 13, 2010 9:30:07 | I can't believe I was forgotten. Guess I really do post a whole lot of nothing. That's actually kinda good. And impressive. Over 14k posts of crap too boring to be remembered. That's ... something. |
| #17Cpt_MichaJul 13, 2010 15:57:45 | I mentioned you :-p |
| #18PinnacleJul 13, 2010 16:30:24 | Is the highest post count, by itself, necessarily a good thing? "There are few wild beasts more to be dreaded than a talking man having nothing to say." -Jonathan Swift ...Actually, I think it mostly just says who's been an active member longest. |
| #19EscherEnigmaJul 13, 2010 16:40:07 | Is the highest post count, by itself, necessarily a good thing? Sure. It means someone can say "it's over 9000!" ...Actually, I think it mostly just says who's been an active member longest. That would just be going by join date, in which case I'd have y'all1 beat. ________ 1That's posted so far, at least. Pig and DirtyFrank are closest with Sept '07, but that still gives me a good three year lead with myi June '04 join date. |
| #20oxybeJul 13, 2010 18:34:59 | Is the highest post count, by itself, necessarily a good thing? dude, i've been a member since '05 and some of these '08-09 have 5-7 times my post count. active time does not equal post count. |
| #21Robin_HoodlumJul 13, 2010 18:38:36 | I have been on here far longer than my present join date implies. |
| #22EscherEnigmaJul 13, 2010 18:53:18 | ... hypothetically speaking, was the poster formerly known as "hater" actually HATER, or THE_HATER? 'cause if it's the latter, I can't find the account to examine the date, banned or otherwise, but if it's the former the account doesn't appear to actually be banned... |
| #23Robin_HoodlumJul 13, 2010 19:01:16 | ... hypothetically speaking, was the poster formerly known as "hater" actually HATER, or THE_HATER? 'cause if it's the latter, I can't find the account to examine the date, banned or otherwise, but if it's the former the account doesn't appear to actually be banned... It was THE_HATED. I must have thought it was banned and changed names again... Besides, those names were giving me a bad rep... |
| #24EscherEnigmaJul 13, 2010 19:10:57 | Eh. A whole mess of threads became unlocked when the forums changed over last August, I wouldn't be surprised if they accidentally let a bunch of accounts also unlock. And I thought HATER predated HATED? Then at some point was THE_TROLL and I think there may have been a baby blowing up a dinosaur at some point... |
| #25Robin_HoodlumJul 13, 2010 19:23:34 | and I think there may have been a baby blowing up a dinosaur at some point... That one wasn't me... And yeah, HATER was before HATED... |
| #26toastedamphibianJul 13, 2010 19:58:18 | Has the futility of this thread hit anyone in full force yet? It's a thread to index the information that appears most frequently of all information in the forum, the number of times the most frequent posters post, which gets automatically posted everytime they post. Tehee, just what I expect from piggy. *chin tickle* |
| #27PinnacleJul 13, 2010 20:14:53 | ...Actually, I think it mostly just says who's been an active member longest. When I said "active member", I didn't just mean how long the account has been active. But I agree. |
| #28dirtyfrankJul 14, 2010 3:47:19 | dude, i've been a member since '05 and some of these '08-09 have 5-7 times my post count. active time does not equal post count. Oh yeah!!! I've been actively posting since mid 08 and some of these people that have been members for 3 to 5 times longer than i've been actively spamming the forums have 5 to 7 times less posts than i do! The WotC community needs to learn how to spam more. |
| #29pluisjenJul 14, 2010 3:58:42 | I'm closing in on 5 digits... I think. Hmm. I thought I had more posts than that Ah well, gimme 2 more years. |
| #30scypioJul 14, 2010 6:59:51 | Is the highest post count, by itself, necessarily a good thing? Yeah, I never understood the prestige of having a high post count. There's nothing wrong with it, but I don't understand the importance of it. |
| #31tshernJul 14, 2010 7:15:32 | Is being on top good or bad? Oh dear, you joined a year after me, but have ten times the amount of posts! I feel even more invisible than I actually am around here. Maybe it's because I mostly visit the ever-so-silent Character Optimization board? |
| #32oxybeJul 14, 2010 10:02:20 | dude, i've been a member since '05 and some of these '08-09 have 5-7 times my post count. active time does not equal post count. AM I DONG IT RITE??? ![]() ![]() |
| #33EscherEnigmaJul 14, 2010 11:42:50 | Gah! I can't believe I missed my cue! *ahem*Is being on top good or bad? Personal preference, really. Just depends on what you're feeling like at the moment, ya? Sometimes yer just in the mood to be a top, sometimes you'd rather not. |
| #34pigknightJul 14, 2010 12:31:12 | I'm pretty sure I got 10% of my posts from actual D&D crap. 10% from GMing the Edition Wars. 50% from the bad RP in the various Edition Wars. 30% from misc. OTT posts. |
| #35dirtyfrankJul 14, 2010 15:14:09 | Is being on top good or bad? yep probably. Back when i was posting purely in the monster, dm and player advice boards i had few posts. Only usually a few a day. Once i started in the OTT....well it was still low. Astrid's did help to increase my posting rate. The big boom came after the ban on political and religious discussion right during the end of the obama/mccain election thingy. After that there were tons of fun spammy screw around threads. In some of them you could easily wrack up upwards to 50 posts a day. Even could do this in few threads each day. Of course most responses where short one liners and whatnot. dude, i've been a member since '05 and some of these '08-09 have 5-7 times my post count. active time does not equal post count. SPAM Gah! I can't believe I missed my cue! *ahem*Is being on top good or bad? Good point there good sir. I'm pretty sure I got 10% of my posts from actual D&D crap. 90% of mine probably come from misc. OTT threads. Probably 9% from Astrid's. The rest in other places. |
| #36Mad_JackJul 16, 2010 2:31:59 | I'm reasonably certain that at least 40% of my posts contain at least 40% actual D&D content, which is probably why I'm not on the list. I'd probably have a much higher post count, but, A. endless debate and arguing makes my eyes glaze over, B. anything inane, lame, political or current-events-related tends to make me skip over the thread, and C. I'm a self-editing smartass - I tend to only post when I have something either actually relevant or at least vaguely entertaining to say. Damn, I'd make a terrible internet forum poster, lol. I really need to post more inane drivel. |
| #37death_isthe_beginingJul 16, 2010 21:04:07 | I only post in D&D threads and the OTT. I also post only when I have something to contribute. |
| #38toastedamphibianJul 19, 2010 18:37:52 | I also post only when I have something to contribute. I see what you did there. |