Gamescience dice

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

trashsmasher999

Jun 25, 2010 23:00:19
Just a quick question (assuming you all know what Gamescience dice are).
Do you HAVE to sand off the imperfection from the mold? I'm afraid I'll sand it too much, ect. I've looked all over for an answer, even emailed the company.....no reply.

#2

Robin_Hoodlum

Jun 26, 2010 0:47:43
Why would you buy dice you have to "sand"?
#3

Jharii

Jun 26, 2010 8:28:54
Maybe do some homework on the dice in question before flaming.

www.gamescience.com/

All GameScience precision dice are precision-tested and razor-edged (with sharp points!) because they have not been tumbled or sanded.To smooth down the spot on your die that is rough from being broken from the sprue, simply use hobby/automotive sandpaper.These sharp-edged dice are better than the egg-shaped round-edged imported dice because they will roll accurately.



Considering these are reportedly the most balanced dice available, the OP is quite the opposite of what you accuse him of being.
#4

Robin_Hoodlum

Jun 26, 2010 8:32:20
*shrug*
Oh well.

I still woudn't buy dice I have to sand...
#5

trashsmasher999

Jun 26, 2010 8:48:23
Maybe do some homework on the dice in question before flaming.



Thanks Jharii. Yes, please gentlemen, lower your flamethrowers.

Chances are if you've met Mr. Zocchi at a game con, or have seen his youtube video, you may have given his dice a chance. With that being said, I was curious if everyone sanded the blemish. I couldn't tell from what's said in the video and on their website if you have to remove it. Like I said, I emailed the company and haven't got a reply, and the only 800 number is for the company selling the dice, Gamestation. I may try and give them a call Monday, but I'd still like to hear other gamers' expericences.

Robin and Goldomark........if you're curious:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=bR2fxoNHIuU
#6

evilvegan

Jun 26, 2010 13:13:26
I have 4 sets of these dice.  I didnt' sand them. 

If memory serves I remember him saying that the rest of the edges were sharp enough that you don't have to sand them.

Basically, the weight and shape are infinitessimally relevant, but on any normal surface it should still stop on the side with the imperfection.

I know it doesn't matter on many of the dice (d10 for example).  The d20 could probably do with a light sanding, but nothing major.  Just enough to round the top.
#7

pigknight

Jun 26, 2010 13:21:16
I still use the dice that I got from my 3.5 starter set. I've trained them well and always get above half (i.e. d10 rolls 6-10, d6 rolls 3-6, d20 rolls 10-20).

You just gotta love your dice long enough.


Also don't cheat on your dice or they get vindictive...
#8

Robin_Hoodlum

Jun 27, 2010 10:48:41
With my GS dice I used a razor knife to remove the rough edge. No sanding needed.

Best dice ever made, ignore the flaming ****es.



If you yhink someone is "flaming", the correct thing to do would be to report it.
Not call them names, therfore making yourself guility of "baiting".
#9

Klirshon

Jun 27, 2010 10:54:02

Be thankful they just bark at you. They could leave their "mark" on you instead. Though that tends to be an opportunity for a well placed kick.

As for the gamescience dice; I have yet to try them myself.

#10

pigknight

Jun 27, 2010 10:59:39
People! No one likes flamers and no one likes mass baiting!
#11

EscherEnigma

Jun 27, 2010 19:28:58
Reporting people is snitching and that is bad, m'kay?


Not always.  And it's good to remember that whistle-blowers are "snitches" too.
#12

theoriginalbigdaddy

Jun 27, 2010 21:16:17
I use gamescience dice and more often than not I have low rolls. But I may just be unlucky because I also play virtual d&d and get lots of low rolls there too.
#13

Ragnar_Lodbrok

Jun 30, 2010 2:19:56
People! No one likes flamers and no one likes mass baiting!


Right. Flamers of Tzeentch are teh broke. Forum flamers are bad too.

Yeah, I've never used Gamescience dice. I just can't bring myself to buy dice if there doesn't seem to be a need (I've never had to purchase dice for D&D due to gifts, and the only reason I bought GW dice was because I needed a lot of d6s).
#14

MechaPilot

Jun 30, 2010 13:47:38
People! No one likes flamers and no one likes mass baiting!



I love flamers.

One kind is delightfully campy.  Another is the easiest way for infantry men to take out a battlemech.  Although the forum ones are bad, I am decidedly pro-flamer in other regards.
#15

zombie_babies

Jun 30, 2010 14:19:03
I don't like 'em at all.  Light mechs equipped with flamers and machine guns can run circles around the mechs I like to use and really crush my heat.  Not cool.  Literally not cool. 
#16

MechaPilot

Jun 30, 2010 15:35:03
I don't like 'em at all.  Light mechs equipped with flamers and machine guns can run circles around the mechs I like to use and really crush my heat.  Not cool.  Literally not cool. 



I know.  I once customed a light mech that was all engines, heat sinks, and flamers.  I took out a battlemaster with it in one-on-one combat.  It was hilarious.
#17

zombie_babies

Jun 30, 2010 15:43:52
Yeah, light mechs can totally pwn if they're built the right way.  My pals and I rarely use flamers, though.  Cuz flamers are lamers. 
#18

trashsmasher999

Jul 02, 2010 18:52:30
Goldomark.........no worries. No reporting will come from me! Also no hate.


Thunder and Evil.............thanks for the feedback!!! Smile