| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1homicidal_squirrelFeb 25, 2011 15:57:58 | www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41783295/?gt1=43001 |
| #2eratoFeb 25, 2011 17:16:31 | Sense when do the girl scouts need a sellers permit? When they're selling something? |
| #3wodensonFeb 25, 2011 17:38:52 | Rookie cops with no sense FTL. |
| #4homicidal_squirrelFeb 25, 2011 20:31:53 | Sense when do the girl scouts need a sellers permit? Exactly. He should have tazered the little criminals and their enabler mothers. |
| #5zmortisFeb 25, 2011 20:46:36 | Sense when do the girl scouts need a sellers permit? Since community regulations put in place by dimwit council members get enforced by some cops with no amount of common sense I would guess. |
| #6zmortisFeb 25, 2011 20:53:03 | As an aside the Girl Scouts as an incorporated "not-for-profit" organization with national, state, and local chapters and still subject to various state laws for transient vendors should have been ahead of this situation before it ever arose. This is also their "corporate wing's" lack of common sense at work as well. |
| #7jetshieldFeb 25, 2011 21:44:30 | The cop was just trying to get a free box of thin mints. Too bad those little girls haven't learned how the world really works yet. This post is meant as humor. It should not be taken to mean that I believe all police are corupt or feel themselves above the law. |
| #8QubeFeb 26, 2011 1:32:56 | Sense when do the girl scouts need a sellers permit? LOL. Tasers are for wussies. dont cops carry guns? |
| #9KlirshonFeb 26, 2011 6:08:28 | Why waste the ammunition? Just tackle the kids and take the cookies as criminal paraphernalia after you have the little buggers restrained in the paddy wagon. |
| #10homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 7:52:23 | LOL. Not as fun. Kills too quickly. Taser-guns are a lot more fun, and afterwards you can take them to jail. Teach those little hoodlums that there are rules and consequences for not following those rules. It’s kind of hard to learn that if you are dead.
|
| #11jetshieldFeb 26, 2011 8:36:21 | A good tasering might teach this kid a lesson too. |
| #12capitan_estabanFeb 26, 2011 8:44:28 | A good tasering might teach this kid a lesson too. This reminds me of the South Park episode where all the kids are on Ridalin, and the parents watch a video for a guy who has a non-chemical solution. video-guy: "Sit down, and Shut-up". student: "No" video-guy smacks the student video-guy: "I said, sit down and shut up." student: "Yes sir." What is really suprising is that in a free country you are required to get a piece of paper from the government to permit you to do something. |
| #13homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 8:44:59 | Arrested five times? Seriously... five times? What the hell, they should have given him jail time!!! And the first time they arrested him, they should have arrested him with THIS |
| #14homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 10:12:53 |
Not unless you are engaging in sex with a bunch of 10 year olds. What kind of ed up girl scouts do you have in Quebec? |
| #15Robin_HoodlumFeb 26, 2011 10:16:18 |
![]() |
| #16homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 10:17:26 |
So how old is the French girl scout you are going out with tonighht? |
| #17homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 10:25:11 |
Why are you going out with her then?Wait, is this the one you mentioned you workedwith that was pregnant and looking for a new baby daddy? |
| #18Robin_HoodlumFeb 26, 2011 10:30:18 |
I'm sure you will let us know the details... |
| #19homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 10:35:36 | No. the coworker is Transylvanian, and she just wanted lunch. We do not have much in common, it wasn't paticularly fun. Weird. I her name Jennifer? She emailed me too. She said she liked my profile. I thought I was the only she was emailing ![]() |
| #20Robin_HoodlumFeb 26, 2011 10:38:58 |
I'm more interested in the funny stories... |
| #21homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 10:42:58 | No. the coworker is Transylvanian, and she just wanted lunch. We do not have much in common, it wasn't paticularly fun. Weird. Jenniferette Better? |
| #22homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 10:44:00 |
It's Goldo... I would imagine sex stories only come in the tragically funny kind. |
| #23homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 10:45:28 | Not even close. Jean-ferette How about now? |
| #24Robin_HoodlumFeb 26, 2011 10:45:41 |
LOL You're correct, of course. |
| #25homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 10:53:25 | Yeah. Like yesterday. I wanted to say to my ex that I never wanted to see her again. Now, I will probably go on a month long trip with her. /facepalm I would suggest a testosterone booster as part of your workout supplements. |
| #26homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 13:04:02 | Yeah. Like yesterday. I wanted to say to my ex that I never wanted to see her again. Now, I will probably go on a month long trip with her. /facepalm We already know she has you1, but why do you keep going back? _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 - Wussy: A person regarded as weak or timid and especially as unmanly www.thefreedictionary.com/wussy As you are Goldo, I assume you are refering to yourself perhaphs? ![]() |
| #27homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 13:41:02 | Not bad, but is it worth a month long trip? Where are you going to be going? |
| #28homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 13:50:39 | Very cool. I've wanted to go on that and take pictures along with my toe-shoes. There are just a few other trips my toe-shoes need to be on before we go there. By the way... a bit of a religious trip for you isn't it? |
| #29homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 14:01:38 | And why does she want to go? |
| #30homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 14:26:33 | If it wasn't hard for her, you wouldn't be going. |
| #31homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 14:35:01 | Take a minute and think about it. |
| #32homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 14:44:35 | So what you're saying is that you haven't slept with her? |
| #33homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 14:51:23 | Run... just run... |
| #34homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 15:02:14 | I can't imagine. She's already neutered you. What else could she possibly do? |
| #35Sheffields_ParkFeb 26, 2011 15:57:04 | Sense when do the girl scouts need a sellers permit? I took American Criminal Justice, and this subject actually came up. The gun is only supposed to go off if you, the officer, feel your life or the lives of others are in danger, and only if you intend to shoot the other person, so no "warning shots." If someone pulls a gun, knife, or other dangerous weapon, you break out the gun. If your life or the lives of others are not in danger, but you're still in harm's way or need to take someone down? Just two words into the little shoulder radio: "deploying taser." The suspect has enough time to notice two little prods stick into his/her skin, just before they "ride the lightning" as it were. There are also other non-lethal means of taking someone down in their arsenal, like pepperspray and batons, but they're there for the same reason: an equalizer in a fight with someone using non-lethal force. Before I wanted to get into genetics and biochemistry, I wanted to be a criminal psychologist, so I took the Criminal Justice class. Very interesting course, and the teacher was old with crappy vocal cords, so he only spoke for half the course anyway. But you take a couple years off of school, and eventually interests change, and well, seven years later, here I am. : P |
| #36Sheffields_ParkFeb 26, 2011 16:20:49 | Run... just run... I could. Speaking from experience, the answer is probably nothing, especially if you don't feel anything for her, and if you do, once those feelings fade, the answer will still be nothing. Going back for the "mating" is never a good idea. While its been a while since I broke things off with the ex, there's something to moving on. There's a lot less stress, a lot less annoyance. I'm not one for goodbyes, so I just disappeared from my ex's life after the last time we'd spoken. She had always been a destructive influence in my life, and I'd given her too much power over me in the past. It not only freed me of a burden, it opened up the possibility of finding a new relationship, and letting go of the pain and the memories gave me a chance to replace them happiness, and new memories. Disappearing freed me of a burden, and it allowed me to open my heart to the beautiful, kind hearted, wonderful woman I'm with now. |
| #37pluisjenFeb 26, 2011 17:13:30 | so I just disappeared from my ex's life after the last time we'd spoken. I would be more impressed if you'd disappear from her life before the last time you'd spoken to her. |
| #38Cpt_MichaFeb 26, 2011 17:30:00 | Run... just run... Oh man, but that could spoil their shopping excursions, pedicures, and getting their nails done! |
| #39homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 17:31:19 | ![]() Run... just run... |
| #40homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 17:31:53 | so I just disappeared from my ex's life after the last time we'd spoken. I would have been more impressed if he had made her dissapear. |
| #41pluisjenFeb 26, 2011 18:24:19 | Eh, that's not so much impressive as it is creepy and/or criminal. |
| #42Sheffields_ParkFeb 26, 2011 18:48:39 | I would have been more impressed if he had made her dissapear. Somehow, the terms "CSI", "lethal injection," and "death row" come to mind when I read that. ![]() ...Along with "maximum security pound-me-in-the-ass prison." |
| #43Sheffields_ParkFeb 26, 2011 18:51:37 | Eh, that's not so much impressive as it is creepy and/or criminal. Yeah, I mean I don't want her dead, just completely out of my life, without so much as a chance to get back in. Disappearing and cutting her off while leaving her in the dark was the only real way to do that. I mean, I wanted a clean break, not a rap sheet and first degree homicide charges, followed by an inevitable death sentence. By then though, I didn't care. Apathy had already set in, so I wouldn't have had any motivation to kill her/"make her disappear" anyway. |
| #44homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 20:55:25 | Wow... the two of you have some issues. I said make her dissapear, not kill her. What is wrong with the two of you? He could have just been really crude and disgusted her to the point that she dissapeared from Shefield's life... you know... like you "dissapeared" from hers. You bunch of savages. |
| #45Sheffields_ParkFeb 26, 2011 23:01:09 | Wow... the two of you have some issues. I said make her dissapear, not kill her. What is wrong with the two of you? He could have just been really crude and disgusted her to the point that she dissapeared from Shefield's life... you know... like you "dissapeared" from hers. That's usually what one means when they refer to "making someone else disappear." For use in a sentence: "I'm not [just] going to kill you, I'm gonna make you disappear." |
| #46homicidal_squirrelFeb 26, 2011 23:09:28 | Wow... the two of you have some issues. I said make her dissapear, not kill her. What is wrong with the two of you? He could have just been really crude and disgusted her to the point that she dissapeared from Shefield's life... you know... like you "dissapeared" from hers. Something tells me you didn't kill yourself when you dissapeared. Or did you? |
| #47pluisjenFeb 27, 2011 3:16:30 | That's because "I disappeared from X" has a very different meaning from "I made X disappear from Y". |
| #48homicidal_squirrelFeb 27, 2011 9:22:55 | Only difference is who is doing the dissapearing an who is dissapearing. You're such a bloody savsage thinking you have to kill the poor girl to make her dissapear. |
| #49Sheffields_ParkMar 01, 2011 23:40:28 | Only difference is who is doing the dissapearing an who is dissapearing. You're such a bloody savsage thinking you have to kill the poor girl to make her dissapear. I'm just going to walk away from the discussion before this goes from the definition of "making someone else disappear" to how best to get away with it. |
| #50toastedamphibianMar 02, 2011 0:23:14 | ... At work, probably. The presence of secondary victims, including the place of business itself, gives rise to a much higher number of potential suspects: exes of the other co-workers, people who have a grudge aginst or stand to profit from the distruction of the business, ect. Just have to figure out how to obscure the arson, which honestly should be much easier than obscuring most types of murder [who commited the arson, not the fact that the fire was intentional]. |
| #51toastedamphibianMar 02, 2011 1:53:05 | Not at all. I am, sadly, still at work. |
| #52zombie_babiesMar 03, 2011 13:09:22 |
|