| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1ADHadhSep 12, 2008 9:12:34 | Is there anyone willing to argue with me? |
| #2zombie_babiesSep 12, 2008 9:19:22 | No. |
| #3ADHadhSep 12, 2008 9:23:54 | No. Nonsense! There is someone willing to argue with me and you will be proven wrong! |
| #4james_gaines_dupSep 12, 2008 9:31:13 | No he won't. |
| #5BloodsoulSep 12, 2008 9:32:05 | Shut your festering gob, you ***! Your type really makes me puke, you vacuous, coffee-nosed, maloderous, pervert!!! |
| #6zombie_babiesSep 12, 2008 9:34:59 | Nonsense! There is someone willing to argue with me and you will be proven wrong! Dude, there is no way in hell anyone is going to take your request for an argument seriously. No friggin' way. EDIT: You bastard. |
| #7Narf_the_MouseSep 12, 2008 9:37:09 | No! You'll have peace and quiet and you'll like it! Penguins are wannabe evil overlords! |
| #8batshidoSep 12, 2008 9:38:51 | Dude, there is no way in hell anyone is going to take your request for an argument seriously. No friggin' way. Shows what you know. EDIT: You bastard. Hoser. No! You'll have peace and quiet and you'll like it! And thus begins the wakawakawaka portion of the thread. |
| #9ADHadhSep 12, 2008 9:50:02 | No he won't. Yes, he will! Shut your festering gob, you ***! Your type really makes me puke, you vacuous, coffee-nosed, maloderous, pervert!!! Um, that's not the "Insult me" thread, that's the argument thread. |
| #10jwtSep 12, 2008 9:51:33 | Is there anyone willing to argue with me? You pestilent dung heap. Everything fiber of your wretched being is an affront to humanity. You are a boil on the.... Oh sorry - this is abuse. Argument is down the hall. (Wow, I think I just accidentally defined the preeminent meme of the Off-Topic Tavern, no?) |
| #11zombie_babiesSep 12, 2008 9:51:39 | Shows what you know. Actually, it shows what you don't. Hoser. Ya' know, I can tolerate a great many things. Canuk insults from Canadia go too far. That's mean, man, just ... mean. And thus begins the wakawakawaka portion of the thread. Fozzy Bear FTW. Though the correct spelling is: "Wocka Wocka Wocka". A couple seconds of research could have spared you this humiliation. Lazy bones. |
| #12ADHadhSep 12, 2008 9:54:56 | No! You'll have peace and quiet and you'll like it! Canadians would need to take over the Tavern completely first. |
| #13batshidoSep 12, 2008 9:57:16 | Actually, it shows what you don't. Wow, how out of touch are you? Ya' know, I can tolerate a great many things. Canuk insults from Canadia go too far. That's mean, man, just ... mean. My appologies. I crossed a line. How about "durak?" (Makes more sense in Cyrillic, I'm afraid.) Fozzy Bear FTW. Though the correct spelling is: "Wocka Wocka Wocka". A couple seconds of research could have spared you this humiliation. Lazy bones. Research is for elitist hacks. I go on my gut, and it's never steered me wrong. Obviously, that means in this case that you're mistaken. Wikiality is currently rewriting itself to back me up. |
| #14zombie_babiesSep 12, 2008 10:08:34 | Wow, how out of touch are you? *Sigh* The appropriate question, here, is how in touch do you mistakenly feel you are? My appologies. I crossed a line. You certainly did. Though I cannot accept any apology from the likes of you. Your willingness to use a base word like "hoser" in an intellectual debate of this magnitude speaks volumes about your character - or, more precisely, lack thereof. Durak? I'm alright with that one. Let ignorance be my shield! (I did look it up. Damn my "elitism".) Research is for elitist hacks. I go on my gut, and it's never steered me wrong. Obviously, that means in this case that you're mistaken. Wikiality is currently rewriting itself to back me up. In the immortal words of Stewie Griffin, Ha! Mentioning research and "Wiki" in the same comment further illustrates your failings at intelligent debate. Wikipedia. Honestly. And just because I did get my info from that site does not mean I'm wrong. Nope. But if you do, you are. That's how this stuff works. |
| #15batshidoSep 12, 2008 10:17:02 | *Sigh* The appropriate question, here, is how in touch do you mistakenly feel you are? Thanks for asking that of yourself. Now maybe you can answer that. Or are you so far out of touch that you can't even manage that? You certainly did. Though I cannot accept any apology from the likes of you. Your willingness to use a base word like "hoser" in an intellectual debate of this magnitude speaks volumes about your character - or, more precisely, lack thereof. If my use of the word indicates a lack of character, then your reaction to the same surely does as well. Really, resorting to pointing out my personal shortcomings rather than debating my argument? What kind of feckless loser are you? Durak? I'm alright with that one. Let ignorance be my shield! And you got exactly what you deserved. In the immortal words of Stewie Griffin, Ha! Mentioning research and "Wiki" in the same comment further illustrates your failings at intelligent debate. Wikipedia. Honestly. And just because I did get my info from that site does not mean I'm wrong. Nope. But if you do, you are. That's how this stuff works. I suggest we call a truce on the Wikipedia issue. It's obvious you're in the wrong here, and the wiki confirms it. You should save some face before your personal wiki page needs to be updated with your impending rhetorical thrashing. In the even more immortal words of Nelson Muntz; "Ha ha!" |
| #16stardrifterSep 12, 2008 10:20:59 | Is there anyone willing to argue with me? I've told you once. |
| #17ADHadhSep 12, 2008 10:50:55 | I've told you once. Oh no you didn't! That would be an outrage! |
| #18zombie_babiesSep 12, 2008 11:41:35 | Thanks for asking that of yourself. Now maybe you can answer that. Or are you so far out of touch that you can't even manage that? Are you always so evasive? I was obviously telling you that you needed to ask yourself that question considering how far off-base you were. But ... if you feel the need to deflect I can understand. I can't respect it, but I can understand. If my use of the word indicates a lack of character, then your reaction to the same surely does as well. You're right. My reaction to your demonstration of your lack of character certainly does prove you do, in fact, lack it. I'm glad we're beginning to see eye to eye on this point, at least. And you got exactly what you deserved. How did you find out I was awarded a nomination for the Nobel Prize in Literature for that comment? Word certainly does travel fast if it reached your backwoods locale this quickly ... I suggest we call a truce on the Wikipedia issue. It's obvious you're in the wrong here, and the wiki confirms it. You should save some face before your personal wiki page needs to be updated with your impending rhetorical thrashing. Links? Proof? Show me five impartial (to my cause) studies by accredited (by me) researchers in the field that verify what you're saying here because, to be blunt, I say that this assertion is nothing more than a steaming pile of Bravo Sierra - pardon my French. I'm not surprised by your call for a truce, however. That's the last resort of a failed argument. And you know this, man! Still, and of the utmost importance here, in the more immortal than immortal words of the fabled Stewie Griffin; "I don't have to f***ing impress you". |
| #19squarecircleSep 12, 2008 11:50:21 | HOLY MOTHER F-ING TACOS. 50 internets to Batshido and Zombie Babies for that impressive parody of forum debates. Abso-f-ing-lutely fantastic. |
| #20ADHadhSep 12, 2008 13:05:54 | HOLY MOTHER F-ING TACOS. 50 internets to Batshido and Zombie Babies for that impressive parody of forum debates. How do you know this is a parody? It's absolutely not! |
| #21batshidoSep 12, 2008 13:18:06 | Are you always so evasive? I was obviously telling you that you needed to ask yourself that question considering how far off-base you were. But ... if you feel the need to deflect I can understand. I can't respect it, but I can understand. I don't know where you get off accusing me of being evasive, exactly. You won't even answer your own question. What's the problem, afraid you won't like the answers you have to give to yourself? Sounds like the voices in your head need to have a pow-wow, pal. You're right. My reaction to your demonstration of your lack of character certainly does prove you do, in fact, lack it. I'm glad we're beginning to see eye to eye on this point, at least. This is an ad homenim attack, and I won't even justify it with a response. Clearly accusing me of agreeing with you on any level is the basest of insults, I must insist you retract that statement in the interest of civil discussion. How did you find out I was awarded a nomination for the Nobel Prize in Literature for that comment? Word certainly does travel fast if it reached your backwoods locale this quickly ... Pix or it didn't happen. Troll. Links? Proof? Show me five impartial (to my cause) studies by accredited (by me) researchers in the field that verify what you're saying here because, to be blunt, I say that this assertion is nothing more than a steaming pile of Bravo Sierra - pardon my French. I'm not surprised by your call for a truce, however. That's the last resort of a failed argument. And you know this, man! Here are your studies; The Angel Institute The Goddard Group Planned Parenthood Rassmussen Polling Institute Gallup USA Of course, I know you'll just handwave these away with bogus claims, but the info is there in black and white. Still, and of the utmost importance here, in the more immortal than immortal words of the fabled Stewie Griffin; "I don't have to f***ing impress you". I find it telling that you're hiding behind the words (if you can call them that) of a toothless sociopath. It really says a lot about you and your argument; somebody needs a diaper change. |
| #22zombie_babiesSep 12, 2008 13:41:36 | I don't know where you get off accusing me of being evasive, exactly. You won't even answer your own question. What's the problem, afraid you won't like the answers you have to give to yourself? Sounds like the voices in your head need to have a pow-wow, pal. That question was directed at you, sir, and you know it. But since you obviously can't comprehend this simplest of facts, I'll just assume the worst. If you and the other voices in my head choose to convene a meeting, I will, of course, abide by any decision reached. Maybe. Probably not. Ok. Nah. This is an ad homenim attack, and I won't even justify it with a response. Clearly accusing me of agreeing with you on any level is the basest of insults, I must insist you retract that statement in the interest of civil discussion. Ad homenim? Did you pull that out of the "Junior Interwebz Deb8ter Handbook"? Please. I have not yet begun to ad homenim. If you can't hang, you can report it. Though I hear the mods have a prejudice against you Avenger guys. Pix or it didn't happen. Well, the only pix I have include your mother. They're x-rated, of course, so I will not respond to your baiting and get myself into trouble by posting them here. BTW, it's against the CoC to call someone a troll. Even when you're right and they are a troll. Especially if they're an admitted troll and sock puppet. Watch it, pal, or I'll be forced to report the crap right outta ya'. Here are your studies; ... snip due to offensive linking ... You say you're for intelligent debate and you have the nerve to clutter the boards with that spam? Consider yourself reported. Again. The mods here take a pretty harsh stance against offensive linking, friend-o. In the future I suggest you try posting some impartial research. You let your true colors (yellow and mauve) bleed through by posting this partisan rhetoric. And mauve is hideous. I find it telling that you're hiding behind the words (if you can call them that) of a toothless sociopath. It really says a lot about you and your argument; somebody needs a diaper change. Stewie has some teeth. Aside from correcting that blatant untruth, I'll be over in a jiff to change you're diaper, pal. Oh no he didn't! Oh yes he did! Booh-yah! |
| #23boj0Sep 12, 2008 13:54:04 | OH snap girlfriend, you did not just call those people out for that thing they didn't do! I should know, I was there and the way this thing looked to me, you were all over that stuff. Now I want an apology and to see you get permab& fool. |
| #24korgoththepristSep 12, 2008 14:57:29 | ... Grats your all argueing with him. The Arguement is ! IF Someone would want to argue with him TaDa! You know what? What would you like to Argue on? I Will do it so long as we know about what and some certain rules. There take it your all wrong Someone will argue with him even though eveyone allready was. |
| #25korgoththepristSep 12, 2008 15:00:09 | OH snap girlfriend, you did not just call those people out for that thing they didn't do! I should know, I was there and the way this thing looked to me, you were all over that stuff. Now I want an apology and to see you get permab& fool. people shoulda just said Pike Off your a troll the fact your still complaining about this is Prove enough Of course after there was warning about this Hey you Bambies. Quit complaining allready. All we need is a little love Come on Eveybody Group hug! And dont you dare go "No" Or such becouse that just proves YOUR BOTH BEING EVASIVE AND TROLLING/BAITING/RANTING SO SHUT UP AND GIVE EVEYBODY A GROUP HUG! |
| #26goblin_prideSep 12, 2008 15:04:42 | Okay then. ** Walks away, muttering** |
| #27batshidoSep 12, 2008 15:24:17 | That question was directed at you, sir, and you know it. But since you obviously can't comprehend this simplest of facts, I'll just assume the worst. If you and the other voices in my head choose to convene a meeting, I will, of course, abide by any decision reached. Maybe. Probably not. Ok. Nah. You should really stop typing out your internal monologues like this. It makes you look as crazy as you really are. It's best to hold some of that back, it helps maintain credibility. Ad homenim? Did you pull that out of the "Junior Interwebz Deb8ter Handbook"? Please. I have not yet begun to ad homenim. If you can't hang, you can report it. Though I hear the mods have a prejudice against you Avenger guys. This is baiting, and you know it. Straight out of the "Usenet Guide to trolling without looking like it." Wow, if the moderation around here weren't crap, you'd have been gone months ago. Well, the only pix I have include your mother. They're x-rated, of course, so I will not respond to your baiting and get myself into trouble by posting them here. I'm pretty sure threatening to post naked pics of other poster's family members is against the CoC. Not that they ever actually enforce that thing, just sayin. BTW, it's against the CoC to call someone a troll. Even when you're right and they are a troll. Especially if they're an admitted troll and sock puppet. Watch it, pal, or I'll be forced to report the crap right outta ya'. Damn me and my single account. If only I had more so that I could report each of your trolling posts multiple times, then jump on here under other names and talk about how you're going to get yours. Not having an alias to hide behind is really cramping my style. You say you're for intelligent debate and you have the nerve to clutter the boards with that spam? Consider yourself reported. Again. The mods here take a pretty harsh stance against offensive linking, friend-o. In the future I suggest you try posting some impartial research. You let your true colors (yellow and mauve) bleed through by posting this partisan rhetoric. And mauve is hideous. You asked for links and I gave you links. If you're just going to handwave them away (exactly as I predicted you would) then I don't even know why I'm bothering with this. Either refute them with facts or accept your defeat at the hands of an intellectual superior. Either/or. I await your decision. Stewie has some teeth. Aside from correcting that blatant untruth, I'll be over in a jiff to change you're diaper, pal. Oh no he didn't! Oh yes he did! Booh-yah! I'm fully potty-trained, thank you. I think that's your own **** you're smelling. |
| #28pyromancer999Sep 12, 2008 15:36:16 | Hahahahahahahahahahaha. You've all been tricked into argueing |
| #29zombie_babiesSep 12, 2008 15:49:08 | You should really stop typing out your internal monologues like this. It makes you look as crazy as you really are. It's best to hold some of that back, it helps maintain credibility. Oh sure. Attack your perception of my mental state to avoid answering the question (again). Nothing beats the "make up stuff about my opponent and then attack the junk I made up" approach. Well done. What are you, twelve years old? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() This is baiting, and you know it. Straight out of the "Usenet Guide to trolling without looking like it." Wow, if the moderation around here weren't crap, you'd have been gone months ago. Ahh. The classic attack the mods cuz someone defeated you in intellectual combat approach. I smelled it coming. I thought the smell might have been more BS from you and I was right. Seriously, if I was in the wrong I'd be gone. Since I function within the limits of the wide-open CoC, I am effectively teflon coated. What's next? You accuse me of being a company employee? I'm pretty sure threatening to post naked pics of other poster's family members is against the CoC. Not that they ever actually enforce that thing, just sayin. I thought it was all good if they were sexy pics. I better review that section of the CoC. It's right under the section detailing how to set up and properly flame with sock puppets, right? Damn me and my single account. If only I had more so that I could report each of your trolling posts multiple times, then jump on here under other names and talk about how you're going to get yours. Not having an alias to hide behind is really cramping my style. And that's another reason why I'm winning. I only need one account to smash your internet persona. It's been great since they stopped banning people for anything. I could post pictures of gutted children and be ok. Great time to be a board member. You asked for links and I gave you links. If you're just going to handwave them away (exactly as I predicted you would) then I don't even know why I'm bothering with this. Either refute them with facts or accept your defeat at the hands of an intellectual superior. Either/or. I await your decision. Right. ![]() ![]() Predict I'll handwave them, post outrageous lies and then fault me for criticizing the s*** on a stick you post. Clever, but this is one trick that everyone knows about. I've gotten 17 PMs from people that saw you try to pull this and called you on it (to me). I'm fully potty-trained, thank you. I think that's your own **** you're smelling. If you're going to continue with this beligerrant tone, I must warn you I'll be forced to PM my vast conspiracy of like-minded forum posters to come in and attack you simply for disagreeing with me. They love it when someone posts the kind of exaggerated lies like you do. Nothin' beats a good forum gang-up. And that's the motto of our organization. So chill or I'll unleash the hidden conspiracy hounds. |
| #30goblin_prideSep 12, 2008 15:54:22 | Hahahahahahahahahahaha. You've all been tricked into argueing Yes, but they're arguing with each other, not the OP. He lost the thread. |
| #31doomsoughtSep 12, 2008 16:01:37 | Pie |
| #32batshidoSep 12, 2008 16:08:06 | Oh sure. Attack your perception of my mental state to avoid answering the question (again). Nothing beats the "make up stuff about my opponent and then attack the junk I made up" approach. Well done. What are you, twelve years old? Hey, it's not my fault you're fostering that perception. Maybe if you'd quit posting about the voices in your head I'd stop wondering if they're the ones doing the typing. Ahh. The classic attack the mods cuz someone defeated you in intellectual combat approach. I smelled it coming. I thought the smell might have been more BS from you and I was right. Seriously, if I was in the wrong I'd be gone. Since I function within the limits of the wide-open CoC, I am effectively teflon coated. You defeating me in anything is about as likely as the mods actually stepping up and banning you for your obvious trolling. What's next? You accuse me of being a company employee? Well, are you? I wouldn't be the least bit surprised, you shill. I thought it was all good if they were sexy pics. I better review that section of the CoC. It's right under the section detailing how to set up and properly flame with sock puppets, right? If you think naked pictures of my mom are sexy, you're more damaged in the head than I thought. And it's after the section about the quickest way to get around a ban and before the part about the many uses of sock puppets. Seriously, if you can't even quote from the CoC correctly, what kind of troll are you. Take some pride in your threadcrapping, man. And that's another reason why I'm winning. I only need one account to smash your internet persona. It's been great since they stopped banning people for anything. I could post pictures of gutted children and be ok. Great time to be a board member. If you only need one, why do you have so many? I'm counting at least half a dozen in this thread. Is your complex really that bad, or do you have one screenname for each of the voices in your head? Right. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() See, I can do that too. Now, if you wouldn't mind ACTUALLY ANSWERING THE QUESTION, I can get back to proving you wrong. If you're going to continue with this beligerrant tone, I must warn you I'll be forced to PM my vast conspiracy of like-minded forum posters to come in and attack you simply for disagreeing with me. They love it when someone posts the kind of exaggerated lies like you do. Nothin' beats a good forum gang-up. And that's the motto of our organization. So chill or I'll unleash the hidden conspiracy hounds. I knew it. You're a Svengali, mobilizing your minions to protect you from reprisal while you spout blatant falsehoods and bait people into arguments. That's it, I'm going to report the lot of you, then post pictures of naked women beating children who are holding up signs with dirty words written on them. |
| #33kistraSep 12, 2008 16:21:56 | I am completely neutral, so you can trust anything I say about either of you two and I think you are equally crazy. (<-- see! being neutral!) It is clearly obvious to everyone that Zombie_Babies smells better than Batshido. Can we get past that fact and move on to discussing the real issues? I mean really, plus his arguments are just more persuasive. Sorry batshido, I agree with everything Zombie_Babies has to say. But you can't disagree with me because I am neutral. |
| #34rotheSep 12, 2008 16:26:07 | why your arguign aboot smthing here thats ovbiouslly claer that yourre all wrong aboot it adn DONT tell me aboot mine speeling eiter or anyhting aboot usijn comas or puctuantion youer grammer natziees all of you |
| #35ADHadhSep 12, 2008 17:02:05 | Yes, but they're arguing with each other, not the OP. He lost the thread. No cookie for me. Well, living approx. six hours in the future has this side effect - I'm exhausted before you all warm up. I'd like to notice that Batshido has proven himself to be hell of an arguer - in most threads I see his posts in he's arguing with someone. Strangely enough, if I remember correctly, he's neither American nor French nor Polish*; he's Canadian. *It is said that where two Poles meet, there are three different political parties; believe me, it's true. Pie It'd better not be raspberry or plum pie. |
| #36goblin_prideSep 12, 2008 17:05:30 | I'd like to notice that Batshido has proven himself to be hell of an arguer - in most threads I see his posts in he's arguing with someone. Strangely enough, if I remember correctly, he's neither American nor French nor Polish*; he's Canadian. Not unless Canada has annexed Kansas. |
| #37ADHadhSep 12, 2008 17:45:50 | Not unless Canada has annexed Kansas. And me apparently. |
| #38stardrifterSep 12, 2008 20:37:24 | Oh no you didn't! That would be an outrage! yes I did |
| #39wyld_mutationSep 12, 2008 20:43:09 | That's a lie. You didn't. (Monty Python FTW!!) |
| #40stardrifterSep 12, 2008 20:58:26 | That's a lie. yes I did! I'm sorry is this the five minute argument or the full half hour? (fifty odd years on, and still some of the funniest stuff in the world) |
| #41wyld_mutationSep 12, 2008 21:04:33 | It isn't an argument. It's a dicussion. |
| #42stardrifterSep 12, 2008 21:12:10 | It isn't an argument. no, it's not |
| #43doomsoughtSep 12, 2008 23:44:05 | The pie is a lie The cake is a lie There is no spoon Only the spork remains |
| #44squarecircleSep 13, 2008 3:03:43 | Not unless Canada has annexed Kansas. Yup, Bat and I share a state. Hey 'shido, how close are you to Kansas City, by chance? I'm in the "Greater KC" area. |
| #45batshidoSep 13, 2008 6:32:36 | I am completely neutral, so you can trust anything I say about either of you two and I think you are equally crazy. (<-- see! being neutral!) Sockpuppet. Yup, Bat and I share a state. Actually, I'm not at this point. I grew up there, but I've moved to Philly with my now wife for her schooling. My hometown is about 3 hours from the Kansas City airport, if that helps. Straight north of Manhattan and about 15 miles from the Nebraska border. Google Maps "Marshal County, Kansas," and it becomes clear fairly quickly that it is, in fact, not in Canada. |
| #46knights_discipleSep 13, 2008 6:37:32 | Yup, Bat and I share a state. Wait, seriously? I am too! Which part? You've not been flooded away, have you? Edit: Oh, um, on topic...I reject your reality, and substitute my own! |
| #47batshidoSep 13, 2008 6:45:02 | Wait, seriously? Growing up, I lived on a floodplain in an oxbow of one of the rivers/creeks that fed into Tuttle Creek. In 1992, we had to canoe to school in three separate months, and in 1993 we were surrounded by water for all but 3 days in the month of July. In 1994, we moved the house to a nearby hill. |
| #48knights_discipleSep 13, 2008 6:54:27 | Growing up, I lived on a floodplain in an oxbow of one of the rivers/creeks that fed into Tuttle Creek. Of course, being the Midwest, if you're not canoeing in a flood, you're hiding from a tornado, or sledding across a blizzard plain. Of course, our ground generally stays still, so I still say it's better than CA. ;) (No offense to CA residents out there) |
| #49goblin_prideSep 13, 2008 7:01:45 | Of course, being the Midwest, if you're not canoeing in a flood, you're hiding from a tornado, or sledding across a blizzard plain. What about that bloody groundshaker in Illinois back in April? 4.2 isn't a minor quake is it? I realize you silly buggers out farther west might not have even noticed it, but it certainly got my attention. True enough 'bout the twisters though. Ol' Parkersburg got hit by a big one that wiped it off the map on the 25th of May and then had 6 more pass within a mile since then. 'tween twisters and floods, 85 of Iowa's 99 counties are listed as disaster areas. Any bets on what winter's gonna look like? |
| #50knights_discipleSep 13, 2008 8:06:32 | What about that bloody groundshaker in Illinois back in April? 4.2 isn't a minor quake is it? I realize you silly buggers out farther west might not have even noticed it, but it certainly got my attention. Well, considering this was one of the coldest August months I've seen here in a while... |
| #51squarecircleSep 13, 2008 8:17:14 | Wait, seriously? Yes. Olathe. No. Olathe is my current location. I've also lived in Independence for quite a long time and Liberty for a while, Missouri side. Prior to that: NorCal, Western WA, Idaho, North Carolina, and for a short bit, Nuremburg, Germany. |
| #52squarecircleSep 13, 2008 8:20:15 | Of course, being the Midwest, if you're not canoeing in a flood, you're hiding from a tornado, or sledding across a blizzard plain. Don't forget, the west coast doesn't just have earthquakes, but volcanoes as well. And it's not just Cali, but Oregon and Washington as well. Heh. I spend 11 years on the West coast. :P (5 in Washington and 6 in California.) In all seriousness though, it's not any better or worse for natural disasters. |
| #53knights_discipleSep 13, 2008 8:23:28 | Yes. Olathe. No. Wow. It's always a bit weird to find people so close on boards like this. I myself live in Raymore, but I actually work in KS. New Century, specifically. 3 guesses where I work, with one more hint: I don't deal with airplanes. And since you're a resident of the area, you and Bats should know what the instinctual reaction to these two words is: Grandview Triangle. |
| #54batshidoSep 13, 2008 8:26:19 | And since you're a resident of the area, you and Bats should know what the instinctual reaction to these two words is: Grandview Triangle. Guuuuuuuhhh. I'd rather not think about that. Give me gravel backroads anytime, thanks. Speaking of, apparently nobody taught Philadelphians how to drive on wet roads, I nearly died 3 times this morning because of jerks who expected their antilock brakes to take them from 60 to 0 in a 10 yard span. Kansas has earthquakes too, folks. Remember the 3.6 that hit K-State campus a few years back? Turns out they built the Tuttle Creek damn on a fault line. Corps of Engineers FTW. |
| #55batshidoSep 13, 2008 8:32:04 | What about that bloody groundshaker in Illinois back in April? 4.2 isn't a minor quake is it? I realize you silly buggers out farther west might not have even noticed it, but it certainly got my attention. After the one earthquake in Manhattan's living memory, we caught no end of crap from people on the west coast. It's different when your ground doesn't normally move, dammit. True enough 'bout the twisters though. Ol' Parkersburg got hit by a big one that wiped it off the map on the 25th of May and then had 6 more pass within a mile since then. 'tween twisters and floods, 85 of Iowa's 99 counties are listed as disaster areas. Any bets on what winter's gonna look like? We're looking at record twister numbers in Kansas too, last I heard from my folks. I had some family in Greensburg when that whole thing went down, scary stuff. My uncle works for KDoT driving a bulldozer, so he's got all kinds of stories about tornado cleanup. |
| #56rotheSep 13, 2008 8:32:29 | ![]() (just imagine this is posted by Doppleganster) |
| #57knights_discipleSep 13, 2008 8:34:49 | After the one earthquake in Manhattan's living memory, we caught no end of crap from people on the west coast. It's different when your ground doesn't normally move, dammit. What he said about the ground. Yeah, yesterday was apparently pretty active for twisters, too. Of course, I was dead asleep when it all happened, so I don't know if sirens went off in my area... |
| #58squarecircleSep 13, 2008 9:48:02 | Wow. It's always a bit weird to find people so close on boards like this. LOL. Oh crud. I used to commute from Olathe to Independence, but it was in the wee hours of the morning (4am) so it wasn't so bad. I then headed back before 3pm so I didn't have to deal with the worst of traffic. I don't really know much about New Century, so I have no idea where you work. :P Off-hand guess: Overland Park? |
| #59knights_discipleSep 13, 2008 10:02:11 | LOL. Oh crud. Heh. New Century's that littl slice of Gardner off of 56. I work at Embarq down thataways. ;) Though I did live in Overland Park for a few years. |
| #60baneofelvesSep 13, 2008 15:10:58 | why is everyone arguing? it's funny, but. . . ![]() |
| #61rotheSep 13, 2008 15:44:25 | Damn you for questioning the argument! |
| #62baneofelvesSep 13, 2008 15:54:59 | Damn you for questioning the argument! Oh, yeah buddy? Yeah? Well DAMN YOU TOO! :P |
| #63terronusSep 13, 2008 16:01:24 | I will be hosting a slumber party to help resolve this thread, all posters are invited. Every person should bring their own food dishes, that way no one should be mad or start an argument about bad food!! I will provide hot cocoa with marshmallows as well as several varieties of sodas. Lastly, we will watch both of the landmark films Dungeons & Dragons and Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God. This will help show us that we need to stop arguing and enjoy why we all post on these forums anyways: Potlucks, Marlon Wayans, fantasy inspired slumber parties, and the wrath of dragons. Bedtime is at 9.30 so we don't wake up my Grandma. |
| #64baneofelvesSep 13, 2008 16:06:22 | I will be hosting a slumber party to help resolve this thread, all posters are invited. Every person should bring their own food dishes, that way no one should be mad or start an argument about bad food!! Wait, we bring our own dishes right? That means I can do what I want with MY dishes. smashing time. And you have to go to bed at 9:30? Ugh. I stay up till midnight or one thirty. (and I don't have to get up at the butt crack of dawn to go to school. I'm homeschooled. yay) Now, please let us get back to pointless arguments. |
| #65doomsoughtSep 13, 2008 16:28:51 | Oh, yeah buddy? Yeah? Well DAMN YOU TOO! :P now that you two are both going to hell, I'll just put on my Anti-damnation firewall and watch. |
| #66baneofelvesSep 13, 2008 16:35:36 | now that you two are both going to hell, I'll just put on my Anti-damnation firewall and watch. I don't believe in hell. *uses create water spells to destroy your anti damnation firewall* DAMN YOU! DAMN YOU DAMN YOU DAMN YOU! oh and have a nice day, please come again. |
| #67doomsoughtSep 13, 2008 16:46:42 | *the hell fire boils the water, plasma's the steam, and burns away the magic* Oh? You don't believe in hell? then you might not want to look down. Well, nobody in their right mind would want to anyway. Oh well. *sips some coke* |
| #68korgoththepristSep 13, 2008 17:42:35 | Hahahahahahahahahahaha. You've all been tricked into argueing I think they dont realy know that. We should join forces and give eveybody group hugs! Ooo And Choclate Boxes! |
| #69korgoththepristSep 13, 2008 17:53:25 | I am completely neutral, so you can trust anything I say about either of you two and I think you are equally crazy. (<-- see! being neutral!) Watch me! *Rubs hands together* Zombie babies is the one trolling/baiting. Unfortinatly for Batshido hes taking the bait. Zombie Babies Hears a simple question If Batshido Is Crazy. Then what would that make you for argueing and such with a "Crazy" Person I Think this is the classic case of "Dumb and Dumber" Its just a figure of speech, But i beleve Batshido is the dumb one. While Zombie Babies is the Dumber one for enjoying this crap becouse thats the only Reasonable excuise he has right now. If A Person is insane You never say anything to upset em. So Zombie Babies Going on the Theroy that Batshido is Crazy. I Would vote that would make you Even more so then he is. Just a Theroy however! Muhahaha See that Kistra I Have Argued agest your point While doing the whole "Claiming" to be Netrual better then you! OH BTW Before anybody respondes. COOKIES FOR EVEYBODY! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Better hurry before Cookie monster finds out i stole his Stash ... If i missed anybody let me knows! BTW each cookie cost a Group Hug! |
| #70korgoththepristSep 13, 2008 17:56:12 | *the hell fire boils the water, plasma's the steam, and burns away the magic* ewwww Warm Coke I Allways beleved hell was an ice prision I Mean satan wants people to like him right? Then he better have Cold Beverages like Coke and such. I Mean your hot Hell is just disgusting Ewww Warm Coke and beer and such At least in cold ice tomb you can have sandwhiches and Cold Beverages!. |
| #71doomsoughtSep 13, 2008 19:49:05 | ewwww Warm Coke Oh? no. My coke is kept cold by this black hole I found in my backpack. |
| #72batshidoSep 13, 2008 20:00:56 | Oh? no. My coke is kept cold by this black hole I found in my backpack. Quiet, fool. You'll bring the "scientific research is dangerous and shouldn't be done, regardless of the potential benefits and insanely minuscule potential for danger" crowd here. Right now we've got them sequestered in that trippy thread about the supercolider. Let's leave them there, shall we? |
| #73baneofelvesSep 13, 2008 20:07:15 | *the hell fire boils the water, plasma's the steam, and burns away the magic* Oh yeah? Well, I looked down, and you know what I saw? PARADISE. The burned tortured bodies, fires consuming them. . .ahh. thinking about it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside. :D |
| #74stardrifterSep 13, 2008 20:25:28 | Oh? no. My coke is kept cold by this black hole I found in my backpack. No it isn't |
| #75kistraSep 13, 2008 21:13:42 | Watch me! *Rubs hands together* You failed at flaming me though. You just presented a faulty argument. I never said that anyone couldn't argue with me. I said that people couldn't reasonably flame me nor present a rational argument. You are clearly a sock puppet of Zombie_Babies and he is having fun advertising his crazyness. You aren't neutral at all!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I beat you! I give pennies to all! Pennies are better than cookies! |
| #76baneofelvesSep 13, 2008 23:25:10 | no. cookies are better. you can eat a cookie, and they're delicious. now, lemme ask you this, what can you get with a few pennies? (i know you can get stuff with LOTS of pennies so don't even try that one) |
| #77doomsoughtSep 13, 2008 23:37:20 | ooh, interestign thing about hell... you know how in space, ice water will boil, well its sort of like that in hell, you can be frozen up to the privy parts in a block of ice and have the rest on fire. |
| #78knights_discipleSep 13, 2008 23:39:14 | ooh, interestign thing about hell... No, see, that's only the bottom layer. Haven't you read Dante? |
| #79doomsoughtSep 14, 2008 0:01:14 | No, see, that's only the bottom layer. Haven't you read Dante? this is a flame-bait thread in the free for all part of the wizards of the coast forums, If i dig a hole, i either hit the bottom level of hell, or 4chan. I hit hell, so I will count myself lucky. |
| #80baneofelvesSep 14, 2008 0:06:02 | ooh, interestign thing about hell... YESS!! |
| #81d1tremereSep 14, 2008 0:43:38 | Is there anyone willing to argue with me? Greatest topic ever created. |
| #82darkraven18599Sep 14, 2008 2:57:00 | Greatest topic ever created. I disagree, it most certainly must be the worst. |
| #83stardrifterSep 14, 2008 7:18:54 | I disagree, it most certainly must be the worst. No it's the best |
| #84ADHadhSep 14, 2008 9:55:52 | I Mean your hot Hell is just disgusting Ewww Warm Coke and beer and such Well duh, it's supposed to be the punishment. What did you think Hell was about? You know, I have a half-win. No one's arguing with me, but I had an argument between Zombie_Babies and Batshido, the Kansas Kanadian in this thread. I will be hosting a slumber party to help resolve this thread, all posters are invited. Every person should bring their own food dishes, that way no one should be mad or start an argument about bad food!! If you pay for my ticket I'd be happy to ruin the evening! |
| #85darkraven18599Sep 14, 2008 15:41:40 | No it's the best Surely you jest my good sir. This thread must be the single most foolish waste of time on the net. |
| #86goblin_prideSep 14, 2008 17:20:53 | Surely you jest my good sir. This thread must be the single most foolish waste of time on the net. Someone has never seen Youtube. |
| #87darkraven18599Sep 14, 2008 22:18:10 | Someone has never seen Youtube. There is no Youtube. You're full of rubbish! The sky is green! |
| #88baneofelvesSep 14, 2008 22:20:30 | That's BULL! We ALL know the sky is yellow and the moon is blood red! And it's made out of chocolate! |
| #89darkraven18599Sep 14, 2008 22:27:00 | That's BULL! We ALL know the sky is yellow and the moon is blood red! And it's made out of chocolate! Surely you jest! The moon is made of green cheese as any fool knows! |
| #90paul_profession_bakerSep 15, 2008 5:26:17 | I will be hosting a slumber party to help resolve this thread, all posters are invited. Every person should bring their own food dishes, that way no one should be mad or start an argument about bad food!! Where's you're dad liquor, I'm going to need allot of it to watch those films. Don't worry, I'm over 21 and I will trade the liquor with some poutine and some belgian beer. |
| #91batshidoSep 15, 2008 7:58:44 | Wow. The quality of argument at this establishment has taken a downswing in the last couple days. |
| #92darkraven18599Sep 15, 2008 14:28:37 | Wow. The quality of argument at this establishment has taken a downswing in the last couple days. I disagree. The level of argument has merely taken a turn for the better. Simplified quips mean a level of response that can be more easily ascertained and a rejoinder made in the spirit of efficiency. Surely this thread is now the epitome of a well thought out and delivered argument. |
| #93batshidoSep 15, 2008 15:02:19 | I disagree. The level of argument has merely taken a turn for the better. Simplified quips mean a level of response that can be more easily ascertained and a rejoinder made in the spirit of efficiency. Surely this thread is now the epitome of a well thought out and delivered argument. So, in other words; "smaller words and shorter posts make it easier for me to follow." Got it. ;) |
| #94kistraSep 15, 2008 15:10:44 | So, in other words; "smaller words and shorter posts make it easier for me to follow." No you are completely wrong. He was making fun of you for being overly fond of your own voice. |
| #95batshidoSep 15, 2008 15:14:03 | No you are completely wrong. He was making fun of you for being overly fond of your own voice. Tell me, when you look at your screen do you hear voices reading the text that's there? If that's the case, you probably want to make an appointment with a specialist. That sounds like something that medication should clear right up. |
| #96zombie_babiesSep 15, 2008 15:14:43 | Tell me, when you look at your screen do you hear voices reading the text that's there? I know a guy ... |
| #97kistraSep 15, 2008 15:17:01 | Tell me, when you look at your screen do you hear voices reading the text that's there? See, that is a perfect example of how much you love to hear your own voice. You could have just said (and any normal person would have said): Are you hallucinating? Get some meds! There, six words instead of forty-one with all the impact of the original put down. |
| #98batshidoSep 15, 2008 15:19:04 | I know a guy ... Really? Then why isn't he helping you? See, that is a perfect example of how much you love to hear your own voice. You could have just said (and any normal person would have said): That's just my original statement dumbed down. The original was much better, it was more eloquent and more flexible. This new version won't let me do any of the fun things I could with the old version. Epic Fail. |
| #99kistraSep 15, 2008 15:28:32 | That's just my original statement dumbed down. The original was much better, it was more eloquent and more flexible. This new version won't let me do any of the fun things I could with the old version. Epic Fail. Sorry, but you are the Epic Fail since you can't see the beauty in conciseness and that was the guys point. |
| #100batshidoSep 15, 2008 15:32:22 | Sorry, but you are the Epic Fail since you can't see the beauty in conciseness and that was the guys point. As someone who spent 50 words berating me about a 41 word post, you should probably be careful when you start pointing fingers. It's not my fault you're not well enough intellectually endowed to appreciate my posting style. Stick with your pile of "concise" failure for all I care. My way is obviously superior, and I've had thousands of people tell me so. |
| #101zombie_babiesSep 15, 2008 15:32:39 | Really? Then why isn't he helping you? He told me he's too busy workin' out all sorts of mommy issues with some schmuck named Batshido. I took a look at some session notes on this guy and all I can say is if you ever wondered what a child born of the hypothetical unholy union of the Marquis De Sade and Countess Elizabeth Báthory would act like, Batshido's your definitive example. That's one sick puppy. He even eats sick puppies! You ever heard of 'im? |
| #102kistraSep 15, 2008 15:42:47 | As someone who spent 50 words berating me about a 41 word post, you should probably be careful when you start pointing fingers. Unless you can name them all and provide me with contact information to verify your claims you are committing 10 different fallacies and shouldn't be pointing fingers about being poorly endowed intellectually. |
| #103paul_profession_bakerSep 15, 2008 15:48:29 | Wow, there I was just having fun. Now the argument is just getting to personal. Batshido : I like the style and the well turned phrases. DarkRaven18599 : I like the punch of you're concise statements. Well, I lack both since this is not my language. But I really hope you're not serious, I can't really tell. |
| #104batshidoSep 15, 2008 16:00:25 | He told me he's too busy workin' out all sorts of mommy issues with some schmuck named Batshido. I took a look at some session notes on this guy and all I can say is if you ever wondered what a child born of the hypothetical unholy union of the Marquis De Sade and Countess Elizabeth Báthory would act like, Batshido's your definitive example. That's one sick puppy. He even eats sick puppies! You ever heard of 'im? Are you sure he's a doctor and not just another member of your support group? Sounds like you and he might have more in common than you realize. Unless you can name them all and provide me with contact information to verify your claims you are committing 10 different fallacies and shouldn't be pointing fingers about being poorly endowed intellectually. What have I got to prove to you, exactly? You're obviously just a sockpuppet (or one of the voices in Z_B's head). But I really hope you're not serious, I can't really tell. Show ;) |
| #105zombie_babiesSep 15, 2008 16:24:39 | Are you sure he's a doctor and not just another member of your support group? Sounds like you and he might have more in common than you realize. Oh, I see how it's gonna be this time. Since you have nothing intelligent to say or anything to contribute beyond unwarranted snark, you'll attack my disability. Cute. Not that I expected more, of course, but it's still pretty weak. To put this in perspective (since you obviously are incapable of understanding without significant assistance), imagine if I - instead of dealing with what you had to say - attacked your incredible narcissism, outrageous delusions of grandeur, megalomania, cult-like worship of 4e, questionable past (and current) ties with Avengers and overall sociopathic typology. You can't help these things, can you? It's not your fault you've turned out this way, is it? So I will not stoop to your level, sir, and I won't attack your many varied and disturbing diabilites. I am above that because, unlike you, I have a respect for my fellow man. Even when he, such as yourself, is undeserving of said respect. |
| #106maulornSep 15, 2008 16:34:19 | Oh, I see how it's gonna be this time. Since you have nothing intelligent to say or anything to contribute beyond unwarranted snark, you'll attack my disability. Cute. Not that I expected more, of course, but it's still pretty weak. To put this in perspective (since you obviously are incapable of understanding without significant assistance), imagine if I - instead of dealing with what you had to say - attacked your incredible narcissism, outrageous delusions of grandeur, megalomania, cult-like worship of 4e, questionable past (and current) ties with Avengers and overall sociopathic typology. You can't help these things, can you? It's not your fault you've turned out this way, is it? So I will not stoop to your level, sir, and I won't attack your many varied and disturbing diabilites. I am above that because, unlike you, I have a respect for my fellow man. Even when he, such as yourself, is undeserving of said respect. Best paradox award. this is a flame-bait thread in the free for all part of the wizards of the coast forums, If i dig a hole, i either hit the bottom level of hell, or 4chan. I hit hell, so I will count myself lucky. Survey says... Mormon...Mormon was the religion you had to be to get into heaven. So heaven is going to be all about arts and crafts...and guess what... There is a shortage of chairs! |
| #107batshidoSep 15, 2008 16:51:45 | Oh, I see how it's gonna be this time. Since you have nothing intelligent to say or anything to contribute beyond unwarranted snark, you'll attack my disability. Cute. Not that I expected more, of course, but it's still pretty weak. To put this in perspective (since you obviously are incapable of understanding without significant assistance), imagine if I - instead of dealing with what you had to say - attacked your incredible narcissism, outrageous delusions of grandeur, megalomania, cult-like worship of 4e, questionable past (and current) ties with Avengers and overall sociopathic typology. You can't help these things, can you? It's not your fault you've turned out this way, is it? So I will not stoop to your level, sir, and I won't attack your many varied and disturbing diabilites. I am above that because, unlike you, I have a respect for my fellow man. Even when he, such as yourself, is undeserving of said respect. Show That one seemed appropriate, somehow. |
| #108inflictionSep 15, 2008 17:41:09 | Mormon...Mormon was the religion you had to be to get into heaven. So heaven is going to be all about arts and crafts...and guess what... Yes, but there are plenty of extra bicycles. |
| #109maulornSep 15, 2008 17:42:47 | Yes, but there are plenty of extra bicycles. unicycles... |
| #110baneofelvesSep 15, 2008 19:17:41 | Surely you jest! The moon is made of green cheese as any fool knows! That's what the FOOLS know. However, intellegent folk like meself know it's made of chocolate. :P |
| #111darkraven18599Sep 15, 2008 23:20:13 | That's what the FOOLS know. However, intellegent folk like meself know it's made of chocolate. :P It cannot be made of chocolate for surely the nighttime starry fairies would of eaten it by now if it was. The moon is made of moldy green cheese for the proof is in that the fairies have not eaten it yet. |
| #112baneofelvesSep 15, 2008 23:30:21 | LIES! EVERYONE WITH SENSE KNOWS THAT THE NIGHTTIME STARRY FAIRIES ARE POISONED BY CHOCOLATE! |
| #113darkraven18599Sep 15, 2008 23:32:50 | He told me he's too busy workin' out all sorts of mommy issues with some schmuck named Batshido. I took a look at some session notes on this guy and all I can say is if you ever wondered what a child born of the hypothetical unholy union of the Marquis De Sade and Countess Elizabeth Báthory would act like, Batshido's your definitive example. That's one sick puppy. He even eats sick puppies! You ever heard of 'im? It's quite apparent that the man in question is a doctor for only a doctor could come up with something that while it makes absolutely no sense is full of excess jargon that nobody needs. Well, besides a lawyer. And Zombie_Babies has nothing in common with him as he is completely insane and doctors must by definition be sane. Unless you can name them all and provide me with contact information to verify your claims you are committing 10 different fallacies and shouldn't be pointing fingers about being poorly endowed intellectually. Kistra is clearly not a sockpuppet as they lack the use of hands to type out a written response on the computer as well as a central nervous system to read and comprehend the responses of a visual medium on the computer screen. And if she was a voice in Z_B's head I'm sure the medication would of stopped her by now. And as you can plainly see by using an overly verbose and florid display of vernacular I have accomplished nothing that could not have been done much more simply if I had just made use of a laconic answer. Surely you must see that a simple response is the way to go instead of pounding out keystroke after keystroke of useless typing. That method merely takes up too much room on a thread and does nothing but bog down and hamper the potential quick read-throughs that would otherwise occur. ![]() ![]() and also ![]() (I just think the dancin' one is cute...) |
| #114darkraven18599Sep 15, 2008 23:35:34 | LIES! EVERYONE WITH SENSE KNOWS THAT THE NIGHTTIME STARRY FAIRIES ARE POISONED BY CHOCOLATE! Fool! Not if they have the antidote from the higgleypuffs that live on the sun's rays! The nighttime starry fairies must have surely brokered a deal between themselves and the higgleypuffs through a neutral third party like....oh, I don't know....ummm, badgers? |
| #115squarecircleSep 16, 2008 1:39:26 | As someone who spent 50 words berating me about a 41 word post, you should probably be careful when you start pointing fingers. You. Suck. |
| #116knights_discipleSep 16, 2008 3:15:36 | You. Suck. No, You. |
| #117darkraven18599Sep 16, 2008 5:41:24 | No, You. Au contraire, I believe the title of suck falls squarely on your shoulders. |
| #118paul_profession_bakerSep 16, 2008 5:55:05 | This thread is getting sucked in a whole new dimension of argument. |
| #119darkraven18599Sep 16, 2008 6:08:19 | This thread is getting sucked in a whole new dimension of argument. I would have to agree to disagree with that statement. As you can clearly read back into this thread the context of arguments is find as long as one completely agrees with the OP. After all, ADHadh is most assuredly correct. |
| #120goblin_prideSep 16, 2008 6:16:53 | Fool! Not if they have the antidote from the higgleypuffs that live on the sun's rays! The nighttime starry fairies must have surely brokered a deal between themselves and the higgleypuffs through a neutral third party like....oh, I don't know....ummm, badgers? Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' Badgers.... |
| #121knights_discipleSep 16, 2008 6:19:51 | Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' Badgers.... But we will be teaching Poodles how to fly. |
| #122goblin_prideSep 16, 2008 6:24:00 | But we will be teaching Poodles how to fly. Mine was from Treasure of the Sierra Madre. Yours was UHF, wasn't it? |
| #123knights_discipleSep 16, 2008 6:33:26 | Mine was from Treasure of the Sierra Madre. Yours was UHF, wasn't it? ...Yes. Also, don't you know the Dewey Decimal System? |
| #124goblin_prideSep 16, 2008 6:37:18 | ...Yes. Nope. I guess it's good I'm not a librarian. |
| #125darkraven18599Sep 16, 2008 7:18:16 | Badgers? We don't need no stinkin' Badgers.... We most certainly do need badgers. For without badgers who would there be to keep toads, rats, and moles from becoming too embroiled in idiotic adventures to recapture dilapidated manor homes from weasels? |
| #126batshidoSep 16, 2008 8:15:47 | We most certainly do need badgers. For without badgers who would there be to keep toads, rats, and moles from becoming too embroiled in idiotic adventures to recapture dilapidated manor homes from weasels? Hawks. |
| #127knights_discipleSep 16, 2008 8:29:50 | Hawks. And Eagles. |
| #128zombie_babiesSep 16, 2008 8:34:20 | Hawks. And Eagles. Snakes. |
| #129batshidoSep 16, 2008 8:52:32 | Snakes. You would go there, wouldn't you? |
| #130zombie_babiesSep 16, 2008 9:10:34 | You would go there, wouldn't you? Well someone had to. You can pussyfoot around the real answers all you like but I refuse to deny the truth. If that's a fault then I'm glad to have it. |
| #131knights_discipleSep 16, 2008 9:14:09 | Well someone had to. You can pussyfoot around the real answers all you like but I refuse to deny the truth. If that's a fault then I'm glad to have it. *Racks round into shotgun* I am tired of these snakes on this board! Rah! *Charges in firing at snakes, but not Z_B* |
| #132batshidoSep 16, 2008 9:27:40 | Well someone had to. You can pussyfoot around the real answers all you like but I refuse to deny the truth. If that's a fault then I'm glad to have it. There's a difference between forthright and being overtly pro-snake. You, sir or madam, are clearly the latter. We don't take kindly to your kind around here. Begone, lest I use my Svengali-like control over the moderation team to ban you permanently and light your computer on fire via the internet. |
| #133knights_discipleSep 16, 2008 9:36:20 | There's a difference between forthright and being overtly pro-snake. You, sir or madam, are clearly the latter. We don't take kindly to your kind around here. Begone, lest I use my Svengali-like control over the moderation team to ban you permanently and light your computer on fire via the internet. *Nods* Let it be known that the Bats are united as one on this. (If that doesn't make sense, look at my sig, and it will) |
| #134kistraSep 16, 2008 9:37:57 | There's a difference between forthright and being overtly pro-snake. You, sir or madam, are clearly the latter. We don't take kindly to your kind around here. Begone, lest I use my Svengali-like control over the moderation team to ban you permanently and light your computer on fire via the internet. See now you are just letting your anti-snake tendencies show through and feed your conspiracy theories. Give it a break. No one actually takes you seriously any more. Entertain us! Come up with some more wacky ideas like that one, please! |
| #135zombie_babiesSep 16, 2008 9:38:42 | There's a difference between forthright and being overtly pro-snake. You, sir or madam, are clearly the latter. We don't take kindly to your kind around here. Begone, lest I use my Svengali-like control over the moderation team to ban you permanently and light your computer on fire via the internet. Whoa man, let's slow down a minute here. Where the hell did I mention that I'm pro-snake? Understanding that the snake is a viable option for whatever it was we were discussing in no way shows any pro-snake leaning. Again, it's the truth I'm posting - nothing more. I don't even care that you're anti-snake. Just don't go puttin' words in my mouth. Just try to remember that not everyone here is like you. Not everyone here has an agenda. I must add that I am in no way surprised by your threats of seeking moderation against me. It's well known that the company that owns these forums is totally anti-snake and, with your recent comments, I must assume that you work for them. Go ahead and cry to your boss to get me banned. It won't change the fact that I'm right and you're just a shill. |
| #136ADHadhSep 16, 2008 11:27:22 | Oh, you're all anti-snake now, huh? Well, that is simply discrimination of the people born in a certain Chinese year! This thread should be closed because of annualism and not respecting the OP. |
| #137kistraSep 16, 2008 14:00:56 | Oh, you're all anti-snake now, huh? Well, that is simply discrimination of the people born in a certain Chinese year! This thread should be closed because of annualism and not respecting the OP. Dude, just chill out. No one is anti-snake either. You are completely overreacting and it is all confirmation bias on your part. We are just discussing the fact that snakes are a viable option with advantages and disadvantages, just like badgers. |
| #138squarecircleSep 16, 2008 14:31:30 | Whoa man, let's slow down a minute here. Where the hell did I mention that I'm pro-snake? Understanding that the snake is a viable option for whatever it was we were discussing in no way shows any pro-snake leaning. Again, it's the truth I'm posting - nothing more. I don't even care that you're anti-snake. Just don't go puttin' words in my mouth. Just try to remember that not everyone here is like you. Not everyone here has an agenda. ROFL from laughter |
| #139darkraven18599Sep 16, 2008 19:07:32 | Snakes are better than Badgers. There, I said it. Deal with it. |
| #140goblin_prideSep 17, 2008 6:50:48 | Dude, just chill out. No one is anti-snake either. You are completely overreacting and it is all confirmation bias on your part. We are just discussing the fact that snakes are a viable option with advantages and disadvantages, just like badgers. We still don't need no stinkin' badgers..... |
| #141ADHadhSep 17, 2008 6:53:07 | We still don't need no stinkin' badgers..... I have to disagree. There might be a good eating on one of those. Especially if you're a large enough snake. |
| #142doomsoughtSep 17, 2008 10:56:07 | I have to say that you are wrong, you, intact, do not disagree. |
| #143kistraSep 17, 2008 11:52:27 | I have to say that you are wrong, you, intact, do not disagree. Are you implying that he would only disagree if he was first dismembered? Prove that he isn't. Otherwise you are just making random assumptions about people and then basing your posts on those assumptions. |
| #144goblin_prideSep 17, 2008 17:28:14 | Are you implying that he would only disagree if he was first dismembered? Ooh, post videos. I can sell those to the gov't and get wads of cash as a reward for turning you in as a religious zealot. |
| #145boj0Sep 18, 2008 8:45:42 | LOUD NOISES!!!!! |
| #146knights_discipleSep 18, 2008 9:51:37 | LOUD NOISES!!!!! Shush! Quiet on the set! |
| #147doomsoughtSep 18, 2008 19:52:10 | there is no t, it is effffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff! |
| #148baneofelvesSep 18, 2008 20:21:42 | MUSTA-KRAKISH!!! Anyone get the reference? You're losers if you don't. Don't argue with me, I'm always right. |
| #149goblin_prideSep 19, 2008 8:32:14 | Don't argue with me, I'm always right. Modest too. |
| #150ADHadhSep 19, 2008 12:16:54 | Don't argue with me, I'm always right. Spoilsport. |
| #151baneofelvesSep 20, 2008 14:31:55 | Modest too. Well, I'd say I was modest, but I got in an argument with a friend of mine over that and lost. Aw, crap. Well, we all now know I lied. Eh, whatever. Does anyone get the Musta-Krakish thing? Does anyone else here listen to Dethklok? I mean, c'mon. |
| #152doomsoughtSep 20, 2008 18:51:07 | Well I'd be a modest megalomaniac... you all seem to have been set on fire! whats this? an empty can of napalm? How did that get in my hands? |
| #153baneofelvesSep 21, 2008 20:51:01 | That's not napalm! |
| #154boj0Sep 21, 2008 23:44:38 | That's not napalm! Thats your mother's deodorant!! BURN! compliments of the Human Torch ![]() |
| #155knights_discipleSep 22, 2008 0:14:19 | Thats your mother's deodorant!! Iceman would like a word. |
| #156squarecircleSep 22, 2008 0:51:19 | Iceman would like a word. Iceman's got nothin' on the Human Torch. The Human Torch takes on villians like Doctor Doom every day. Who does Iceman face? Weaklings like Magneto, that's who. |
| #157doomsoughtSep 22, 2008 20:07:47 | Do you think you are man enough to click this link? |
| #158baneofelvesSep 22, 2008 23:16:13 | Thats your mother's deodorant!! my mom doesn't wear deodorant |
| #159baneofelvesSep 22, 2008 23:18:22 | Doomsought, I hate you. |
| #160squarecircleSep 23, 2008 2:31:51 | Do you think you are man enough to click this link? What a sexist question. |
| #161ADHadhSep 23, 2008 8:43:13 | What a sexist question. Yeah, it should have been "Are you bad dude enough to click this link?". |
| #162squarecircleSep 23, 2008 10:56:11 | Yeah, it should have been "Are you bad dude enough to click this link?". It still assumes the reader is male, which I find revolting. And the original question played on sexism in more ways than that, by exuding the machoism which is inherently sexist. Are you defending such vile behavior? How repulsive. |
| #163knights_discipleSep 23, 2008 11:46:39 | It still assumes the reader is male, which I find revolting. And the original question played on sexism in more ways than that, by exuding the machoism which is inherently sexist. Are you defending such vile behavior? How repulsive. Clearly you're the sexist here. You're just projecting your hidden feelings upon the quote. The quote itself does not use "dude" in the literal sense, but in the metaphorical sense, of a state of being. I'm sure if they had used "dude/dudette" you would have still found something to complain about. Even the original isn't sexist. After all, humans are often called "mankind", and it's clearly calling upong that meaning of the word "man" here. |
| #164squarecircleSep 23, 2008 12:33:26 | Clearly you're the sexist here. And how, exactly, am I the sexist? You clearly don't know what you're talking about, and this is just some last ditch effort to save face and turn me into the "bad guy." You'd like that, wouldn't you? Well, it's not going to happen. I'm clearly in the right, and you're just sour about it. You're probably just trying to troll me because I pointed out the fact that your precious Iceman is inferior to the Human Torch. Got an agenda, much? Yeah, I see right through you. You're just projecting your hidden feelings upon the quote. You'd like it if that were the case. What a weak defense you've mustered up. Smear the person you're attacking. How "noble" of you. The quote itself does not use "dude" in the literal sense, but in the metaphorical sense, of a state of being. I wasn't talking about that one so much as the original, but I'm sure you knew that. Yet another vain attempt to shift the argument. Only a sign that you've already lost, of course. I'm sure if they had used "dude/dudette" you would have still found something to complain about. Oh, whatever. Sure, make up an example that is clumsy on the tongue to support your point. What a straw man. Totally overlooking the fact that you know darn well the quote could have simply said, "Are you brave enough to click this link," and get the full meaning across without being clumsy or sexist. But it's easy to overlook obvious solutions like that when you're just trying to hide the fact that you're sexist, isn't it? Even the original isn't sexist. After all, humans are often called "mankind", and it's clearly calling upong that meaning of the word "man" here. No, it's not the same at all, as saying, "Are you man enough," evokes macho-ism, whereas terms like "mankind" do not. And in this day in age, we've evolved to say things like "humankind." Looks like you're so sexist that you aren't even up with the times. How sad. |
| #165baneofelvesSep 23, 2008 14:33:19 | So was anyone else dumb enough to click the link? |
| #166ADHadhSep 23, 2008 15:20:53 | So was anyone else dumb enough to click the link? Maybe it should have been stated "Shaft enough", as that was probably the original meaning. Click to check. |
| #167fenrir7139Sep 24, 2008 16:48:03 | So was anyone else dumb enough to click the link? *Raises Hand* ![]() |
| #168squarecircleSep 24, 2008 16:51:21 | I see my opponent has run away from the argument. Typical. |
| #169doomsoughtSep 24, 2008 18:26:00 | Oh, what is this? The ants are swarming about my feet, I had not noticed. |
| #170baneofelvesSep 24, 2008 23:08:05 | I see my opponent has run away from the argument. Typical. Then you win. |
| #171knights_discipleSep 24, 2008 23:37:26 | I see my opponent has run away from the argument. Typical. Run away, or plotting for something larger..... ![]() |
| #172goblin_prideSep 27, 2008 9:52:08 | Run away, or plotting for something larger..... Sun Tzu did say to fight on your own terms. |