| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 14:31:27 | I hates you to death. Every last one of you. |
| #2krownhunter07Apr 17, 2009 14:34:16 | Why? |
| #3baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 14:36:16 | Cuz I can. :P |
| #4krownhunter07Apr 17, 2009 14:38:38 | I could stab out the eyes of every person that looked at me... that, in no way, means that it is a good idea to do so. So much hate is bad for the digestive tract, here, have some Tums. |
| #5baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 14:40:56 | Well, you only have one black eye, so I can tell you again. :P EDIT: this is all a joke. I can't tell if you're taking me seriously or just running with it. |
| #6stompie5Apr 17, 2009 15:26:39 | I know you don't hate midnightpoison. |
| #7KillerGMApr 17, 2009 15:28:58 | Well, I hate you too. Well, not really, I can't muster enough to care about you, either way. But I will enjoy killing your character. ;) |
| #8baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 15:30:12 | Did I say that "I hate all you guyz and galz?" No. I just said guys. I love all of the ladies here. It's just the dudes that suck. GIT OUTTA HERE! You're cramping my style! |
| #9KillerGMApr 17, 2009 15:34:52 | Did I say that "I hate all you guyz and galz?" No. I just said guys. I love all of the ladies here. It's just the dudes that suck. GIT OUTTA HERE! You're cramping my style! Congratulations. Now I hate you. |
| #10baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 15:36:48 | ![]() VICTORY! Now everyone here hates me! :D I'm guessing that you're going to find some especially nasty way to kill my character now, huh? I mean, even worse than you had originally planned. Also.... *whines about PHB only materials* :P |
| #11KillerGMApr 17, 2009 15:39:42 | Nope, not really. You'll probably die of starvation or some other minute detail you didn't account for. EDIT: Meh, I'm back to apathy again. |
| #12baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 15:41:15 | Well, I got food, blankets, water, sources of light, stuff like that. But hey, death by starvation is kewl. |
| #13baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 15:44:35 | EDIT: Meh, I'm back to apathy again. Dammit. |
| #14KillerGMApr 17, 2009 15:46:56 | *shrugs* I just have other targets more worthy of my hatred. |
| #15baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 15:47:59 | Like who? I want to know who I should emulate! |
| #16KillerGMApr 17, 2009 15:50:48 | Nobody on the forums. Actually, now that I think about it, I don't hate anyone in particular at the moment. I'm a pretty low-hate kind of person. Which is weird because I rant all the time. |
| #17baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 15:52:19 | Yeah, you do rant a lot. You're an oddball. Which is what makes you interesting and fun. |
| #18EscherEnigmaApr 17, 2009 16:07:47 | Ah, I don't hate you Bane. I just think you're an angsty teen that will hopefully grow out of it before you're legally allowed to buy guns and beer. |
| #19baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 16:09:55 | Hahahahaha. That'll never happen. Also, I HAVE a gun. Already. And a crossbow. And I'm pretty good with 'em. Watch out, world. I'm coming to get you. ![]() |
| #20EscherEnigmaApr 17, 2009 16:15:33 | See, you're the kind of person that if I knew face-to-face would have me practicing in front of the mirror every morning "But officer, he was always such a nice boy." |
| #21goblin_prideApr 17, 2009 16:18:12 | See, you're the kind of person that if I knew face-to-face would have me practicing in front of the mirror every morning "But officer, he was always such a nice boy." Teaching yourself to lie on camera? |
| #22baneofelvesApr 17, 2009 16:18:52 | ![]() I don't mean most of the stuff I say on here. I turn the rational part of my brain off on this website. If I didn't, I'd be boring. |
| #23cherubaddonApr 17, 2009 16:22:38 | You're really bored bane, aren't you? Well, I am as well. Still, hating doesn't make it better. In fact, [insert generic preaching here]. That's why I play Solitaire to wait for people to post on the boards. You should try it. I know it sounds goofy, but it's actually a good stress reliever. Off-topic derail @EscherEnigma: I see you did update your sig. Now that you've told me about it, I think it's pretty damn funny, but do you think many people will get it? Most people will just think, "ah well, he resides in an ivory tower." Whatever. I like it . |
| #24MacariusApr 17, 2009 16:27:01 | ![]() |
| #25EscherEnigmaApr 17, 2009 16:27:35 | I'm just waiting for me to get reported for having derogatory speech in my sig. |
| #26goblin_prideApr 17, 2009 16:31:01 | I'm just waiting for me to get reported for having derogatory speech in my sig. Their censor program didn't catch it and you're being derogatory towards yourself. If you get reported, I'd ask why. |
| #27cherubaddonApr 17, 2009 16:37:56 | Also, I think Resident has too many "normal" meanings for it to get censored. Seriously, how many people whom you didn't tell about it understood it so far? |
| #28goblin_prideApr 17, 2009 16:39:12 | Also, I think Resident has too many "normal" meanings for it to get censored. Seriously, how many people whom you didn't tell about it understood it so far? Heck, most of mail comes addressed that way. Occupant is my neighbor. |
| #29zakhari_dupApr 17, 2009 17:00:15 | Love you too jackass. ![]() |
| #30ADHadhApr 17, 2009 17:38:00 | Know what bane? I have not a single emotion associated with your name. I'm indifferent to your hate :P Actually I've barely noticed it. |
| #31pigknightApr 17, 2009 17:38:55 | Hey, you stole my line. |
| #32krownhunter07Apr 17, 2009 17:41:41 | I stole a guys line once... he wasn't happy, BUT I WAZ! |
| #33awesome_dudeApr 18, 2009 12:24:06 | I hate everyone. But you knew that. |
| #34crofterApr 18, 2009 13:17:12 | I, on the other hand, hate no one. I have tried a few times, but so far no success. I am not sure what I should think of it. |
| #35cherubaddonApr 18, 2009 13:37:22 | Same for me. The worst I can feel for someone is uncaring. |
| #36goblin_prideApr 18, 2009 15:31:51 | I don't care enough to hate anyone. |
| #37bob_loblawApr 18, 2009 17:10:32 | ![]() |
| #38baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 13:48:08 | ![]() Yes, yes, more suffering! I feed upon the tears of children! |
| #39Lord_VentnorApr 19, 2009 14:40:39 | Aw, I don't hate you, bane! ![]() Unless you're still a baby-eating arsonist. Then... Carbonite gets you!!! ![]() |
| #40The_White_SorcererApr 19, 2009 14:46:21 | Did I say that "I hate all you guyz and galz?" No. I just said guys. I love all of the ladies here. It's just the dudes that suck. GIT OUTTA HERE! You're cramping my style! Hmm... If only you were pigknight... Though I don't want you loving me, either, thank you very much. |
| #41baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 14:48:03 | Pfft. Only losers like Han Solo fall for that trick. You'll never get me. |
| #42Lord_VentnorApr 19, 2009 14:56:32 | That is what you think. Truth is, you're already gotten!!! :evillaugh |
| #43baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 15:06:55 | Nah, that was a clone. |
| #44Ragnar_LodbrokApr 19, 2009 19:44:08 | *snaps BoE's neck and sets the corpse on fire* Don't worry, Steve, I hatez you too :D . |
| #45baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 20:05:10 | Nah, that was a clone |
| #46powerattackfortwentyApr 19, 2009 20:40:17 | hmmm, I hate you you hate me Lets get together and kill barney |
| #47baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 20:46:04 | Alright. *grabs various weaponry* Let's go. |
| #48dirtyfrankApr 19, 2009 21:02:38 | What's this thread about? |
| #49baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 21:05:04 | I have no idea, to be honest. |
| #50dirtyfrankApr 19, 2009 21:06:04 | Then why'd you start it? |
| #51baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 21:14:04 | Boredom |
| #52goblin_prideApr 19, 2009 22:11:00 | Boredom That seems to be a recurring theme, doesn't it? |
| #53dirtyfrankApr 19, 2009 22:17:05 | Boredom killed the nerd. Or did it kill the cat? I guess that's if you assume a cat is curious because it's bored. |
| #54Lord_VentnorApr 19, 2009 22:53:30 | TROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLLTROLL |
| #55goblin_prideApr 19, 2009 23:19:43 | Is that what "trolling" is? Seems kinda silly to make that a CoC violation... |
| #56baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 23:21:56 | No, trolling is what people like Rant_Casey and Psychotic_Robot do. Lord Ventnor is just screwing around, that's not trolling. |
| #57dirtyfrankApr 19, 2009 23:23:52 | Trolling and baiting are just fishing terms. What fishing has to do with forums and the internet, I don't know. |
| #58goblin_prideApr 19, 2009 23:25:40 | Trolling and baiting are just fishing terms. What fishing has to do with forums and the internet, I don't know. That seems a bit outdoorsy for a bunch of computer geeks, doesn't it? |
| #59pigknightApr 19, 2009 23:26:34 | Well furries sometimes are outdoors... |
| #60baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 23:33:10 | Well furries sometimes are outdoors... WILL. YOU. SHUT. UP. ABOUT. THOSE. DAMN. FURRIES. I do not want one of my threads to be tainted by them! |
| #61dirtyfrankApr 19, 2009 23:35:57 | That seems a bit outdoorsy for a bunch of computer geeks, doesn't it? It does. |
| #62pigknightApr 19, 2009 23:36:16 | Apparantly today is furry day. |
| #63EscherEnigmaApr 19, 2009 23:36:39 | This is the internet. It's tainted by far worse then furries. It's tainted by... military research. Ah, who am I kidding. My job depends on military research. Yay military research! Even if it does occasionally go towards researching the viability of a 'gay gas'. |
| #64pigknightApr 19, 2009 23:38:26 | Achmed: The Americans are bombing! *bombs fall* Achmed: Muhammed? Muhammed: Heeeeeey! Achmed: *Falls to knees* NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! |
| #65dirtyfrankApr 19, 2009 23:38:37 | What is "gay gas"? |
| #66baneofelvesApr 19, 2009 23:40:02 | Gay gas? ![]() |
| #67EscherEnigmaApr 19, 2009 23:41:10 | I don't feel like digging up the article, but the US Army was researching the viability of an airborne mind-affecting agent that would cause men to be so obsessed with sex that they would stop fighting and start GLEEMAX!ing each other instead. The idea was eventually discarded as infeasable, but it was researched for quite a while. Doesn't that make you feel good about those taxes you filed? |
| #68pigknightApr 19, 2009 23:41:16 | @DF: Look at my post under Escher's. |
| #69pigknightApr 19, 2009 23:42:16 | I don't feel like digging up the article, but the US Army was researching the viability of an airborne mind-affecting agent that would cause men to be so obsessed with sex that they would stop fighting and start GLEEMAX!ing each other instead. Just drop a few porno magazines, guys will drops their guns and whip out their "other guns". |
| #70dirtyfrankApr 19, 2009 23:43:31 | I don't feel like digging up the article, but the US Army was researching the viability of an airborne mind-affecting agent that would cause men to be so obsessed with sex that they would stop fighting and start GLEEMAX!ing each other instead. Sure. It would be a somewhat peaceful way of ending some wars. ;) |
| #71EscherEnigmaApr 19, 2009 23:48:04 | ... I know you guys are being silly, so I'm just gonna have to ignore this until you get on a different topic, so I don't have to lecture you. Oh, look, a distraction!. |
| #72Lord_VentnorApr 19, 2009 23:48:08 | Sure. It would be a somewhat peaceful way of ending some wars. ;) ... Yeah, no. At least, not if you have a dangerously overactive mind's eye that you've tried to stab out on more than one occasion... ![]() |
| #73pigknightApr 19, 2009 23:48:55 | Who likes pie? |
| #74dirtyfrankApr 19, 2009 23:52:17 | Oh, look, a distraction!. Trying to distract pigknight? |
| #75pigknightApr 19, 2009 23:53:19 | I'm just using tabs. |
| #76goblin_prideApr 20, 2009 0:25:27 | I'm just using tabs. Leaving yourself a hand free, eh? |
| #77turalisjApr 20, 2009 0:34:44 | Their censor program didn't catch it and you're being derogatory towards yourself. If you get reported, I'd ask why. Because this is the WotC forums. |
| #78zakhari_dupApr 20, 2009 0:51:52 | Hail to the furries! |
| #79baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 0:54:28 | SILENCE! SILENCE, YOU FOOL!! I'm assuming that you're new here. I'll fill you in. I am the resident psycho that just says ****. Everyone else is boring. I'm the heart of this place. :D |
| #80zakhari_dupApr 20, 2009 0:55:56 | Oh? Sounds delicious... ![]() |
| #81baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 0:58:42 | EscherEnigma is the resident normal person that isn't boring. Dirtyfrank and Zombie Babies are the corrupting influences. PigKnight tries to be the star of attention, and has tons of weird fetishes. So you can just call him fetish boy. It really makes him mad, but it's hella funny. Minja is the resident guy pretending to be a girl on the internet. |
| #82zakhari_dupApr 20, 2009 1:03:47 | So a fetish loner, a transvestite and a pair of corrupt stalkers walk into a bar... No, stop me if you've heard this one. |
| #83baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 1:08:58 | HEY! YOU FORGOT TO PUT ME IN THE JOKE ***DAMMIT! YOU SUCK! WHERE IS THE UNREASONABLY ANGRY PERSON IN THE JOKE?! WELL?! ![]() |
| #84zakhari_dupApr 20, 2009 1:10:05 | Don't worry, you're the punch line of the joke. ;) |
| #85baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 1:12:23 | "Punch" Line? Yes...that sounds like me. So, let's hear the rest of the joke, then. |
| #86zakhari_dupApr 20, 2009 1:13:46 | But you already did. Didn't you like it? |
| #87baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 1:14:45 | So, when they walk into "A bar" you meant my fist? I like that joke! You're kewl man, you're kewl |
| #88zakhari_dupApr 20, 2009 1:17:46 | Thank you. Thank you. I do what I can. |
| #89baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 1:19:05 | I still hate you, though. |
| #90zakhari_dupApr 20, 2009 1:21:05 | That's okay. I have a low opinion of you anyway. *******! |
| #91turalisjApr 20, 2009 7:50:09 | Aw, I don't hate you, bane! What about a drow-eating arsonist? You've never seen anything funny until you've seen the Underdark turned into the multiplanes' largest bbq pit. :D |
| #92s-marrowApr 20, 2009 7:57:25 | ...I don't hate you, turalisj... but I now would feel moderately uncomfortable standing within a 30ft radius of you. |
| #93turalisjApr 20, 2009 8:16:21 | Why? You aren't drow related are you? ((my WotC persona has always been that of a bronze dragon with a strong taste for drow)) |
| #94s-marrowApr 20, 2009 9:20:43 | I'm 1/32 drow on my mother's side. Well, I suppose it's a little bit better if it's purely from a predatory standpoint instead of cannibalization....actually, does it count as cannibalization for, say, a dwarf to eat a drow? Unless a dwarf could reproduce with a drow they wouldn't be biologically the same species, I suppose...not going to go down this line of thought any further. |
| #95zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 10:04:16 | I gave this thread one star. Suck it. |
| #96awesome_dudeApr 20, 2009 11:01:49 | I did too, but mostly because Goober or whatever his name is thinks adding zs to the end of words, using poor grammar and pretending he's not a horny teenager is funny ("A HURF DURF I WILL KILL YOU *SMILEY* *FURRY ROLEPLAY*"), and yet has the almighty gall to declare me unfunny when I make fun of Somalian pirates. The persecution is just starting, Goofy. |
| #97zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 11:35:30 | I did too, but mostly because Goober or whatever his name is thinks adding zs to the end of words, using poor grammar and pretending he's not a horny teenager is funny ("A HURF DURF I WILL KILL YOU *SMILEY* *FURRY ROLEPLAY*"), and yet has the almighty gall to declare me unfunny when I make fun of Somalian pirates. I gave this post ^^ four stars. Suck that, too. |
| #98EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 11:54:44 | EscherEnigma is the resident normal person that isn't boring. I'm normal? |
| #99baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 12:34:27 | @ Zombie_Babies: Eh, whatever. @ Awesome Dude: Yeah, it's really funny to make fun of situations where people are dying/could potentially die. Haha. You've made tasteless jokes like that before, and you aren't funny. @EscherEnigma: You're the most normal person that I know on the forums. Does that disappoint you? |
| #100EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 12:45:13 | ... just confused. But I'm not sure what itemizing the myriad ways in which I'm abnornal (for all the groups in which I could be labeled as a member) would accomplish. |
| #101baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 12:47:32 | I just gave this thread one star! Suck it! Oh..wait. But anyways. EE, you're one of the normal people here. You aren't a corrupting influence, you aren't completely ****ing insane.....you're normal. |
| #102zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 12:48:06 | ... just confused. But I'm not sure what itemizing the myriad ways in which I'm abnornal (for all the groups in which I could be labeled as a member) would accomplish. It would be a good read. That's something this thread is lacking. So you'd be elevating this ... whatever ... to something entertaining. |
| #103baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 12:53:04 | It would be a good read. That's something this thread is lacking. So you'd be elevating this ... whatever ... to something entertaining. I just made it because I was bored. I didn't think that anyone would bother responding to it. *shrug* I just did it cuz I felt like it. And it wasn't my intent to make this thread entertaining. |
| #104zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 12:56:17 | It shows, Presto. It shows. ;) :P |
| #105baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 12:59:20 | So Rant, I noticed that you haven't been trolling lately. What's up? I thought you had to show your undying hate of 4E. |
| #106zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 13:00:17 | Yeah, about that. Turns out I like 4e ok. It's not terrible. Who'da thunk? |
| #107baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 13:03:46 | Is that why you just vanished from the 4E section, Rant? But your posts were so funny! (And completely off the mark!) |
| #108turalisjApr 20, 2009 13:07:42 | But anyways. EE, you're one of the normal people here. You aren't a corrupting influence, you aren't completely ****ing insane.....you're normal. Am I in the first option, second option, or a third unknown one? :D *insert remark about 4th edition ruining dnd* |
| #109zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 13:08:36 | Is that why you just vanished from the 4E section, Rant? They were not. They were 100% cereal and true and you know it. You scoff now because you failed to properly defend your position then. Rewriting history to suit yourself and remove the shame I placed upon you during the intellectual thrashing you suffered at my fingertips. Gerbil lover. |
| #110baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 13:11:49 | They were not. They were 100% cereal and true and you know it. You scoff now because you failed to properly defend your position then. Rewriting history to suit yourself and remove the shame I placed upon you during the intellectual thrashing you suffered at my fingertips. Gerbil lover. Umm..Rant. I just lurked in the 4E general section at the time. I just read your posts and laughed. I felt no need to "defend my position" I never talked to you on your puppet account. |
| #111zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 13:24:36 | Umm..Rant. I just lurked in the 4E general section at the time. I just read your posts and laughed. I felt no need to "defend my position" So you admit to fearing confrontation, then? Yeah, that's better. I suppose something can be said for you realizing that your position was indefensible and keepin' your trap shut, though. I guess my words dazzled you into silence. Tell me, Presto, are you certain that you were laughing? I'd not be surprised at all if you were choking back sobs of agony at my dismantling of your 4e sycophant compatriots' arguments. How does it feel to know you're playing an inferior game but can't go back to 3.5 without admitting how wrong you were? I bet it feels bad, Presto. Real bad. Crisco abuser. |
| #112EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 13:30:18 | It would be a good read. That's something this thread is lacking. So you'd be elevating this ... whatever ... to something entertaining. Meh. I'm a homosexual who isn't gay, an agnostic that doesn't have a chip on his shoulder about religion, a college student that isn't part of the college student crowd, a gamer that has the rules understanding of the rules lawyer but the interest in RP typical to the, well, roleplayer. I wear cowboy boots because I think they're comfortable and could look like a high school student if I shaved my beard, my personal politics are unhinged on many issues from my registered party, I just like them a little bit better then the other guys. I'm an American that has read quite a bit about world history, a computer programmer that writes and draws. I'm considering going to grad school to learn to be a librarian as a career (ain't that odd all on it's own?). Um, I can speak enough Spanish to get by, and enough that if I ever spent a few weeks in a Spanish speaking country without other English speakers around I would pick up the rest pretty quickly... Oh yeah, and I think I'm better then everyone else, but have decided to go with noblese oblige instead of condescension. I enjoy teaching people new things, but like it even more when they can teach me something new in-kind. |
| #113baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 13:31:12 | So you admit to fearing confrontation, then? Yeah, that's better. No Rant, I didn't argue with you because it's impossible to reason with fanbois. And I was laughing my ass off, not choking and crying. All you ever did was say "$E is teh suxx0rz!" |
| #114baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 13:33:05 | Meh. I'm a homosexual who isn't gay, an agnostic that doesn't have a chip on his shoulder about religion, a college student that isn't part of the college student crowd, a gamer that has the rules understanding of the rules lawyer but the interest in RP typical to the, well, roleplayer. I wear cowboy boots because I think they're comfortable and could look like a high school student if I shaved my beard, my personal politics are unhinged on many issues from my registered party, I just like them a little bit better then the other guys. I'm an American that has read quite a bit about world history, a computer programmer that writes and draws. I'm considering going to grad school to learn to be a librarian as a career (ain't that odd all on it's own?). Um, I can speak enough Spanish to get by, and enough that if I ever spent a few weeks in a Spanish speaking country without other English speakers around I would pick up the rest pretty quickly... You just sound talented: not strange. And a bit indifferent, as well. |
| #115zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 13:38:55 | No Rant, I didn't argue with you because it's impossible to reason with fanbois. Nope. You're just skeered. Pansy. @EE: See? Now there's an interesting post to read. Not that pretending to be another poster just to insult bane (even though he knows that's exactly what's happening) wasn't interesting ... oh wait ... it wasn't ... ;) I give my most recent posts in this thread two stars. Suck it. |
| #116EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 13:39:16 | Talented is strange, but that wasn't really the point. Everything I listed in that is strange for the group I identified myself as. Well, except for the language thing. That's actually true of most people once they have a basic understanding they'll pick up the rest if you throw in them into a deep-immersion situation. They may not be fluent speakers, but they'll get enough to get by pretty quickly. But meh. This thread isn't about me. It's about how you hate everyone. |
| #117baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 13:39:57 | Zombie Babies, I don't shave gerbils and Crisco them. what I do is shave a bunch of cats instead then I feed them ecstasy And throw them in a bathtub full of lotion so they writhe around, mewling in strange pleasure THEN, I get nekkid and jump in Oh, but the cats are declawed, of course "I'm taking a bath full of moist, erotic pussies!" "that make noise. Mreow mreow!" |
| #118EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 13:41:10 | I suspect Bane says things like this in jest so often so that when he does finally get around to confessing his strange erotic fantasies we'll all think he's just kidding around some more. |
| #119baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 13:43:03 | ![]() |
| #120zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 13:44:58 | That ... that ... it almost turned me on. I had no idea Presto knew how to party. |
| #121baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 13:47:03 | What the fu-.....? |
| #122zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 13:52:06 | Exactly. What the **** indeed. |
| #123baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 13:53:37 | That **** almost turned you on? Eww. |
| #124zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 13:54:55 | Something did. Who's to say what it was or wasn't? |
| #125EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 13:57:25 | Just as long as it wasn't you photoshopping my head onto Brad Pitt's body. That would just be creepy. |
| #126zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 14:01:15 | It wasn't that. Well, not this time anyway. |
| #127turalisjApr 20, 2009 14:08:10 | I give this thread... One blackstar dragonball and a nappa bobblehead. There. ![]() |
| #128baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 14:20:21 | Hey, the thread quality is already poor enough without you mentioning Dragonball Z |
| #129EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 14:22:07 | There ya go, Bane, back on the track of unreasonable hatred! You can do it! We ... well, not exactly 'believe' in you, or support you and your unreasonable hatred and anger, but... we... think you can probably do it? |
| #130Reg06Apr 20, 2009 14:23:19 | He's like the little train that could, only fueled by hate, and not adorable. But still, a train. |
| #131turalisjApr 20, 2009 14:24:54 | There ya go, Bane, back on the track of unreasonable hatred! You can do it! We ... well, not exactly 'believe' in you, or support you and your unreasonable hatred and anger, but... we... think you can probably do it? BELIEVE IT! |
| #132IdolisApr 20, 2009 14:25:18 | Don't mind Bane ya'll. I just peed in his cornflakes this morning. |
| #133EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 14:28:04 | And that's why I don't ear cereal. |
| #134baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 14:28:08 | I'm gonna get you for that, you ******* |
| #135IdolisApr 20, 2009 14:28:53 | Oh yeah? I got back at you! I banged your (insert close female relative/friend) Was she good? |
| #136baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 14:29:57 | WTF? |
| #137EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 14:30:12 | Was she willing and did she enjoy it? |
| #138IdolisApr 20, 2009 14:31:06 | I was wondering why my collie mix was walking funny. |
| #139turalisjApr 20, 2009 14:32:17 | XD |
| #140baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 14:32:33 | What the hell are you talking about? |
| #141IdolisApr 20, 2009 14:34:08 | Her name is Shelby, Bane. She's a she and you said she was good and now she's walking funny. What's not to get? |
| #142EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 14:35:31 | A dog is a man's (and sometimes woman's) best friend. |
| #143baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 14:36:30 | Her name is Shelby, Bane. She's a she and you said she was good and now she's walking funny. What's not to get? Read my posts. I have no idea what you're talking about. You dog? Huh? ![]() |
| #144EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 14:37:52 | I'm reminded of phrase 5 of a song... Phrase 5 of the Hedgehog Song The squirrel requires the climbing of trees, which puts you at risk of a slip and a fall. The dog's man's best friend if you don't mind the fleas, but the hedgehog can never be buggered at all. |
| #145IdolisApr 20, 2009 14:38:10 | Read my posts. I have no idea what you're talking about. You dog? Huh? You editted your post. Everyone knows you said "Hellz Yeah!" when I asked if she was good. WTF? |
| #146EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 14:39:13 | I think Bane didn't want to make Piggy jealous. |
| #147baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 14:39:57 | It has a section that says my post is edited if I did it, but there ISN'T. Thus, I did not edit my post. Got you there, don't I? |
| #148EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 14:42:19 | Not really, if you edit your post within a certain amount of time (a minute or so, I think) it doesn't say you did. Not sure why, but thats the way it is. |
| #149IdolisApr 20, 2009 14:42:24 | It has a section that says my post is edited if I did it, but there ISN'T. Thus, I did not edit my post. Bane, I don't have to prove anything. From now on, I'll just quote everything you say. |
| #150EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 14:44:35 | Bane, I don't have to prove anything. From now on, I'll just quote everything you say. Doesn't actually prove anything either. But what's it matter? We all know what Bane said, and Bane knows what Bane said, so we just have to make sure Piggy knows what bane said. |
| #151baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 14:45:47 | Bane, I don't have to prove anything. From now on, I'll just quote everything you say. You know, quoted posts can be altered. For example Bane, I fully support you, the Mad Monkey Militia, and will give you my life savings so you can buy weapons to take over the world See? (:P) |
| #152IdolisApr 20, 2009 14:48:14 | True. But the fact remains you altered your post. It's cool. You stepped on a landmine and tried to avert the detonation. It's cool Bane. It was too easy anyway. |
| #153baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 14:51:36 | Eh, I just do that to mess with people from time to time. I will admit that you got me with that joke about your dog. It was a good one, but I haven't practiced the art of the EDIT NINJA for a while. I won't edit this post. So about that landmine I stepped on. It's not one of those ones designed to blow your nuts off, right? |
| #154IdolisApr 20, 2009 14:53:10 | A Bouncing Betty? It can be if you want it to be. |
| #155baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 14:54:25 | NO! NO! NO! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! AGH! ****! MY POOR *******! Oww..... |
| #156EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 14:54:38 | you don't design landmines to blow someones nuts off. you design them to either kill outright or to wound the person badly. Why you would want to kill should be obvious (it takes a soldier out of action, permanently) but the wounding isn't quite so obvious... For one thing, it's easier, and for a second, it forces his1 friends/fellow wolsiders to carry and support him as they get back to a safe base, slowing the entire group down and putting them at an even bigger disadvantage when you try to ambush the group later on then if you had just killed the soldier out right. --- 1I am making an assumption about sex here. |
| #157zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 14:58:21 | Exactly. Most landmines are designed to maim for that reason. Ideally, you'll maim the guy so badly that even though two of his pals evacuate him, he still dies. It's also ok to vaporize a couple of 'em, too. So long as you wound some as well. Did you know that there are two main types of grenade? Offensive and - believe it or not - defensive. |
| #158IdolisApr 20, 2009 14:59:10 | Anti-personel mines have fallen out of fashion and have been largely replaced by anti-armor mines simply because you take the vehicles out and injure or kill the occupants. Why kill or injure one or two when you can kill or injure six or more? |
| #159EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 15:01:42 | Hrm... I'm not up on current military technology, but conceivably it might be easier to build and deploy smaller anti-personnel mines then anti-armor mines. That's just me thinking of one possible answer, though. |
| #160zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 15:03:08 | APM are still quite useful for limiting available avenue of approach. |
| #161baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 15:03:46 | So when will the military use Tesla's death ray? |
| #162zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 15:05:58 | Umm. There is no such animal. They are currently phasing in some rather large chemical lasers, though. Some on ground vehicles for blowin' up suspected IEDs and another in a converted 747(?) to handle ICBMs. Mid-air. |
| #163IdolisApr 20, 2009 15:09:07 | I guess it depends on on what battlefield the fight takes place. In Iraq the troops are spread out far from base so traveling is done by vehicle. In Viet Nam, it was in a jungle and vehicle transport was done mostly by helicopter so the jungle was filled with anti-personel mines and booby traps to limit movement after the insertion. Edit: This post was in response to Zombie's post about landmines. |
| #164zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 15:10:36 | No matter where war is fought, men still need to get out o' their rides. APM are always a good - and cheap - defensive measure. And likely always will be in one form or another. |
| #165IdolisApr 20, 2009 15:13:54 | I think we're both saying the same thing. So I'll cede the argument. |
| #166zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 15:19:27 | Not really, but we can stop anyway. ;) :D I really don't care. Heh. |
| #167baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 15:23:51 | One more time, for good measure! Why I don't crisco shaved gerbils I don't shave gerbils and Crisco them. what I do is shave a bunch of cats instead then I feed them ecstasy And throw them in a bathtub full of lotion so they writhe around, mewling in strange pleasure THEN, I get nekkid and jump in Oh, but the cats are declawed, of course "I'm taking a bath full of moist, erotic pussies!" "that make noise. Mreow mreow!" |
| #168zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 15:28:24 | But you do. We've all seen it. We didn't want to, but you mislead us with the PM title and link label. *******. |
| #169baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 15:29:34 | I didn't place any links, though |
| #170zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 15:33:21 | Oh yes you did you sick, gerbil ****ing puke. Yes you did. Disgusting. |
| #171dirtyfrankApr 20, 2009 15:34:52 | Idolis, how is your D&D group thing going? |
| #172baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 15:36:11 | Oh yes you did you sick, gerbil ****ing puke. Yes you did. Disgusting. Quote the post that has a link to whatever it is you're talking about. |
| #173zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 15:38:54 | It was a PM and you know it, Presto. It was a mass PMing, too. Thank god the mod I reported it to deleted it so I could never ... uhh ... accidentally click on it over and over and over again. |
| #174baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 15:43:32 | The only link I've been PM'ing was an ad for A Band of Orcs Not any gerbil erotica that seems to turn you on. Which is why you project it on others. You have to admit that you have a problem before you can get help. |
| #175zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 15:47:05 | No way dood. I'll make you a deal, though. You cop to sendin' that PM and I'll admit to likin' it. Sound good? |
| #176baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 15:48:05 | *sigh* Fine. |
| #177EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 15:49:28 | I think I just realized why I'm the 'normal' one here. It's all relative. When the baseline is this GLEEMAX!ed up, it's no wonder that what would normally be the outlier starts to look awful 'normal'. |
| #178zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 15:50:48 | *sigh* That's better. I think I just realized why I'm the 'normal' one here. It's all relative. When the baseline is this GLEEMAX!ed up, it's no wonder that what would normally be the outlier starts to look awful 'normal'. Huh? Who'sawhatnow? |
| #179baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 15:52:35 | I think I just realized why I'm the 'normal' one here. It's all relative. When the baseline is this GLEEMAX!ed up, it's no wonder that what would normally be the outlier starts to look awful 'normal'. I'm glad that you finally agree with me. |
| #180EscherEnigmaApr 20, 2009 15:55:03 | Right. So I'm not normal, your baseline is just screwed up. |
| #181baneofelvesApr 20, 2009 15:56:36 | Yep. |
| #182zombie_babiesApr 20, 2009 16:03:37 | Nope. |
| #183s-marrowApr 20, 2009 16:04:42 | Obligatory Maybe |
| #184awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 3:38:07 | @ Awesome Dude: Yeah, it's really funny to make fun of situations where people are dying/could potentially die. Haha. You've made tasteless jokes like that before, and you aren't funny. I'm funny whether you like it or not. I tried that joke during a stand-up act at a club and -- you know, I don't mean to brag -- I seem to remember a temple being built in my honor the next day. |
| #185zakhari_dupApr 21, 2009 5:15:58 | Feel the love! ![]() |
| #186zombie_babiesApr 21, 2009 8:08:07 | I'm funny whether you like it or not. I tried that joke during a stand-up act at a club and -- you know, I don't mean to brag -- I seem to remember a temple being built in my honor the next day. A'ight, if it's that good you simply must retell it. Here. Now. I bet it even gets boe goin' again. Bonus! ;) |
| #187goblin_prideApr 21, 2009 14:09:30 | Right. So I'm not normal, your baseline is just screwed up. Nobody's arguing that point. |