American psychiatrists are the actual guardians of America's people sanity; when you violate federal law there is immediately some of an inquirer who will help you regain reason; first he warns you that you are on the fall; then you gotta stop you from what my poor english graduation tells me it is "falling from a even higher cliff".
French psychiatrists, well euh... there are good and bad ones...
good ones are called expert psychiatrists; fortunately I have met some.
I don't know what French shrinks are like.
Zing!
I think he needs an American Psychiatrist.
Zing!
Poor English-as-second-langauge skills = raving lunatic
I find that offensive and unfunny. It's not even like I have some strange belife that offensive and funny cannot coincide (as anyone who has read many of my posts can probably verify). This is just not funny, and needlessly cruel while being absurd in a cliched way, if that makes sense.
Bad taste and a poor attempt at humor.
A tutor or translator, perhaps, but a Psychiatrist?
But can you blame any modern french psychiatrist for spawning a "movement" that racks in the dough by telling a rather unhappy minority that they can fix themselves if they fork over a lot of cash and allow themselves to be brainwashed, while also going around to various African nations and telling them how they can rid themselves of this minority, often to murderous results? While also complaining about how "oppressed" they are in their own country? And doing their best to stop civil rights for the minority at every turn? And so-on, ad nauseum?
Or, to quote Wolverine: "[Man] called me a disease. You know how that feels to me? I can't even sheathe. My claws won't go back. [He] said we were a disease."1
... Oh, hey, is that my shoulder-chip showing? How embarassing.
-------
1Astonishing X-Men #2
But can you blame any modern french psychiatrist for spawning a "movement" that racks in the dough by telling a rather unhappy minority that they can fix themselves if they fork over a lot of cash and allow themselves to be brainwashed, while also going around to various African nations and telling them how they can rid themselves of this minority, often to murderous results? While also complaining about how "oppressed" they are in their own country? And doing their best to stop civil rights for the minority at every turn? And so-on, ad nauseum?
Really? Cos to me that sounds an awful lot like a certain monotheistic religion.
Really? Cos to me that sounds an awful lot like a certain monotheistic religion.
Different chip. My shoulders have space for a whole bunch of 'em.
Anyway, nobody's "blaming" anyone for anything. The OP just said that he preferred American psychiatrists to French ones. Okay. I prefer British spelling to most American spelling. Whose to say I'm wrong? Whose to say the OP is wrong?
Are you asking if someone can be blamed for spawning genocide? Uhhhhhhh... yeah.......?
Anyway, nobody's "blaming" anyone for anything. The OP just said that he preferred American psychiatrists to French ones. Okay. I prefer British spelling to most American spelling. Whose to say I'm wrong? Whose to say the OP is wrong?
I'll say your wrong. Hell, your both wrong. Not that anyone cares if I say your wrong, as I have no sway here, and no justification for my declaration aside from a momentary desire to be contrary.
LOL, we're all wrong, all right? ;)
... "momentary"?
Momentary refers to duration alone, saying nothing of frequency.
Momentary refers to duration alone, saying nothing of frequency.
Yes. I don't think your "desire to be contrary" is ever momentary. I'm inclined to say it's continuous, even.
I'm not. I know precisely what I'm talking about.
Which means you're wrong, if my premise is correct. But if I'm right, and we're all wrong, where does that leave it? And if I'm wrong, then we're not all right. And if we're not all right, then we're, what? Ambivalent?
Momentary refers to duration alone, saying nothing of frequency.
Yes. I don't think your "desire to be contrary" is ever momentary. I'm inclined to say it's continuous, even.
...
That's just cruel EE. Taunting me with such an obvious opportunity to make a self-conflicting statment.
Well, to be unfair, if your premise is correct, and "we're all wrong", then that extends to you as well, meaning that your statement about us all being wrong is wrong. Since for your statement to be true, your statement must also be wrong, we have a paradox. The only logical conclusion is that, at the very least, you are wrong.
Whether anyone else is right or wrong is, at that point, irrelevant.
@ToastedAmphibian
How so? I'm saying you're always contrary and that it's not a short-lived (however frequent) momentary burst.
A) Agree with you that I am continously contrary
or
B) Continue being contrary by being contrary and claiming I am not contrary.
Both options are equally ammusing to me, and I simply could not pick one over the other, as much as I wanted to. Heart wrenching. So very cruel of you to craft such an obvious and excellent trap.
Okay. I prefer British spelling to most American spelling. Whose to say I'm wrong? Whose to say the OP is wrong?
I say you're wrong!
British and American spelling is only marginally different; and both are equally archaic and confusing.
Really? Cos to me that sounds an awful lot like a certain monotheistic religion.
Different chip. My shoulders have space for a whole bunch of 'em.
Broad shoulders? You must be HOT.
Nah, the chips just stack up pretty nicely. That said, I'm sure it won't be long before someone comes along with the leather-pants pic.
So you have Pringles (tm) on your shoulder?