| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1baneofelvesMay 14, 2009 23:12:33 | Well, since there were all these "I support X" threads, I thought I'd start my own. WHO'S WITH ME!? |
| #2lofgrenMay 15, 2009 1:02:01 | Well, since there were all these "I support X" threads, I thought I'd start my own. The thing about baby eating arsonists is that we control our own population growth in the only sane way: by not wasting anything. Infanticide is bad for the environment because you end up with a ton of disease ridden baby carcasses and nowhere to put them. Actually raising your babies to adulthood is even worse, and since we're an arsonist society, we don't exactly leave a small carbon footprint as it is. Still, we are hoping to ween ourselves off of carbon-based fuels and start using other combustible starters for our destructive purposes by 2020, at which point we will allow a few babies to remain uneaten, chosen by random lottery and raised communally by the entire society. Vote for our grassroots candidate in your local election next fall. |
| #3baneofelvesMay 15, 2009 1:05:14 | The thing about baby eating arsonists is that we control our own population growth in the only sane way: by not wasting anything. Infanticide is bad for the environment because you end up with a ton of disease ridden baby carcasses and nowhere to put them. Actually raising your babies to adulthood is even worse, and since we're an arsonist society, we don't exactly leave a small carbon footprint as it is. Still, we are hoping to ween ourselves off of carbon-based fuels and start using other combustible starters for our destructive purposes by 2020, at which point we will allow a few babies to remain uneaten, chosen by random lottery and raised communally by the entire society. That made me laugh so loud that I woke up my dad. Have a cookie. One with baby flesh in it. |
| #4KillerGMMay 15, 2009 1:11:34 | I suppose feeding arsonists to babies isn't a terrible punishment ... |
| #5dirtyfrankMay 15, 2009 1:39:29 | Infanticide is bad for the environment because you end up with a ton of disease ridden baby carcasses and nowhere to put them. Not to mention all the Zombie Babies that end up crawling about. |
| #6october_darknessMay 15, 2009 2:22:15 | Not to mention all the Zombie Babies that end up crawling about. Just blast them in the head. They'll go away fast. |
| #7ADHadhMay 15, 2009 4:53:52 | Damn, that stupid fad from dA is reaching OTT now? |
| #8DralenanMay 15, 2009 4:57:57 | Well I don't know about baby eating arsonists (because we all know babies should not eat solid food until they are a year old), but I do know I saw a man eating sandwich today. |
| #9turalisjMay 15, 2009 5:09:00 | Just blast them in the head. They'll go away fast. Grenades for the win. :D |
| #10dirtyfrankMay 15, 2009 10:08:22 | Damn, that stupid fad from dA is reaching OTT now? What's is dA? Also, who's been giving all of the OTT 1 star? |
| #11baneofelvesMay 15, 2009 11:00:02 | Some jerkass. |
| #12mock26May 15, 2009 11:59:55 | The thing about baby eating arsonists is that we control our own population growth in the only sane way: by not wasting anything. Infanticide is bad for the environment because you end up with a ton of disease ridden baby carcasses and nowhere to put them. Actually raising your babies to adulthood is even worse, and since we're an arsonist society, we don't exactly leave a small carbon footprint as it is. Still, we are hoping to ween ourselves off of carbon-based fuels and start using other combustible starters for our destructive purposes by 2020, at which point we will allow a few babies to remain uneaten, chosen by random lottery and raised communally by the entire society. The real key to controlling population growth is to feed the homeless to the starving. |
| #13baneofelvesMay 15, 2009 12:04:14 | The real key to controlling population growth is to feed the homeless to the starving. ![]() |
| #14cherubaddonMay 15, 2009 16:57:03 | +1 |
| #15NovacatMay 15, 2009 17:47:59 | If we support baby-eating AND arsonists... BBQ babies? Takes care of the corpse problem and satisfies both the baby-eating and the burning stances. |