Idiots on which we can all agree

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

boraxe

Jan 05, 2011 10:03:10
Just about every topic here (war, religion, poiltics, anime, D&D, etc.) has folks supporting one side or the other which inevitably leads to insults, attacks and arguments. For that reason, I think we need to decide on a common foe, a group whose beliefs are so monumentally stupid and so utterly undeserving of respect that we can all agree to dislike and insult them without restraint.

I nominate those who believe the world will end on Dec. 21, 2012.

Any other nominations?


PS - I know the temptation is quite high to toss in your favourite topic of current contention here (Liberals! Conservatives! Theists! Belgians! Blah blah blah…) but please try to avoid giving in to the urge. Try to keep to the spirit of the thing.
#2

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 05, 2011 10:05:28


Any other nominations?




Flat-earthers.
#3

jesse.two.coins

Jan 05, 2011 10:06:10
people that enjoy those 3D puzzles. the ones that build upward and have depth. i hate those. i also agree with the 2012 thing
#4

jesse.two.coins

Jan 05, 2011 10:06:56
pentecostals :P the ones that scream at you and slap the demons out of you
#5

jesse.two.coins

Jan 05, 2011 10:07:42
people that like frito pie
#6

jesse.two.coins

Jan 05, 2011 10:08:15
paula abdul
#7

jesse.two.coins

Jan 05, 2011 10:08:51
american idol after it boils down to the people that CAN sing.
#8

zombie_babies

Jan 05, 2011 10:30:27
People that think HARP killed all those birds.  And fish.  And will do various sorts of mind-controlly things to them.  Oh, and that lady what copywrote her kid in that awesome letter someone else linked to.  I hate her.  I think we all can, too.
#9

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 05, 2011 10:55:42
People that think HARP killed all those birds. 



Fireworks is the culprit I think.

www.foxnews.com/world/2011/01/05/dozens-...


And the areas in the US that have experienced this also report recent firework activity.


Heh... at first I thought it might be a nerve or blood agent release...
#10

ADHadh

Jan 05, 2011 11:01:43
AMERICANS.





;)



(Flat-Earthers sound unreasonable enough)
#11

zombie_babies

Jan 05, 2011 11:39:29
Fireworks is the culprit I think.

www.foxnews.com/world/2011/01/05/dozens-...


And the areas in the US that have experienced this also report recent firework activity.


Heh... at first I thought it might be a nerve or blood agent release...



The most plausible reason I've read of is hail, believe it or not.  They did some necropsies on the first batch of red winged black birds and everyone they cut open showed organ damage consistant with blunt force trauma.  To me, hail is way more likely than five thousand simultaneous heart attacks caused by fireworks.  Cuz birds live outside.  And there are thunderstorms outside.  And thunderstorms are loud.  And produce bright flashes of light.  Like fireworks.  Heh.
#12

jesse.two.coins

Jan 05, 2011 11:45:36
Fireworks is the culprit I think.

www.foxnews.com/world/2011/01/05/dozens-...


And the areas in the US that have experienced this also report recent firework activity.


Heh... at first I thought it might be a nerve or blood agent release...



The most plausible reason I've read of is hail, believe it or not.  They did some necropsies on the first batch of red winged black birds and everyone they cut open showed organ damage consistant with blunt force trauma.  To me, hail is way more likely than five thousand simultaneous heart attacks caused by fireworks.  Cuz birds live outside.  And there are thunderstorms outside.  And thunderstorms are loud.  And produce bright flashes of light.  Like fireworks.  Heh.


or maybe they're dumb? jk I like the hail theory it seems the most likely. unless this whole thing is a prank?
#13

boraxe

Jan 05, 2011 11:48:27
There's also the fact this phenomenon is not unique and not centered around fireworks holidays or locations. For example, in Britain last year: www.metro.co.uk/news/816890-mystery-as-h...

The human mind strives to forge a causal link when two events occur in close geographical and/or temporal proximity but that doesn't mean such a link actually exists.
#14

zombie_babies

Jan 05, 2011 11:50:02
or maybe they're dumb? jk I like the hail theory it seems the most likely. unless this whole thing is a prank?



Actually fireworks seem plausible in the case Robin linked to.  The number was only about 50 and they were very near the area.  In the case I was referring to, there were about 5k birds killed - to me, far more than one could reasonably assume died from fright or whatever.  Plus there was the whole necropsy thing.  But yeah, the ones in Robin's article may have bought it from fireworks I suppose.  At any rate, HARP didn't kill any of 'em. 

Oh, more idiots: The bastards that prop up and defend the corrupt BCS system.  Gimme a playoff dammmit!  Oh well, at least the Buckeyes shut up that stupid 'SEC, SEC!' chant for a year or so.  ;)
#15

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 05, 2011 12:07:09
Ahhhh...
the BCS, where even the losers are winners!

It is sickening that teams with losing records go to Bowls.
It is sickening that there are so many "Bowls".

That's one of the many reasons I don't watch college ball.
#16

jesse.two.coins

Jan 05, 2011 12:07:09
accents/language barriers?
#17

zombie_babies

Jan 05, 2011 12:13:28
Ahhhh...
the BCS, where even the losers are winners!

It is sickening that teams with losing records go to Bowls.
It is sickening that there are so many "Bowls".

That's one of the many reasons I don't watch college ball.



Dood, the friggin' Saints have to travel to Seattle to whoop the SeaHacks in a wild card game.  The losing record SeaHacks.  Seems the nonsense is spreadin', heh.  Oh well, at least the Hacks won their division - which is something that can't be said for bowl teams with losing records.  There can't be too many of those, though, when I think about it.  Most only play like 12 games and you need 6 wins to qualify.  Hmm ... Doesn't matter, though, cuz it's all a bunch of crap that doesn't even come close to crowning a true champ.
#18

Ragnar_Lodbrok

Jan 05, 2011 17:26:12
Twiblight fanatics.
#19

EscherEnigma

Jan 05, 2011 17:48:13
Can I nominate HR departments?
#20

EscherEnigma

Jan 05, 2011 17:50:27
Less bitter nomination: Lawyers who go after drunk drivers then get arrested for driving under the influence of prescription painkillers1.
________
1You know, the ones that say "do not operate heavy machinery while under the influence of this drug"
#21

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 05, 2011 21:38:12
Since it was being discussed earlier...


#22

pluisjen

Jan 06, 2011 3:34:56
Bwahahaha, especially the last line makes it all so brilliant.
#23

jesse.two.coins

Jan 06, 2011 7:51:42
awkward people
#24

jesse.two.coins

Jan 06, 2011 7:52:06
TRYHARDS!!!!!!!
#25

zombie_babies

Jan 06, 2011 9:25:34
... ... uhh ... ... emos? ... ...
#26

pluisjen

Jan 06, 2011 10:15:17
Trolls?



Hey now, I take offense to that!

..

Oh wait, no I don't really care Laughing 


Can I add "Ignorant people"?
#27

ADHadh

Jan 06, 2011 11:23:47
People who overuse and abuse a word such as "socialism" or "empirical" ad naseum. ;)
#28

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 06, 2011 12:42:48
Europeans who are socialists, progressives, and covertly refer to posters they don't like as idiots and ignorant, and think that posters cannot, or will not, comprehend what they are doing.










#29

ADHadh

Jan 06, 2011 12:50:23
And we're back in business!
#30

pluisjen

Jan 06, 2011 13:12:26
If you're talking to me, I wasn't specifically mentioning you R_H.

I feel no need to be covert about calling you an idiot, and I would've done so clearly had there been any need in this topic.
#31

boraxe

Jan 06, 2011 13:44:58
#32

ADHadh

Jan 06, 2011 13:52:39
Speaking of rail: I need an eye-catching way to advertise Warsaw Railing Museum in urban area (no, that's not my job) and I'm all out of ideas, except for a desire to somehow use this beaut:
#33

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 06, 2011 15:01:08
Speaking of rail: I need an eye-catching way to advertise Warsaw Railing Museum in urban area (no, that's not my job) and I'm all out of ideas, except for a desire to somehow use this beaut:
#34

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 06, 2011 15:02:12
If you're talking to me, I wasn't specifically mentioning you R_H.

I feel no need to be covert about calling you an idiot, and I would've done so clearly had there been any need in this topic.



No you didn't specifically mention me... but I know where your heart was...


@Boraxe,
                I know. I had hopes it wouldn't devolve like this too. But, you know... some people...
#35

toastedamphibian

Jan 06, 2011 16:04:30
I vote for "some people".
#36

zombie_babies

Jan 06, 2011 16:07:28
I vote for 'all people'.
#37

pluisjen

Jan 06, 2011 16:17:38
Eh like I said R_H, if I wanted to call you an idiot I would've just called you an idiot.

You can think you're some kind of special snowflake and you can think that I'm constantly referring to you whenever I say something negative, but that's not the case.

Just because you 're occasionally ignorant doesn't mean you stand out from the other masses of ignorant people or something Smile
#38

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 06, 2011 16:24:28
I am a kind of special snowflke.

And I would rather people talk to me directly, saying exactly what's on their mind. No beating around the bush and being wishy-washy with me! I prefer it that way. And don't worry... I'm a big boy... I can take it.

*shrug*
You say you didn't mean me, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
#39

EscherEnigma

Jan 06, 2011 16:28:48
I am a kind of special snowflke.


Just like everyone else.
#40

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 06, 2011 16:31:58
I am a kind of special snowflke.


Just like everyone else.


Exactly.

#41

toastedamphibian

Jan 06, 2011 18:03:24
I am a kind of special snowflke.


Just like everyone else.


Exactly.




Just like your mom.
#42

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 06, 2011 19:00:38
I am a kind of special snowflke.


Just like everyone else.


Exactly.




Just like your mom.



#43

mock26

Jan 07, 2011 8:37:42
Just about every topic here (war, religion, poiltics, anime, D&D, etc.) has folks supporting one side or the other which inevitably leads to insults, attacks and arguments. For that reason, I think we need to decide on a common foe, a group whose beliefs are so monumentally stupid and so utterly undeserving of respect that we can all agree to dislike and insult them without restraint.

I nominate those who believe the world will end on Dec. 21, 2012.

Any other nominations?


PS - I know the temptation is quite high to toss in your favourite topic of current contention here (Liberals! Conservatives! Theists! Belgians! Blah blah blah…) but please try to avoid giving in to the urge. Try to keep to the spirit of the thing.



I do not believe any of the crap about the 12/21/12 end of the world prediction, but I will be having a huge party on the 12/20/2012.  The main reason for this is that I have always wanted to have an end fo the world party.  And, of course, if the Mayans were in fact correct then it will make for a good last memory!


#44

boraxe

Jan 07, 2011 9:10:45
I do not believe any of the crap about the 12/21/12 end of the world prediction, but I will be having a huge party on the 12/20/2012.  The main reason for this is that I have always wanted to have an end fo the world party.  And, of course, if the Mayans were in fact correct then it will make for a good last memory!


I will be having a huge "We Told You ing Morons the World Wasn't Going to End" party on 12/22/12.
#45

zombie_babies

Jan 07, 2011 9:20:22
I'm pretty sure the Mayans never said the world was gonna end.  It's something more like their calendar just happens to end on that date or it's the end of a period of time or something.  So this retardedness is even more retarded than some end of the world prophecy cuz it isn't even about the end of the world in the first place.
#46

ADHadh

Jan 07, 2011 9:27:09
I'm pretty sure the Mayans never said the world was gonna end.  It's something more like their calendar just happens to end on that date or it's the end of a period of time or something.  So this retardedness is even more retarded than some end of the world prophecy cuz it isn't even about the end of the world in the first place.


Some people say they saw that Euro 2012 was going to be hosted by Poland and Ukraine and were afraid to go on. ;)
#47

Klirshon

Jan 07, 2011 9:34:28
I nominate rioting mobs due to their sheepish and infantile behavior.
#48

boraxe

Jan 07, 2011 9:42:34
I'm pretty sure the Mayans never said the world was gonna end.  It's something more like their calendar just happens to end on that date or it's the end of a period of time or something.  So this retardedness is even more retarded than some end of the world prophecy cuz it isn't even about the end of the world in the first place.


The Mayans never said the world was going to end. Besides, even if they did make such a claim since when does anyone give a what the Mayans have to say about anything?
#49

zombie_babies

Jan 07, 2011 9:47:33
[The Mayans never said the world was going to end. Besides, even if they did make such a claim since when does anyone give a what the Mayans have to say about anything?



Exactly!  This is the dumbest 'world is gonna end' craze ever because the people cited as those claiming its impending doom never even said that in the first place.  It takes an incredibly stupid moron to actually believe this stuff.  Like a flat earther (who someone already mentioned).  Cuz, you know, even if you don't believe the myriad pictures, there's that whole horizon thing anyway. 
#50

ADHadh

Jan 07, 2011 9:50:19

The Mayans never said the world was going to end. Besides, even if they did make such a claim since when does anyone give a what the Mayans have to say about anything?


Well, they did invent chocolate...
#51

Klirshon

Jan 07, 2011 10:12:00
Which would explain why the mayans disappeared, they now work for Wonka...
#52

zombie_babies

Jan 07, 2011 12:25:58
Y2K!  And yes, they deserved our ire. 
#53

Klirshon

Jan 07, 2011 12:50:34
I concur that they were, and possibly still are, idiots.
#54

pluisjen

Jan 07, 2011 13:04:22
At least Y2K was based on something that could actual happen (well... unless you thought the world was going to collapse or computers around the world would actually explode or something) though.

And the same thing might happen again come somewhere mid 2037 as the Integer based timestamps run out.. though I assume those that have software that matters will update it long before then. 
#55

zombie_babies

Jan 07, 2011 13:18:38
True enough, there was some sort of potential for some sort of badness to happen then.  Not on the order of what some thought, of course, but a lot of it was far more plausible than 'omg teh wurld enz on 2012 cuz mians sed soh!'. 
#56

Klirshon

Jan 07, 2011 13:31:42
Since we are mocking the 2012 group of schmucks, I would presume when referencing to Y2K we were describing those that were panicing as if the world would end. I know I was.
#57

zombie_babies

Jan 07, 2011 13:34:05
Yeah, but for you it made sense.  I mean, that was your brain that was in danger.  I understand anyway.  Good to see the recoding worked.
#58

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 07, 2011 13:45:02
Y2K...

One of my brothers happens to be deaf. He was born that way because of a Dr. error.
Anyway, he speaks, but of course, he sounds... funny.
He happens to pronounce "k" as "cake".
One of the funniest things I ever heard him say was around Y2K time.
He kept saying "Y2Cake".

It was hilarious!

...

...

Well, I guess you just had to be there...
#59

Klirshon

Jan 07, 2011 13:47:13
Did your family make him a cake for New Year's Day?
#60

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 07, 2011 13:51:14
Did your family make him a cake for New Year's Day?



Nah.
We got drunk.
#61

ADHadh

Jan 07, 2011 15:04:52
Did your family make him a cake for New Year's Day?



Nah.
We got drunk.


Close enough.
#62

zombie_babies

Jan 07, 2011 15:16:43
Well, there is a shot called a chocolate cake.  You'd never guess what it tastes like.
#63

mock26

Jan 07, 2011 23:41:56
Since we are mocking the 2012 group of schmucks, I would presume when referencing to Y2K we were describing those that were panicing as if the world would end. I know I was.



I was farking my girlfriend's brains out when midnight rolled around.  We did not believe that the world would end, but on the off chance that it did we wanted to go out in the best way possible! 
#64

mock26

Jan 07, 2011 23:45:14
Well, there is a shot called a chocolate cake.  You'd never guess what it tastes like.



If you ever get the chance order a shot of half Frangelico and half Chambord.  It is one variation of the PB & J and it really does taste like Peanut Butter and Jelly.  I am very particular to my above mentioned recipe.  In my experience it is the best one.
#65

iqwinn

Jan 08, 2011 4:47:49
I wasn't expecting any kind of real meltdown on Y2K, but I thought that something might happen that might take a while to fix.  So we stocked up on bottled water, food, etc.  I had to work that night, 10pm to 6am, at a convenience store.  I was ready, and my boss knew it, and approved.  Midnight rolled around and nothing happened.  My boss called and made sure I was all right, then wished me a Happy New Year.  I went back to cleaning the floors.

The Mayan calendar debacle is about the Earth lining up with the galactic plane, which happens every 6000 years or so, according to the Mayan long count calendar.  The stars apparently move up and down in relation to the galactic plane, much like a carousel (insert The Merry-Go-Round Broke Down kaliope music here).  There's supposed to be some kind of blast of energy right on the galactic plane, though no one seems to know how long it will take for this blast to hit the Earth, nor is there any agreement on what will happen when/if this blast hits the Earth.  New Agers seem to think that it will cause humanity to transcend into a higher level of consciousness/existance, where all will be peace and harmony and we'll all have rainbows and unicorns flying out of our @$$es.  Others are more grim, and imagine a scorched earth/Dark Sun scenario.

Personally, I think nothing will happen on that day.  I plan on spending a quiet evening at home with the wife, looking at the Christmas tree, snuggling on the couch and sipping sugar-free hot chocolate with Andes mints melted therein.

I think, though, that anywhere from 6 months to 5 years afterward, something will happen that will slam the world collectively upside the head, and no one will see it coming.  That's when things get interesting.

I don't worry too much about that, though.  I'll just do what I can, and let God take care of the rest.

Peace.
#66

ChaoticGood

Jan 08, 2011 10:19:22
I was farking my girlfriend's brains out when midnight rolled around.  We did not believe that the world would end, but on the off chance that it did we wanted to go out in the best way possible! 



As they said in those halcyon days of yore: "Pics or it didn't happen." Tongue out
#67

Someone

Jan 08, 2011 11:45:17
I heard somewhere that astronomers pointed out the whole "Mayan galactic alignment" shindig is bunk since we've already had a better conjunction a few years ago. So if ravening waves of radiation were going to hit us, they already would have.

Now, if a gamma ray burst were to go off somewhere in our half of the galaxy pointed pointed exactly at us, THAT would suck.
#68

elwyndas

Jan 08, 2011 11:52:30
Judas Priest! The world ends on May 21 2011. This year! Not much time left.
www.ebiblefellowship.com/may21/
#69

Escef

Jan 08, 2011 12:08:50
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.
#70

mock26

Jan 08, 2011 13:51:53
I was farking my girlfriend's brains out when midnight rolled around.  We did not believe that the world would end, but on the off chance that it did we wanted to go out in the best way possible! 



As they said in those halcyon days of yore: "Pics or it didn't happen."



Sadly, there are no longer any pictures.  ;)
#71

mock26

Jan 08, 2011 13:55:14
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.



I'll second this.

I want to ad PETA. Just because.



Did you see when the protested Comic Con?
#72

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 08, 2011 14:02:27
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.



I'll second this.

I want to ad PETA. Just because.



Did you see when the protested Comic Con?



You mean this? www.comicsalliance.com/2010/07/22/super-...
#73

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 08, 2011 18:16:24
Buddy Jesus guy s funny. I liked the" God hates Jedi" trekkie. 
#74

mc-drowbane

Jan 08, 2011 23:06:21
I nominate people who believe in anything.

Belief leads to conflict and dissolution.

Acceptance will set you free.

Don't hate.
#75

EscherEnigma

Jan 09, 2011 0:13:43
Belief leads to conflict and dissolution.

Acceptance will set you free.


Sounds like a belief to me.  Stop the self-hate.

#76

mc-drowbane

Jan 09, 2011 0:30:40
Belief leads to conflict and dissolution.

Acceptance will set you free.


Sounds like a belief to me.  Stop the self-hate.




You got it!
#77

iqwinn

Jan 09, 2011 3:08:09
Judas Priest! The world ends on May 21 2011. This year! Not much time left.
www.ebiblefellowship.com/may21/


These idiots, like Fred Phelps, practice selective Scripture reading:

But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no not the angels of heaven, but My Father only.  Matthew 24:36

But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.  Mark 13:32

Freddy really needs to read Luke 9:51-56, emphasis on that last verse.
#78

mc-drowbane

Jan 09, 2011 9:23:17
You know who I really hate?  Buddhists.  Sitting around being all mindful and loving everything and thinking their better than us.

I mean who knows what they are meditating on?

Sample buddhist train of thought:

"Maybe I should smoke some reefer today and eat some cheetos.  No then I wouldn't be so awesome.  Ya I am pretty awesome.  It must really suck not being as awesome as me.  Those poor non-buddhists."

Then there's Nazis.  And Nazi Buddhists.
#79

ADHadh

Jan 09, 2011 11:22:04
You know who I really hate?  Buddhists.  Sitting around being all mindful and loving everything and thinking their better than us.

I mean who knows what they are meditating on?

Sample buddhist train of thought:

"Maybe I should smoke some reefer today and eat some cheetos.  No then I wouldn't be so awesome.  Ya I am pretty awesome.  It must really suck not being as awesome as me.  Those poor non-buddhists."

Then there's Nazis.  And Nazi Buddhists.


I believe everyone has a right to their own religion, be it Hindu, Jewish or Muslim; I believe there are infinite paths to accepting Jesus Christ as your personal savior.


;)
#80

EscherEnigma

Jan 09, 2011 12:10:36
You know who I really hate?  Buddhists.  Sitting around being all mindful and loving everything and thinking they're better than us.


Grammar nazis?

#81

pluisjen

Jan 09, 2011 12:33:47
Buddhist Grammar Nazis.
#82

mock26

Jan 09, 2011 13:34:40
You know who I really hate?  Buddhists.  Sitting around being all mindful and loving everything and thinking they're better than us.


Grammar nazis?




I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No It Alls.
#83

mock26

Jan 09, 2011 13:36:19
Buddhist Grammar Nazis.



That is self contradictory.  A Buddhist Grammar Nazi would accept the right of existence of all spelling mistakes. 
#84

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 09, 2011 13:39:05
You know who I really hate?  Buddhists.  Sitting around being all mindful and loving everything and thinking they're better than us.


Grammar nazis?




I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No know It Alls.




#85

ADHadh

Jan 09, 2011 14:02:31
I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No It Alls.


*Grammar
*Nazis
*They're
*Internet
*Know

You're welcome



(I'm aware that was a bait)
#86

mock26

Jan 09, 2011 14:53:46

Grammar nazis?




I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No know It Alls.








1 out of 5.  Not bad. 


============================================================


I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No It Alls.


*Grammar
*Nazis
*They're
*Internet
*Know

You're welcome



(I'm aware that was a bait)



Not bait.  Just a joke. 
#87

mc-drowbane

Jan 09, 2011 21:14:16
I love you guys. 

I've been trying to get Char Op to lighten up for a minute now, seems I was just in the wrong forum.
#88

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 09, 2011 21:24:58

Grammar nazis?




I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No know It Alls.








1 out of 5.  Not bad. 

I know... for shame on me! Next time I'll pay more attention. 
#89

EscherEnigma

Jan 09, 2011 22:16:54
I nominate people who post **** like this:


If it's too blurry to read, the text is:  "It's ok. Christina Taylor Green was probably going to end up a left wing bleeding heart liberal anyway. Hey, as 'they' say, what would you do if you had the chance to kill Hitler as a kid? Exactly."

For reference, Christina Taylor Green was the 9-year old that was killed in yesterday's Tuscon shooting that was apparently aimed at congress woman Gabriel Gifford.
#90

mc-drowbane

Jan 09, 2011 22:21:17
Poor taste.
#91

pluisjen

Jan 10, 2011 1:54:18
Extremely poor taste. I certainly hope this person has no political influence (anymore).

And is chewed out by everyone around her. 
#92

mock26

Jan 10, 2011 3:23:54
I nominate people who post **** like this:


If it's too blurry to read, the text is:  "It's ok. Christina Taylor Green was probably going to end up a left wing bleeding heart liberal anyway. Hey, as 'they' say, what would you do if you had the chance to kill Hitler as a kid? Exactly."

For reference, Christina Taylor Green was the 9-year old that was killed in yesterday's Tuscon shooting that was apparently aimed at congress woman Gabriel Gifford.



The beauty and the horror of Free Speech all in one post.
#93

jesse.two.coins

Jan 10, 2011 6:25:34
people who pay for an email account.
#94

boraxe

Jan 10, 2011 8:27:10
The Mayan calendar debacle is about the Earth lining up with the galactic plane, which happens every 6000 years or so, according to the Mayan long count calendar.  The stars apparently move up and down in relation to the galactic plane, much like a carousel (insert The Merry-Go-Round Broke Down kaliope music here).  There's supposed to be some kind of blast of energy right on the galactic plane, though no one seems to know how long it will take for this blast to hit the Earth, nor is there any agreement on what will happen when/if this blast hits the Earth.  New Agers seem to think that it will cause humanity to transcend into a higher level of consciousness/existance, where all will be peace and harmony and we'll all have rainbows and unicorns flying out of our @$$es.  Others are more grim, and imagine a scorched earth/Dark Sun scenario.


And people who aren't idiots realize this is all bunk and nothing at all will happen.
#95

Crimson_Concerto

Jan 11, 2011 15:48:12
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.

I came into this thread to say this.
#96

mock26

Jan 11, 2011 22:11:49
The Mayan calendar debacle is about the Earth lining up with the galactic plane, which happens every 6000 years or so, according to the Mayan long count calendar.  The stars apparently move up and down in relation to the galactic plane, much like a carousel (insert The Merry-Go-Round Broke Down kaliope music here).  There's supposed to be some kind of blast of energy right on the galactic plane, though no one seems to know how long it will take for this blast to hit the Earth, nor is there any agreement on what will happen when/if this blast hits the Earth.  New Agers seem to think that it will cause humanity to transcend into a higher level of consciousness/existance, where all will be peace and harmony and we'll all have rainbows and unicorns flying out of our @$$es.  Others are more grim, and imagine a scorched earth/Dark Sun scenario.


And people who aren't idiots realize this is all bunk and nothing at all will happen.



I disagree.  I predict the end of some bottles of beer and possibly a bottle of scotch.
#97

Someone

Jan 11, 2011 22:41:15
That's a bit of a self-fulfilling (well, self-full-emptying at least) prophesy, isn't it?
#98

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 12, 2011 7:01:30
I nominate...

La Raza
The Nazis
The KKK
The Black Panther Party (old and new)
People who hurt animals for fun
And men named Julian
#99

jesse.two.coins

Jan 12, 2011 7:19:21
I nominate...

La Raza
The Nazis
The KKK
The Black Panther Party (old and new)
People who hurt animals for fun
And men named Julian



I would also nominate Lucien.
#100

iqwinn

Jan 12, 2011 10:33:32
No, that's Lucerne.
#101

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 12, 2011 10:47:08
Hmmm....
I think he may mean "men named Lucien".
#102

jesse.two.coins

Jan 12, 2011 11:35:48
yes :3
#103

mock26

Jan 12, 2011 14:55:36
That's a bit of a self-fulfilling (well, self-full-emptying at least) prophesy, isn't it?




#104

mock26

Jan 12, 2011 15:07:19
No, that's Lucerne.



Hammer Time!
#105

toastedamphibian

Jan 12, 2011 17:32:15
Hmmm....
I think he may mean "men named Lucien".



We should hate werewolves with revenge plots?
#106

boraxe

Jan 13, 2011 9:37:17
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.


These scumbags were going to picket the funeral of Christina Green, the nine year old girl killed by Jared Loughtner in Tucson. They really are human filth.
#107

Cpt_Micha

Jan 13, 2011 9:39:21
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.


These scumbags were going to picket the funeral of Christina Green, the nine year old girl killed by Jared Loughtner in Tucson. They really are human filth.



I wish someone would put them down. With a burning at the stake for being heretics. I think it would be rather hilarious.
#108

ADHadh

Jan 13, 2011 10:37:41
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.


These scumbags were going to picket the funeral of Christina Green, the nine year old girl killed by Jared Loughtner in Tucson. (...)


Wikilleaks. Task. Force.

No, seriously, WHAT.

DOES NOT COMPUTE.
#109

ADHadh

Jan 13, 2011 11:06:29
Just found this (hope it doesn't get nixed):
#110

Escef

Jan 13, 2011 11:50:53
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.


These scumbags were going to picket the funeral of Christina Green, the nine year old girl killed by Jared Loughtner in Tucson. They really are human filth.



The only reason they aren't is because some media outlets used airtime to bribe them out of it.
#111

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 13, 2011 11:51:33
The good thing is that Arizona actually passed some sensible legislation and banned protesters within a certain limit. The westboro baptist church backed off of protesting the funerals. 

 
#112

Crimson_Concerto

Jan 13, 2011 12:29:46
Just found this (hope it doesn't get nixed):
#113

zombie_babies

Jan 13, 2011 12:48:44
Just found this (hope it doesn't get nixed):
#114

Klirshon

Jan 13, 2011 13:11:46
If the image is legitimate, it has changed to specify what activities they disapprove of (the protests near military funerals). Don't expect a klan member to hug EE anytime soon.
#115

mock26

Jan 13, 2011 14:18:40
The good thing is that Arizona actually passed some sensible legislation and banned protesters within a certain limit. The westboro baptist church backed off of protesting the funerals. 

 



It is an Unconstitutional law that needs to be repealed.  As much as I loathe Phelps and his Westboro Bastards, they are legally within their right to protest.  They always keep it on public land, they do not shout at people, they have permits where required, and they just stand their quietly.  They are well within their Constitutional right to protest and the newly passed law is just a knee-jerk reaction where emotions overrode common sense and intelligence.



/I feel so dirty when supporting the 1st Amendment also supports people like Reverand Phelps.
#116

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 13, 2011 14:28:44
I believe the law is based on a similar law that passed in Ohio and the constitutionality of the law has been upheld by the 6th district court. There are also other states with similar laws. The law bans protesters from being within 300 feet of a funeral. The may still protest along the funeral route. It allows for idiots to practice their warped version of Freedom of Speech, while protecting the Rights of Privacy that families at funerals have.
#117

milo_bloom

Jan 13, 2011 14:57:22
The good thing is that Arizona actually passed some sensible legislation and banned protesters within a certain limit. The westboro baptist church backed off of protesting the funerals. 

 



It is an Unconstitutional law that needs to be repealed.  As much as I loathe Phelps and his Westboro Bastards, they are legally within their right to protest.  They always keep it on public land, they do not shout at people, they have permits where required, and they just stand their quietly.  They are well within their Constitutional right to protest and the newly passed law is just a knee-jerk reaction where emotions overrode common sense and intelligence.



/I feel so dirty when supporting the 1st Amendment also supports people like Reverand Phelps.




As much as I despise the Westboro cult, I agree with this. The law shouldn't be passed. What works far better is when other protesters form a human shield between them and the funeral goers as has happened at other recent funerals. Shows the true beauty and strength that humanity is capable of, rather than some Constitutionally questionable ordinance. 

#118

mock26

Jan 13, 2011 17:28:53
I believe the law is based on a similar law that passed in Ohio and the constitutionality of the law has been upheld by the 6th district court. There are also other states with similar laws. The law bans protesters from being within 300 feet of a funeral. The may still protest along the funeral route. It allows for idiots to practice their warped version of Freedom of Speech, while protecting the Rights of Privacy that families at funerals have.



Public land is still public land, even if it is within 300 feet of a funeral.  Also, people could easily argue that the funeral procession route is part of a funeral and ban the protesters from within 300 feet of that road.

Sorry, but I do not care how hurtful or hateful someone's speech is.  Phelps and his clan have the right to stand on public land and protest a funeral and/or funeral procession.  Any limits on this is a bad thing.
#119

Escef

Jan 13, 2011 17:39:24
I think the family/will of the deceased should be allowed to determine what, if any, protests are allowed at the funeral. Call it a kind of preemptive restraining order. Because unwanted protests at such an event equal harassment as far as I'm concerned.
#120

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 13, 2011 19:39:58
I believe the law is based on a similar law that passed in Ohio and the constitutionality of the law has been upheld by the 6th district court. There are also other states with similar laws. The law bans protesters from being within 300 feet of a funeral. The may still protest along the funeral route. It allows for idiots to practice their warped version of Freedom of Speech, while protecting the Rights of Privacy that families at funerals have.



Public land is still public land, even if it is within 300 feet of a funeral.  Also, people could easily argue that the funeral procession route is part of a funeral and ban the protesters from within 300 feet of that road.

Sorry, but I do not care how hurtful or hateful someone's speech is.  Phelps and his clan have the right to stand on public land and protest a funeral and/or funeral procession.  Any limits on this is a bad thing.



Cry all you want, so far it has been upheld in the courts in other states. Thus far it has been deemed constitutional and not a violation of anyones freedoms.
#121

mock26

Jan 14, 2011 1:12:00
I believe the law is based on a similar law that passed in Ohio and the constitutionality of the law has been upheld by the 6th district court. There are also other states with similar laws. The law bans protesters from being within 300 feet of a funeral. The may still protest along the funeral route. It allows for idiots to practice their warped version of Freedom of Speech, while protecting the Rights of Privacy that families at funerals have.



Public land is still public land, even if it is within 300 feet of a funeral.  Also, people could easily argue that the funeral procession route is part of a funeral and ban the protesters from within 300 feet of that road.

Sorry, but I do not care how hurtful or hateful someone's speech is.  Phelps and his clan have the right to stand on public land and protest a funeral and/or funeral procession.  Any limits on this is a bad thing.



Cry all you want, so far it has been upheld in the courts in other states. Thus far it has been deemed constitutional and not a violation of anyones freedoms.



Who is crying?  Certainly not me.
#122

mock26

Jan 09, 2011 13:34:40
You know who I really hate?  Buddhists.  Sitting around being all mindful and loving everything and thinking they're better than us.


Grammar nazis?




I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No It Alls.
#123

mock26

Jan 09, 2011 13:36:19
Buddhist Grammar Nazis.



That is self contradictory.  A Buddhist Grammar Nazi would accept the right of existence of all spelling mistakes. 
#124

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 09, 2011 13:39:05
You know who I really hate?  Buddhists.  Sitting around being all mindful and loving everything and thinking they're better than us.


Grammar nazis?




I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No know It Alls.




#125

ADHadh

Jan 09, 2011 14:02:31
I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No It Alls.


*Grammar
*Nazis
*They're
*Internet
*Know

You're welcome



(I'm aware that was a bait)
#126

mock26

Jan 09, 2011 14:53:46

Grammar nazis?




I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No know It Alls.








1 out of 5.  Not bad. 


============================================================


I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No It Alls.


*Grammar
*Nazis
*They're
*Internet
*Know

You're welcome



(I'm aware that was a bait)



Not bait.  Just a joke. 
#127

mc-drowbane

Jan 09, 2011 21:14:16
I love you guys. 

I've been trying to get Char Op to lighten up for a minute now, seems I was just in the wrong forum.
#128

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 09, 2011 21:24:58

Grammar nazis?




I hate Grammer Nazi's.  Their the most annoying of all internet No know It Alls.








1 out of 5.  Not bad. 

I know... for shame on me! Next time I'll pay more attention. 
#129

EscherEnigma

Jan 09, 2011 22:16:54
I nominate people who post **** like this:


If it's too blurry to read, the text is:  "It's ok. Christina Taylor Green was probably going to end up a left wing bleeding heart liberal anyway. Hey, as 'they' say, what would you do if you had the chance to kill Hitler as a kid? Exactly."

For reference, Christina Taylor Green was the 9-year old that was killed in yesterday's Tuscon shooting that was apparently aimed at congress woman Gabriel Gifford.
#130

mc-drowbane

Jan 09, 2011 22:21:17
Poor taste.
#131

pluisjen

Jan 10, 2011 1:54:18
Extremely poor taste. I certainly hope this person has no political influence (anymore).

And is chewed out by everyone around her. 
#132

mock26

Jan 10, 2011 3:23:54
I nominate people who post **** like this:


If it's too blurry to read, the text is:  "It's ok. Christina Taylor Green was probably going to end up a left wing bleeding heart liberal anyway. Hey, as 'they' say, what would you do if you had the chance to kill Hitler as a kid? Exactly."

For reference, Christina Taylor Green was the 9-year old that was killed in yesterday's Tuscon shooting that was apparently aimed at congress woman Gabriel Gifford.



The beauty and the horror of Free Speech all in one post.
#133

jesse.two.coins

Jan 10, 2011 6:25:34
people who pay for an email account.
#134

boraxe

Jan 10, 2011 8:27:10
The Mayan calendar debacle is about the Earth lining up with the galactic plane, which happens every 6000 years or so, according to the Mayan long count calendar.  The stars apparently move up and down in relation to the galactic plane, much like a carousel (insert The Merry-Go-Round Broke Down kaliope music here).  There's supposed to be some kind of blast of energy right on the galactic plane, though no one seems to know how long it will take for this blast to hit the Earth, nor is there any agreement on what will happen when/if this blast hits the Earth.  New Agers seem to think that it will cause humanity to transcend into a higher level of consciousness/existance, where all will be peace and harmony and we'll all have rainbows and unicorns flying out of our @$$es.  Others are more grim, and imagine a scorched earth/Dark Sun scenario.


And people who aren't idiots realize this is all bunk and nothing at all will happen.
#135

Crimson_Concerto

Jan 11, 2011 15:48:12
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.

I came into this thread to say this.
#136

mock26

Jan 11, 2011 22:11:49
The Mayan calendar debacle is about the Earth lining up with the galactic plane, which happens every 6000 years or so, according to the Mayan long count calendar.  The stars apparently move up and down in relation to the galactic plane, much like a carousel (insert The Merry-Go-Round Broke Down kaliope music here).  There's supposed to be some kind of blast of energy right on the galactic plane, though no one seems to know how long it will take for this blast to hit the Earth, nor is there any agreement on what will happen when/if this blast hits the Earth.  New Agers seem to think that it will cause humanity to transcend into a higher level of consciousness/existance, where all will be peace and harmony and we'll all have rainbows and unicorns flying out of our @$$es.  Others are more grim, and imagine a scorched earth/Dark Sun scenario.


And people who aren't idiots realize this is all bunk and nothing at all will happen.



I disagree.  I predict the end of some bottles of beer and possibly a bottle of scotch.
#137

Someone

Jan 11, 2011 22:41:15
That's a bit of a self-fulfilling (well, self-full-emptying at least) prophesy, isn't it?
#138

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 12, 2011 7:01:30
I nominate...

La Raza
The Nazis
The KKK
The Black Panther Party (old and new)
People who hurt animals for fun
And men named Julian
#139

jesse.two.coins

Jan 12, 2011 7:19:21
I nominate...

La Raza
The Nazis
The KKK
The Black Panther Party (old and new)
People who hurt animals for fun
And men named Julian



I would also nominate Lucien.
#140

iqwinn

Jan 12, 2011 10:33:32
No, that's Lucerne.
#141

Robin_Hoodlum

Jan 12, 2011 10:47:08
Hmmm....
I think he may mean "men named Lucien".
#142

jesse.two.coins

Jan 12, 2011 11:35:48
yes :3
#143

mock26

Jan 12, 2011 14:55:36
That's a bit of a self-fulfilling (well, self-full-emptying at least) prophesy, isn't it?




#144

mock26

Jan 12, 2011 15:07:19
No, that's Lucerne.



Hammer Time!
#145

toastedamphibian

Jan 12, 2011 17:32:15
Hmmm....
I think he may mean "men named Lucien".



We should hate werewolves with revenge plots?
#146

boraxe

Jan 13, 2011 9:37:17
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.


These scumbags were going to picket the funeral of Christina Green, the nine year old girl killed by Jared Loughtner in Tucson. They really are human filth.
#147

Cpt_Micha

Jan 13, 2011 9:39:21
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.


These scumbags were going to picket the funeral of Christina Green, the nine year old girl killed by Jared Loughtner in Tucson. They really are human filth.



I wish someone would put them down. With a burning at the stake for being heretics. I think it would be rather hilarious.
#148

ADHadh

Jan 13, 2011 10:37:41
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.


These scumbags were going to picket the funeral of Christina Green, the nine year old girl killed by Jared Loughtner in Tucson. (...)


Wikilleaks. Task. Force.

No, seriously, WHAT.

DOES NOT COMPUTE.
#149

ADHadh

Jan 13, 2011 11:06:29
Just found this (hope it doesn't get nixed):
#150

Escef

Jan 13, 2011 11:50:53
I'd nominate the Westboro Baptist Church. These people raise being hated to an artform.


These scumbags were going to picket the funeral of Christina Green, the nine year old girl killed by Jared Loughtner in Tucson. They really are human filth.



The only reason they aren't is because some media outlets used airtime to bribe them out of it.
#151

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 13, 2011 11:51:33
The good thing is that Arizona actually passed some sensible legislation and banned protesters within a certain limit. The westboro baptist church backed off of protesting the funerals. 

 
#152

Crimson_Concerto

Jan 13, 2011 12:29:46
Just found this (hope it doesn't get nixed):
#153

zombie_babies

Jan 13, 2011 12:48:44
Just found this (hope it doesn't get nixed):
#154

Klirshon

Jan 13, 2011 13:11:46
If the image is legitimate, it has changed to specify what activities they disapprove of (the protests near military funerals). Don't expect a klan member to hug EE anytime soon.
#155

mock26

Jan 13, 2011 14:18:40
The good thing is that Arizona actually passed some sensible legislation and banned protesters within a certain limit. The westboro baptist church backed off of protesting the funerals. 

 



It is an Unconstitutional law that needs to be repealed.  As much as I loathe Phelps and his Westboro Bastards, they are legally within their right to protest.  They always keep it on public land, they do not shout at people, they have permits where required, and they just stand their quietly.  They are well within their Constitutional right to protest and the newly passed law is just a knee-jerk reaction where emotions overrode common sense and intelligence.



/I feel so dirty when supporting the 1st Amendment also supports people like Reverand Phelps.
#156

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 13, 2011 14:28:44
I believe the law is based on a similar law that passed in Ohio and the constitutionality of the law has been upheld by the 6th district court. There are also other states with similar laws. The law bans protesters from being within 300 feet of a funeral. The may still protest along the funeral route. It allows for idiots to practice their warped version of Freedom of Speech, while protecting the Rights of Privacy that families at funerals have.
#157

milo_bloom

Jan 13, 2011 14:57:22
The good thing is that Arizona actually passed some sensible legislation and banned protesters within a certain limit. The westboro baptist church backed off of protesting the funerals. 

 



It is an Unconstitutional law that needs to be repealed.  As much as I loathe Phelps and his Westboro Bastards, they are legally within their right to protest.  They always keep it on public land, they do not shout at people, they have permits where required, and they just stand their quietly.  They are well within their Constitutional right to protest and the newly passed law is just a knee-jerk reaction where emotions overrode common sense and intelligence.



/I feel so dirty when supporting the 1st Amendment also supports people like Reverand Phelps.




As much as I despise the Westboro cult, I agree with this. The law shouldn't be passed. What works far better is when other protesters form a human shield between them and the funeral goers as has happened at other recent funerals. Shows the true beauty and strength that humanity is capable of, rather than some Constitutionally questionable ordinance. 

#158

mock26

Jan 13, 2011 17:28:53
I believe the law is based on a similar law that passed in Ohio and the constitutionality of the law has been upheld by the 6th district court. There are also other states with similar laws. The law bans protesters from being within 300 feet of a funeral. The may still protest along the funeral route. It allows for idiots to practice their warped version of Freedom of Speech, while protecting the Rights of Privacy that families at funerals have.



Public land is still public land, even if it is within 300 feet of a funeral.  Also, people could easily argue that the funeral procession route is part of a funeral and ban the protesters from within 300 feet of that road.

Sorry, but I do not care how hurtful or hateful someone's speech is.  Phelps and his clan have the right to stand on public land and protest a funeral and/or funeral procession.  Any limits on this is a bad thing.
#159

Escef

Jan 13, 2011 17:39:24
I think the family/will of the deceased should be allowed to determine what, if any, protests are allowed at the funeral. Call it a kind of preemptive restraining order. Because unwanted protests at such an event equal harassment as far as I'm concerned.
#160

homicidal_squirrel

Jan 13, 2011 19:39:58
I believe the law is based on a similar law that passed in Ohio and the constitutionality of the law has been upheld by the 6th district court. There are also other states with similar laws. The law bans protesters from being within 300 feet of a funeral. The may still protest along the funeral route. It allows for idiots to practice their warped version of Freedom of Speech, while protecting the Rights of Privacy that families at funerals have.



Public land is still public land, even if it is within 300 feet of a funeral.  Also, people could easily argue that the funeral procession route is part of a funeral and ban the protesters from within 300 feet of that road.

Sorry, but I do not care how hurtful or hateful someone's speech is.  Phelps and his clan have the right to stand on public land and protest a funeral and/or funeral procession.  Any limits on this is a bad thing.



Cry all you want, so far it has been upheld in the courts in other states. Thus far it has been deemed constitutional and not a violation of anyones freedoms.
#161

mock26

Jan 14, 2011 1:12:00
I believe the law is based on a similar law that passed in Ohio and the constitutionality of the law has been upheld by the 6th district court. There are also other states with similar laws. The law bans protesters from being within 300 feet of a funeral. The may still protest along the funeral route. It allows for idiots to practice their warped version of Freedom of Speech, while protecting the Rights of Privacy that families at funerals have.



Public land is still public land, even if it is within 300 feet of a funeral.  Also, people could easily argue that the funeral procession route is part of a funeral and ban the protesters from within 300 feet of that road.

Sorry, but I do not care how hurtful or hateful someone's speech is.  Phelps and his clan have the right to stand on public land and protest a funeral and/or funeral procession.  Any limits on this is a bad thing.



Cry all you want, so far it has been upheld in the courts in other states. Thus far it has been deemed constitutional and not a violation of anyones freedoms.



Who is crying?  Certainly not me.