I'm pretty sure it'd be a CoC violation to answer your question.
Don't worry, I'm pretty sure that this thread itself is a CoC violation.
I'm pretty sure it'd be a CoC violation to answer your question.
Don't worry, I'm pretty sure that this thread itself is a CoC violation.
Yes, yes it is.
I'm sorry I didn't know. As thread creator, I officially close this thread forever.
You have to cast summon monster I and choose "orc."
I'm sorry I didn't know. As thread creator, I officially close this thread forever.
Officially? What, are there forms now? Do we have to put in for a Post Deferement with our local government? Is there a 509-Bt Schedule 17-A I should have received in the mail? Do I follow steps 1-17 or steps B-Delta4?
I'm sorry I didn't know. As thread creator, I officially close this thread forever.
Officially? What, are there forms now? Do we have to put in for a Post Deferement with our local government? Is there a 509-Bt Schedule 17-A I should have received in the mail? Do I follow steps 1-17 or steps B-Delta4?
Don't forget to file your I-D-ten-tango.
you do realize that telling people not to post here is like an open invitation to see how many posts we can get in here before its closed?
Of course. So long as these new posts have nothing whatsoever to do with the topic presented in the OP, it's all good. It's still best that this thread be closed before the OP is revisited. Until the, shoot for the stars and post whatever nonsense you wish. Try to set a record, even. What-evs. ;)
I'm sorry I didn't know. As thread creator, I officially close this thread forever.
Officially? What, are there forms now? Do we have to put in for a Post Deferement with our local government? Is there a 509-Bt Schedule 17-A I should have received in the mail? Do I follow steps 1-17 or steps B-Delta4?
Don't forget to file your I-D-ten-tango.
I can never properly fill that one out due to this weird PEBKAC thing that keeps happening...
I can never properly fill that one out due to this weird PEBKAC thing that keeps happening...
Yeah, a similar problem occured with one of the office workers I had to deal with. I need to contact someone in the VA about correcting my DD214, it says I participated in OIF 3 times instead of once.
I'm sorry I didn't know. As thread creator, I officially close this thread forever.
Officially? What, are there forms now? Do we have to put in for a Post Deferement with our local government? Is there a 509-Bt Schedule 17-A I should have received in the mail? Do I follow steps 1-17 or steps B-Delta4?
What about 18DELTA?
IBTL.;)He isn't gone.
;)
Oh, and I'm sure he can't help but feel touched that he left such an impression on so many people.
He wouldn't have wanted it any other way...
Oh, and I'm sure he can't help but feel touched that he left such an impression on so many people.
Yeah, some things just keep coming back.
Herpes, for instance.
Oh, and I'm sure he can't help but feel touched that he left such an impression on so many people.
Yeah, some things just keep coming back.
Herpes, for instance.
I would get that checked if I were you...
Edit: And given what I've seen, such a mysterious personae doesn't need any help getting banned. He or She or It seems proud of it. It wouldn't surprise me if he/she/it made objectional postings deliberately, just for the thrill of getting away with it, despite the repeated bannings of this wholely hypothetical and fictional person.
And not to mention that if this theoretical poster is honestly earnest in his convictions (and all evidence points to "yes") then why should he hide? The righteous only serve their enemies when they hide in the shadows, no? Admittedly, after so many times you might suspect they enjoy the validation of being a martyr, but still. If you honestly believe you're right and just, you should feel no need to hide in the face of (perceived) tyranny.
You say "tomato," I say "troll."
*singing*
"Let's call the whole thing off!"
What amazes me is that it is apparently impossible for the forum moderators to actually enforce their rules and prevent an entirely hypothetical person from continueing to post. I actually thought they had some measure of control, no matter how slight. Obviously not.
You say "tomato," I say "troll."
When someone has demonstrably consistent viewpoints, consistently gets into arguments about similar topics, and so-on, they're not a troll. They're just opionated and not very skilled at keeping their discussions civil.
What amazes me is that it is apparently impossible for the forum moderators to actually enforce their rules and prevent an entirely hypothetical person from continueing to post. I actually thought they had some measure of control, no matter how slight. Obviously not.
Why does this amaze you? An IP-ban is problematic, and an account-ban is toothless if the person doesn't care.
What amazes me is that it is apparently impossible for the forum moderators to actually enforce their rules and prevent an entirely hypothetical person from continueing to post. I actually thought they had some measure of control, no matter how slight. Obviously not.
Mod is dead?
What amazes me is that it is apparently impossible for the forum moderators to actually enforce their rules and prevent an entirely hypothetical person from continueing to post. I actually thought they had some measure of control, no matter how slight. Obviously not.
Why does this amaze you? An IP-ban is problematic, and an account-ban is toothless if the person doesn't care.
Simple ignorance and naivitae (sp?). I know better now.
As for the definition of "a creature that lives under a bridge," genuine belief isn't a sufficient defense. How and where you choose to make your arguments matters as well.
Mod is dead?
Nope. Just impotent.
As for the definition of "a creature that lives under a bridge," genuine belief isn't a sufficient defense. How and where you choose to make your arguments matters as well.
Exactly. And when someone starts new threads to discuss topics they want to discuss, give a different viewpoint on topic in a discussion, and so-on, they're not a troll. Controversial? Sure. But being opinionated about controversial topics shouldn't be sufficient to be labeled a troll.
And when someone starts new threads to discuss topics they want to discuss, give a different viewpoint on topic in a discussion, and so-on, they're not a troll. Controversial? Sure. But being opinionated about controversial topics shouldn't be sufficient to be labeled a troll.
That's sig material...
May I?