| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1zombie_babiesNov 23, 2009 15:43:01 | For fans of a tangent in another thread, continue the conversation here. If you don't know what this is about, I ain't talkin' to you. |
| #2EscherEnigmaNov 23, 2009 15:52:03 | You know, I've never really liked that slang. "Junk". I mean really, just what image are we trying to sell here? "Junk"? Really? Of all the words in the English language we get the one that means "piles of disorderly stuff with no real purpose"? |
| #3dirtyfrankNov 23, 2009 15:52:12 | So is it called free-ballin' or goin' commando for women or do they call it something like removin' the barrel or kissin' the sky? |
| #4zombie_babiesNov 23, 2009 15:57:10 | You know, I've never really liked that slang. "Junk". I mean really, just what image are we trying to sell here? "Junk"? Really? Of all the words in the English language we get the one that means "piles of disorderly stuff with no real purpose"? Yeah, 'junk' isn't exactly the most flattering term. I'm guessing it was originally used by doods that wanted to look all 'hey man, I don't care about anything' or something. I think it's kinda funny, but it isn't great. Package is pretty good, though. |
| #5owls_and_more_owlsNov 23, 2009 16:04:45 | This thread is about boobs, right? |
| #6EscherEnigmaNov 23, 2009 16:05:09 | Yeah, 'junk' isn't exactly the most flattering term. I'm guessing it was originally used by doods that wanted to look all 'hey man, I don't care about anything' or something. I think it's kinda funny, but it isn't great. Package is pretty good, though. A holy man speaking to a wayward youth: "Your soul is a precious package, to be nurtured and cared for until the time of deliverance. Let me guide you there! Entrust your package to me, and it will feel wonderful!" Wayward youth gives him a somewhat disbelieving stare and says "... are you high?" ... *ahem* bad jokes aside, package sounds like one too. I mean, it's just full of innuendo. "Hey baby, I'm the delivery man and boy have I got a 'package' for you". Just bad jokes all around, ya know? |
| #7zombie_babiesNov 23, 2009 16:12:46 | But ... but bad jokes are the best jokes. EDIT: So how do you feel about 'My Unit'? |
| #8EscherEnigmaNov 23, 2009 16:13:40 | But ... but bad jokes are the best jokes. I dislike the military associations. |
| #9dirtyfrankNov 23, 2009 16:15:38 | But ... but bad jokes are the best jokes. What does a ZombieBabie unit measure? |
| #10CyvarisNov 23, 2009 16:35:54 | This thread cause me to laugh and also reminds me why I love the internet. For those of you that missed it I read Twilight because I was bored and had nothing better to do. On topic I never really liked the term either. Package is full of funny puns. But working in a grocery store I must say I have the best "junk" related pun. I work in a Sweetbay(a division of foodlion/hannaford brand foods). We sell many products. Look on your pay slip next time and see how stuff is abbreviated. Now to the funny. Our generic store brand is Hannahford, which abbreviates to HRD. No when you ring up our store brand hot dogs you would expect, HRD hotdogs, but no you get the following HRD wieners. Gets me everytime I see it. |
| #11KillerGMNov 23, 2009 16:49:52 | ... the 'hammer' is my penis. *giggles* |
| #12CyvarisNov 23, 2009 16:52:29 | Considering the thread it branched from, you would be surprised to know were the discussion began, very surprised. Also five dollars we don't make it past page 5. Edit: ahh KillerGm uses the best of all qoutes to describe this thread. |
| #13ah_maclimeszeroNov 23, 2009 16:56:43 | I like to refer to it as my "double entendre". |
| #14EscherEnigmaNov 23, 2009 16:57:58 | ... the 'hammer' is my penis. Wait, we can say penis now? |
| #15ah_maclimeszeroNov 23, 2009 16:58:43 | Wait, we can say penis now? Ummmm.... no? |
| #16dirtyfrankNov 23, 2009 17:06:36 | Considering the thread it branched from, you would be surprised to know were the discussion began, very surprised. Also five dollars we don't make it past page 5. I'm not surprised that people talkin' about skinin' their roosters started from a thread talkin' about Palin goin' rogue. Oh, I could help her go rogue. <3 ... the 'hammer' is my penis. I believe it's still a CoC violation that the mods will threaten to ban ya for knowingly using it but never will. |
| #17EscherEnigmaNov 23, 2009 17:14:47 | Eh, the word itself isn't "sexually explicit". It's how you use it that makes it go from "anatomy" to "sexual". |
| #18dirtyfrankNov 23, 2009 17:22:23 | Wasn't that word censored before the switch to the beta? But yeah, the mods and junk have tolds some of us before that even though a word might not be censored, it is still a CoC violation if it falls under that CoC violation zone such as referin' to sex, drugs, cussin' and whatnot. I'm sure that webster or them ORCs can explain it better than this dude can. I need to get back to doin' scoo work nowz. Gotta read about how them Neanderthal womenz were as hugely muscular as the Neanderthal dudes. I guess I can't realy relate the scoo work to this thread though cuz they don't talk about Neanderthal packages. Just about how Neanderthals must have had a really muscular build. Now I got a picture in my mind of a bunch of Conans runnin' about and some of them are female versions of Conan. My guess is that they're all goin' commando (barbarian?) under their animal skins. ![]() |
| #19KillerGMNov 23, 2009 17:38:19 | Wasn't that word censored before the switch to the beta? But yeah, the mods and junk have tolds some of us before that even though a word might not be censored, it is still a CoC violation if it falls under that CoC violation zone such as referin' to sex, drugs, cussin' and whatnot. I'm sure that webster or them ORCs can explain it better than this dude can. I'm so using "goin' barbarian" from now on. :-) As for the "word" issue ... if someone reports it and I get in trouble, I'll respect the decisions, but I wouldn't have posted it if I thought it violated the CoC (you guys know me better than that!). But yeah ... "goin' barbarian" is totally in my vocabulary now. :-) |
| #20generalhenryNov 23, 2009 17:40:04 | what's going on up in this trunk?!? |
| #21dirtyfrankNov 23, 2009 20:59:32 | Wasn't that word censored before the switch to the beta? But yeah, the mods and junk have tolds some of us before that even though a word might not be censored, it is still a CoC violation if it falls under that CoC violation zone such as referin' to sex, drugs, cussin' and whatnot. I'm sure that webster or them ORCs can explain it better than this dude can. Yay, I increase people's vocabularies. *happy dance* Why go Commando when you can go BARBARIAN!! Having orc problems? Then go barbarian. Need more freedom while raiding? Then go barbarian. Wanna feel the midday breeze? Then go barbarian. I've been goin' barbarian since 8 this morning. It's worked for me. It'll work for you. I guarantee it. ![]() So if goin' with no undies is to be called "goin' barbarian" does that mean wearing a thong or G-string is goin' amazon? |
| #22owls_and_more_owlsNov 23, 2009 21:00:58 | I go Warlord, myself. I keep everything under WRAPS, and I'm constantly asking "anyone need anything?" |
| #23boraxeNov 24, 2009 9:02:57 | I prefer "junk" cos I will always hear it as shouted by JFK on Clone High: "Hey, don't damage the merchandise…and by merchandise I mean MY JUNK" |
| #24zombie_babiesNov 24, 2009 9:10:05 | Mine was once called The Captain. That chick was crazy. Am I the only one that gets an uncomfortable feelin' when he sees 'violates the CoC' in this thread? I see that phrase all the time and it doesn't bother me a bit. For whatever reason, when I see it in this thread, it does. Odd, no? Oh, I was also always partial to 'Yogurt Slinger'. |
| #25dirtyfrankNov 24, 2009 9:15:39 | The Captain.... ....violates the CoC |
| #26zombie_babiesNov 24, 2009 9:17:26 | ....violates the CoC Owwwwwie. EDIT: What about 'Baby Batter Blaster'? |
| #27Cpt_MichaNov 24, 2009 10:56:19 | So are we just going to make junk jokes and euphemisms or are we going to go back to the discussion that was taking place in the original thread? |
| #28generalhenryNov 24, 2009 11:29:29 | bleh what discussion, It's an argument that's been going on for thousands of years without being resolved. It really doesn't matter who's right since it doesn't have a huge impact either way. It's a cultural choice, and there's no way you're going to get all people to agree one culture is better than another. Back on topic, wild and wooly? smooth? trimmed? |
| #29Cpt_MichaNov 24, 2009 11:32:04 | bound to be tmi here, but Smooth. There is a certain hilarity in that this tangent has also just cropped up in Astrid's. Wow that was a bad pun. |
| #30zombie_babiesNov 24, 2009 11:46:55 | Yeah, I noticed it was sort of carried over. And so I helped with a stupid joke. :P Umm ... I'm trimmed. If you don't at least do that, you risk it lookin' like an egg in a nest. Baby birds are cute an' all, but nobody wants to bang 'em. At least I hope not. |
| #31EscherEnigmaNov 24, 2009 11:48:04 | Eh, my big beef is that as far as a medical procedure goes it's of negligible cost savings (the reason the UK doesn't cover non-therapeutic ones), and that as far as a cultural thing goes it's often done to infants who have no choice. An adult man wants to get it done? Fine. His body, his choice, he can get done to it what he wants. But to a friggin' baby? Yeah. In short: as a preventive medical procedure it's of questionable merit, and as a cultural one the boy should be given the choice. *ahem* Anyway. but Smooth. as a whistle? [link] |
| #32zombie_babiesNov 24, 2009 11:51:14 | ... my big beef ... Tee hee. |
| #33EscherEnigmaNov 24, 2009 12:00:13 | ... my big beef ... ... I swear that was unintentional. |
| #34ah_maclimeszeroNov 24, 2009 12:16:29 | Umm ... I'm trimmed. If you don't at least do that, you risk it lookin' like an egg in a nest. Baby birds are cute an' all, but nobody wants to bang 'em. At least I hope not. This is the internet, sir. Please keep a close eye on your personal belongings, reservations about the perversions of humanity, and sense of self. |
| #35Cpt_MichaNov 24, 2009 12:18:19 | Yeah, I noticed it was sort of carried over. And so I helped with a stupid joke. :P This is the internet my friend. I'm sure finding an image of a baby bird getting banged are just a google search away. I see I was sort of half ninjad. Nice pun escher. (clicks link) wow, I wasn't horrified or disturbed by someone's link for once... and considering the thread wow. *laughs* Yes as a whistle. |
| #36ah_maclimeszeroNov 24, 2009 12:27:54 | I see I was sort of half ninjad. "Okay, I want to roll up a half-ninja elf." "You mean a half-elf ninja?" "I know what I said." |
| #37zombie_babiesNov 24, 2009 13:05:50 | ... I swear that was unintentional. Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure it was. ;) |
| #38toastedamphibianNov 24, 2009 16:39:38 | This thread cause me to laugh and also reminds me why I love the internet. For those of you that missed it I read Twilight because I was bored and had nothing better to do. Aha! I was wondering who that went to. |
| #39ViolenceJackNov 25, 2009 3:25:43 | To go with the birdie in the nest, better to let it fly than clip its wings. So yeah. In other news, whatcah gonna do with all that junk? You know, all that junk inside that trunk? |
| #40zombie_babiesNov 25, 2009 8:13:35 | That's the wrong kind of junk for this discussion. It's really the right kind, but not right now. Different junk altogether. |
| #41dirtyfrankNov 25, 2009 11:15:47 | Hey, don't go kickin' him in the junk. |
| #42EscherEnigmaNov 25, 2009 15:54:43 | Wait, are we allowed to talk about putting metaphorical junk into a metaphorical trunk here? |
| #43ah_maclimeszeroNov 25, 2009 16:00:56 | Wait, are we allowed to talk about putting metaphorical junk into a metaphorical trunk here? We're metaphorically allowed. |
| #44toastedamphibianNov 25, 2009 16:08:02 | Am I allowed to talk about putting 'junk' on a 'chest', or in a 'drawer' 'box'? |
| #45dirtyfrankNov 25, 2009 16:09:08 | Wait, are we allowed to talk about putting metaphorical junk into a metaphorical trunk here? Sure, but why put junk in the trunk when a lady's trunk already gots a lot of junk? |
| #46toastedamphibianNov 25, 2009 16:11:18 | Not a fan of used trunks? |
| #47dirtyfrankNov 25, 2009 16:15:08 | I'm all for used trunks but why put junk in a trunk that's already got too much junk in it? |
| #48toastedamphibianNov 25, 2009 16:22:50 | Professionals. |
| #49EscherEnigmaNov 25, 2009 16:30:33 | I'm all for used trunks but why put junk in a trunk that's already got too much junk in it? But how do you know it's got too much junk in it? Is having any junk too much, or is there an amount of junk that still allows you to put more junk in? |
| #50dirtyfrankNov 25, 2009 16:34:46 | I'm all for used trunks but why put junk in a trunk that's already got too much junk in it? Good point. I guess we'd have to try and put more junk in it to see if the junk would fit in the trunk. Only problem with that though is that both the junk and trunk could be damaged by forcing the junk into a trunk that already contains junk. |
| #51toastedamphibianNov 25, 2009 16:40:51 | I'm all for used trunks but why put junk in a trunk that's already got too much junk in it? Which is why you need professionals. *Link omitted* |
| #52EscherEnigmaNov 25, 2009 16:42:54 | Edit: you know what? Nevermind. I think I crossed a line and it's silly to tempt fate over a silly immature joke. |
| #53dirtyfrankNov 25, 2009 16:47:58 | Which is why you need professionals. *Link omitted* And let me guess, professionals don't come cheap? |
| #54toastedamphibianNov 25, 2009 16:52:27 | Professionals: cache2.asset-cache.net/xc/72472040.jpg?v... And, because it is strangely disturbing: ![]() |