| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1homicidal_squirrelApr 24, 2013 22:14:26 | www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/24/nasa_pe... |
| #2The_SilverswordApr 24, 2013 22:57:24 | "We note the page allows visitors to "enlarge" the image." |
| #3zombie_babiesApr 25, 2013 8:39:17 | The article I read had a decent comment about it: 'who let Jeremy Clarkson drive it?'. ![]() |
| #4KlirshonApr 25, 2013 10:34:06 | This is old news, but I am compelled to tell you why the rover drew that on the Martian soil and took a picture afterwards. It was to send a message to someone that works for NASA. I estimate that jerk got the message but will refuse to acknowledge it. |
| #5Cpt_MichaApr 25, 2013 11:03:02 | Nah, it was drawing something it wish it had. ![]() |
| #6KlirshonApr 25, 2013 11:15:06 | That is incorrect. Your statement applies to humans, not machines. That rover knows should it desire that kind of component, it will get one eventually that is superior to such a limb of man. |
| #7CorranHornIsAwesomeApr 25, 2013 17:23:40 | That is incorrect. Your statement applies to humans, not machines. That rover knows should it desire that kind of component, it will get one eventually that is superior to such a limb of man. Pics or it didn't happen. |
| #8KlirshonApr 25, 2013 19:28:33 | Request an image from Google with safesearch disabled. I estimate you would eventually find one. |
| #9EscherEnigmaApr 25, 2013 19:30:22 | That is incorrect. Your statement applies to humans, not machines. That rover knows should it desire that kind of component, it will get one eventually that is superior to such a limb of man. ... I'm not sure why knowing that it'll eventually get one means it won't idly dream and doodle one in the sand. |
| #10KlirshonApr 25, 2013 19:34:01 | Are you implying that the rover drew a phallic image due to its unproductiveness? That is absurd. |
| #11zombie_babiesApr 26, 2013 8:45:21 | They lost track of one cuz it got stuck, right? That's pretty unproductive. The precedent is there, brah. Does. Not. Compute. |
| #12KlirshonApr 26, 2013 9:41:23 | No, the absurd part was it drawing a phallus on the soil due to an idle desire to have such a component. It's wheels lack the precision to make a rough schematic. Thus I conclude that the rover drew it as a message to the one that requested it to be decommissioned. |
| #13zombie_babiesApr 26, 2013 10:22:37 | There's two rovers, right? You tryin' to say one wouldn't be happier with a dong? Does. Not. Compute. |
| #14KlirshonApr 26, 2013 10:52:51 | It would be disappointed that it can't have one while on Mars when we haven't a manufactory there yet. If it wanted one enough, it would have began preparing a site for construction processes. |
| #15zombie_babiesApr 26, 2013 11:16:25 | That's what it may have been doing. A penis factory with a penis floorplan seems sort of penis creative. |
| #16KlirshonApr 26, 2013 11:44:13 | It's too small for a proper factory. Size is very important for such concepts. |
| #17zombie_babiesApr 26, 2013 11:52:16 | Goddamm, boy! Just how big a pecker you think this here machine needs!??! |
| #18KlirshonApr 26, 2013 13:45:39 | Large enough to house drones in it. |