Ah...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Anybody really care to comment...?
Earth.
Too much "mass". Not a chance. I said, yea I know.
Weather Control.
Definitely. HAARP, looks like ionizing radiation to me. I'm over the the headtrip of Revelation, Jesus in the clouds, ectetra ect ect.
Not to offend Hunter S. Thompson fans, or that whack stuff they did to the band Avenged Sevenfold, but yea.
Earth.
Too much "mass". Not a chance. I said, yea I know.
Weather Control.
Definitely. HAARP, looks like ionizing radiation to me. I'm over the the headtrip of Revelation, Jesus in the clouds, ectetra ect ect.
..... you remind me of someone.
Oh yes, Kourgoth. That's it. Or something like that.
Besides, if we did have an earthquake weapon, I think we have better places than Haiti to target. Like North Korea and about half the Middle East.
Korg?
Korina-wood
KKK Our Goth
Coors, *gulg ahhhhsphphht
How about this.
They were sayin' Mammon on the FM dial, right?
Here, how's this.
Ruhn, as in Ruin
Wren Guard (from the city of Ruin)
Rhun_of_Rhengad at Turbine bulletin boards (copying his e-mail verbatim onto the board for a possible lawsuit-see allegation of fraud).
You'll notice all the jokes on late night talk shows with the cyber-money for real-money.
Isn't this a pretty church? I don't burn down, would, could, but still don't anyway...otherwise defile things like a terrorist would. People in the Klan aren't the most stellar of white people, wouldn't you agree? No, no, no Star Trek honor medals for them, Captain Kirk. I think the High command in Goth-style Germany's section, Heidelberg and Bavaria...understood Michael's Dome over in London...may not be a strategic target.
The sound of the war-machine-craft approaching, would be psychological enough, don't you think?
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/t...
So sci-fi is now sci-fact?
Vietnam, make mud, not war...see Forrest Gump
from USN veteran, possible crackpot...citation: Note that Geiger tubes do not necessarily detect nuclear radiation; they detect ionizing radiation, regardless of the type. While nuclear radiation is certainly ionizing radiation, so is strong scalar radiation. Even though the scalar wave is a standing wave, its increased level of potential can ionize the gas in the tube.
from Wiki, un-accredited source...citation: Einstein's theory of gravity, the General Relativity is of another nature. It unifies space and time in a 4-dimensional manifold called space-time that depends upon mass itself. In General Relativity there is no gravitational force, but instead a curvature of space-time. The curvature is consequence of mass and in linear approximation it is identifiable with a force.
This is the part where everyone laughs at me, because I asked a stupid question to MIT, so don't say you heard this here first, uh...lie, ok? I don't want people to openly curse when I die, just mumble, snore or whatever. I'm just going to write my last will and testament.
The scalar description of the sub-atomic ground state, is missing the Abraham–Lorentz force, tensor, in reference to the EMF problem for the CEO's Blacklight Power 'classical' description (e.g. post-Einstein and Schrodinger's Cat and the Quantum ideology). The ionizing radiation wil show up in the presence of these electrical fields, thus the Geiger will go off in other words. The formula needs to be solved by plasma physics, it's going to involve an assumed constant, more than likely defined by the couloumbs (relative) to the ratio with the nuclear energy. It's a spherical equation, where distance is involved, much like regular ol' radiation...which discusses among a lot of things, the Maxwell equation, a reference point for almost everything electrical, I'm wishing I had my first chapter of Physics 101 about now...but the strength is the neighborhood of 1,200th for the orbiting electron. This is a weaker force, than subatomic nucleaus. The potential heat source is within this un-observable 3-D (subatomic) force, attributable to mass, but not quantum mechanics.
But the Electro-Dynamics question about the negative potential of the ground state (or dark energy as they like to say), can be answered by the subatomic electron force of Hydrogen, NOT the nuclear binding energies, or the mass defect energies of fusion/fission...
Hydrinos, seem to be a different type of element, which has me worried about long-term exposure in the atmosphere. I think it's a matter of what constitutes a stable product for disposal, and where? Space, and the solar wind?? Is it reconstituting back to water, probably not, but that's not to say the potential for energy exists as a fuel, maybe the turbine's force can be repulsed in a system of water under certain conditions. That's what intrigues me, because the enthalpy of the thermodynamics theory is quite managable.
Hence the background radiation of the universe adds up, possibly...that's up to Hawking. I'm interested in the free energy, almost frikkin' free that is...AND NO COx, NOx, SOx.
What I'm saying is...if it ain't ionizing with subfrequency waves, then is the double standing wave producing cloud vapor. I've seen this stuff with Barium I believe it was, in the Metallica rock video?! Figures, they are upset by cloud trails...but this is different than pollution. My guess is the photoelectric effect occurs with a strong RF type EMF, it heats the components of the atmosphere, and that upsets the el Nino type currents, and definitely the glacier ice stoppage of the conveyor belt for the Atlantic, plus other longitude changes possibly like the, uh..., as well, as the latitude changes...when normal winds take over, and the hurricane formation out-of-control in England this winter, weaponized, ect ect, dumb Christos NASA Neocon mission, who knows. Let's not get into an explanation about religion, ok?
But aside from that, yea...I'd say it's photoelectric, compton, or something, where the gamma like energies of the RF rip away the electron of the gas atom, so it becomes ionized, yes...yes, oui? Am I wrong here?!?
They won't crash the energy companies with the technology, so the patent office is letting Westinghouse do what-ever they want, yep. It's gotta be confirmed by a Navy lab, or something...soon. This effluent needs to be understood before the Jersey Jerky boys, and other Bell Lab people from the North-East, get too carried away.
But testing it on Haiti? Please... we have the Bikini islands for things like that. I mean, it's not like we haven't relocated the locals before when we wanted to test some weapons.
Eh. We have laser guided missles, sonic-guns, microwave-guns, and the military has seriously considered proposals for "gay bombs" before. An earthquake weapon fits in, actually.
Don't forget the WWII bat bombs that were being developed alongside the atomic bomb.
That last post is going to freak out the establishment, especially academia. They re-named Pluto.
I worked on a titanium fab machining project, hopefully. Let's not get into a discussion about your physics and patents. I don't have all night. I want some money...
I'm going to sleep the whole day away tomorrow. I'm too busy studying the skills to deal with ACK-ademia, Bill the Cat.
Let's not forget Rhonda the Clover Grower, eating her radishes, and parsnips, and greens under the trees of her mid-west Goldenberry Tolkien art schools.
Help me, Rhonda, help help me, Rhonda.
That last post is going to freak out the establishment, especially academia. They re-named Pluto.
I ask you again, what makes you think "the establishment" or "academia" reads your posts and gives them any weight?
They've obviously got issues with bats.
I like to think, "owls".
I'm definitely an owl person. The crows aren't friends...but I know a few Raven wings.
The neighbors think I'm a witch, or maybe warlock, would be the tenacious reasoning there...
Y'know, the crows don't like the large birds, and vice versa, but really they'll get into the trees, where their dark color keeps them hidden. The raven (and I'm not really going there, Raven fans, Disney Jonas Bro-love), it's a predator theme with them, and when they go for the corn, it's like Korn. But y'see...that's the dig, I turn down the meat, the fat of the land is spread around...and the Wizard is NEVER late for the spring plant. Slash and burn, but don't torch the brambles, under-thickets from decades of fruit rot. The large trees will suffer greatly from the heat. The bean sprouts around the corn stalk, turns the nutrients, as well as the land resting after seven years.
Owls don't get along with crows, herons, predators.
One of the opening comics, mentioned the Klan, that was like a half-hour ago.
I think she might be live, this calls for a drink of wine, Mister Stewart.
The studio audience is messin' with my head. I'm playing "Evil Woman" by Santana, drinking French Cabernet Sauvignon, thinking about the spas in Burgandy like a Samuel Clemson...just dreamin' of California, checking my head.
I just messed up. I thought it was Windsor castle, but it turned out to be The White Tower of William's land. Isn't the internet great? I wish I could remember all the trivia.
from wiki: It had been thought that there have been at least six ravens in residence at the tower for centuries. The legend of these Ravens in the Tower of London is so important to the people of England that ten ravens (6 on duty and 4 young spares) are actually employed by the Tower of London at the expense of the British government, in return for their service they are treated very well and in deference to the ancient legend and the decree of King Charles II at least six ravens are provided with Raven's Lodgings at the Tower of London. A Yeoman Warder, or Beefeater, has the specific role of Ravenmaster at the Tower and takes care of their feeding and well being. The Ravenmaster builds this relationship with the ravens as he takes the fledglings into his home and hand rears them over a period of about six weeks. Ravens live up to an average of 25 years, but have been known to reach the age of 45 years. To prevent the birds from flying away one of their wings is clipped by the Ravenmaster. This does not hurt or harm the raven in any way. Clipping their wing unbalances their flight ensuring that they don't stray too far from the Tower.
I just missed Neil Young on Conan O'Brien's last night for the show, oops. Oh well. Did you ever get the feeling the Ravens are on duty?
I don't think that the technology that something like that would require is anywhere near available. I'd guess you're on crack, but since you live in Venezuela, I don't need to guess.I guess, I'm retro.
The first is a wallpaper of a black dragon from Hasbro/WotC file. The light has been improved and the character Elric inserted, which is a nod to the letters from the director, much abliged Hasbro.
The insertion of the profile picture I snapped, has been blurred slightly with the picture from you, and I think the color and drama of the motion in the collage...bring out my desire for the Red Dragon, which as funny as it may seem...happens to need an older gentleman's voice for the movie.
Casting aside, I'd think the response would be impressionistic.
(why not? It's already a wasteland Yeah I went there. Thanks FEMA, and government for letting insurance companies pull the **** that they pulled)
As an aside joke, France must believe Hugo since they think we are sending an occupying force to take over Haiti.
To France: Look I understand that ya'll are a bunch of sissies that can't win a war without at least two countries fighting it for you, and an instruction manual complete with easy to follow pictures. What I don't understand is how your country can be so self absorbed as to not be even remotely familiar with how bad looting, riots etc are in a country that was just completely leveled. Let alone being in the Drug Belt.
(Like we would want that dump? We have New Orleans.)
Moonbats. hahahah ahahahahahaha hahahahahahahah ahahahahaha
Moonbats indeed my friend.Here's the thing, gentleman.
I, of course, researched these sources. The interesting fact of the matter, is a military-industrial complex exists, who doesn't want to lose their jobs, and that's not just your local firemen/police either.
We as a nation must realize volunteerism meant our colony of thirteen, the early settlers who also came into the land of milk and honey, were going to have to be more self-sufficient, and it's those type of messages the original TSR crew wrote about.
I'm listening to Pink Floyd's random selection "Final Cut", now that's depressing Roger, nah...
I gotta go to my playlist, which I admit...are old selections...
"She's So Heavy" by the Beatles
You till the land accordingly during the hard times, you pay attention to the sun, you ignore the goombah South American goons, and you move on.
Now on my end, I know the crackpot verses the government's CIA cover, and it begins with street cred called MIT. This is why I discussed the very same Blacklight Power firm as did turbines 'sustained' local Cleveland neighborhood (likewise development). I did this after the fact of President of these United States of America, but I did indeed, direct my recent conversations to re-employment, and infrastructure development.
www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue...
The chemical bond is a misnomer. The Electro-Dynamic theory is being covered up. The sub-atomic attraction of the electron to the nucleaus is below state. The hydrogen interface, for example in a hurricane inner eye-wall with surface, is not a break-up of the bonding action for the chemical molecule, like as we know, makes the molecule water different anyway.
The electro principle is sub-atomic, everything else is definitely confusion. The attraction of the electron is in the neighborhood of 1200th the internal attraction of the nucleaus, therefore...the below state and over-unity action from plasma physics cannot possibly describe a 'chemical' reaction. They are confounded with a Lorentz equation (typical weaponized rail-gun development), because the wave of pressure stresses the metal conductor's lengthwise dimension, to the point of breakage. The water vapor discharge energy travels in a 'parallel' direction of the conductor ect, I know you get that part, right? So then it's not a vector in the sense of a component (of) the derived Maxwell equations...it's a vector from the original formulas before Lorentz and Maxwell, which is not a way the MIT professor describes correctly I think, because he seeks a unity classical viewpoint, either. I mean, it seems simple to me, the force of heat in the hurricane and ion attraction/potential in lightning strikes, simply mitigate the electro pressure release, probably ozone...which could also easily be converted in better designed hydro-electric plants (meaning no Carbon or Nitrogen by-products), where the efficiency of the generator reaches phenomenal anti-frictional efficiency, and that's just a Tesla start, right? hint: The power/pressure ratio is inverted by travelled distance in 3-D, so the derivative (or possibly second-order integral) of the wave front changes according to the Newton equations, just make sure to reflect the vector in the proper direction. Don't worry about the Maxwell equation, yet. The co-efficients obtained become charts, as data. The polarity of the charge is inconsequential, as it only directs the charge. The, yea sure, I get it, but I'm not sure if any of this is right, because I'm too busy to bury my nose into the equations. It just seems to me, the Lorentz equations define Couloumb Ampere laws undefined, I guess, if you are looking without defining the bond breakage in the electron's orbit in the first place. The below-state occurs simply because the sub-atomic process is so much stronger, all of them, so mass defect of the elemental atomic weights is inconsequential in the first place, as a matter of fact too.
reference: thesis by grad-student, I've seen the original but it mysteriously disappeared from my 'favorites' file in the browser, names might be changed
www.df.lth.se/~snorkelf/Longitudinal/Slu...
The electro-thing might be designed as a frikkin' piston motor with a crank (!), which means land use away from rivers, like a big slow-speed diesel on a small South Pacific island. But in our backyard, and I'm guessing completely sustainable...meaning it will be those MIT patents, who the select scientists own, who also will work in the engineering field office...that our country needs, just as much as we do the trucking industry still, but coal demand needs to end within a period of 30-50 years or the mass extinction could make famine pretty bad, which as the way I see it, keeps China attacking us for the food. Because let's face it, they are going to have some pretty bad problems down in South America too.
www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Scie...
The Ampere forces alone don't add up like the total energy of latent heat, thus surface tension of the molecule...because the chemical bond, nor the professor's equation for classical Ampere...is correct.
The electron's force at the sub-nuclear level accounts for the energy released. I'd almost bet on it. I'm going to give the cranks a mark in the column on this.
They stopped researching in '94. Why? Isn't this why they want a Kyoto/Manhatten project?
There's something about the discharge effluent, which worries them, I'm guessin'. Probably ozone.
Am I the only one who doesn't know wha the **** this cat is sayin'?
You guys are the ones, who are so smart.
www.phact.org/e/z/BeardenReview.htm
Dude...
Am I the only one who doesn't know wha the **** this cat is sayin'?
I'm surprised he hasn't got banned yet. Hell, at least you're understandable!
Dude...
Am I the only one who doesn't know wha the **** this cat is sayin'?
I'm surprised he hasn't got banned yet. Hell, at least you're understandable!
Thanks!
I been studyin'...
Shoot, we'd test it on New Orleans first. It's not like the government really cares about them down there anyway.
Why would we want to make New Orleans look any better?
(Like we would want that dump? We have New Orleans.)
I don't know. Haiti might be in better condition...
He's probably still around because i'm guessing that nobody has reported him for obsessively spamming yet.
Dude...
Am I the only one who doesn't know wha the **** this cat is sayin'?
I'm surprised he hasn't got banned yet. Hell, at least you're understandable!
I'm not, people have to report him for that to happen, and even then the Mods would have to decide that he's crossed the line from just being weird to being actively disruptive. As-is, he's too incomprehensible to be disruptive.
In short, merely being weird isn't against the CoC.
In short, merely being weird isn't against the CoC.
Then why the hell do I keep getting free rides on the banned wagon?
Seriously though, I'm not the reportin' type of guy (though God knows people love to report me), and even if I was, I really see nothing reportable.
I still don't understand his ramblings though...
www.strategypage.com/htmw/htamph/article...
I think the Venezulean people are a bit more smarter than ol' Papa Hugo...
Then why the hell do I keep getting free rides on the banned wagon?
I won't pretend to know, but I very much doubt it has anything to do with you being "weird".
Then why the hell do I keep getting free rides on the banned wagon?
I won't pretend to know, but I very much doubt it has anything to do with you being "weird".
I'm sure.
You want to go geopolitical in your talk...
Start smarting up. I walked away for an hour, to let you grow disinterested...before I came back.
These people aren't your normal crowd around the water cooler here.
More Hugo meddling..
www.strategypage.com/htmw/htamph/article...
I think the Venezulean people are a bit more smarter than ol' Papa Hugo...
That's not saying much mind you. :-p
Chavez I think is going to try and start something down there. which will drag us in and we'll get to depose him.
Am I the only one who doesn't know wha the **** this cat is sayin'?
No, it's all nonsense. I assume it's a sock puppet, playing at being all "crazy" and "weird".
And in response to an earlier comment: no, we didn't fail to notice the "collage" we just ignored it cos it's bad.
Am I the only one who doesn't know wha the **** this cat is sayin'?
No, it's all nonsense. I assume it's a sock puppet, playing at being all "crazy" and "weird".
And in response to an earlier comment: no, we didn't fail to notice the "collage" we just ignored it cos it's bad.
Dude needs to get a blog, 'cause that's what all his posts read like. Nothing at all to do with the topic or even flow of conversation, which is harder to accomplish here than other parts of the forum.
You will see a pattern emerge.
I had no idea Chavez was such a huge fan of Jesse Ventura.
GET OUT OF MY MIND
Even if you do, how do you know it wasn't me making you resist them?
You can buy one for a cheap price of four easy payments of 999. Euros. (we don't take dollars, that currency is too unstable and close to being totally worthless)
We'll even throw in this platinum foil hat!
The fact that Chavez is still alive to spew insane conspiracy theories about a US earthquake weapon and not rotting beneath a million tons of collapsed building is proof enough that no such weapon exists.
Agreed.
I do not understand most of the math(maybe 1/4 of it, maybe) he keeps bringing up but I understand everything else he says(except the occasional obscure reference). He speaks primarily in comparisons, it's like playing connect the dots except the dots are logical and the lines are emotions inspired by the logic. It's speaking in imppresions. Don't use logic to connect his paragraphs, use emotion to inspire thought to reach an understanding of the next paragraph.
You will see a pattern emerge.
I have done and for the most part It's not been worth it. I've dealth with people who "communicate" (for lack of a better word) like this in real life and I've never found the experience worthwhile.
Put simply, if someone cannot take the time and effort to communicate effectively then why should we, the reader, do it for them? To expect otherwise is not just rude, it's arrogant.
Because it is confusing most people will ignore it but others will enjoy it(I do). It gives you some insight into a person(more than most conversations) and it is most enjoyable to watch others try to figure it out. It also creates wilder ideas which is great for brainstorming. It is a style of thought that prevents stagnation.
I prevents nothing but communication, which impedes the effective exchange of ideas and hence fosters, rather than prevents, stagnation.
Except that people do not think entirely based on logic. Communication is a combination of emotion, logic, and the search for something better than what you already have, which requires something that has not been thought up yet by one them.
Communication is not a "search for something better than what you already have", it is a transference of information. A "search for something better than what you already have" is simply a goal or topic about which one can elect communicate.
Your position on this, that rambling incoherent nonsense is an effective form of communication, is akin to claiming that jamming eggs, flour and milk down the barrel of a shotgun and firing it into a stove is an effective way of making a cake.
A brainstorming method like this works well for that purpose.
This is not a brainstorming session, it is a message board. Even in brainstorming one's contributions need to be communicated effectively.
Because my mind saver tells me when the thoughts are mine. lol
You can buy one for a cheap price of four easy payments of 999. Euros. (we don't take dollars, that currency is too unstable and close to being totally worthless)
We'll even throw in this platinum foil hat!
Actually, you can pick up a Mind Saver at your local convenience store. In a package of original-flavor life savers, it's the yellow one.
My position is that while Brian is rambling he is still coherent.
All conversations are brainstorming sessions to some degree. I have no trouble understanding what he says(except about 3/4 of the math) and, if you don't aren't you being rude and arrogant attacking what he has to say?
A thought just occurred to me, what if english isn't his native language? If that is the case then he should be laughing at us right now.
When people hear something they automatically compare it to they beleive and they latch on to the one they feel is better.
My position is that while Brian is rambling he is still coherent.
All conversations are brainstorming sessions to some degree. I have no trouble understanding what he says(except about 3/4 of the math) and, if you don't aren't you being rude and arrogant attacking what he has to say?
A thought just occurred to me, what if english isn't his native language? If that is the case then he should be laughing at us right now.
Umm. He's shown us that he can most certainly communicate like everyone else when he chooses to do so. We're not being rude and arrogant, he is. Failure to communicate clearly by choice is an asshat thing to do - especially when it's basically a lame cry for attention.
No matter how you feel about it, the fact remains that he is making a choice to be unclear. When you're in a place where conversation is the entire damned purpose, that's being an asshat. And it runs totally counter to this place's purpose.
When people hear something they automatically compare it to they beleive and they latch on to the one they feel is better.
Irrelevant theory.
My position is that while Brian is rambling he is still coherent.
Irrelevant position.
All conversations are brainstorming sessions to some degree.
Irrelevant theory.
I have no trouble understanding what he says(except about 3/4 of the math) and, if you don't aren't you being rude and arrogant attacking what he has to say?
Since it's being attacked on coherency grounds and ability to be understood, not really. Not that people aren't arrogant and rude, but there's so many better reasons to label someone as arrogant and rude that this is kinda trivial. I mean, it's like citing why the big-bad is so very evil, and ending the list of arson and murder with jay-walking. Kinda petty, ya know?
A thought just occurred to me, what if english isn't his native language? If that is the case then he should be laughing at us right now.
I doubt this, or if it isn't his native language, it's not a barrier. You see, his trouble isn't grammar, it's not structuring sentences, it's giving them meaning, it's including context, it's plucking out the middle sentence of a paragraph and expecting us to fo fill in the beginning and end.
That's not a language-barrier problem, that's just not being coherent.
When people hear something they automatically compare it to they beleive and they latch on to the one they feel is better.
My position is that while Brian is rambling he is still coherent.
All conversations are brainstorming sessions to some degree. I have no trouble understanding what he says(except about 3/4 of the math) and, if you don't aren't you being rude and arrogant attacking what he has to say?
A thought just occurred to me, what if english isn't his native language? If that is the case then he should be laughing at us right now.
Umm. He's shown us that he can most certainly communicate like everyone else when he chooses to do so. We're not being rude and arrogant, he is. Failure to communicate clearly by choice is an asshat thing to do - especially when it's basically a lame cry for attention.
No matter how you feel about it, the fact remains that he is making a choice to be unclear. When you're in a place where conversation is the entire damned purpose, that's being an asshat. And it runs totally counter to this place's purpose.
The fact that he has expressed himself a little more clearly in scientific medium(which has it's own international terminology) does not necessarily mean that his inability to express himself is intentional(assuming that he is in fact unable to do so).
It would be nice however if he would say something one way or the other.
The fact that he has expressed himself a little more clearly in scientific medium(which has it's own international terminology) does not necessarily mean that his inability to express himself is intentional(assuming that he is in fact unable to do so).
It would be nice however if he would say something one way or the other.
He talked about guns in WDYWTTA? perfectly coherently - and I responded in kind. I also just stumbled across a post of his where he flat out says he's doing this on purpose. Something about it basically being acting. So yeah, you're wrong.
A thought just occurred to me, what if english isn't his native language? If that is the case then he should be laughing at us right now.
This his incoherent thought writing process isn't a language thingy. Having chatted with many a people over the net that don't have english as their native language I can say that none of them have writing like his. See they tend to screw up spelling and grammar. not never having a theme, coherence, detail or a point despite having good spelling and at least mediocre grammar. Seeing as how I blocked them many posts ago I have not seen them type normally but of what I saw it indicates that they have some mental problem or they are doing such intentionally. In one case they can not avoid it. In the other they are violating the CoC on at least 3 accounts, if not more, with about almost every single post they make.
I played "Dungeon" by Midnight Syndicate tonight on the stereo, while simutaneously mentioning some things about certain fetishes 'people' have...just for the fun of it, because I live in a role-play world of imagination anyway. Why not. If I can't amuse myself alone in the privacy of my home, then what sense would it make...not to practice my art/craft, or even write a book? It's just acting, already. Comics?? It's all about the vaudeville, the show, yes? Non?!?
From the thread titled 'people' (dirty LFG!), post 9.
The fact that he has expressed himself a little more clearly in scientific medium(which has it's own international terminology) does not necessarily mean that his inability to express himself is intentional(assuming that he is in fact unable to do so).
It would be nice however if he would say something one way or the other.
He talked about guns in WDYWTTA? perfectly coherently - and I responded in kind. I also just stumbled across a post of his where he flat out says he's doing this on purpose. Something about it basically being acting. So yeah, you're wrong.
So you mean he's admitted to spamming and trolling all at once?
When people hear something they automatically compare it to they beleive and they latch on to the one they feel is better.
Irrelevant theory.My position is that while Brian is rambling he is still coherent.
Irrelevant position.All conversations are brainstorming sessions to some degree.
Irrelevant theory.I have no trouble understanding what he says(except about 3/4 of the math) and, if you don't aren't you being rude and arrogant attacking what he has to say?
Since it's being attacked on coherency grounds and ability to be understood, not really. Not that people aren't arrogant and rude, but there's so many better reasons to label someone as arrogant and rude that this is kinda trivial. I mean, it's like citing why the big-bad is so very evil, and ending the list of arson and murder with jay-walking. Kinda petty, ya know?A thought just occurred to me, what if english isn't his native language? If that is the case then he should be laughing at us right now.
I doubt this, or if it isn't his native language, it's not a barrier. You see, his trouble isn't grammar, it's not structuring sentences, it's giving them meaning, it's including context, it's plucking out the middle sentence of a paragraph and expecting us to fo fill in the beginning and end.
That's not a language-barrier problem, that's just not being coherent.
Are you saying that I'm jumping to conclusions? If so you might be right, I am used to getting context where there is little, then again maybe I am just picking up more than most people are willing to bother trying.
So you mean he's admitted to spamming and trolling all at once?
Nah, he just admitted that he likes to play. It isn't an outright confession of disruption. I doubt that's his style. Anyhoo, if anyone feels any post written by anyone in any thread is disruptive jibberish, you can report it. It is a CoC violation and I've seen threads closed because their OP was nonsense before. You do, however, have to keep in mind what kind of thread it is. For example, in WDYWTTA, jibberish is ok. Anything is on topic. When I created the stupid Blerg and Blorp threads, anything was ok to put there. They were designed to be silly. Threads with a purpose (or topic), though, are the places that disruption of that nature could be reported successfully.
Note: This is not meant to direct people to report posts by any specific poster. Report what breaks the CoC if you choose, but do so without bias. Headhunting isn't cool. Trust me.
Here's the admittance that it's just a game:I played "Dungeon" by Midnight Syndicate tonight on the stereo, while simutaneously mentioning some things about certain fetishes 'people' have...just for the fun of it, because I live in a role-play world of imagination anyway. Why not. If I can't amuse myself alone in the privacy of my home, then what sense would it make...not to practice my art/craft, or even write a book? It's just acting, already. Comics?? It's all about the vaudeville, the show, yes? Non?!?
From the thread titled 'people' (dirty LFG!), post 9.
And this was in response to people joking about dungeons and masters and costumes, he was joking in a way that is vulgar(and is against CoC), heck most people in that thread were joking.
All the same I am somewhat annoyed that I'm defending someone who has not yet said a word in their own defense. If he doesn't say something by tommorow I think I shall leave well enough alone and drop the subject.
All the same I am somewhat annoyed that I'm defending someone who has not yet said a word in their own defense. If he doesn't say something by tommorow I think I shall leave well enough alone and drop the subject.
I wouldn't hold your breath, if I were you. I've tried to address him multiple times with direct questions to things he's said, and he's never even aknowledged them. I think the only time I saw him actually respond back-and-forth with someone was when he had a tiff with Malcadon, but I think I'll chalk that up to him still getting a feel for the persona and hadn't settled on just how disdainful it was of others.
And this was in response to people joking about dungeons and masters and costumes, he was joking in a way that is vulgar(and is against CoC), heck most people in that thread were joking.
All the same I am somewhat annoyed that I'm defending someone who has not yet said a word in their own defense. If he doesn't say something by tommorow I think I shall leave well enough alone and drop the subject.
That's not my read on it. He said he lives in a world of role play imagination and endeavors to amuse himself in that vein. He said he wishes to practice his craft. He said he does so to amuse himself. To me, that's pretty much sayin' it's just a game. But that doesn't even matter. Know why? The fact that we both look at this same section of text and read two totally different things into it effectively demonstrates my point: He failed at communication.
The exact reason for the formation of the planet's (Earth) water...is something only recently agreed upon by astrophysicists.
What's clear to me from biblical lore, is a sudden down-ward freeze at the poles results in the phenomena of mass extinction. How this happens, concerns me. It's un-related to our own device as humans or organisms on planet earth. It's neither a comet, or meteor impact, nor collapse of internal geological processes. It's a stellar phenomena, in other words. The close proximity passes us with enough of an effect to suddenly drop the temperature at the poles. Some may think Mars and what remains of the asteroid belt, were causing the very same phenomena...but I'm not so sure.
And the calculations show the Oort cloud to produce a 'nemesis' at the 26 million interval, at which, thankfully...we are now on the other side from...at 13 million years, exactly 1/2 as you notice.
But the problem is the perturbed comets also follow the intervals from collisions in our binary star system. The other body being, of course, an invisible body we are orbiting? I really don't know, but this is what I read:
A theory has been proposed which accurately predicts the orbits of our solar planets as well as the orbits of planets (and tiny stars) in nearby star systems. This theory postulates that our solar system was formed with the aid of a solar companion star. A dark body has been detected by the IRAS satellite. The IRAS measurements and data from other sources have been utilized to determine an orbit and mass.
Nemesis is estimated to orbit the Sun with a period slightly more than 5000 years and to have a mass 4.7% that of the Sun. The orbit is highly eccentric and inclined at about 49 deg. to the ecliptic plane. Nemesis pasted aphelion around 1969 to 1971, about 453 AU distant from the Sun.
It is postulated that comets drawn from the Oort cloud, planetary rings or elsewhere, could be orbiting in trajectories related to the planet's orbit. These comets, possibly composed of toxic compounds, could occasionally pass through the Earth's orbit with potentially disastrous consequences. Noah's biblical flood was likely caused by one of these comets striking Earth. It is suspected that a comet swarm may leave the vicinity of Nemesis when it is near aphelion and, on the second pass, a few may collide with Earth as they approach the Sun. The orbit period of the comets is estimated to be about two thirds that of Nemesis. Accordingly, the comet which may have caused Noah's flood left the vicinity of Nemesis at least two (Nemesis) orbit periods ago. It missed the Earth on its first pass but struck it on the second (around 3000 B.C.). Recent cometary activity (e.g. those striking Jupiter) may herald the beginning of an unprecedented and dangerous celestial period. The period of highest risk is between now and 2200 A.D. (earlier dates more likely). Only a concerted effort focused on detection and neutralization can avoid an impending environmental catastrophe of biblical proportions. (source: B.Warmkessel)
.I can no longer defend my previous position intelligently so all that is left to say is, I still like the manner of speaking. That is all
Oh yeah!?! Well ... something.
This is some misguided science, but intriguing facts.
double right click, save, ZIP copy of this entire book (1.2 MB)
And this was in response to people joking about dungeons and masters and costumes, he was joking in a way that is vulgar(and is against CoC), heck most people in that thread were joking.
Nothing I said in that thread was vulgar. you may have interpreted it as such but none of it was inherently vulgar. Others might have interpreted as such as well and responded as if it were.
All the same I am somewhat annoyed that I'm defending someone who has not yet said a word in their own defense. If he doesn't say something by tomorrow I think I shall leave well enough alone and drop the subject.
Because they don't defend their position. When asking them a simple question they seem to either spam with something not related or try to pick a fight with you in a non coherent manner.
I had blocked him and so I can't see his posts. however when I am responding I can see them and well I have seen that his first response here (i guess in his defense) is basically a pic of the milky way of which I'm using for my avatar. anyways assuming that he's not baiting for someone in particular he seems to be making more sense within his own posts even though they seem to have no connection to anything in the thread they are posted in.
I can no longer defend my previous position intelligently so all that is left to say is, I still like the manner of speaking. That is all
Meh. It seems to me the standard internet response is pretty much always stick to your guns no matter what rather than admitting you're wrong. To each their own.
These guys are really behind the curve.
And this was in response to people joking about dungeons and masters and costumes, he was joking in a way that is vulgar(and is against CoC), heck most people in that thread were joking.
Nothing I said in that thread was vulgar. you may have interpreted it as such but none of it was inherently vulgar. Others might have interpreted as such as well and responded as if it were.All the same I am somewhat annoyed that I'm defending someone who has not yet said a word in their own defense. If he doesn't say something by tomorrow I think I shall leave well enough alone and drop the subject.
Because they don't defend their position. When asking them a simple question they seem to either spam with something not related or try to pick a fight with you in a non coherent manner.
I had blocked him and so I can't see his posts. however when I am responding I can see them and well I have seen that his first response here (i guess in his defense) is basically a pic of the milky way of which I'm using for my avatar. anyways assuming that he's not baiting for someone in particular he seems to be making more sense within his own posts even though they seem to have no connection to anything in the thread they are posted in.
I have already stopped defending Brian.
I can no longer defend my previous position intelligently so all that is left to say is, I still like the manner of speaking. That is all
Meh. It seems to me the standard internet response is pretty much always stick to your guns no matter what rather than admitting you're wrong. To each their own.
Actually I was admitting that he was intentionally screwing with people's heads but that it still inspires me to think more creatively, and that I enjoy such regardless of the source.