Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 EscherEnigma Jul 23, 2009 17:16:56	The Naked Cowboy is running for NYC Mayor. Not much else I can say about it, not being a NYC resident and all. What? If Hater (or whatever he's calling himself these days) can make posts that don't do much else other then link to an article, why can't I?
#2 KillerGM Jul 23, 2009 17:23:57	Franking awesome. We need more naked politicians.
#3 toastedamphibian Jul 23, 2009 17:29:45	Hmm, I seem to rember alot of people suggesting Mrs. Paline should get naked to increase her odds of getting elected. I remember alot of people getting mad about that...
#4 owls_and_more_owls Jul 23, 2009 17:34:06	Alaskan Moose field-dresses Sarah Pailin.
#5 Dark_Stryke Jul 23, 2009 18:25:55	I hope he wins. Entirely for the lulz, of course.
#6 Mechalibur Jul 23, 2009 18:46:27	I hope he wins. Entirely for the lulz, of course. That's the only reason some people have been in office.
#7 owls_and_more_owls Jul 23, 2009 18:47:59	We know about his nudity, but what about his policies?
#8 Klirshon Jul 23, 2009 18:51:38	That's the only reason some people have been in office. Wasn't that the reason Jesse Ventura became a Governor of Minnisota?
#9 KillerGM Jul 23, 2009 18:54:10	"Naked is a state of mind" - Luscious Jackson
#10 EscherEnigma Jul 23, 2009 19:02:24	We know about his nudity, but what about his policies? From his website, doing more with less (insert joke and/or pun about him being nearly naked), stimulus package for small business, more government transparency (insert joke and/or pun about him being nearly naked), something about taxes, energy efficiency, gay marriage (he is an ordained minister and officially registered as a marriage officiant of NYC), and apparently humor as his website is a pretty amusing read. The big two questions, to me, are these: If he gets elected, will he keep busking? Will there be a televised debate between him and incumbent mayor Bloomberg?
#11 owls_and_more_owls Jul 23, 2009 19:06:24	From his website, doing more with less (insert joke and/or pun about him being nearly naked), stimulus package for small business, more government transparency (insert joke and/or pun about him being nearly naked), something about taxes, energy efficiency, gay marriage (he is an ordained minister and officially registered as a marriage officiant of NYC), and apparently humor as his website is a pretty amusing read. The big two questions, to me, are these: If he gets elected, will he keep busking? Will there be a televised debate between him and incumbent mayor Bloomberg? Everything you just said could easily be modified into a crude joke.
#12 KillerGM Jul 23, 2009 19:36:57	Everything you just said could easily be modified into a crude joke. Couldn't the same be said for 99.9% of the things posted here? :P
#13 EscherEnigma Jul 23, 2009 19:41:07	Everything you just said could easily be modified into a crude joke. As someone that's turned "sugar" into a sexual innuendo such that I could get a girl sitting ten feet away from me blushing and giggling from just saying the word, I think that's true of most of the English language. And now I'm forced to ponder whether or not there's any porno of an erotic reading of the Constitution.
#14 owls_and_more_owls Jul 23, 2009 19:41:48	I don't believe so. I think you need to rectify your thinking.
#15 toastedamphibian Jul 23, 2009 19:50:02	Couldn't the same be said for 99.9% of the things posted here? :P No. A good 30.9% of what is posted here is already a crude joke, leaving the percentage of things that could be turned into crude jokes at a healthy 69%
#16 KillerGM Jul 23, 2009 19:58:12	No. A good 30.9% of what is posted here is already a crude joke, leaving the percentage of things that could be turned into crude jokes at a healthy 69% Oh please, that 30.9% could be twisted into a more (or differently) crude joke, so I think it still qualifies. :P
#17 EscherEnigma Jul 23, 2009 20:01:51	I don't believe so. I think you need to rectify your thinking. Oh comeon, with lines like "into a more perfect union" and "we the forefathers" there's gotta be someone that's done it already. Rule 34 any all that.
#18 toastedamphibian Jul 23, 2009 20:21:42	Oh please, that 30.9% could be twisted into a more (or differently) crude joke, so I think it still qualifies. :P No. Thats like saying you can take a peice of paper and twist it into a peice of paper. It's still a peice of paper. You havnt make it into a peice of paper. You just changed other qualities of it. In order to 'make it into a crude joke' it has to have not been a crude joke. Otherwise your making yourself into yourself all the time, it is a phrase without meaning. Don't cheapen words to try to warp the world into a place where your made up statistic is more correct KGM, thats just low.
#19 KillerGM Jul 23, 2009 20:39:15	*shrug* I still disagree. Accusing me of warping the world is pretty low, but I guess I should expect it of you. And actually, I do think I'm making myself into a different self all the time, but am still myself ...
#20 toastedamphibian Jul 23, 2009 20:41:58	'diffrent self' is not the same as 'a self'. And yes, you should expect that of me. I never proposed that you couldnt make a crude joke into a diffrent crude joke, simply that you could not make a crude joke into a crude joke, as that is what it already is. You cant make a concious thing concious. You can alter its conciousness. It msut be unconcious in order to be made concious. Anything else is altering the conciousness, not making it. Edit: arguing diffrently is kind of like saying I can make self-awareness because a can beat a kid in teh head with a brick untill he is retarded.
#21 KillerGM Jul 23, 2009 20:45:17	OK, TA, you're smart. I was making a joke about what another poster said. You one-upped me and have shown how smart you are by disassembling a furthering of the joke. Good job. EDIT: This was written before your edit, which included the 4 sentences before the "edit", as well as the stuff afterwards. Now you're just being a jerk.
#22 toastedamphibian Jul 23, 2009 20:52:00	:{ Didn't realise you where taking this seriously. I was just having fun playing with words. No offense was intended. I mistook your continued participation as playing along for the sake of the game, not as actually attempting to defend your claim. Sorry about that.
#23 KillerGM Jul 23, 2009 20:54:44	Apology accepted. Personally, I like to blame it on the drugs ... PERFECTLY LEGAL COLD MEDICINE!!
#24 bosskitty Jul 24, 2009 9:09:51	Franking awesome. We need more naked politicians. I'm there, as long as they don't look like John McCain or Hilliary Clinton. Brrrr!
#25 pigknight Jul 24, 2009 11:49:30	Oh comeon, with lines like "into a more perfect union" and "we the forefathers" there's gotta be someone that's done it already. Rule 34 any all that. With catgirls.
#26 KillerGM Jul 24, 2009 16:21:59	I'm there, as long as they don't look like John McCain or Hilliary Clinton. Brrrr! *shrugs* I don't care who they are or what they look like.
#27 tiwaztyrsfist Jul 24, 2009 22:37:32	Couldn't the same be said for 99.9% of the things posted here? :P Ha-ha! Thing...
#28 pigknight Aug 13, 2009 11:16:28	Teehee.
#29 subsistcyber Aug 13, 2009 11:23:03	So... anything happen with this? Edit: I'd look for myself, but typing in "naked cowboy" at work would probably return with results that could get me in trouble.