New Batman and Bane pitures

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 02, 2011 2:20:20
movies.yahoo.com/photos/collections/gall...

Interesting.
#2

The_Silversword

Aug 02, 2011 3:17:06
Ye Gods!!!

Hasnt Bane already been used!?

When the hells are they gonna do one with Man-Bat already!?

just incase no ones able to figure it out, Man-Bat has long been my favorite Bat-Man villan.
#3

ADHadh

Aug 02, 2011 5:06:02
I think Bane was always a lot more dangerous than people remembered, if only because he's actually very intelligent.
After all, his initial purpose was to kill Batman. And he was able to use Joker of all people as a minion.
#4

draco1119

Aug 02, 2011 8:58:20
I think Bane was always a lot more dangerous than people remembered, if only because he's actually very intelligent.
After all, his initial purpose was to kill Batman. And he was able to use Joker of all people as a minion.

Yeah, Batman & Robin REALLY didn't do Bane justice.  Remember, this is the dude who broke Batman's back, leading to the Azrael stories.
#5

zombie_babies

Aug 02, 2011 9:21:24
Yeah, that was my first thought, too.  Tiny Bane is tiny.
#6

ADHadh

Aug 02, 2011 10:14:50
Because after the last movie people were too scared, so they decided to make the villain cuter this time?

BTW., people rolled their eyes at first pictures of Ledger's Joker as well (I know I was underwhelmed at first). I say we gotta wait and see.
#7

pluisjen

Aug 02, 2011 10:23:49
Keep in mind that Frodo was played by a regular sized guy as well. These are shots from the set, not from the movie. People can feel a lot bigger or smaller based on how you film them.
#8

trappedslider

Aug 02, 2011 13:12:53
Who is playing Bane again?



Tom Hardy
#9

lofgren

Aug 02, 2011 13:19:25
With the exception of the shire all of the hobbits while on screen with regular sized people were shot on green screen. This is not green screen work.



This is not true, at least not according to the extra features on the DVDs. According to those Jackson wanted to keep greenscreening to a minimum. The illusion of the hobbits' size was mostly done using camera tricks like forced perspective.

Can anybody explain why they are calling this movie The Dark Knight Rises when they had a perfectly good title with Knightfall? Given that they are marketing it as the conclusion of the trilogy, it would seem like a perfect title. There are a lot of people out there who never read the comic but loved Batman Begins and The Dark Knight who would be all, "Batman's going to DIE?! NOOOO!" They would feel absolutely compelled to see this, if only for the novelty of seeing a superhero movie marketed based on the hero losing.
#10

trappedslider

Aug 02, 2011 13:20:43

Can anybody explain why they are calling this movie The Dark Knight Rises when they had a perfectly good title with Knightfall? Given that they are marketing it as the conclusion of the trilogy, it would seem like a perfect title. There are a lot of people out there who never read the comic but loved Batman Begins and The Dark Knight who would be all, "Batman's going to DIE?! NOOOO!" They would feel absolutely compelled to see this, if only for the novelty of seeing a superhero movie marketed based on the hero losing.



Because they may not be using that storyline,and may be going with a different one
#11

lofgren

Aug 02, 2011 13:21:32

Because they may not be using that storyline,and may be going with a different one



It's Batman vs. Bane. Close enough.
#12

zombie_babies

Aug 02, 2011 13:24:39
Keep in mind that Frodo was played by a regular sized guy as well. These are shots from the set, not from the movie. People can feel a lot bigger or smaller based on how you film them.



They also make Tom Cruise and Al Pacino look bigger than the midgets they are.  Fair point. 
#13

akaddk

Aug 02, 2011 13:29:01
Keep in mind that Frodo was played by a regular sized guy as well. These are shots from the set, not from the movie. People can feel a lot bigger or smaller based on how you film them.


Elijah Wood is not regular sized. He's 5'6" which in 90% of countries around the world is considered short for a male.
#14

trappedslider

Aug 02, 2011 13:30:33

Because they may not be using that storyline,and may be going with a different one



It's Batman vs. Bane. Close enough.



and Catwoman is going to be in it as well,they may have elements of Knightfall,but it won't be knightfall,jsut like Dark Knight had elements of the long halloween and The killing Joke
#15

zombie_babies

Aug 02, 2011 13:32:21
Elijah Wood is not regular sized. He's 5'6" which in 90% of countries around the world is considered short for a male.



True, but in 90% of shires 5'6" is ****ing gigantic. 
#16

lofgren

Aug 02, 2011 14:15:07

Because they may not be using that storyline,and may be going with a different one



It's Batman vs. Bane. Close enough.



and Catwoman is going to be in it as well,they may have elements of Knightfall,but it won't be knightfall,jsut like Dark Knight had elements of the long halloween and The killing Joke



I don't recall many elements of the Killing Joke in Dark Knight, not the plot anyway. It had more in common with the Joker's first appearance in Batman #1, where he vows to kill several people on television and then proceeds to do so in mysterious means despite Batman's protection.

In order to call a story an adaptation of the Killing Joke, I think you would need:

  1. Joker kidnaps, kills, maims, or at least threatens Gordon's family.

  2. Joker kidnaps Gordon, or somebody very close to Batman, and tortures them.

  3. Gordon (or whomever) rallies and reveals that we are not so fragile as his twisted cynicism would have it.

You could argue that Dent's ordeal satisfies these criteria, but personally I don't think it does because it's presented as more of an afterthought in the movie. The primary arc is the Joker terrorizing Gotham in a very similar vein to the way he did so in Batman #1, with Two-Face as merely a pawn in the endgame. The Joker's philosophy is obviously greatly influenced by the Killing Joke but that's not enough to call it an adaptation.

I don't remember the Long Halloween well enough to comment on that.

In any event I highly doubt they could get away with titling the movie after one of the villains.

On the other hand, for a Knightfall adaptation, all you need is:

  1. Bane's introduction

  2. Bane fights Batman to within an inch of his life, preferably by using other criminals as pawns to leave Batman mentally and physically exhausted.

  3. Batman is injured severely enough to be near death, and forced to consider retiring forever.

  4. Batman rallies and returns to the fight having learned a lesson from Bane, that his weapon is as much his wits as his strength and fighting smart is more important than being tough.

#2 is going to happen no matter what, and the preview, featuring Gordon (I assume) dying of cancer (since that was a pretty big arc from the comics), is perfectly suited for foreshadowing #3. In fact, given that there is nothing Nolan likes better than parallel character arcs, I would stake money that #3 happens. Batman obviously doesn't end the movie having lost, since it's a superhero movie (and called the Dark Knight Rises), so some variation of #4 is obviously going to happen as well.

Falling is more consistent than rising thematically and tonally with the first two movies, which were about Batman battling hopelessly against urban decay and collapse, giving every impression that he is desperately fighting a rising tide by trying to punch individual waves in the face, with zero awareness of the simpe fact that he'll never accomplish anything except getting all wet. If Batman is going to accomplish anything in Gotham he needs to learn that he can't do it by putting out brush fires, and Bane is the perfect man to teach him that, and (temporarily) falling is the perfect method because it evokes the line echoed from the first movie in the second: "Why do we fall?" "To learn to get back up."

Plus Knightfall just sounds better. Dark Knight Rises sounds like the straight to DVD sequel tacked on and shot in two weeks when somebody realized the fine print wouldn't let him out of his contract.
#17

ADHadh

Aug 02, 2011 14:16:48
With the exception of the shire all of the hobbits while on screen with regular sized people were shot on green screen. This is not green screen work.


Ok, someone already said it's not true, but I come with pictures:
#18

lofgren

Aug 02, 2011 14:23:19
With the exception of the shire all of the hobbits while on screen with regular sized people were shot on green screen. This is not green screen work.


Ok, someone already said it's not true, but I come with pictures:
#19

ADHadh

Aug 02, 2011 14:33:08
Wow, two stills in a 9 hour movie! This is most certain proof positive that "most" of the scenes with hobbits and regular size people were greenscreened, since these two shots consist of the vast majority of Frodo's appearance in the film. (Or from, the original post "all except the ones in the shire," which is weird because both of these stills are from shire scenes and thus not pertinent to the claim.)

All I can say is that according to the DVD extras, Jackson used minimal greenscreening. The hobbit effects were "mostly" done with body doubles and forced perspective. Note the "most." Now, you can say that the documentarians were lying or mistaken, and since this is basically official LotR propaganda you might even have a point, but by all accounts Jackson dislikes greenscreening and CGI which is why so many elements of the films were built by Weta even though it cost significantly more than CGI.


Someone already mentioned all this, but did not provide stills. I have no idea what are you aiming at.
Anyway, it is possible that Bane will be huge in the movie despite appearing small in afore linked pictures from the set. Apparently Nolan dislikes CGI as well, judging from the chase scene described in the Cracked article. He may be using similar techniques.
#20

lofgren

Aug 02, 2011 14:36:08
I have faith that no matter what happens Ann Hathaway will be awesome as Catwoman.

Also, David S. Goyer is not being credited with dialogue. Thank the gods. That man is a terrible, terrible writer. Great stories, don't get me wrong, but anytime he tries to write actual human speech you know you're in for trouble. As evidence, contrast Blade II, which had a story by Goyer but was almost completely rewritten by the director, with Blade III which was written entirely by Goyer.
#21

lofgren

Aug 02, 2011 14:37:24

Someone already mentioned all this, but did not provide stills. I have no idea what are you aiming at.
Anyway, it is possible that Bane will be huge in the movie despite appearing small in afore linked pictures from the set. Apparently Nolan dislikes CGI as well, judging from the chase scene described in the Cracked article. He may be using similar techniques.



My bad, I totally misunderstood your post. (Specifically, I missed the aren't in the Cracked article title.)
#22

Crimson_Concerto

Aug 02, 2011 14:42:30
TOM HARDY IS SO SEXY!



I'm actually very skeptical, though, about Ann Hathaway as Catwoman. Has she ever done anything more action oriented like this? Not that I doubt her acting ability, I just don't know that I've seen any evidence that this sort of role is in her range. I'd be happy to be wrong, of course.
#23

lofgren

Aug 02, 2011 14:46:54
It's well outside the range of anything she has done before, but I've been continually impressed by her acting chops. I have faith she can make it work. The major obstacle will be whether or not Nolan can write decent dialogue for a woman, something that Memento and the last two Batman movies suggest might be somewhat beyond his abilities.
#24

zombie_babies

Aug 02, 2011 15:15:07
Guys, she's done action.  Get Smart, anyone?   

Seriously, though?  She's like the hawtest chick in Hollywood and I personally can't wait to see her in a leather Catwoman getup.  And dialogue?  **** that.
#25

trappedslider

Aug 02, 2011 16:42:20
I don't recall many elements of the Killing Joke in Dark Knight, not the plot anyway. It had more in common with the Joker's first appearance in Batman #1, where he vows to kill several people on television and then proceeds to do so in mysterious means despite Batman's protection.

In order to call a story an adaptation of the Killing Joke, I think you would need:

  1. Joker kidnaps, kills, maims, or at least threatens Gordon's family.

  2. Joker kidnaps Gordon, or somebody very close to Batman, and tortures them.

  3. Gordon (or whomever) rallies and reveals that we are not so fragile as his twisted cynicism would have it.

You could argue that Dent's ordeal satisfies these criteria, but personally I don't think it does because it's presented as more of an afterthought in the movie. The primary arc is the Joker terrorizing Gotham in a very similar vein to the way he did so in Batman #1, with Two-Face as merely a pawn in the endgame. The Joker's philosophy is obviously greatly influenced by the Killing Joke but that's not enough to call it an adaptation.

I don't remember the Long Halloween well enough to comment on that.



 Goyer, who penned the first draft of the film, cited the DC Comics 13-issue comic book limited series Batman: The Long Halloween as the major influence on his storyline. Nolan suggested Batman: The Killing Joke influenced a section of the Joker's dialogue in the film, in which he says that anyone can become like him given the right circumstances.

And to go with your hting,why wasn't the episode of BTAS that introduced Bane into the cartoon simply titled "Knightfall?" It had bane vs batman too...even went so far as to have Bane get ready break his back jsut like in the comic
#26

lofgren

Aug 02, 2011 16:46:44
Nolan suggested Batman: The Killing Joke influenced a section of the Joker's dialogue in the film, in which he says that anyone can become like him given the right circumstances.



So it's as I said, a bit of dialogue capturing the Joker's philosophy (such as it is) was taken from Killing Joke, but the plot really was not an adaptation of that story.


And to go with your hting,why wasn't the episode of BTAS that introduced Bane into the cartoon simply titled "Knightfall?" It had bane vs batman too...even went so far as to have Bane get ready break his back jsut like in the comic



Just because an adaptation uses Bane doesn't mean it must use the title Knightfall and/or must be an adaptation of that series. It's just so perfect in this case because follows so logically from the previous installments.
#27

CCS

Aug 02, 2011 17:56:42
Remember, this is the dude who broke Batman's back, leading to the Azrael stories.



You say this like any of that was a good thing.
#28

draco1119

Aug 02, 2011 20:47:54
Remember, this is the dude who broke Batman's back, leading to the Azrael stories.

You say this like any of that was a good thing.

Just that Bane did what no other villain was able to do.  Bring down the Batman for a sustained period of time.

#29

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 02, 2011 21:15:19
Remember, this is the dude who broke Batman's back, leading to the Azrael stories.

You say this like any of that was a good thing.

Just that Bane did what no other villain was able to do.  Bring down the Batman for a sustained period of time.



Bane will probably bring Batman down for a bit, but I'm sure it will differ from the comics. You have to remember that they are working with a movie that has to be over in about 2... maybe 2 and a half hours. They can't really cripple Batman and then give him some months to start walking again. The time requirements mean that there will be changes to the story. So far, Nolan has done a pretty damn good job with the story. 
#30

draco1119

Aug 02, 2011 21:28:03
They can't really cripple Batman and then give him some months to start walking again.

Sure they can.  Some new super-villain breaks him in half even before the credits.  During opening credits you show a montage showing how much worse of a ****-hole Gotham has become.  Then get into the story.  Easy peasie.

#31

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 02, 2011 21:35:33
They can't really cripple Batman and then give him some months to start walking again.

Sure they can.  Some new super-villain breaks him in half even before the credits.  During opening credits you show a montage showing how much worse of a ****-hole Gotham has become.  Then get into the story.  Easy peasie.



Meh... I'm not a fan of movies using "To Be Continued..." I don't know how many people would like it.
#32

draco1119

Aug 02, 2011 21:58:36
They can't really cripple Batman and then give him some months to start walking again.

Sure they can.  Some new super-villain breaks him in half even before the credits.  During opening credits you show a montage showing how much worse of a ****-hole Gotham has become.  Then get into the story.  Easy peasie.



Meh... I'm not a fan of movies using "To Be Continued..." I don't know how many people would like it.

No, not a TBC thing.  Break his back before the OPENING credits.

#33

lofgren

Aug 02, 2011 23:49:45
That would be sweet. AND it would explain why the title is "Rises" instead of "Falls." I think you might be on to something here.
#34

ORC_Sinister

Aug 03, 2011 14:09:25

I’ve removed content from this thread because innappropriate content is a violation of the Code of Conduct.  You can review the Code of Conduct here: wizards.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wizards.cfg...


 


 


Please keep your posts polite, respectful, and on-topic, and refrain from making personal attacks.

#35

akusu

Aug 03, 2011 14:10:43
I realize that bane is a genious however he is also 6 1/2 feet tall and 400 pounds of muscle. Why do we have someone who is shorter than Bale playing the part?

This is what pissed me off about Venom too.
#36

zombie_babies

Aug 03, 2011 14:39:46


That's all I can say.  It is directed at nothing and no one.  But yeah, .
#37

draco1119

Aug 03, 2011 16:23:27
I’ve removed content from this thread because innappropriate content is a violation of the Code of Conduct.  You can review the Code of Conduct here: wizards.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wizards.cfg...
Please keep your posts polite, respectful, and on-topic, and refrain from making personal attacks.

Maybe I should report this post for being off-topic...

#38

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 03, 2011 17:04:39

#39

Crimson_Concerto

Aug 03, 2011 20:12:52
Really. You orked someone for saying an actress is attractive?

Is that what happened? I hope nobody sees my last post in this thread...
#40

lofgren

Aug 03, 2011 23:43:27
The whole point of innuendo is that the only people who understand it have already experienced with the explicit facts that are being alluded to. The only people who could possibly object to what was said are people who are already well familiar with the topic. Anybody who could possibly be exposed to the inappropriateness of it who wasn't already well aware of certain normal and healthy bodily functions have no idea what was being discussed because it went right over their heads.

The whole back-and-forth was less artful but no more explicit than a Donald Duck cartoon.

(In fact, that last sentence of the second paragraph in this post was way more explicit.)
#41

lofgren

Aug 03, 2011 23:58:24
Only the first two of my sentences were about the orking and the rest was about innuendo. I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.
#42

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 04, 2011 0:05:22
Only the first two of my sentences were about the orking and the rest was about innuendo. I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.


Actually... talking about the modded post is also an offense.
#43

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 0:10:30
Only the first two of my sentences were about the orking and the rest was about innuendo. I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.


Actually... talking about the modded post is also an offense.



OK, fixed. Now posts 40-52 will have to be stricken, with the exception of my strange little tangent there. What could I be referring to? I have no idea. Do you?
#44

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 04, 2011 0:11:47
Only the first two of my sentences were about the orking and the rest was about innuendo. I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.


Actually... talking about the modded post is also an offense.



OK, fixed. Now posts 40-52 will have to be stricken, with the exception of my strange little tangent there. What could I be referring to? I have no idea. Do you?


Sadly, the ORCs don't need to have any idea, just a complaint. 
#45

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 0:13:34
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.
#46

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 04, 2011 0:22:01
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.


See... now you are just asking for it. That would be referrencing politics and sex. When the hoarde comes to visit you, don't be surprised.
#47

Crimson_Concerto

Aug 04, 2011 1:12:31
I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.

What did I do?
#48

trappedslider

Aug 04, 2011 1:14:22
I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.

What did I do?



lol and orc in the house
#49

Robin_Hoodlum

Aug 04, 2011 6:25:27
I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.

What did I do?



lol and orc in the house


Finally got your badge, did you?
#50

draco1119

Aug 04, 2011 8:13:57
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.


See... now you are just asking for it. That would be referrencing politics and sex. When the hoarde comes to visit you, don't be surprised.

No, under the current administration it's politics and racism.  Sex was is in the '90s. 

#51

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 04, 2011 9:19:49
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.


See... now you are just asking for it. That would be referrencing politics and sex. When the hoarde comes to visit you, don't be surprised.

No, under the current administration it's politics and racism.  Sex was is in the '90s. 



The snowhite thread begs to differ.
#52

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 10:49:25
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.


See... now you are just asking for it. That would be referrencing politics and sex. When the hoarde comes to visit you, don't be surprised.



Wait, what? This is ridiculous. It's bad enough that wink, wink, nudge, nudge posts get modded when the complainer was the one having all those dirty thoughts to begin with, but how do you say that "plausible deniability" has anything to do with sex? Or anything to do with politics, other than being a tool used by politicians?

God, I hate to think what the mods would do if anybody mentioned filibustering…
#53

draco1119

Aug 04, 2011 11:04:55
God, I hate to think what the mods would do if anybody mentioned filibustering…

Or Phillip McRevis...

#54

zombie_babies

Aug 04, 2011 11:57:50
Or Phillip McRevis...



Gettin' back to what we were talkin' about, I'd Phillip her McRevis - if you know what I'm sayin'.  ;)

And if you do know what I'm sayin', howsabout tellin' me?  I really have no idea ...
#55

trappedslider

Aug 04, 2011 12:18:25
Or Phillip McRevis...



Gettin' back to what we were talkin' about, I'd Phillip her McRevis - if you know what I'm sayin'.  ;)

And if you do know what I'm sayin', howsabout tellin' me?  I really have no idea ...






#56

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 13:52:47
I raise you Monty Python

#57

draco1119

Aug 04, 2011 14:05:49
I raise you Monty Python

"Um... What's it like?"

#58

trappedslider

Aug 04, 2011 15:56:15
I raise you Monty Python



too easy and over used...
#59

trappedslider

Aug 04, 2011 16:36:45
Still better than the pie...



apple or fish?
#60

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 23:57:14
The apple is really only for special occasions.
#61

Crimson_Concerto

Aug 05, 2011 6:17:15
#62

draco1119

Aug 05, 2011 7:03:33
That pic is not drool-worthy.  But I'm gonna do it anyway! 
#63

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 15, 2011 18:38:23
The Batwing is here...
www.okmagazine.com/2011/08/watch-the-dar...

 
#64

Count_Von_CoC

Aug 15, 2011 20:30:35
The Batwing is here...
www.okmagazine.com/2011/08/watch-the-dar...

I've got a batwing in mah pants!  See, all you have to do is spread out your... Nevermind. 
#65

The_Silversword

Aug 15, 2011 22:56:56
Why does he need a Bat-Wing? Maybe Man-Bat WILL be in this one!?
#66

Klirshon

Aug 16, 2011 8:33:01
Man-Bat is elsewhere, "terrorising" other people.





#67

The_Silversword

Aug 17, 2011 6:27:32
Man-Bat is elsewhere, "terrorising" other people.





Hahahahahahahahaha!!!! Awesome!!!!

#68

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 17, 2011 7:45:13
Even if it's a furry, why are people so scared and the police so brutal?


Because he's French?
#69

ADHadh

Aug 17, 2011 7:51:41
So you'Re saying this was filmed in the US? How typical.


Oh, maybe that was that French guy that dresses himself up and then goes to town to upset people.
I think even other French people hate him. Trolls probably like him tough.
#70

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 17, 2011 8:02:10
So you'Re saying this was filmed in the US? How typical.


Oh, maybe that was that French guy that dresses himself up and then goes to town to upset people.
I think even other French people hate him. Trolls probably like him tough.



Who would get upset by a guy in a cheap costume?


The guy at the ATM. Watch the video.
#71

ADHadh

Aug 17, 2011 8:12:17
And pizza delivery men:



#72

The_Silversword

Aug 17, 2011 23:50:11
What gets me about that bat dude is that hes still flappin his arms as hes runnin away from an ass kickin, hahaha!! He (could be a she, I dunno?) stays in character, no matter what! hahaha! gotta respect that!
#73

sfdragon

Aug 17, 2011 23:53:56
cowabunga dudes
#74

The_Silversword

Aug 17, 2011 23:54:15
And pizza delivery men:




HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! great stuff, Makes it even funnier cause I just was saying something about ninja turtles in another thread hahahaha! its like youre psychotic or whatever.
#75

sfdragon

Aug 17, 2011 23:54:52
you both likely have pizza on the brain....
#76

ADHadh

Aug 18, 2011 4:17:51

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! great stuff, Makes it even funnier cause I just was saying something about ninja turtles in another thread hahahaha! its like youre psychotic or whatever.


I'm pretty sure you've ment psychic, but I won't deny that I could be psychotic as well.
#77

The_Silversword

Aug 18, 2011 4:29:38

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! great stuff, Makes it even funnier cause I just was saying something about ninja turtles in another thread hahahaha! its like youre psychotic or whatever.


I'm pretty sure you've ment psychic, but I won't deny that I could be psychotic as well.



Yeah, that too, I did say "or whatever"  I finally figured out what that means. Everytime that guy at work said "or whatever" what he meant was "insert something here that makes sense" or whatever.
#78

Robin_Hoodlum

Aug 18, 2011 6:52:21
I raise you Monty Python



AWESOME!!!!
THANKS!!!
I laughed until I wet myself...
*whew*
Haven't seen that in a loonnng time!

#79

Robin_Hoodlum

Aug 18, 2011 15:29:22
Not the best MP skit but it's still good.


I always got strange looks in High School whenever I talked about MP...
hmmm, come to think of it, I also got strange looks when we played D&D at the lunch table.
#80

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 18, 2011 22:19:52
Not the best MP skit but it's still good.


I always got strange looks in High School whenever I talked about MP...
hmmm, come to think of it, I also got strange looks when we played D&D at the lunch table.


I once saw a couple of kids playing D&D at an Ihop. What a bunch of weirdos
#82

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 04, 2011 0:05:22
Only the first two of my sentences were about the orking and the rest was about innuendo. I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.


Actually... talking about the modded post is also an offense.
#83

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 0:10:30
Only the first two of my sentences were about the orking and the rest was about innuendo. I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.


Actually... talking about the modded post is also an offense.



OK, fixed. Now posts 40-52 will have to be stricken, with the exception of my strange little tangent there. What could I be referring to? I have no idea. Do you?
#84

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 04, 2011 0:11:47
Only the first two of my sentences were about the orking and the rest was about innuendo. I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.


Actually... talking about the modded post is also an offense.



OK, fixed. Now posts 40-52 will have to be stricken, with the exception of my strange little tangent there. What could I be referring to? I have no idea. Do you?


Sadly, the ORCs don't need to have any idea, just a complaint. 
#85

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 0:13:34
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.
#86

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 04, 2011 0:22:01
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.


See... now you are just asking for it. That would be referrencing politics and sex. When the hoarde comes to visit you, don't be surprised.
#87

Crimson_Concerto

Aug 04, 2011 1:12:31
I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.

What did I do?
#88

trappedslider

Aug 04, 2011 1:14:22
I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.

What did I do?



lol and orc in the house
#89

Robin_Hoodlum

Aug 04, 2011 6:25:27
I'm actually the least guilty person on this entire page of comments.

What did I do?



lol and orc in the house


Finally got your badge, did you?
#90

draco1119

Aug 04, 2011 8:13:57
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.


See... now you are just asking for it. That would be referrencing politics and sex. When the hoarde comes to visit you, don't be surprised.

No, under the current administration it's politics and racism.  Sex was is in the '90s. 

#91

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 04, 2011 9:19:49
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.


See... now you are just asking for it. That would be referrencing politics and sex. When the hoarde comes to visit you, don't be surprised.

No, under the current administration it's politics and racism.  Sex was is in the '90s. 



The snowhite thread begs to differ.
#92

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 10:49:25
But I have plausible deniability! It works for the president, it ought to work for me.


See... now you are just asking for it. That would be referrencing politics and sex. When the hoarde comes to visit you, don't be surprised.



Wait, what? This is ridiculous. It's bad enough that wink, wink, nudge, nudge posts get modded when the complainer was the one having all those dirty thoughts to begin with, but how do you say that "plausible deniability" has anything to do with sex? Or anything to do with politics, other than being a tool used by politicians?

God, I hate to think what the mods would do if anybody mentioned filibustering…
#93

draco1119

Aug 04, 2011 11:04:55
God, I hate to think what the mods would do if anybody mentioned filibustering…

Or Phillip McRevis...

#94

zombie_babies

Aug 04, 2011 11:57:50
Or Phillip McRevis...



Gettin' back to what we were talkin' about, I'd Phillip her McRevis - if you know what I'm sayin'.  ;)

And if you do know what I'm sayin', howsabout tellin' me?  I really have no idea ...
#95

trappedslider

Aug 04, 2011 12:18:25
Or Phillip McRevis...



Gettin' back to what we were talkin' about, I'd Phillip her McRevis - if you know what I'm sayin'.  ;)

And if you do know what I'm sayin', howsabout tellin' me?  I really have no idea ...






#96

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 13:52:47
I raise you Monty Python

#97

draco1119

Aug 04, 2011 14:05:49
I raise you Monty Python

"Um... What's it like?"

#98

trappedslider

Aug 04, 2011 15:56:15
I raise you Monty Python



too easy and over used...
#99

trappedslider

Aug 04, 2011 16:36:45
Still better than the pie...



apple or fish?
#100

lofgren

Aug 04, 2011 23:57:14
The apple is really only for special occasions.
#101

Crimson_Concerto

Aug 05, 2011 6:17:15
#102

draco1119

Aug 05, 2011 7:03:33
That pic is not drool-worthy.  But I'm gonna do it anyway! 
#103

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 15, 2011 18:38:23
The Batwing is here...
www.okmagazine.com/2011/08/watch-the-dar...

 
#104

Count_Von_CoC

Aug 15, 2011 20:30:35
The Batwing is here...
www.okmagazine.com/2011/08/watch-the-dar...

I've got a batwing in mah pants!  See, all you have to do is spread out your... Nevermind. 
#105

The_Silversword

Aug 15, 2011 22:56:56
Why does he need a Bat-Wing? Maybe Man-Bat WILL be in this one!?
#106

Klirshon

Aug 16, 2011 8:33:01
Man-Bat is elsewhere, "terrorising" other people.





#107

The_Silversword

Aug 17, 2011 6:27:32
Man-Bat is elsewhere, "terrorising" other people.





Hahahahahahahahaha!!!! Awesome!!!!

#108

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 17, 2011 7:45:13
Even if it's a furry, why are people so scared and the police so brutal?


Because he's French?
#109

ADHadh

Aug 17, 2011 7:51:41
So you'Re saying this was filmed in the US? How typical.


Oh, maybe that was that French guy that dresses himself up and then goes to town to upset people.
I think even other French people hate him. Trolls probably like him tough.
#110

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 17, 2011 8:02:10
So you'Re saying this was filmed in the US? How typical.


Oh, maybe that was that French guy that dresses himself up and then goes to town to upset people.
I think even other French people hate him. Trolls probably like him tough.



Who would get upset by a guy in a cheap costume?


The guy at the ATM. Watch the video.
#111

ADHadh

Aug 17, 2011 8:12:17
And pizza delivery men:



#112

The_Silversword

Aug 17, 2011 23:50:11
What gets me about that bat dude is that hes still flappin his arms as hes runnin away from an ass kickin, hahaha!! He (could be a she, I dunno?) stays in character, no matter what! hahaha! gotta respect that!
#113

sfdragon

Aug 17, 2011 23:53:56
cowabunga dudes
#114

The_Silversword

Aug 17, 2011 23:54:15
And pizza delivery men:




HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! great stuff, Makes it even funnier cause I just was saying something about ninja turtles in another thread hahahaha! its like youre psychotic or whatever.
#115

sfdragon

Aug 17, 2011 23:54:52
you both likely have pizza on the brain....
#116

ADHadh

Aug 18, 2011 4:17:51

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! great stuff, Makes it even funnier cause I just was saying something about ninja turtles in another thread hahahaha! its like youre psychotic or whatever.


I'm pretty sure you've ment psychic, but I won't deny that I could be psychotic as well.
#117

The_Silversword

Aug 18, 2011 4:29:38

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! great stuff, Makes it even funnier cause I just was saying something about ninja turtles in another thread hahahaha! its like youre psychotic or whatever.


I'm pretty sure you've ment psychic, but I won't deny that I could be psychotic as well.



Yeah, that too, I did say "or whatever"  I finally figured out what that means. Everytime that guy at work said "or whatever" what he meant was "insert something here that makes sense" or whatever.
#118

Robin_Hoodlum

Aug 18, 2011 6:52:21
I raise you Monty Python



AWESOME!!!!
THANKS!!!
I laughed until I wet myself...
*whew*
Haven't seen that in a loonnng time!

#119

Robin_Hoodlum

Aug 18, 2011 15:29:22
Not the best MP skit but it's still good.


I always got strange looks in High School whenever I talked about MP...
hmmm, come to think of it, I also got strange looks when we played D&D at the lunch table.
#120

homicidal_squirrel

Aug 18, 2011 22:19:52
Not the best MP skit but it's still good.


I always got strange looks in High School whenever I talked about MP...
hmmm, come to think of it, I also got strange looks when we played D&D at the lunch table.


I once saw a couple of kids playing D&D at an Ihop. What a bunch of weirdos