Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 Robin_Hoodlum Apr 17, 2010 8:17:51	It sucks. Save your money. The original is much more entertaining... IMHO of course...
#2 Klirshon Apr 17, 2010 8:29:47	Not that I've seen the movie myself; I have been informed of similar opinions of the film.
#3 Robin_Hoodlum Apr 17, 2010 9:00:00	Yeah... I wasted $20 on that movie... $20 I worked for...
#4 evilvegan Apr 17, 2010 9:03:20	Loved it. Cheesy Acting: Check. Bad Storyline: Check. Giant Scorpions: Check. Snake Woman: Check. Giant fish man getting turned to stone: Check. Its an action movie based on a somewhat silly 80s movie, what exactly were you expecting? The pacing in the first one was more like a fantasy-adventure story and this one was more of a straight-up action movie. I didn't pay though and I went in expecting absolute garbage from all the reviews. Don't see the 3D version and go to a matinee.
#5 Robin_Hoodlum Apr 17, 2010 9:06:20	What was I expecting? Something worth the money I paid. The movie was horrible...
#6 Cpt_Micha Apr 17, 2010 9:31:36	So it's on par with the original. Should make for an entertaining watch then. (Especially as I only spend $8.00 for my tickets :-p) And by the way, welcome back buddy. We've missed you.
#7 Robin_Hoodlum Apr 17, 2010 9:33:52	As bad as you think the old one was, the new one is worse... And thanks! I'm glad to be back! Although some people are probably groaning...
#8 Cpt_Micha Apr 17, 2010 9:36:40	Pfft. Those people can go suck an egg. I dunno, it's pretty hard to be lower than the original. I mean really if it weren't for the sheer novelty of the first one (and by courtesy the second) I would probably trash it like I routinely do Michael Bay Films.
#9 pigknight Apr 17, 2010 11:30:56	You're alive! *Huggles* <(^o^<)
#10 Ragnar_Lodbrok Apr 17, 2010 12:23:09	As bad as you think the old one was, the new one is worse... And thanks! I'm glad to be back! Although some people are probably groaning... I'm apathetic, not groaning.
#11 Robin_Hoodlum Apr 17, 2010 12:42:34	I'm apathetic, not groaning. I'll accept that
#12 scypio Apr 19, 2010 12:31:55	I liked the new "Clash of the Titans". The original was better, but this one wasn't so bad. I liked the story better in the original, but the remake had better action and visuals. The monsters looked pretty badass and I think I'm a fan of Sam Worthington even though he's just a bro in all his films. I didn't really like how they portrayed Zeus, but overall it was pretty good. It was very God of War-like. Although I agree with your sentiment with 3D. I hate 3D, especially this case where the film was just upcoverted into 3D. That was extremely lame.
#13 zombie_babies Apr 19, 2010 12:37:37	I have some friends that saw this and they warned me away from it despite my comments indicating I never had even the slightest desire to see it.  Apparently, they thought it was truly awful and I guess that the way the 3d was handled (after filming) was really, really bad.  But I don't really care cuz I didn't waste any time or money on it.
#14 scypio Apr 19, 2010 12:45:32	I think the original was better. But I thought this one was pretty decent. It had pretty good action scenes and the character design for the monsters was pretty good. Visually, I thought it was pretty excellent, although I thought Zeus looked retarded. So for a random action movie, I thought it was good. So I don't really understand what was so horrible about it. And they really need to stop making 3D movies. But if you're going to make a 3D movie, at least do it right. In Avatar, you can at least notice the 3D-ness and see something interesting. This movie's 3D-ness was just flat out horrible. It was barely noticable and when it was, it didn't add anything.
#15 Cpt_Micha Apr 19, 2010 12:47:12	Well 3D Tvs are hitting the market now. (which means 2d LED tvs will be coming down! WOOOOO) So I think this time 3d is here to stay.
#16 zombie_babies Apr 19, 2010 12:47:49	I can't remember the specific complaints, but I do remember there were specific complaints.  And that, hopefully, will complete my utter uselessness to this thread.
#17 scypio Apr 19, 2010 13:03:25	I don't understand the 3D craze. But I can only hope that it fails again.
#18 zombie_babies Apr 19, 2010 13:04:47	Meh, it was good in Avatar but Avatar was intended to have it.  It wasn't an afterthought.  I don't see the TVs catching on, really.  You still need to wear stupid glasses.
#19 boraxe Apr 19, 2010 13:21:54	It's an action movie. "Cheesy" and "mindless" are the defaults for the genre. The original Clash of the Titans is crap. Only the rose-tinted lenses of nostalgia make it seem otherwise. There's no such thing as a humble opinion.
#20 Klirshon Apr 19, 2010 13:52:57	I'm estimating that Robin_Hoodlum meant in his honest opinion. As for the original being crap, I wouldn't know. I don't have interest in observing it nor its remake.
#21 Mechalibur Apr 19, 2010 15:28:43	I've seen so many complaints about this movie, but I haven't seen any about the thing that bothered me the most. They completely screwed up Greek mythology. I mean... I understand that certain liberties need to be taken to adapt the story into a movie, but this is just ridiculous. THE KRAKEN IS NORSE, PEOPLE! Though I suppose "Release the Leviathan" wouldn't have had the same ring to it
#22 Robin_Hoodlum Apr 19, 2010 15:33:57	There's no such thing as a humble opinion. I didn't mean to infer that my opinion is humble... it is not. Klirshon is correct in that I meant my "honest" opinion... (not that I would give a dis-honest one...)
#23 dragom Apr 19, 2010 17:39:16	The original Clash of the Titans is crap. Only the rose-tinted lenses of nostalgia make it seem otherwise. It never really was a masterpiece.  It was neat for it's day, but it's endeavor to bring the Clever counter point of the Brutish Hercules to film was pretty pretty much hack work.