| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1homicidal_squirrelSep 19, 2011 16:30:43 | www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/2011/0... |
| #2KillerGMSep 19, 2011 17:11:09 | Seems legit. |
| #3pluisjenSep 20, 2011 1:33:58 | Amazing! It could happen that 200 year old people kinda look like their modern day offspring, especially when said offspring is compared to a low resolution black and white image. |
| #4ADHadhSep 20, 2011 6:10:41 | And even back then he looked like a dork. |
| #5jetshieldSep 20, 2011 7:29:50 | A grainy old picture and a wild theory? I know I'm convinced. |
| #6Ragnar_LodbrokSep 20, 2011 8:46:25 | Why a vampire? An Immortal makes much more sense. |
| #7homicidal_squirrelSep 20, 2011 12:51:59 | Why a vampire? An Immortal makes much more sense. Have you ever watched a Nick Cage movie? Only a vampire could suck that much. |
| #8ADHadhSep 20, 2011 12:57:10 | Why a vampire? An Immortal makes much more sense. Made my evening! |
| #9zombie_babiesSep 20, 2011 15:14:36 | Well, I buy it. I mean, he's certainly not an actor. |