| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1Cpt_MichaJul 06, 2011 13:29:10 | today.msnbc.msn.com/id/43465344/ns/today... Good on him ![]() |
| #2JhariiJul 06, 2011 13:37:53 | Awesome story. He was a hero/role model long before he fell into the money, which makes this story infinitely better. |
| #3iqwinnJul 06, 2011 17:59:16 | Guh-ROOVY!! ![]() |
| #4bronski113Jul 06, 2011 20:27:17 | When you hear about someone like him you realize you could do more. Basically just be a decent person and when you can help out do so. I hope the guy wins again. It sounds like he deserves it. |
| #5lokiareJul 06, 2011 21:54:00 | That's awesome, but people are forgetting some economics. First after taxes it's less than 60% which means if the guy were frugal he could live without working for about 5 years (20,000 per year). So keeping his job was the better plan and cementing his stay there was worth it. "You can't fire him he did all this stuff for us"... |
| #6draco1119Jul 06, 2011 22:04:51 | That's awesome, but people are forgetting some economics. First after taxes it's less than 60% which means if the guy were frugal he could live without working for about 5 years (20,000 per year). So keeping his job was the better plan and cementing his stay there was worth it. "You can't fire him he did all this stuff for us"... Right. Because the guy's obviously a calculating, selfish jerk. ![]() On topic: This article made me think of Bob Ladouceur. The dude's had multiple offers to coach professionals, but feels that he can have a greater impact on high school kids. |
| #7lokiareJul 06, 2011 23:33:37 | That's awesome, but people are forgetting some economics. First after taxes it's less than 60% which means if the guy were frugal he could live without working for about 5 years (20,000 per year). So keeping his job was the better plan and cementing his stay there was worth it. "You can't fire him he did all this stuff for us"... I didn't say he wasn't a genuinely good person. I did say the other option was just ignorant though... |
| #8capitan_estabanJul 06, 2011 23:40:28 | Nice guy. Lottery stories always remind me of this. |
| #9MaxpersonJul 07, 2011 0:20:09 | That's awesome, but people are forgetting some economics. First after taxes it's less than 60% which means if the guy were frugal he could live without working for about 5 years (20,000 per year). So keeping his job was the better plan and cementing his stay there was worth it. "You can't fire him he did all this stuff for us"... Let's assume 50%. That leaves him 1.7 million dollars. 20k a year for 5 years in 100k. Looks like he can live for 85 years at that rate. Longer since there is interest involved. |
| #10capitan_estabanJul 07, 2011 0:44:25 | 50% isn't a horrible assumption, but that doesn't take into account taxes, it only takes into account annuities. I would figure that you probably will lose another 35% (topline tax rate) of the remaining 50% (or 67.5%). At 20k a year, the 1,202k will last 60 years. |
| #11QubeJul 07, 2011 1:24:12 | Actually, if you have 1 million, a 2% intrest would cover your 20k costs entirely. So, not 85 or 60 years, but (theoretically) indefinitely ... |
| #12lokiareJul 07, 2011 10:14:21 | Actually, if you have 1 million, a 2% intrest would cover your 20k costs entirely. where are you getting 2% interest? The best interest I can find is 0.5% |
| #13MaxpersonJul 07, 2011 10:19:05 | 50% isn't a horrible assumption, but that doesn't take into account taxes, it only takes into account annuities. I would figure that you probably will lose another 35% (topline tax rate) of the remaining 50% (or 67.5%). At 20k a year, the 1,202k will last 60 years. I don't know how it works there, but after taxes AND cash value deductions, you walk away with 40-50% in the California Super Lotto and the Megamillions multi-state lotteries. |
| #14QubeJul 07, 2011 14:25:58 | Actually, if you have 1 million, a 2% intrest would cover your 20k costs entirely. wha? Does a US savings account only give .5 percent? Not to mention other ways of making money (investments, ...) |
| #15zombie_babiesJul 07, 2011 14:28:21 | Dood, I had an 18 month CD that made, like, less than 3% or something pitiful like that. It don't pay to save your cash in a bank anymore. |
| #16QubeJul 07, 2011 14:33:57 | Dood, I had an 18 month CD that made, like, less than 3% or something pitiful like that. It don't pay to save your cash in a bank anymore. it is when you got 1M and only need 20K a year. Your pityfull 3percent on 18 months is exactly enough ... |
| #17homicidal_squirrelJul 07, 2011 14:46:48 | Yeah, the interest you earn on savings accounts had dropped. However, the guy with a cool million in the bank isn't going to be crying. He still makes a nice bit of cash off of that million with a 2% interest rate. If you have $200 in the bank... well... that's a different story... |
| #18pluisjenJul 07, 2011 15:04:08 | Generally banks also offer higher interest when you store a lot of money with them. (You'd think that makes absolutely no sense, but it's still often so) |
| #19zombie_babiesJul 07, 2011 15:07:20 | it is when you got 1M and only need 20K a year. Your pityfull 3percent on 18 months is exactly enough ... Oh yeah, that's not bad. Me, though? It was 2k from a 401k acct I couldn't roll over. I could have made it an IRA ... and then paid penalties on it annually since if your IRA is less than 5k they charge you. Awesome. Shoulda bought that motorcycle with it like I planned ... ![]() |
| #20homicidal_squirrelJul 07, 2011 15:08:17 | it is when you got 1M and only need 20K a year. Your pityfull 3percent on 18 months is exactly enough ... You could have named it IRA. |
| #21JhariiJul 07, 2011 15:09:18 | Generally banks also offer higher interest when you store a lot of money with them. It makes more sense. More money in the bank is more money they can loan out to other people at 3.5-20% depending on the loan. |
| #22zombie_babiesJul 07, 2011 15:22:46 | You could have named it IRA. Yeah, I coulda. Looked more like a Robert, though. |
| #23homicidal_squirrelJul 07, 2011 15:23:58 | You could have named it IRA. So you would have been riding Robert? |
| #24zombie_babiesJul 07, 2011 15:24:49 | Hard and fast. I'd also be sure to always use both hands. Wouldn't want him buckin' me off if I punched it too roughly. |
| #25homicidal_squirrelJul 07, 2011 15:29:05 | Hard and fast. I'd also be sure to always use both hands. Wouldn't want him buckin' me off if I punched it too roughly. ![]() |
| #26ADHadhJul 07, 2011 16:41:29 | You could have named it IRA. ? |