OH NOES! POISONOUS SUGAR!

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

Robin_Hoodlum

Jun 15, 2013 19:10:16
Oh wait...

www.plstorebrands.com/top-story-report__...
#2

CorranHornIsAwesome

Jun 15, 2013 19:13:36


...I'm going to have to call bias.
#3

Robin_Hoodlum

Jun 15, 2013 19:16:26
Of course you are.
The story doesn't jibe with the narrative you wish to promote.


I guess it doesn't matter to you that the report was published by the American Council on Science and Health.
I guess they are biased too?
#4

CorranHornIsAwesome

Jun 15, 2013 19:19:29
Of course you are.
The story doesn't jibe with the narrative you wish to promote.


I guess it doesn't matter to you that the report was published by the American Council on Science and Health.
I guess they are biased too?

Find me an account of this report from a non-biased website and I'll be happy to look it over.


And I have to call BS on your whole "wounded by false accusations of bias" act. If I linked to a webpage called 5 Steps to Socialism! you wouldn't care if the report they interpreted came from the Heritage Foundation.
#5

Robin_Hoodlum

Jun 15, 2013 19:22:42
Of course you are.
The story doesn't jibe with the narrative you wish to promote.


I guess it doesn't matter to you that the report was published by the American Council on Science and Health.
I guess they are biased too?

Find me an account of this report from a non-biased website and I'll be happy to look it over.


And I have to call BS on your whole "wounded by false accusations of bias" act. If I linked to a webpage called 5 Steps to Socialism! you wouldn't care if the report they interpreted came from the Heritage Foundation.


Hey kid, the report was conducted and published by the American Council on Science and Health.
What difference does it make what website I link it from?
Use your head for something other than a place to keep your hair.

Also, at the end of the article, they provide a link to the report itself.

And I wouldn't be talking about bias if I were you, you know, because you are wearing yours on your forehead like a badge of honor.
#6

CorranHornIsAwesome

Jun 15, 2013 19:25:15
Of course you are.
The story doesn't jibe with the narrative you wish to promote.


I guess it doesn't matter to you that the report was published by the American Council on Science and Health.
I guess they are biased too?

Find me an account of this report from a non-biased website and I'll be happy to look it over.


And I have to call BS on your whole "wounded by false accusations of bias" act. If I linked to a webpage called 5 Steps to Socialism! you wouldn't care if the report they interpreted came from the Heritage Foundation.


Hey kid, the report was conducted and published by the American Council on Science and Health.
What difference does it make what website I link it from?
Use your head for something other than a place to keep your hair.


The article interprets the report. Ergo, it can be affected by bias.

Also, at the end of the article, they provide a link to the report itself.


Do they? I hadn't read that far. I'll check it out.


And I wouldn't be talking about bias if I were you, you know, because you are wearing yours on your forehead like a badge of honor.


Why the hell would you wear a badge on your forehead?
#7

draco1119

Jun 15, 2013 19:35:49
Yes, they did.
You've really got to start reading the articles before you post.
#8

CorranHornIsAwesome

Jun 15, 2013 19:36:09
Yes, they did.
You've really got to start reading the articles before you post.

I stopped when I saw that logo.
#9

homicidal_squirrel

Jun 15, 2013 19:58:25
Oh wait...

www.plstorebrands.com/top-story-report__...

You guys should really read the article and the report. It's like you guys don't even know what you're arguing about. ;)

#10

CorranHornIsAwesome

Jun 15, 2013 20:27:30
Oh wait...

www.plstorebrands.com/top-story-report__...

You guys should really read the article and the report. It's like you guys don't even know what you're arguing about. ;)


Dood, we're OTTers.
#11

homicidal_squirrel

Jun 15, 2013 20:53:14
You guys must be the retarded ones. ;)
#12

CorranHornIsAwesome

Jun 15, 2013 21:04:28
You guys must be the retarded ones. ;)


#13

trappedslider

Jun 15, 2013 21:28:52
Oh wait...

www.plstorebrands.com/top-story-report__...

You guys should really read the article and the report. It's like you guys don't even know what you're arguing about. ;)


Dood, we're OTTers.



and that means otters don't need to understand to argue about anything....
#14

CorranHornIsAwesome

Jun 16, 2013 7:24:22
Oh wait...

www.plstorebrands.com/top-story-report__...

You guys should really read the article and the report. It's like you guys don't even know what you're arguing about. ;)


Dood, we're OTTers.



and that means otters don't need to understand to argue about anything....

Wow. Dood, that was kinda bad. Maybe it's the lack of capitalisation but really, try harder.
#15

Robin_Hoodlum

Jun 16, 2013 9:18:55
Oh wait...

www.plstorebrands.com/top-story-report__...

You guys should really read the article and the report. It's like you guys don't even know what you're arguing about. ;)


Dood, we're OTTers.



and that means otters don't need to understand to argue about anything....


TS is simply jealous that he isn't an OTTer. He was kicked out, of course. And he is also angry about his horrible grammar.
It's best to just ignore him and let him pout.

#16

mellored

Jun 17, 2013 10:01:35
Eating lots of sugar will make you obese.
Eating lots of HFCS will make you obese.
People like to eat sugar and HFCS.

No conspiracy.  Just poorly programmed people.  

Evolution will sort it out.  Fat people won't breed.
#17

jetshield

Jun 17, 2013 10:06:22
Fat people won't breed.


You don't get out much, do you?
#18

Hipster_Dog

Jun 17, 2013 11:12:06
I think he ment breath. Have you seen how difficult it is for them ****s to breath? Just a bit more air pollution and they will all die.