If you grew up liking Godzilla/Gamera...giant monster(Kaiju) films...you are going to love it.
Saw a preview for it when I say Man of Steel (stupid movie BTW) and I thought it looked kinda interesting, is there an actual story to it or is it just giant robots fighting giant monsters?
It has a story but I am not going to lie to you....only enough to give an excuse to repeatedly see giant robots fight giant monsters. The acting is good and there are human character struggles that make for a decent narrative, but it's all about the action.
I won't waste my money seeing it.
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
Like the guy what wants to make a gay spiderman movie?
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
Like the guy what wants to make a gay spiderman movie?
No. That is an actor. You should read the articles before you post them.
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
Watching porn doesn't make you an expert on films.
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
Like the guy what wants to make a gay spiderman movie?
No. That is an actor. You should read the articles before you post them.
Aye, but an actor what thinks he is a director.
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
Like the guy what wants to make a gay spiderman movie?
No. That is an actor. You should read the articles before you post them.
Aye, but an actor what thinks he is a director.
Why? Because he had some imput on how he could interpret the character he is interpreting?
Do you think actors should only do what directors tell them?
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
Like the guy what wants to make a gay spiderman movie?
No. That is an actor. You should read the articles before you post them.
Aye, but an actor what thinks he is a director.
Why? Because he had some imput on how he could interpret the character he is interpreting?
Do you think actors should only do what directors tell them?
He should be playing the character as the character is, not how he wants him to be.
If he wants to be gay spiderman, he can make his own stupid, rip-off movie.
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
Like the guy what wants to make a gay spiderman movie?
No. That is an actor. You should read the articles before you post them.
Aye, but an actor what thinks he is a director.
Why? Because he had some imput on how he could interpret the character he is interpreting?
Do you think actors should only do what directors tell them?
He should be playing the character as the character is, not how he wants him to be.
If he wants to be gay spiderman, he can make his own stupid, rip-off movie.
Were you has mad when they made spiderman shoot goo out of his wrist in the first trilogy? That wasn't how spiderman was.
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
Like the guy what wants to make a gay spiderman movie?
No. That is an actor. You should read the articles before you post them.
Aye, but an actor what thinks he is a director.
No he doesn't. You should really go and read the article you linked. It'll help.
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
Like the guy what wants to make a gay spiderman movie?
No. That is an actor. You should read the articles before you post them.
Aye, but an actor what thinks he is a director.
Why? Because he had some imput on how he could interpret the character he is interpreting?
Do you think actors should only do what directors tell them?
He should be playing the character as the character is, not how he wants him to be.
If he wants to be gay spiderman, he can make his own stupid, rip-off movie.
Were you has mad when they made spiderman shoot goo out of his wrist in the first trilogy? That wasn't how spiderman was.
Actually, I was.
I almost walked out of the theatre.
Almost doesn't count.
It does in horse shoes, hand grenades, and thermonuclear warfare.
Were you has mad when they made spiderman shoot goo out of his wrist in the first trilogy? That wasn't how spiderman was.
Is was apart of the spider-man mythos for a very short time...
In "Disassembled", Spider-Man develops the ability to shoot organic webbing from his wrists (after he recovered from being changed into a spider), and he stopped using his Web-shooters which was a great advantage for him because it allowed him to stop being dependent on web cartridges which allowed him limited shots. Once, while fighting Iron Man, Spider-Man supposedly "let loose", allowing his webbing to shoot out unrestrained. After he had stopped, he had generated enough webbing to completely encase Iron Man, and nearly fill the alley in which they were fighting with webbing. Since the beginning of the 2008 "Brand New Day" storyline, this power seems to have gone away, for reasons that are currently unknown
The Spectacular Spider-Man vol. 2 #15-20 (2004)
It does in horse shoes,
Almost managed to get the horseshoe on the horse? No, doesn't count.
hand grenades, and thermonuclear warfare.
Almost managed to explode? No, doesn't count.
I think it looks stupid.
I won't waste my money seeing it.
I will reiterate...
If you grew up liking Godzilla/Gamera...giant monster(Kaiju) films...you are going to love it.
That being said, if you never really enjoyed that genre, I don't think you would like it. It is a modern homage to the classic kaiju film.
As a guy who grew up loving Godzilla/Gamera films, it most definitely was not a waste of money.
I think it looks stupid.
I won't waste my money seeing it.
I will reiterate...
If you grew up liking Godzilla/Gamera...giant monster(Kaiju) films...you are going to love it.
That being said, if you never really enjoyed that genre, I don't think you would like it. It is a modern homage to the classic kaiju film.
As a guy who grew up loving Godzilla/Gamera films, it most definitely was not a waste of money.
Ignore RH. He grew up back in the time of the dinosaurs. This movie just reminds him of his childhood.
Let's see...It does in horse shoes,
Almost managed to get the horseshoe on the horse? No, doesn't count.
The game of horse shoes. But you knew that.
hand grenades, and thermonuclear warfare.
Almost managed to explode? No, doesn't count.
No. All you have to do is get close to your target, not actually hit it.
But you knew that.
I think it looks stupid.
I won't waste my money seeing it.
I will reiterate...
If you grew up liking Godzilla/Gamera...giant monster(Kaiju) films...you are going to love it.
That being said, if you never really enjoyed that genre, I don't think you would like it. It is a modern homage to the classic kaiju film.
As a guy who grew up loving Godzilla/Gamera films, it most definitely was not a waste of money.
Ignore RH. He grew up back in the time of the dinosaurs. This movie just reminds him of his childhood.
Let's see...It does in horse shoes,
Almost managed to get the horseshoe on the horse? No, doesn't count.
The game of horse shoes. But you knew that.hand grenades, and thermonuclear warfare.
Almost managed to explode? No, doesn't count.
No. All you have to do is get close to your target, not actually hit it.
But you knew that.
ou didn't say any of that. How I'm I supposed to know it?
I think it looks stupid.
I won't waste my money seeing it.
I will reiterate...
If you grew up liking Godzilla/Gamera...giant monster(Kaiju) films...you are going to love it.
That being said, if you never really enjoyed that genre, I don't think you would like it. It is a modern homage to the classic kaiju film.
As a guy who grew up loving Godzilla/Gamera films, it most definitely was not a waste of money.
Ignore RH. He grew up back in the time of the dinosaurs. This movie just reminds him of his childhood.
It's the truth, and sometimes the truth hurts. Ask RH.
Let's see...It does in horse shoes,
Almost managed to get the horseshoe on the horse? No, doesn't count.
The game of horse shoes. But you knew that.hand grenades, and thermonuclear warfare.
Almost managed to explode? No, doesn't count.
No. All you have to do is get close to your target, not actually hit it.
But you knew that.
ou didn't say any of that. How I'm I supposed to know it?
Common sense and an understanding of how those weapons work.
I think it looks stupid.
I won't waste my money seeing it.
I will reiterate...
If you grew up liking Godzilla/Gamera...giant monster(Kaiju) films...you are going to love it.
That being said, if you never really enjoyed that genre, I don't think you would like it. It is a modern homage to the classic kaiju film.
As a guy who grew up loving Godzilla/Gamera films, it most definitely was not a waste of money.
Ignore RH. He grew up back in the time of the dinosaurs. This movie just reminds him of his childhood.
It's the truth, and sometimes the truth hurts. Ask RH.
It's true.
On both counts.
Miguel O'Hara, from Spider-Man 2099 was the first to have spinnerets, and there was an outcry from comic fans then.
That's because it isn't 2099 yet.
Let's see...It does in horse shoes,
Almost managed to get the horseshoe on the horse? No, doesn't count.
The game of horse shoes. But you knew that.hand grenades, and thermonuclear warfare.
Almost managed to explode? No, doesn't count.
No. All you have to do is get close to your target, not actually hit it.
But you knew that.
ou didn't say any of that. How I'm I supposed to know it?
Common sense and an understanding of how those weapons work.
Yeah, they have to explode to work. Almost exploding is pointless, wouldn't you agree?
Let's see...It does in horse shoes,
Almost managed to get the horseshoe on the horse? No, doesn't count.
The game of horse shoes. But you knew that.hand grenades, and thermonuclear warfare.
Almost managed to explode? No, doesn't count.
No. All you have to do is get close to your target, not actually hit it.
But you knew that.
ou didn't say any of that. How I'm I supposed to know it?
Common sense and an understanding of how those weapons work.
Yeah, they have to explode to work. Almost exploding is pointless, wouldn't you agree?
Well, that depends.
Even when a nuclear device almost explodes, it still causes a lot of damage.
www.nti.org/gsn/article/north-korean-tes...
Well, that depends.
Even when a nuclear device almost explodes, it still causes a lot of damage.
www.nti.org/gsn/article/north-korean-tes...
That's a partial explosion, not an almost explosion.
Well, that depends.
Even when a nuclear device almost explodes, it still causes a lot of damage.
www.nti.org/gsn/article/north-korean-tes...
That's a partial explosion, not an almost explosion.
Same difference.
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
I get why people say this about Tarentino (even if I disagree), but Del Toro, really? I'm not saying that in the sense of "Guillermo Del Toro is the greaaaaaatest!" but more that I think his reputation and his skill are pretty evenly matched. Pan's Labyrinth aside, the guy's reputation is basically "megageek that makes geeky action movies with great visuals and poor pacing." Pretty much every movie he makes is 20 minutes longer than it needs to be, and I don't know if I've met anyone who'll go tooth and nail to contradict that statement.
I love his stuff, but he doesn't have nearly the cult of personality that Tarentino does. Box office wise his movies do good but not great. Critically his movies do good but not great (Pan's Labyrinth being the exception). As far as I've ever seen his reputation is "good, but not great." I think mostly people are just glad that he exists, because so few movies like Hellboy and Pacific Rim get made as it is without someone like Del Toro pushing for them.
As far as Pacific Rim is concerned, I loved it. It was buckets of fun. The action's good, the visuals are great, the actors are good (the main character is some forgettable Chris Pine clone, but the rest of the cast makes up for him, Idris Elba in particular), and the overall world-story is pretty interesting.
The movie sets up the basic conflict with the kaiju in the first few minutes, then jumps forward 12 years or so, to the point that fighting the kaiju is old news to get the plot rolling. It's a neat choice, and leaves a nice big gap in the story that I hope they explore further with either a project like The Animatrix, or a couple volumes of comic books (beyond "Tales From Year Zero").
I can't stress it enough: it's a lot of fun. It's also a damn shame that America decided that Grown Ups 2 was more interesting than watching Stringer Bell punch Godzilla in the balls.
You expected more from Del Toro? Why? The guy is overrated. Same with Tarantino. Bunch of hacks that get more credit than they deserve.
I get why people say this about Tarentino (even if I disagree), but Del Toro, really? I'm not saying that in the sense of "Guillermo Del Toro is the greaaaaaatest!" but more that I think his reputation and his skill are pretty evenly matched. Pan's Labyrinth aside, the guy's reputation is basically "megageek that makes geeky action movies with great visuals and poor pacing." Pretty much every movie he makes is 20 minutes longer than it needs to be, and I don't know if I've met anyone who'll go tooth and nail to contradict that statement.
I love his stuff, but he doesn't have nearly the cult of personality that Tarentino does. Box office wise his movies do good but not great. Critically his movies do good but not great (Pan's Labyrinth being the exception). As far as I've ever seen his reputation is "good, but not great." I think mostly people are just glad that he exists, because so few movies like Hellboy and Pacific Rim get made as it is without someone like Del Toro pushing for them.
As far as Pacific Rim is concerned, I loved it. It was buckets of fun. The action's good, the visuals are great, the actors are good (the main character is some forgettable Chris Pine clone, but the rest of the cast makes up for him, Idris Elba in particular), and the overall world-story is pretty interesting.
The movie sets up the basic conflict with the kaiju in the first few minutes, then jumps forward 12 years or so, to the point that fighting the kaiju is old news to get the plot rolling. It's a neat choice, and leaves a nice big gap in the story that I hope they explore further with either a project like The Animatrix, or a couple volumes of comic books (beyond "Tales From Year Zero").
I can't stress it enough: it's a lot of fun. It's also a damn shame that America decided that Grown Ups 2 was more interesting than watching Stringer Bell punch Godzilla in the balls.
Good review...and I agree with your last line in particular!
It's also a damn shame that America decided that Grown Ups 2 was more interesting than watching Stringer Bell punch Godzilla in the balls.
So, you still think someone punching someone else in the balls is "interesting" and good entertainment?
I grew out of thinking that was funny in 3rd grade.
Godzilla is not a someONE, Godzilla is a someTHING. Admit it: you still think the "Wolfman's got nards!" bit from Monster Squad is funny, because Wolfman is a monster, not a person.
It's also a damn shame that America decided that Grown Ups 2 was more interesting than watching Stringer Bell punch Godzilla in the balls.
So, you still think someone punching someone else in the balls is "interesting" and good entertainment?
I grew out of thinking that was funny in 3rd grade.
Well, technically Stringer Bell is a character from HBO's "The Wire", a dark, gritty, and serious telenovel exploring the War on Drugs with a multifacited approach, following the perspective of both the police, politics, and drug dealers. While the character of Stringer Bell was played by actor Idris Elba, he isn't present in Pacific Rim despite Idris Elba playing a character within the film. Likewise Godzilla is a character from the long running series of films bearing his name, and is credited with being the first modern incarnation of kaiju in popular culture, but does not personally appear in Pacific Rim beyond the similarities of form and theme in the film. While the film, Pacific Rim, does contain fighting, it doesn't resort to crass "kick in the balls" humour.
The humour of "watch Stringer Bell punch Godzilla in the balls" is derived from the double violation of expectatons, by implying the presence of both the chracters Stringer Bell and Godzilla where there is only similarity, as well as the apparent double-standard of heriarchizing Pacific Rim above Grown Ups 2 while implying a type of action in the former that would be perfectly at home in the latter. Additionally this humour plays off a cultural predilecton among select internet peer groups for fan-generated mashups of licensed characters, sometimes referred to as "fan art" or "fan fiction", wherein the stereotypical product is of poor quality, often pandering to base desires for visceral scenaros, i.e. violence and/or sex between the characters.
I hope you have found this over-explaination of the joke helpful.
He just needs to make At the Mountains of Madness like he has always been trying. Alien vs Predator doesn't count.
I heard that he may back off due to prometheus
insidemovies.ew.com/2012/06/10/prometheu...
..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" contenteditable="true" />I hope you have found this over-explaination of the joke helpful.
Yes. You successfully killed it.
I love his stuff, but he doesn't have nearly the cult of personality that Tarentino does. Box office wise his movies do good but not great. Critically his movies do good but not great (Pan's Labyrinth being the exception). As far as I've ever seen his reputation is "good, but not great." I think mostly people are just glad that he exists, because so few movies like Hellboy and Pacific Rim get made as it is without someone like Del Toro pushing for them.
As far as Pacific Rim is concerned, I loved it. It was buckets of fun. The action's good, the visuals are great, the actors are good (the main character is some forgettable Chris Pine clone, but the rest of the cast makes up for him, Idris Elba in particular), and the overall world-story is pretty interesting.
The movie sets up the basic conflict with the kaiju in the first few minutes, then jumps forward 12 years or so, to the point that fighting the kaiju is old news to get the plot rolling. It's a neat choice, and leaves a nice big gap in the story that I hope they explore further with either a project like The Animatrix, or a couple volumes of comic books (beyond "Tales From Year Zero").
I can't stress it enough: it's a lot of fun. It's also a damn shame that America decided that Grown Ups 2 was more interesting than watching Stringer Bell punch Godzilla in the balls.
Agree with your review, except that I had no problem with the Chris Pine clone. I had more of an issue with the Robert Kazinsky/Chuck Hansen character, who was far more the cardboard cut-out. But pointing that out in a Giant Robots vs Monsters movie is a bit silly :D There was more than enough characterisation imo
I have no desire to see a Transformers copy - Transformers was bad enough, no? I get that the people are ready and willing for cheap CGI gigantomonsters but I also see exactly how poorly that reflects on said people.
*Scans Zombie_Babies for soul*
*finds none*
I have no desire to see a Transformers copy - Transformers was bad enough, no?
Agreed.
*Scans Zombie_Babies for soul*
*finds none*
It's not a soul that's at issue here. It's simply that I've come to terms with the fact that I am no longer 5 years old. Dinosaurs are not cool. Giant robots are not cool. I need something more. Excuse me for developing my taste beyond strained carrots.
*Scans Zombie_Babies for soul*
*finds none*
It's not a soul that's at issue here. It's simply that I've come to terms with the fact that I am no longer 5 years old. Dinosaurs are not cool. Giant robots are not cool. I need something more. Excuse me for developing my taste beyond strained carrots.
You say that but you like Lobo and Cable ;)
I do know, though, that Spiderman is awful so something better should be offered.
Well, thats a strange thing to "know". Spiderman is one of the better characters out there. Unique and unusual powers. Was one of the "new wave" back in 62, of characters with mundane problems like making the rent. Sure, in 50+ years there have been some crap stories (Clones, OMD, anything with Venom) but there have also been some great ones (Death of Gwen Stacy, Spiderman No More, Harry Osborn Saga).
It's not a soul that's at issue here. It's simply that I've come to terms with the fact that I am no longer 5 years old. Dinosaurs are not cool. Giant robots are not cool. I need something more. Excuse me for developing my taste beyond strained carrots.
Except dinosaurs are cool. So is Alejandro Jodorowski, Jim Jarmusch, Michel Gondry, Sofia Coppola, Ridley Scott, Wes Anderson, David Fincher, &c. &c. &c. Robots, aliens, car chases, sick stunts, and badass one liners are no less worthy of our attention than long meditations on the frailty of existence.
"Movies are so rarely great art, that if we cannot appreciate great trash, we have very little reason to be interested in them."
-Pauline Kael
Anyone who has no room left inside them for childish glee in addition to the rest of their ponderous, "important" emotions has too much garbage in their soul.
Nah, they're really not cool. It's no so much an inability to experience childish glee as it is seeing thing enough to no longer be impressed by them. I have no problem accepting or even enjoying trash. I just am not as easily impressed as I once was. I do not consider that to be any great failing.
Okay. Kind of curious what you get out of Dungeons and Dragons then? Even more curious what you get out of the OTT section of a D&D Forum?
Okay. Kind of curious what you get out of Dungeons and Dragons then? Even more curious what you get out of the OTT section of a D&D Forum?
No need to get all snippy, sistah. An explanation of my philosophy is not an indictment of yours. ;)
Anyhoo, it's pretty simple: I play D&D with the same cats I've been playing D&D with for over 20 years. It's not the game, it's the company. We've played everything from D&D (2e, 3e, 3.5) to not-D&D (4e) to Pathfinder to Shadowrun to Battletech to Talisman ... you get the picture. And here? Nothing could be easier to explain in this context: I talk to people about things I'm currently interested in. I also never said the people here impress me. ;)
I also never said the people here impress me. ;)
But...but, I impress you, right?
No need to get all snippy, sistah.
No need to get defensive. It was a genuine question. But no longer interested.
But...but, I impress you, right?
Well, you are impressive in your unimpressiveness.
No need to get defensive. It was a genuine question. But no longer interested.
Well, I did genuinely answer it. ;)
But...but, I impress you, right?
Well, you are impressive in your unimpressiveness.
apps.warnerbros.com/pacificrim/designer/...
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Anyway, instead of a sequel I would like to see a prequel of some sort, something about the solo-Jaegers from the early war or how the whole thing affected the world at large (reasons for rationing food, the kaiju black market, Jaeger maintenance, etc).
Just saw it too. I wanted to see what you guys thought of it, but it seems you're more interested in gay spider-men.
Anyway, instead of a sequel I would like to see a prequel of some sort, something about the solo-Jaegers from the early war or how the whole thing affected the world at large (reasons for rationing food, the kaiju black market, Jaeger maintenance, etc).
Maybe in comic books, but not in films. It was a financial failure.
Just saw it too. I wanted to see what you guys thought of it, but it seems you're more interested in gay spider-men.
Anyway, instead of a sequel I would like to see a prequel of some sort, something about the solo-Jaegers from the early war or how the whole thing affected the world at large (reasons for rationing food, the kaiju black market, Jaeger maintenance, etc).
Maybe in comic books, but not in films. It was a financial failure.
Meh... It still has the pay-per-views and DVD sales to make up some of that lost money. How much did it cost to make?
Just saw it too. I wanted to see what you guys thought of it, but it seems you're more interested in gay spider-men.
Anyway, instead of a sequel I would like to see a prequel of some sort, something about the solo-Jaegers from the early war or how the whole thing affected the world at large (reasons for rationing food, the kaiju black market, Jaeger maintenance, etc).
Maybe in comic books, but not in films. It was a financial failure.
Meh... It still has the pay-per-views and DVD sales to make up some of that lost money. How much did it cost to make?
Cost 190 millions to make. It has made 188 millions now. A film is considered a financial success when it makes double its production budget (to cover promotion, distribution, and other cost) at the box office.
110 millions came from foreign markets, which means it "only" made 78 millions in the US market. Also not a good sign for a sequel.
Just saw it too. I wanted to see what you guys thought of it, but it seems you're more interested in gay spider-men.
Anyway, instead of a sequel I would like to see a prequel of some sort, something about the solo-Jaegers from the early war or how the whole thing affected the world at large (reasons for rationing food, the kaiju black market, Jaeger maintenance, etc).
Maybe in comic books, but not in films. It was a financial failure.
Meh... It still has the pay-per-views and DVD sales to make up some of that lost money. How much did it cost to make?
Cost 190 millions to make. It has made 188 millions now. A film is considered a financial success when it makes double its production budget (to cover promotion, distribution, and other cost) at the box office.
110 millions came from foreign markets, which means it "only" made 78 millions in the US market. Also not a good sign for a sequel.
Machete got a sequel. I don't see why Pacific Rim can't get a sequel.
Just saw it too. I wanted to see what you guys thought of it, but it seems you're more interested in gay spider-men.
Anyway, instead of a sequel I would like to see a prequel of some sort, something about the solo-Jaegers from the early war or how the whole thing affected the world at large (reasons for rationing food, the kaiju black market, Jaeger maintenance, etc).
Maybe in comic books, but not in films. It was a financial failure.
Meh... It still has the pay-per-views and DVD sales to make up some of that lost money. How much did it cost to make?
Cost 190 millions to make. It has made 188 millions now. A film is considered a financial success when it makes double its production budget (to cover promotion, distribution, and other cost) at the box office.
110 millions came from foreign markets, which means it "only" made 78 millions in the US market. Also not a good sign for a sequel.
Machete got a sequel. I don't see why Pacific Rim can't get a sequel.
It also made 4 times its production budget, champ. ;)
Just saw it too. I wanted to see what you guys thought of it, but it seems you're more interested in gay spider-men.
Anyway, instead of a sequel I would like to see a prequel of some sort, something about the solo-Jaegers from the early war or how the whole thing affected the world at large (reasons for rationing food, the kaiju black market, Jaeger maintenance, etc).
Maybe in comic books, but not in films. It was a financial failure.
Meh... It still has the pay-per-views and DVD sales to make up some of that lost money. How much did it cost to make?
Cost 190 millions to make. It has made 188 millions now. A film is considered a financial success when it makes double its production budget (to cover promotion, distribution, and other cost) at the box office.
110 millions came from foreign markets, which means it "only" made 78 millions in the US market. Also not a good sign for a sequel.
Machete got a sequel. I don't see why Pacific Rim can't get a sequel.
It also made 4 times its production budget, champ. ;)
$12.00?
Boo-ya!
No, that is what your mom charges.
Boo-ya!
Ha! She over charged you and you fell for it!
No, that is what your mom charges.
Boo-ya!
Ha! She over charged you and you fell for it!
It is ok, the extra cash was for her to kiss you right after.
Boo-ya!
No, that is what your mom charges.
Boo-ya!
Ha! She over charged you and you fell for it!
It is ok, the extra cash was for her to kiss you right after.
Boo-ya!
Well she lied to you again. You got scammed, homie.
No, that is what your mom charges.
Boo-ya!
Ha! She over charged you and you fell for it!
It is ok, the extra cash was for her to kiss you right after.
Boo-ya!
Well she lied to you again. You got scammed, homie.
Not according to the filom your dad made.
Boo-ya!
Got my oldest daughter with me for the summer, thinking of talking everyone out to a movie tomorrow, was thinking of Pacific Rim, I mean whats not to like about giant robots fighting giant monsters right? The wife really wants to see The Conjuring though, that one doesnt really seem like a good one for the kids though. Any suggestions?
I actually saw Pacific Rim twice. First my wife and I enjoyed the film...then I went a second time with my kids. Can't recommend it highly enough.
Got my oldest daughter with me for the summer, thinking of talking everyone out to a movie tomorrow, was thinking of Pacific Rim, I mean whats not to like about giant robots fighting giant monsters right? The wife really wants to see The Conjuring though, that one doesnt really seem like a good one for the kids though. Any suggestions?
The To Do List is a good family film.
Is the To Do List bertter than Pacific Rim and/or The Wolverine?
Different kind of movie. Pacific Rim is a decently fun movie. If you want to see giant robots fight giant monsters, and you don't mind the cheap forced drama, it's a fun movie.
The Wolverine is a fun movie if you hate yourself and want to throw some money away. The To Do List is a comedy. It has that girl that played the big sister in Scott Pilgrim VS The World.
btw, did you know that Adam Ant invented Adamatium? Why else do you think its called Adam Antium?
Was The Wolverine really that bad? It cant be any worse than the first one, can it? Adamantium bullet!?
You remember that scene in the last Batman movie where Bruce gets his spine fixed by the old guy in the prison with a rope and questionable chiropractic techniques? The stuff they pull in The Wolverine makes that scene in Batman seem totally legit.
btw, did you know that Adam Ant invented Adamatium? Why else do you think its called Adam Antium?
Well that explains why it's such a terrible metal.
But looks like, thats the movie we're going to see, the wife decided that shes taking a nap and we're going to the Skyporn drive-in, which will be showing Turbo followed by the Wolverine, so I will witness firsthand just how bad it is. The Drive-In is actually called the Skyborn, but they used to show pornos there so everyone called it the Skyporn, and the name stuck, even though they dont show pornos anymore, I mean seriously drive-in pornos! Why doesnt anyone do that anymore!?
I mean seriously drive-in pornos! Why doesnt anyone do that anymore!?
Overpopulation concerns, and the constantly-shrinking size of the average automobile back seat.
I never saw the last Bat-Man movie, but I had this guy at work tell me about it, hes one of those guys that when he tells you about a movie he goes into great detail, scene by scene, so I do know the part youre takking about.
But looks like, thats the movie we're going to see, the wife decided that shes taking a nap and we're going to the Skyporn drive-in, which will be showing Turbo followed by the Wolverine, so I will witness firsthand just how bad it is. The Drive-In is actually called the Skyborn, but they used to show pornos there so everyone called it the Skyporn, and the name stuck, even though they dont show pornos anymore, I mean seriously drive-in pornos!
I bet more than the name stuck.
Why doesnt anyone do that anymore!?
Because no one wants to clean that mess up afterwards.
I mean seriously drive-in pornos! Why doesnt anyone do that anymore!?
Overpopulation concerns, and the constantly-shrinking size of the average automobile back seat.
Because no one wants to clean that mess up afterwards.
Thats why socks were invented!
EDIT: and on the pyshics side of things... blogs.scientificamerican.com/overthinkin...
Machete got a sequel. I don't see why Pacific Rim can't get a sequel.
Well, Machete was entertaining. Bad on purpose, not accidentally.
Well saw the new Wolverine, instead of a magic bullet, this ones got a magic sword that can cut through adamantium, 2 actually
You were warned.
Machete got a sequel. I don't see why Pacific Rim can't get a sequel.
Well, Machete was entertaining. Bad on purpose, not accidentally.
Are you saying PacRim wasn't? You must be truly as dead inside as your nickname suggests.
Go see it again Americans, it's your duty. That movie made me enthusiastic for the upcoming Godzilla from the same studio.
Are you saying PacRim wasn't? You must be truly as dead inside as your nickname suggests.
Go see it again Americans, it's your duty. That movie made me enthusiastic for the upcoming Godzilla from the same studio.
'Bad accidentally' is, uhh, really bad. And, again, I outgrew robots and dinosaurs over two decades ago. It's time to grow up and get a job, hippy.
Hopefully Godzilla has the ability to fire off a hand in that one.
I had a Godzilla Shogun Warrior toy that did that in the 70's...still have it!
Are you saying PacRim wasn't? You must be truly as dead inside as your nickname suggests.
Go see it again Americans, it's your duty. That movie made me enthusiastic for the upcoming Godzilla from the same studio.
'Bad accidentally' is, uhh, really bad. And, again, I outgrew robots and dinosaurs over two decades ago. It's time to grow up and get a job, hippy.
There's a difference between not being interested in giant dinosaurs and robots and outgrowing them. Seems your journey to convince yourself that you have good taste has produced some casualties.
Are you saying PacRim wasn't? You must be truly as dead inside as your nickname suggests.
Go see it again Americans, it's your duty. That movie made me enthusiastic for the upcoming Godzilla from the same studio.
'Bad accidentally' is, uhh, really bad. And, again, I outgrew robots and dinosaurs over two decades ago. It's time to grow up and get a job, hippy.
There's a difference between not being interested in giant dinosaurs and robots and outgrowing them. Seems your journey to convince yourself that you have good taste has produced some casualties.
All in self-defense with no profiling involved, I am sure.
Hopefully Godzilla has the ability to fire off a hand in that one.
I had a Godzilla Shogun Warrior toy that did that in the 70's...still have it!
Yup thats what I was talking about, I used to have one as well, unfortunatly I left him at my grannys house and she threw him away cause she thought he was a dinosaur, and dinosaurs are the devil cause they aint in the bible.
There's a difference between not being interested in giant dinosaurs and robots and outgrowing them. Seems your journey to convince yourself that you have good taste has produced some casualties.
I do have good taste. I'm not trying to convince myself of anything. People that like Pacific Rim are as easily entertained as NASCAR fans. Srsly.
There's a difference between not being interested in giant dinosaurs and robots and outgrowing them. Seems your journey to convince yourself that you have good taste has produced some casualties.
I do have good taste. I'm not trying to convince myself of anything. People that like Pacific Rim are as easily entertained as NASCAR fans. Srsly.
Well, that last part is true, at least.
Which makes me right.
That "good taste" part is still arguable
Hardly - and I'll take no lip from any Star Bores fan!
What about some tongue?
Gross ... and ... and illegal. Ok, the problem is mostly the illegal thing.
Well put.
What are laws anyway?
They're made to be violated, that's what they are.
What are laws anyway?
I ... I guess I don't rightly know ...
What are laws anyway?
They're made to be violated, that's what they are.
Like women!
What are laws anyway?
They're made to be violated, that's what they are.
Like women!
Now, now - let's not be sexist. Men are meant to be violated, too.
What are laws anyway?
They're made to be violated, that's what they are.
Like young boys!
What are laws anyway?
They're made to be violated, that's what they are.
Like women!
Now, now - let's not be sexist. Men are meant to be violated, too.
I'm not really into those.
What are laws anyway?
They're made to be violated, that's what they are.
Like women!
Now, now - let's not be sexist. Men are meant to be violated, too.
What are laws anyway?
They're made to be violated, that's what they are.
Like women!
Now, now - let's not be sexist. Men are meant to be violated, too.
I'm not really into those.
But ... but they could be into you, right?
What are laws anyway?
They're made to be violated, that's what they are.
Like women!
Now, now - let's not be sexist. Men are meant to be violated, too.
I'm not really into those.
But ... but they could be into you, right?
Depends on when you say manhood starts. Yanno, 18, 17...or 16.
It's actually somewhere closer to 30.
So if you're gay before the age of 30 it isn't really gay? Like, a second Golden Rule?
What are laws anyway?
They're made to be violated, that's what they are.
Like women!
Now, now - let's not be sexist. Men are meant to be violated, too.
I'm not really into those.
But ... but they could be into you, right?
Yeah, but that doesn't count. It is nly cause girls can't do it.
It's actually somewhere closer to 30.
So if you're gay before the age of 30 it isn't really gay? Like, a second Golden Rule?
Umm ... I don't see why not.
It's actually somewhere closer to 30.
So if you're gay before the age of 30 it isn't really gay? Like, a second Golden Rule?
Umm ... I don't see why not.
Sweet.