| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1homicidal_squirrelFeb 01, 2011 23:07:17 | www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/31/peta-s... Their commercials certainly are... |
| #2pluisjenFeb 02, 2011 1:55:58 | Oh yeah, that's certainly a convincing argument to turn people into vegetarians ![]() "If we show enough boobs, they'll stop eating meat for sure!" |
| #3homicidal_squirrelFeb 02, 2011 6:53:41 | Oh yeah, that's certainly a convincing argument to turn people into vegetarians Wait, they have a bunch of girls performing various sexy activities with vegetables and you actually got some message out of this commercial that upsets you??? Really? |
| #4pluisjenFeb 02, 2011 7:06:34 | It makes me more ashamed of people (not because they do this, but because it works) then it upsets me, actually. But yeah, it always bothered me when people have an interesting opinion, and attempt to convince other people of it with boobs. If I want to watch boobs, I'll watch a porno. |
| #5homicidal_squirrelFeb 02, 2011 7:15:24 | Don't over estimate the impact of boobs on people'S opinions. I am a boob and I convince no one! To be fair, you have a beard. Hairy boobs are not sexy at all. |
| #6homicidal_squirrelFeb 02, 2011 8:09:12 | You live just to contradict me, don't you Homocidal_Squirrel? Yes... Yes I do. ![]() |
| #7homicidal_squirrelFeb 02, 2011 8:20:54 | Never trust a guy with a toe fetish. When I conquer Quebec, I will pass laws requiring everyone to wear toe-shoes... even if you don't have feet!!! |
| #8homicidal_squirrelFeb 02, 2011 8:36:47 | Who is Monique? |
| #9homicidal_squirrelFeb 02, 2011 8:57:02 | She is a chain smoking, boozehound, fat and voracious woman. She is that woman you will sleep with when you will be too drunk to know right from wrong after drinking our beer and smoking our weed. I don't think you realize that your weed is weak sauce. Aren't all your women fat? Isn't that how they insulate themselves from the cold? |
| #10homicidal_squirrelFeb 02, 2011 9:11:04 | She is a chain smoking, boozehound, fat and voracious woman. She is that woman you will sleep with when you will be too drunk to know right from wrong after drinking our beer and smoking our weed. Hey, tell those kids it's not funny to compare fat chicks to pyramids. |
| #11pluisjenFeb 02, 2011 9:14:49 | Hey, tell those kids it's not funny to compare fat chicks to pyramids. Ok that one made me laugh |
| #12homicidal_squirrelFeb 02, 2011 9:46:51 | Hey, tell those kids it's not funny to compare fat chicks to pyramids. ![]() |
| #13boraxeFeb 02, 2011 10:07:08 | "At PETA we love animals so much we treat women like cattle." What a bunch of ing scumbags. |
| #14pluisjenFeb 02, 2011 10:13:16 | "At PETA we love animals so much we treat women like cattle." Heh, that's another interesting way to look at it. |
| #15zombie_babiesFeb 02, 2011 10:16:11 | Right. Don't exploit animals but exploiting people is a-ok. See, animals are better than us. ![]() |
| #16ADHadhFeb 02, 2011 10:17:15 | "At PETA we love animals so much we treat women like cattle." If they treated cattle like women it would be funnier. I remember an Onion video on that quoted version... |
| #17homicidal_squirrelFeb 02, 2011 11:12:24 | Hey, tell those kids it's not funny to compare fat chicks to pyramids. ![]() |
| #18zombie_babiesFeb 02, 2011 11:43:25 | Yeah, some eco-militants believe the best solution for the planet is to not have humans on it. Not the bet way to get sympathie from the pubic, to say the least. Well, they are kinda right. We are terrible for planets. |
| #19zombie_babiesFeb 02, 2011 12:22:40 | Yup. Indigenous people had the way of things down. Too bad we killed 'em off and corrupted most of what's left. There is a way to do it but nobody alive today would ever consider it. Most wouldn't survive if they had to live that way, either. You have to wonder at what sort of luxurious lives we live that eating meat is even a question. |
| #20EscefFeb 02, 2011 13:40:52 | www.theonion.com/video/advocacy-group-de... |
| #21ADHadhFeb 02, 2011 13:46:54 | www.theonion.com/video/advocacy-group-de... Yup, that's the thing. |
| #22EscherEnigmaFeb 02, 2011 14:19:49 | @Goldo: I was actually reading a study that was looking at Viagra's effect on safe-sex practices1 and one of the interesting findings was that because of the alcohol-impotence connection you mentioned some men were less likely to wrap it before sex since with the reduced feeling it made it even harder to hold the erection. With Viagra tossed into the mix, however, the men could still perform with protection, so in some cases Viagra actually got people to practice safe-sex. Of course, then the guys figured out they could get really drunk and still get hard enough for a condom, which lead to them getting even drunker and not having the judgement to use a condom. So it's a mixed bag. For some men having Viagra available made safe-sex more likely, for some it just encouraged even more irresponsible behavior. I can't remember which group was larger. Still, the more you know. ________ 1It was specifically looking at safe-sex practices among gay men in large cities, but some of the conclusions might generalize. |
| #23boraxeFeb 02, 2011 14:30:19 | Yup. Indigenous people had the way of things down. The whole "natives live in harmony with nature" line is a load. They can, and have, been just as destructive to their environment. The only differenence between them and the modern era is scale. Industrialization has allowed humans to things up on a global scale instead of ing thigns up on a local scale as did our ancestors and "indigenous peoples". |
| #24zombie_babiesFeb 02, 2011 14:37:51 | Meh, blame the era then. There was a way of life that worked that we have moved far, far away from. That's pretty much it, I guess. |
| #25zombie_babiesFeb 02, 2011 15:38:21 | Yep. And somehow they managed not to ever be in danger of running out of buffalo to stampede until some strange looking folk from across the sea decided that they wanted to eat Buffalo meat and wear Buffalo fur, too. Even then they weren't in real danger of running out until these same strangers decided to mount a campaign to eradicate the Buffalo from the land in order to prevent these people from eating and wearing them. Jeebus. Lrn2histry. |
| #26EscherEnigmaFeb 02, 2011 15:46:58 | Eh. Even the Native Americans were destructive to the planet, just not to the same degree that Europeans were. The real culprit is numbers, and once you start with agriculture/horticulture you're putting into place a system that not only allows greater numbers but demands greater numbers. So if you're looking for something to blame, go with that. Before agriculture/horticulture you had gatherer/hunter tribes that really couldn't grow very fast at all and were much closer to a neutral-impact on their environment. But for that sort of society to work you need a friggin' huge amount of land for each person. |
| #27boraxeFeb 02, 2011 16:04:25 | Yep. And somehow they managed not to ever be in danger of running out of buffalo to stampede until some strange looking folk from across the sea decided that they wanted to eat Buffalo meat and wear Buffalo fur, too. Even then they weren't in real danger of running out until these same strangers decided to mount a campaign to eradicate the Buffalo from the land in order to prevent these people from eating and wearing them. Again, it was only a question of scale. Do you really think industrialized western people are the only ones ever to extinct a species? If the mystical "indigenous people" had a larger population to feed and clothe, and more effective means of hunting, they'd have wiped out the buffalo just as easily as they did the mammoth. |
| #28zombie_babiesFeb 02, 2011 16:15:26 | Right, scale. I was in that case responding to a specific post. The harm in that case was not done by the activity that was highlighted. That was my only point. I'll give ya scale. No doubt about it. |
| #29ADHadhFeb 02, 2011 18:28:23 | The whole "natives live in harmony with nature" line is a load. (...) Except maybe in Africa, where nature grew alongside man, meaning it has learn how to exploit him. Hence the harshness of many African environments. Hmm, maybe it's more "nature lives in harmony with the natives". |
| #30KlirshonFeb 02, 2011 23:45:19 | You could blame technology for your blunders with nature. Knowledge has permitted your species to flourish as it adapted, thus furthering its influence for exploitation of the world abroad. I however will not let this stop my goals for a technological domination of this planet. The ends will justify the means. |
| #31EscefFeb 02, 2011 23:55:38 | You could blame technology for your blunders with nature. Knowledge has permitted your species to flourish as it adapted, thus furthering its influence for exploitation of the world abroad. I however will not let this stop my goals for a technological domination of this planet. The ends will justify the means. Ok, so what are we looking at here? Skynet? Phyrexia? Biodreads? |
| #32KlirshonFeb 03, 2011 0:30:53 | Those were meant to make humans despise machine societies as fleshling authors wished to make a mechanical villain that is painted as "evil". |
| #33lokiareFeb 03, 2011 2:12:52 | Watch the final episode of Battlestar Gallactica (the new one not the old one). That pretty much sums up the argument... |
| #34toastedamphibianFeb 03, 2011 3:03:15 | I hate people some time, so self focused. Just because something hates you, wants to destroy you and everything like you: that doesn't make it evil. It probably makes you adversaries, but you don't get automatic moral high ground just because you want it. |
| #35EscefFeb 03, 2011 3:54:09 | I hate people some time, so self focused. Just because something hates you, wants to destroy you and everything like you: that doesn't make it evil. It probably makes you adversaries, but you don't get automatic moral high ground just because you want it. [Irish accent] Aye, and Ayn Rand is a self-centered prick who is obsessed with the idea of everyone else being a self-centered prick.[/Irish accent] |
| #36boraxeFeb 03, 2011 9:33:51 | The whole "natives live in harmony with nature" line is a load. (...) There's a couple man-made deserts in Africa that suggest otherwise. |
| #37boraxeFeb 03, 2011 9:50:08 | Watch the final episode of Battlestar Gallactica (the new one not the old one). That pretty much sums up the argument... The last few episodes of BSG are dreadful. Easily the worst of the lot and a bit of an insult to the series as a whole. |
| #38zombie_babiesFeb 03, 2011 9:52:54 | The last few episodes of BSG are dreadful. Easily the worst of the lot and a bit of an insult to the series as a whole. Agreed. Total copout, lazy writing and just very, very sad in comparison to all that came before. They kept talking about how they wanted to end it on their terms so that they could do a great job of it but instead blew the opportunity. They seemed lost in their own plot complexities and unable to find a decent way to tie things up. So what we got was what we got - garbage. |
| #39EscherEnigmaFeb 03, 2011 12:12:19 | Just because something hates you, wants to destroy you and everything like you: that doesn't make it evil. But... I'm a super hero! And so anyone that opposes me if a villain! And villains are evil! ... or at least, that would be my logic if I were a super hero. |
| #40EscherEnigmaFeb 03, 2011 12:26:30 | To put is succinctly, I'm homosexual, but not all that gay, if that makes sense? |
| #41jesse.two.coinsFeb 03, 2011 12:31:11 | To put is succinctly, I'm homosexual, but not all that gay, if that makes sense? you aren't flambouyant? |
| #42EscherEnigmaFeb 03, 2011 12:39:37 | I'm really not. The leather pants picture (I'm sure someone can provide a link)? That was one day five years ago when my roommates and friends decided I should look more gay. Most days? I'm closer to |
| #43jesse.two.coinsFeb 03, 2011 12:43:14 | haha lookin good man |