| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1firebeetleMar 28, 2010 10:31:30 | As many of you already know, Rona Jaffe's hurried and slanderous book "Mazes and Monsters" depicts Dungeons and Dragons as a game that will turn players into pyschotics. CBS has turned this awful book into a movie, starring none other that worldwide superstar Tom Hanks in the lead role. Tom plays a man whose belief in his character, a 9th level cleric named Pardue, takes him through a psychotic episode. This movie damages the reputation of Dungeons and Dragons as good, clean fun without liquor or unprotected sex. It instead portrays the game as the first step into complete self-destruction. Made in 1982, the evidence is overwhelming that D&D does nothing more than provide entertainment to law-abiding, well-rounded, mentally stable citizens who tend to be college educated with high-income jobs. Nearly thirty years later, it is high time that Tom Hanks apologized for his role in this slanderous film. Go to the wiki and sign the petition today. Tom Hanks must tell the world he regrets insulting their intelligence, as well as their wisdom, charisma, strength, dexterity, and constitution. Sign the petition on the wiki in this Community Group: community.wizards.com/tom_hanks Did you suffer persecution and ignorance because of this movie? Feel free to share your experiences with Mazes and Monsters. Together, we can get a public acknowledgement from Tom Hanks that this movie was biased, unfair, and damaging in its portrayal. |
| #2oxybeMar 28, 2010 12:10:10 | A) why only Tom Hanks? he wasn't a superstar at the time so you can't blame him for taking a crappy role B) what about Steven Stern, the director? why aren't petitioning him for making the movie? C) the other actors? again, why only Tom Hanks? as for "suffering", well i was born in '85, 3 years after the movie was made, and raised in a small rural french community of about 2500 people in Prince Edward Island. our school was from K-12 and had about 450 students. people knew of D&D but usually didn't care, or if they know did it's usually because they played it before themselves. i suffered more in my pre-teen and teen years for being a bit overweight and a huge nerd then being a D&D player. i never even heard of mazes & monsters other then a vague blurb on the web and stayed disinterested. i highly doubt the guys who would tease me would have watched M&M anyways. note that the suffering was quite minor once my potential tormentors realized that i had 20-40 lbs on them when i was a kid and not afraid to knock out a few teeth should the need arise. once the awkward years were mostly over, i got a rep as "that big jolly guy who's playing cards in the corner with those other guys who'll fix your computer problems and lift heavy things for you if you ask politely". i never had a problem at the workplace since i was always a tech guy: most of the people i know at work are either Comic Book Geeks, Video Game Geeks, Computer Geeks or RPG Geeks (and a good healthy mix of the different categories). when i wasn't working at a tech job, it was physical labor and it just kept you occupied, so D&D never came up. as for family issues brought upon by the movie: my mom was worried when she heard of it from my aunt... for about the hour it took her to read the basic concepts of the books and watch us play. at best she was amused to see teenagers playing pretend by rolling dice, at worst annoyed that we were taking up the dinner table and she was expecting company so she couldn't put out the good dishes and table cloth. then again, this is the same lady who bought me an NES once i was old enough to imput the Contra Code, had me raised on Ghostbusters, Spiderman & the TMNT and thought that me running around in the yard swinging swords & sheilds made of old wood and rusty nails while playing in my dad's lobster fishing gear years before i learned of LARPing and that they had a safer NERF-based alternative for faux-medival weaponry was a good idea. all the guys i grew up with and played D&D with had similar experiences: no sneaking around behind their parents to roll the demonic dice... just a bunch of kids playing pretend in the living room where they can be watched instead doing Gord knows what and where. the movie wasn't even a blip on our radar growing up. i still haven't watched it and i honestly don't plan to. |
| #3ian.thomsonMar 28, 2010 15:55:25 | Here's the thing: three of the four players were better off because of the game. Tom Hanks's character had a history of mental unwellness before playing the game. Pat Robertson is faaarrr more to blame, but don't bother with a petition against him, he's got about fifty billion other problems and needs to have other petitions delivered to him in a way that he'd need a colostomy to breathe properly (yes, I know that doesn't work, but that man makes it hard for me to call myself a Baptist). |
| #4The_SilverswordMar 28, 2010 16:47:15 | Ok now wait a minute, that movie was supposed to be taken seriously!? |
| #5Cpt_MichaMar 28, 2010 16:55:12 | Yeah it was. Which is the odd part. |
| #6Dougan_AxehammerMar 28, 2010 20:58:54 | Actually, instead of not taking the movie seriously, I found the movie to show a message contrary to the writer's intent: that the main characters mental breakdown was the root of his release through fantasy role-play, not the fantasy role-play being the root of his mental breakdown. As far as blaming Tom Hanks for the slight (however real or imagined it is), it was ten years ago. Get over it. |
| #7baneofelvesMar 28, 2010 21:06:07 | Whoah. Hey. Hey. HEY! LISTEN! It's called a movie. It's to provide entertainment. That would be like me getting angry at the show Metalocalypse for many of the bassist jokes that are now common in the musician's society. People who actaully take these kinds of things seriously and judge others based off of that are IGNORANT. What you do is make them realize how foolish they are making themselves look, and then point and laugh. Loudly. I'm sure others will soon follow. no need to get riled up, just play a few mind games with 'em, and they'll STFU. |
| #8calronmoonflowerMar 28, 2010 21:31:12 | As many of you already know, Rona Jaffe's hurried and slanderous book "Mazes and Monsters" depicts Dungeons and Dragons as a game that will turn players into pyschotics. CBS has turned this awful book into a movie, starring none other that worldwide superstar Tom Hanks in the lead role. Actually, instead of not taking the movie seriously, I found the movie to show a message contrary to the writer's intent: that the main characters mental breakdown was the root of his release through fantasy role-play, not the fantasy role-play being the root of his mental breakdown. I believe that the author was saying that playing fantasy role playing games was a symptom of psychological problems, rather than playing fantasy role playing games causes psychological problems. If you see the movie, pay attention to the reporters soliloquy on the game, and it will be spelled out directly. Also at the end of the movie, while the former group is in the car, the girl will speak of a book she is writing about how playing the game helped them through their problems. Links: Mazes and Monsters and Mazes and Monsters (novel) |
| #9AbsintaMar 28, 2010 22:09:45 | I've a feeling this was a slightly early April Fool's joke. And it's been alot more than 10 years. |
| #10firebeetleMar 28, 2010 22:58:29 | I thought people would get the joke, obviously I thought wrong. Let me explain further: For those of you who didn't experience it, the early eighties and "Satanic panic" was an issue, one whose stink still lingers today like the mold in my basement. Many people were convinced D&D was going to cause you become a Satan worshiper, commit suicide, or both. "Mazes and Monsters' was a major contributer to this perception. Many of us had to deal with a variety of indignities. Some were lectured, forbidden to play, punished, some had their books burned (and forced to burn them personally), or worse. To this day, the perception remains. I had my job threatened a few years ago by it (more later, long story), and many people cling to the belief (one of my players was told by a co-worker that "mushrooms would grow out of his ears". What does that MEAN?) I got the idea during the recent prison case in which some prisoners were forbidden to play D&D. The case submitted all the cases in which D&D was used as a "twinkie defense", even those none of those defenses were successful, just by the negative association of "D&D makes you go crazy." Ironically, a penitentiary filled with prisoners playing D&D would probably be pretty peaceful, IMO. I think it's time to hit this problem 21st century style, with an internet meme. A campaign to win an apology from one of Hollywood's kings. Picture people in costumes with signs that read "Elves are people too", "Crazy 4 D&D, D&D (does not equal sign) Crazy", and "Tom Hanks stole my twelve-sided die". T-shirt with Tom in his Pardue outfit with "Apologize" on them. It's a perfect storm really:
There's no reason to target anyone else with this, no one else is famous or alive. Further, with any campaign, you always focus on one person (I spent three years as President of our local teacher's union. Focusing on one person works. We can smear Jack Chick later.) |
| #11darkspartanMar 29, 2010 1:28:26 | There's no reason to target anyone else with this, no one else is famous or alive. Further, with any campaign, you always focus on one person (I spent three years as President of our local teacher's union. Focusing on one person works. We can smear Jack Chick later.) Now that you mention it, smearing Jack Chick would be fun. Can we get Jack Van Impe while we're at it? PleasePleasePlease? He's another along the same stripe. Not the same as trying to pushing out Billy Graham and Jimmy Swaggert's brain-dead litters, but almost as much fun. Oh, and that whiner in the Senate from CT that simply *must* campaign to have video games banned. He liked the attempt to have D&D banned back then, too. As far as Tom Hanks, he really only needs apologize for his assistance in giving these idiots ammunition. I kinda like him otherwise. He did very well in the role of Jim Lovell. -Sarena |
| #12zombie_babiesMar 29, 2010 9:19:41 | Tom Hanks repaid his debt for MM with the simply amazing Band of Brothers. You can't watch that and not forgive him for his youthful transgression. However, this masterpiece does not absolve him completely. His work in the film Cast Away did more to damage the empires of Voit and Spalding than M&M did to damage D&D. His constant cries of 'Wilson' and the obviously not only platonic love he and the ball shared lowered the products of these other fine companies in the eyes of many. As a fan of Voit (and this goes back to my youth - I'm no bandwaggoner), I simply cannot let this rest until I get a personal apology or an alternate version featuring the plucky sanity savior Voit. It's a better name anyway. |
| #13Cpt_MichaMar 29, 2010 9:31:20 | Voit was a Name Brand? Wow, I always thought it was just some off brand that made cheap crappy shoes for Walmart. I remember every pair if Voit shoes I ever owned lasting less than six months before Destruction began to set in . I guess you learn something new every day. |
| #14zombie_babiesMar 29, 2010 9:32:48 | There is nothing 'off-brand' or 'cheap' about Voit, sir. |
| #15Cpt_MichaMar 29, 2010 9:36:01 | You sure about that? My mom always got me the Cheap Shoes as a kid. (and wound up buying me shoes several times a year because of that) And Voit was something she used to buy me alot of. Given how tight our financial situation was back then, Voit would have to have been Cheap. I used to get cheap shoes up till middleschool where my Converse shoes lasted longer than four pairs of shoes combined, and then after that the Offbrand buying stopped. My next pair was a pair of Nike Airs that out lasted my shoe size even. After that I discovered Steel Toe boots in highschool. Been wearing those ever since. I've been through exactly three pairs of boots since highschool. One pair was given to a friend. One pair ruined by a mineral spirits accident. And this pair is well over three years old. |
| #16zombie_babiesMar 29, 2010 9:40:18 | Sir, I'll ask you once to refrain from dragging the Voit name through the mud. Are you some sort of representative of Mr Hanks? Possibly Mr Zemekis? Maybe Image Movers or Playtone Studio? Hmm? There are ways of discovering this sort of thing, sir, and I can assure you my lawyer is looking into it. |
| #17Cpt_MichaMar 29, 2010 9:42:58 | Was your lawyer the fat bastard with the greasy hands? If so I regret to inform you he won't be helping you anytime soon. I introduced him to a Cake Buffet. |
| #18zombie_babiesMar 29, 2010 9:48:41 | My lawyer would never lower himself to a personal meeting during the course of an investigation. I assure you, sir, that I am well represented and my lawyer has a crack team working for him. I am hoping, however, that I can keep this out of the courts. It's not about money to me, it's about reputation. I think you and your cohorts over at Wilson (yes, I know all about that) will find that that makes people like myself far, far more dangerous. |
| #19lofgrenMar 29, 2010 9:51:02 | I demand an apology from Tom Hanks for the 5 years I spent as a scrawny pubescent scouring cheap carnivals for a Zoltar machine. |
| #20zombie_babiesMar 29, 2010 9:53:28 | It appears that Mr Hanks has a lot to apologize for - and to many people, too. Shall we take this class-action? |
| #21boraxeMar 29, 2010 12:43:31 | Yeah, cos nothing says "D&D players are just normal folks and not maladjusted weirdos" like a class-action lawsuit demanding an apology from a major Hollywood star for insulting a game 30 years ago. |
| #22zombie_babiesMar 29, 2010 12:56:45 | I care not for whatever slight some D&D players may feel over M&M. What I do care for is the damage Voit suffered at the hands of Mr Hanks in Cast Away. |
| #23lofgrenMar 29, 2010 14:59:55 | I would also like an apology from Mr. Hanks for the uncomfortable conversation I had with my dad after he discovered that I had watched his copy of Bachelor Party with my friends during an elementary school sleepover. I would also like an explanation from my dad as to why he would spend money on freaking Bachelor Party. I assume he was wandering around Sunset Video drunk or something. |
| #24The_SilverswordMar 29, 2010 15:27:25 | You all can dis Mazes & Monsters and Castaway all you want, but leave Bachelor Party out of it! That movie was Hanks finest performance! That was easily the best movie to come out of 1984. That and the donkey scene in that movie led to the donkey scene in Clerks 2, funny, funny stuff. |
| #25boraxeMar 29, 2010 15:39:50 | You all can dis Mazes & Monsters and Castaway all you want, but leave Bachelor Party out of it! That movie was Hanks finest performance! That was easily the best movie to come out of 1984. That and the donkey scene in that movie led to the donkey scene in Clerks 2, funny, funny stuff. 1984 was the year that gave us Ghostbusters, The Terminator, Spinal Tap, Amadeus, Buckaroo Banzai, and Repo Man. If you think Bachelor Party was the best film of the year you are out of your damned mind! What Hanks really owes us all an apology for is The Terminal. ![]() |
| #26The_SilverswordMar 29, 2010 16:01:22 | 1984 was the year that gave us Ghostbusters, The Terminator, Spinal Tap, Amadeus, Buckaroo Banzai, and Repo Man. If you think Bachelor Party was the best film of the year you are out of your damned mind! I should of done more research before proclaiming Bachelor Party the best movie 1984 had to offer, obviously that distinction should go to Spinal tap! Hello Cleveland! And to be honest its been years and years since ive seen Bachelor Party, and chances are its not nearly as good as I remember it, much like Tron. And The Terminal isnt all bad, anytime I have trouble sleeping, I put that one in, works like a charm! |
| #27EscherEnigmaMar 29, 2010 16:18:41 | ... but I liked Terminal. Not a "watch again and again" film, but it certainly wasn't bad. |
| #28psiratMar 30, 2010 19:58:20 | I dunno about Mr. Hanks, but I for one apologize to the world for my good friend Firebeetle's sorry excuse for a sense of humor. I shall have him beaten profusely for this. You may all go back to your daily routines. |
| #29toastedamphibianMar 30, 2010 22:29:14 | What foolishness is this?I dunno about Mr. Hanks, but I for one apologize to the world for my good friend Firebeetle's sorry excuse for a sense of humor. I shall have him beaten profusely for this. See that you do. To ensure that he does not relapse into old ways, We officially appoint Psirat as Firebeetle's keeper. You are new here, so We offer you a bit of advice that needs rarely be spoken: "Do not disapoint Us". |
| #30firebeetleMar 30, 2010 23:36:29 | Oh c'mon people, picture the scene: Assistant: "And we have a petition. . ." Hanks: "Really, what for? I usually don't get petition." Assistant: "Well, apparently 250 fans of Dungeons and Dragons want you to, ah, apologize." Hanks: "Apologize, what for?" Assistant: "Your role in Mazes and Monsters, but the letter says they loved you in Castaway and Forrest Gump." (Silence, followed by laughter) That's funny, why can't we make that happen? |
| #31EscherEnigmaMar 31, 2010 1:07:32 | That's funny, why can't we make that happen? Because the internet is serious business, and only to be used for serious business. That business is not serious, and thus it has no place here. |
| #32toastedamphibianMar 31, 2010 4:18:07 | As usual, the Elitist of the Ivory Tower offers wise council. Keep your waggling tongue in check, for no good can come from one of such low station and base inclinations as yourself drawing the eyes of your betters. |
| #33zombie_babiesMar 31, 2010 8:45:29 | That's funny, why can't we make that happen? 1) Because it isn't funny. 2) Because this: they loved you in Castaway is totally untrue. To those of us that support Voit, this movie was an abomination. |
| #34Cpt_MichaMar 31, 2010 20:39:31 | I like to think to anyone that has any form of Sanity left that Castaway is an abomination. |
| #35zombie_babiesApr 01, 2010 8:51:52 | I really think it would have been Best Picture worthy had they only made one cast substitution. Namely, replace that hack Wilson with the classically trained and vastly more handsome Voit. I think they were afraid that if they did bring Voit on, he'd steal every scene he was in, though. After seeing Hanks act more than once and after seeing Voit many times more, I have to say that their worries were not unfounded. My complaint is that nobody watched that movie to see Hanks - they watched it to see the ball. As that's the case, why not go with the best? |
| #36Elton74May 01, 2010 19:45:04 | Surely you all have something better to do. |
| #37Mad_JackMay 02, 2010 4:24:18 | Surely you all have something better to do. (Ahem.) Ah, you do realize you're replying to a thread that's a month old, right?... ![]() |
| #38firebeetleMay 02, 2010 10:52:41 | I haven't forgotten. Hanks will apologize, yes, he will. Bwahahahahaha! |
| #39NovacatMay 02, 2010 22:20:43 | "NO! Not BLACK LEAF!!!" |
| #40Elton74May 10, 2010 11:19:58 | Surely you all have something better to do. no, not really. I've been hanging about the DAZ forums more than here. |
| #41Luis_CarlosMay 29, 2010 17:18:23 | Where is the petition to ask Tom Hanks to apalogize for "Da Vinci´s code" and "Angels and demons" movies? |
| #42johnkretzerJun 06, 2010 2:29:09 | I know this is a bit of thread necromancy but... The real problem with this idea is that I really doubt Tom Hanks would ever admitt to be in Monsters & Mazes. Really most big Hollywood actors and directors hate it when fans bring up crappy movies from the past. It would almost be as bad as about asking Spielburg about the Star Wars X-Mas Special. |
| #43pippyprawnstockingJun 06, 2010 8:42:58 | Appologize? I want to thank him for his role in Mazes in Monsters. That movie is hysterical. |
| #44Mad_JackJun 06, 2010 22:05:54 | the Star Wars X-Mas Special. < grins > Ohhhh yeah. < /grin > |
| #45IdolisJun 06, 2010 22:45:01 | Wasn't there another one too. One that had to do with a family crash landing on Endor and meeting the ewok Wickit, or whatever his name was? Edit: Oh yeah, I found it. Ewoks:Battle for Endor or something or other. But it wasn't a Christmas special. |
| #46Ragnar_LodbrokJun 06, 2010 22:48:13 | the Star Wars X-Mas Special. No. No there was not . |
| #47The_SilverswordJun 06, 2010 23:22:39 | Everyone should have a copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special! |
| #48NovacatJun 07, 2010 1:12:46 | ![]() |
| #49johnkretzerJun 07, 2010 2:39:43 | Everyone should have a copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special! You can not. Lucus gathered every copy of it and destroyed...it would be gone from this earth if not some few preserved by taping it. Thanks to the internet we can all share in the joy. I think Lucus really hates the internet now. The most f***ed up scene is when Grandpas Chewbaca views a porn like scene... |
| #50The_SilverswordJun 08, 2010 23:23:42 | Everyone should have a copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special! Yes I remember the Ewok made for TV movies, and the cartoon, and the Droids cartoon as well. I wouldnt mind geting the Droids one on DVD, the others I can live with out. But if you really want a copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special, I posted a linky. I remember loving that as a kid, I thought it was the best thing ever! I was so disappointed that it never aired again. Flash foward years later and I finally find it on DVD and I was like yes! Then after I watched it I was like what the hell? Lucas must of done something to it, I dont remember it being so utterly incoherent. So who wants to play some Mazes & Monsters, Live action!!! |
| #51NovacatJun 08, 2010 23:28:10 | ![]() |