Roy is BACK! - Downloaded from the Wizards Community, all coding removed by Solauren

Roy is BACK!

Post/Author/DateTime Post
#1
Greater_Lammasu
Jun 25, 2009 23:52:29 ROY IS BACK. Plus a funny Captain America reference.
#2
oxybe
Jun 25, 2009 23:55:27 "You're invisible!"... awesome callback to an old gag.
#3
ellorin
Jun 26, 2009 2:00:26
#4
Reg06
Jun 26, 2009 4:47:49 I looked, and I looked, but what Captain America reference?
#5
Dark_Stryke
Jun 26, 2009 9:41:39
I looked, and I looked, but what Captain America reference?

The previous comic
#6
ody_saraph_of_karsus
Jun 26, 2009 12:20:42 Oh No! If Roy's Back, who's gonna defend Little Eric Greenhilt from MJ!?!?!?
#7
ADHadh
Jun 26, 2009 13:29:56
Oh No! If Roy's Back, who's gonna defend Little Eric Greenhilt from MJ!?!?!?

There are Devas in the first line, making sure everyone goes to the plane they should. Was MJ LG?
Then there's Roy's Grandpa.
Last, bad joke.
#8
doneisi
Jun 26, 2009 17:27:40 To be honest the comic kind of sucked without Roy and the others as a group.
#9
toastedamphibian
Jun 26, 2009 17:32:30
I looked, and I looked, but what Captain America reference?

I think it has something to do with the name on the sign the second driver is holding. I don't know enough about comics to say for sure though, but that would be my guess. AKA someone in the marval universe is about to come back from the dead.
#10
joni-san
Jun 26, 2009 17:37:54 Sixth panel, first sign.

S. Rogers stands for Steve Rogers, also known as CAPTAIN AMERICA!
#11
Reg06
Jun 26, 2009 17:44:52 Yes. I didn't see the first link, cleverly hidden as it was.
#12
annoyinglizardvoice
Jun 26, 2009 18:01:16 Glad to see him back.
The comic was much better when the crazier characters had Roy to play off.
#13
baneofelves
Jun 26, 2009 18:03:30 Ugh, FINALLY. I got sick of the repetetive, side quest ******** that was used as a filler for the plot.
#14
Dark_Stryke
Jun 26, 2009 20:28:34
Ugh, FINALLY. I got sick of the repetetive, side quest ******** that was used as a filler for the plot.

I actually liked the attention the other characters got, and it was interesting to see how such a dysfunctional family behaves when they're all separated.

I don't see where you have a right to complain, though. It's not costing you anything to read the comic, and if you don't like it, you can always just not read it.

And repetitive? What plotlines were recycled?
#15
toastedamphibian
Jun 26, 2009 21:23:38 How did Roy's dad even get near the Lawful Good afterlife? His actions seem more Chaotic Neutral-Good than anything.
#16
innabinder
Jun 26, 2009 21:28:55 Only one more until the MitD reveal (I'm betting). w00t!
#17
powercat
Jun 26, 2009 21:29:13
How did Roy's dad even get near the Lawful Good afterlife? His actions seem more Chaotic Neutral-Good than anything.

What's to say your personality has to be static in the afterlife?
#18
stealthmarmot
Jun 26, 2009 21:45:28
What's to say your personality has to be static in the afterlife?

Thing is, if your personality were to shift, it would cause them to punt you out of whatever cloud you are sitting on moving you to the next cloud.
#19
toastedamphibian
Jun 26, 2009 22:23:19 From what little we know of his time on the prime material, he didn't seem exactly lawful good even then. I predict that when someone finnally kills xykon, they review his dads case and decide not to let him in anyways. They then send him to some other afterlife where they would have let him in all along, not caring about his oath. The only reason the lawful good staffers didn't send him there sooner is because thats not the order the paperwork is supposed to be done in.
#20
pigknight
Jun 26, 2009 22:27:22 Roy's dad seemed more Neutral or Chaotic Good in the views we had of him.

Also I thought S. Rogers was Mr. Rogers (from da hood).

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 Greater_Lammasu Jun 25, 2009 23:52:29	ROY IS BACK. Plus a funny Captain America reference.
#2 oxybe Jun 25, 2009 23:55:27	"You're invisible!"... awesome callback to an old gag.
#3 ellorin Jun 26, 2009 2:00:26
#4 Reg06 Jun 26, 2009 4:47:49	I looked, and I looked, but what Captain America reference?
#5 Dark_Stryke Jun 26, 2009 9:41:39	I looked, and I looked, but what Captain America reference? The previous comic
#6 ody_saraph_of_karsus Jun 26, 2009 12:20:42	Oh No! If Roy's Back, who's gonna defend Little Eric Greenhilt from MJ!?!?!?
#7 ADHadh Jun 26, 2009 13:29:56	Oh No! If Roy's Back, who's gonna defend Little Eric Greenhilt from MJ!?!?!? There are Devas in the first line, making sure everyone goes to the plane they should. Was MJ LG? Then there's Roy's Grandpa. Last, bad joke.
#8 doneisi Jun 26, 2009 17:27:40	To be honest the comic kind of sucked without Roy and the others as a group.
#9 toastedamphibian Jun 26, 2009 17:32:30	I looked, and I looked, but what Captain America reference? I think it has something to do with the name on the sign the second driver is holding. I don't know enough about comics to say for sure though, but that would be my guess. AKA someone in the marval universe is about to come back from the dead.
#10 joni-san Jun 26, 2009 17:37:54	Sixth panel, first sign. S. Rogers stands for Steve Rogers, also known as CAPTAIN AMERICA!
#11 Reg06 Jun 26, 2009 17:44:52	Yes. I didn't see the first link, cleverly hidden as it was.
#12 annoyinglizardvoice Jun 26, 2009 18:01:16	Glad to see him back. The comic was much better when the crazier characters had Roy to play off.
#13 baneofelves Jun 26, 2009 18:03:30	Ugh, FINALLY. I got sick of the repetetive, side quest ******** that was used as a filler for the plot.
#14 Dark_Stryke Jun 26, 2009 20:28:34	Ugh, FINALLY. I got sick of the repetetive, side quest ******** that was used as a filler for the plot. I actually liked the attention the other characters got, and it was interesting to see how such a dysfunctional family behaves when they're all separated. I don't see where you have a right to complain, though. It's not costing you anything to read the comic, and if you don't like it, you can always just not read it. And repetitive? What plotlines were recycled?
#15 toastedamphibian Jun 26, 2009 21:23:38	How did Roy's dad even get near the Lawful Good afterlife? His actions seem more Chaotic Neutral-Good than anything.
#16 innabinder Jun 26, 2009 21:28:55	Only one more until the MitD reveal (I'm betting). w00t!
#17 powercat Jun 26, 2009 21:29:13	How did Roy's dad even get near the Lawful Good afterlife? His actions seem more Chaotic Neutral-Good than anything. What's to say your personality has to be static in the afterlife?
#18 stealthmarmot Jun 26, 2009 21:45:28	What's to say your personality has to be static in the afterlife? Thing is, if your personality were to shift, it would cause them to punt you out of whatever cloud you are sitting on moving you to the next cloud.
#19 toastedamphibian Jun 26, 2009 22:23:19	From what little we know of his time on the prime material, he didn't seem exactly lawful good even then. I predict that when someone finnally kills xykon, they review his dads case and decide not to let him in anyways. They then send him to some other afterlife where they would have let him in all along, not caring about his oath. The only reason the lawful good staffers didn't send him there sooner is because thats not the order the paperwork is supposed to be done in.
#20 pigknight Jun 26, 2009 22:27:22	Roy's dad seemed more Neutral or Chaotic Good in the views we had of him. Also I thought S. Rogers was Mr. Rogers (from da hood).