Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 homicidal_squirrel May 06, 2011 13:48:37	blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2011/05/...
#2 Maxperson May 06, 2011 14:00:43	I like how they KNOW they are looked at for ridiculous news stories
#3 zombie_babies May 06, 2011 14:22:43	Unbelievable.  Passing a law like that without consulting the animal residents.  That's seriously wrong.  Where's PETA when you need them?  The animals should have had their say, dammit!
#4 homicidal_squirrel May 06, 2011 14:23:57	Just another example of government becoming too big and invading people's lives.
#5 homicidal_squirrel May 06, 2011 14:25:14	I like how they KNOW they are looked at for ridiculous news stories The best part is that no matter what they do, it becomes stupid news.
#6 Maxperson May 06, 2011 14:31:19	Unbelievable.  Passing a law like that without consulting the animal residents.  That's seriously wrong.  Where's PETA when you need them?  The animals should have had their say, dammit! Animals need kinky love too!
#7 Maxperson May 06, 2011 14:31:39	I like how they KNOW they are looked at for ridiculous news stories The best part is that no matter what they do, it becomes stupid news.  lol  True.
#8 zombie_babies May 06, 2011 14:36:44	Just another example of government becoming too big and invading people's lives. Exactly.  What a man does with a guinea pig and some peanut butter in the privacy of his own home is between him and his pal. Animals need kinky love too! They at least deserve the respect of having their various voices heard.  And how can they just totally ban something like this?  I mean, sure the majority of small rodents like mice and hamsters and the like would probably be ok with the ban (party time can be quite fatal for our smaller brothers) but what about dogs or horses?  They may well be down.  The point here is that you shouldn't take it away completely.  It's a complex issue that merits there being some room for interpretation.  This is just so wrong.
#9 homicidal_squirrel May 06, 2011 14:43:00	At least they created a bunch of jobs. No wait... the animal sex industry just lost jobs. damn those dasterdly politicians! Damn them to hell!!!
#10 zombie_babies May 06, 2011 15:06:34	Exactly!  And it's not like the animal sex industry will just go away!  It's just gonna move to the bushes where it can't be properly regulated.  Many animals are now in grave danger.  I see animal shelters experiencing a massive influx of animals caught hookin' bein' sent in over it.  Just a damned shame all around.
#11 shiningwolf88 May 06, 2011 15:22:52	...am I the only person hoping the governor veto's the bill just so we can have another awesomely silly story?
#12 ellorin May 06, 2011 15:23:13	It could get worse...plants would still be legal...time to hide the petunias.
#13 homicidal_squirrel May 06, 2011 15:25:51	...am I the only person hoping the governor veto's the bill just so we can have another awesomely silly story? No you're not. I'm hoping the same. I've sent him $5.00 and a half eaten cupcake. That should get him to veto this horrendous government abuse.
#14 pluisjen May 06, 2011 16:32:49	So Squirrel, you won't be able to take advantage of our women. At least not legally. Canadian women are animals?
#15 goblin_pride May 06, 2011 16:51:24	Canadian women are animals?   Well played, sir. I salute you.
#16 Cpt_Micha May 06, 2011 16:57:13	to plu.
#17 Idolis May 06, 2011 16:59:30	Not trying to ruin the vibe but I think the only reason this passed is so that people that argue against Same Sex Marriage can't go back to that stand-bye arguement "Are we going to legalize beastiality too?" (I am in no way supporting the practice of beastiality, just making an observation. Probably an obvious one, since no one brought it up. Still, I think it's a good thing.) Edit for clarification before someone makes the obvious joke: I think the passage of the bill is a good thing, not beastiality.
#18 goblin_pride May 06, 2011 17:03:41	Not trying to ruin the vibe but I think the only reason this passed is so that people that argue against Same Sex Marriage can't go back to that stand-bye arguement "Are we going to legalize beastiality too?" (I am in no way supporting the practice of beastiality, just making an observation. Probably an obvious one, since no one brought it up. Still, I think it's a good thing.)   So, you're in favor of animal marriage?
#19 Idolis May 06, 2011 17:04:42	Man I'm glad I added that edit. I just wish I had done it sooner.
#20 WolfLordBran May 07, 2011 11:54:33	So Squirrel, you won't be able to take advantage of our women. At least not legally. Canadian women are animals? They are sexy beasts. They're Austin Powers?
#21 pluisjen May 07, 2011 12:23:25	That would explain why we can't handle them. And the chest hair.
#22 toastedamphibian May 07, 2011 13:18:46	... Currently beastiality draws charges of animal abuse. I'm not sure how this bill is a change. Seems like a waste of time, I can see why they did not put a priority on addressing it.