Set sail for fail. - Downloaded from the Wizards Community, all coding removed by Solauren

Set sail for fail.

Post/Author/DateTime Post
#1
homicidal_squirrel
Jul 18, 2011 22:52:03 latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2011...

#2
The_Silversword
Jul 18, 2011 23:14:44 I gotta admit though it seems somehow appropriate.
#3
homicidal_squirrel
Jul 18, 2011 23:22:31
I gotta admit though it seems somehow appropriate.

Definitely.
#4
jetshield
Jul 18, 2011 23:25:41
LulzSec is back and this time they have gone after Rupert Murdoch's embattled News Corp., hacking the website of to its British tabloid, the Sun.

#5
zombie_babies
Jul 19, 2011 10:00:05 I ... I don't understand. So it's ok to hack if you're part of Anon but not otherwise? The free spread of information now has limits? Going by the 'reasons' they gave for stuff they did, shouldn't they have been applauding him? They ... they don't make any sense. And they can't even see they don't.
#6
homicidal_squirrel
Jul 19, 2011 10:04:33
I ... I don't understand. So it's ok to hack if you're part of Anon but not otherwise? The free spread of information now has limits? Going by the 'reasons' they gave for stuff they did, shouldn't they have been applauding him? They ... they don't make any sense. And they can't even see they don't.

Were you expecting them to make any sense?
#7
pluisjen
Jul 19, 2011 10:07:59 If anything, they're going to deal with the terrible, terrible way software is designed these days. I get so sick of the stupid "clobber something together, and launch it once we gets past pre-alpha stages and we'll work on it live" mentality that lots of managers have and is the main cause of crap on the web (and "hacks" to your website, half of which are caused by launching things that aren't ready yet)

So yeah ^^
#8
ADHadh
Jul 19, 2011 10:21:38 I'm pretty sure LulzSec is separate from Anon and doesn't necessarily approve. But Anon has likely splintered into a thousand pieces once they stopped targeting specifically scientology. Today anons have nothing to do with the old anons.
It's always been more of a mob than a group.
#9
zombie_babies
Jul 19, 2011 10:22:34
Were you expecting them to make any sense?

Well, no. But that sort of idiocy always hurts my bwainz.

If anything, they're going to deal with the terrible, terrible way software is designed these days. I get so sick of the stupid "clobber something together, and launch it once we gets past pre-alpha stages and we'll work on it live" mentality that lots of managers have and is the main cause of crap on the web (and "hacks" to your website, half of which are caused by launching things that aren't ready yet)

So yeah ^^

That would be nice. With how much stuff is going web based these days, it'd be nice to finally get something 'ready' that wasn't really a super buggy alpha that we pay to test. This isn't a knock on the D&D webtools (ok, not 100% ) alone, this is standard friggin' practice these days. Like, with massive corporations as the consumer instead of some basement dwelling teen.
#10
zombie_babies
Jul 19, 2011 10:23:39
I'm pretty sure LulzSec is separate from Anon and doesn't necessarily approve. But Anon has likely splintered into a thousand pieces once they stopped targeting specifically scientology. Today anons have nothing to do with the old anons.
It's always been more of a mob than a group.

LulzSec recently reintegrated with AnonOps in order to get more help and cover. They also recently 'retired', though, so who knows what it is they're actually doing.
#11
ADHadh
Jul 19, 2011 10:50:06 AnonyLulz.

@ZB, it needen't be "the" Anonymus, if there is such a thing. I gotta say, it was clever on their part to be decentralized, though it probably made managing the thing a nightmare
#12
draco1119
Jul 19, 2011 12:14:45
LULZANON?

"Hi. My name is Captain Obvious... and I'm a hacker. It's been 32 days since my last hack..."

Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 homicidal_squirrel Jul 18, 2011 22:52:03	latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2011...
#2 The_Silversword Jul 18, 2011 23:14:44	I gotta admit though it seems somehow appropriate.
#3 homicidal_squirrel Jul 18, 2011 23:22:31	I gotta admit though it seems somehow appropriate. Definitely.
#4 jetshield Jul 18, 2011 23:25:41	LulzSec is back and this time they have gone after Rupert Murdoch's embattled News Corp., hacking the website of to its British tabloid, the Sun.
#5 zombie_babies Jul 19, 2011 10:00:05	I ... I don't understand. So it's ok to hack if you're part of Anon but not otherwise? The free spread of information now has limits? Going by the 'reasons' they gave for stuff they did, shouldn't they have been applauding him? They ... they don't make any sense. And they can't even see they don't.
#6 homicidal_squirrel Jul 19, 2011 10:04:33	I ... I don't understand. So it's ok to hack if you're part of Anon but not otherwise? The free spread of information now has limits? Going by the 'reasons' they gave for stuff they did, shouldn't they have been applauding him? They ... they don't make any sense. And they can't even see they don't. Were you expecting them to make any sense?
#7 pluisjen Jul 19, 2011 10:07:59	If anything, they're going to deal with the terrible, terrible way software is designed these days. I get so sick of the stupid "clobber something together, and launch it once we gets past pre-alpha stages and we'll work on it live" mentality that lots of managers have and is the main cause of crap on the web (and "hacks" to your website, half of which are caused by launching things that aren't ready yet) So yeah ^^
#8 ADHadh Jul 19, 2011 10:21:38	I'm pretty sure LulzSec is separate from Anon and doesn't necessarily approve. But Anon has likely splintered into a thousand pieces once they stopped targeting specifically scientology. Today anons have nothing to do with the old anons. It's always been more of a mob than a group.
#9 zombie_babies Jul 19, 2011 10:22:34	Were you expecting them to make any sense? Well, no. But that sort of idiocy always hurts my bwainz. If anything, they're going to deal with the terrible, terrible way software is designed these days. I get so sick of the stupid "clobber something together, and launch it once we gets past pre-alpha stages and we'll work on it live" mentality that lots of managers have and is the main cause of crap on the web (and "hacks" to your website, half of which are caused by launching things that aren't ready yet) So yeah ^^ That would be nice. With how much stuff is going web based these days, it'd be nice to finally get something 'ready' that wasn't really a super buggy alpha that we pay to test. This isn't a knock on the D&D webtools (ok, not 100% ) alone, this is standard friggin' practice these days. Like, with massive corporations as the consumer instead of some basement dwelling teen.
#10 zombie_babies Jul 19, 2011 10:23:39	I'm pretty sure LulzSec is separate from Anon and doesn't necessarily approve. But Anon has likely splintered into a thousand pieces once they stopped targeting specifically scientology. Today anons have nothing to do with the old anons. It's always been more of a mob than a group. LulzSec recently reintegrated with AnonOps in order to get more help and cover. They also recently 'retired', though, so who knows what it is they're actually doing.
#11 ADHadh Jul 19, 2011 10:50:06	AnonyLulz. @ZB, it needen't be "the" Anonymus, if there is such a thing. I gotta say, it was clever on their part to be decentralized, though it probably made managing the thing a nightmare
#12 draco1119 Jul 19, 2011 12:14:45	LULZANON? "Hi. My name is Captain Obvious... and I'm a hacker. It's been 32 days since my last hack..."