| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 16:27:35 |
|
| #2baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 16:29:48 | I'd say that I should be on the list, as well as Dirtyfrank, Zombie Babies, Pigknight, EscherEnigma, KillerGM, and you. Just off the top of my head. Oh, and possibly Idolis and StealthMarmot. |
| #3dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 16:33:40 | Seeing as how KillerGM was the one to bring up the topic I'd say she might have the stuff to make the list. TA, you might be worthy enough to make the list seeing as how you noticed KillerGM bringing up such a topic. I'm not sure about anybody else at the moment. |
| #4goblin_prideApr 21, 2009 16:35:57 | Nice list, Bane. |
| #5baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 16:38:52 | I just picked all the regulars. I would put you, but you've only recently returned. But I think you should be on the past significants list. |
| #6awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 16:55:24 | I'd say that I should be on the list, as well as Dirtyfrank, Zombie Babies, Pigknight, EscherEnigma, KillerGM, and you. None of these are significant. |
| #7baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 16:57:31 | Why? Because we don't make tasteless jokes about people that are dying/in a life threatening situation? There's a reason that I didn't mention you. |
| #8stompie5Apr 21, 2009 16:59:15 | Why? Because we don't make tasteless jokes about people that are dying/in a life threatening situation? There's a reason that I didn't mention you. BAM!! |
| #9baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:00:25 | I've seen stompie around a lot lately too. I recommend him, as well. |
| #10toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 17:19:03 | Current Proposed list changes: Additions: Current: dirtyfrank ToastedAmphibian KillerGM pigknight stompie5 Zombie_Babies Previous: Goblin Pride Discuss |
| #11baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:24:44 | You forgot to put me in the "Current" section. |
| #12awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 17:25:17 | Why? Because we don't make tasteless jokes about people that are dying/in a life threatening situation? There's a reason that I didn't mention you. And here is the reason we don't allow 16-year-olds to vote. |
| #13awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 17:27:01 | You forgot to put me in the "Current" section. Yes. "Forgot." |
| #14baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:27:40 | And here is the reason we don't allow 16-year-olds to vote. Because most 16 year olds don't keep up with politics, and tend to make rash decisions, that's why. Me thinking that you have an f-ed up sense of humor isn't why I'm not allowed to vote. Start making a proper argument, or STFU. |
| #15awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 17:31:18 | Because most 16 year olds don't keep up with politics, and tend to make rash decisions, that's why. They also tend to fail at logic. For example, you intentionally left me out even though I regularly post in this forum because you couldn't bear the fact that I have a different sense of humor from you (and not ****ed up by any rational standard). Which means you convinced yourself using an ad hominem argument. => You're not allowed to vote. Dismissed. |
| #16baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:33:29 | I only see you here every now and then: generally two days out of the week. When I say "regular" I'm talking about the people that I tend to see on a daily basis. |
| #17awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 17:35:44 | Then why the hell did you imply that you left me out for the other, less valid reason? Why would you intentionally make yourself look like a retard? |
| #18baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:36:33 | Because I just felt like dissing ya. ;) |
| #19pigknightApr 21, 2009 17:38:34 | I don't know Awesome Dude. |
| #20baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:39:21 | And that's because he isn't here often enough. |
| #21toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 17:43:26 | I didn't "forgot" you baneofelves, I ignored your self nomination. Noone else has proposed your inclusion and I feel self nominations should always be ignored in matters such as this. |
| #22baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:45:00 | OK, I can accept that. I just added myself in cuz I'm here like, every freaking hour of every day. |
| #23awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 17:46:26 | I also don't engage in roleplay, innuendo or otherwise useless posting on the internet. Which this sub-forum basically consists of. Also, I veto one of baneofelves' nominations. Suck on that for disrespecting me! Now you need two to even qualify. |
| #24terronusApr 21, 2009 17:47:15 | Can I nominate myself... but only for talking about movies? I love coming to OTT to talk about movies. 1 ton ghost, Zombie_Babies (when he seems interested) and Cherubaddon also seem to be movie buffs. So maybe some of us can get honorable mentions. |
| #25baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:47:24 | @ Awesome_Dude: Well, that's why I didn't recommend you for the list. |
| #26toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 17:47:27 | Self nominations will not be considered but self promotion and campainging for nomination and inclusion are both acceptable and encouraged. |
| #27pigknightApr 21, 2009 17:48:39 | I think you have to have played in the Edition War at some point. It's one of the major things in this subforum. |
| #28dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 17:48:57 | Just because one posts here often it doesn't mean they are a significant poster. Just because one thinks that they themselves is funny, doesn't mean they are a significant poster. |
| #29awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 17:51:03 | To expand on dirtyfrank's point, he has, like, 10 million posts on this forums, 99% of which are just him naming every friggin' song he listens to. Ever. |
| #30dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 17:51:24 | Can I nominate myself... but only for talking about movies? I love coming to OTT to talk about movies. I'll nominate this guy (Terronus) and 1 ton ghost just for the hell of it. They don't partake in all the childishness that most of the OTT does but that however doesn't mean they can't be significant. |
| #31dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 17:52:04 | To expand on dirtyfrank's point, he has, like, 10 million posts on this forums, 99% of which are just him naming every friggin' song he listens to. Ever. No it's probably less than 10% that are in that thread. |
| #32baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:52:17 | @ Awesome_Dude: Don't complain, you were the one that started that thread. |
| #33pigknightApr 21, 2009 17:52:20 | To expand on dirtyfrank's point, he has, like, 10 million posts on this forums, 99% of which are just him naming every friggin' song he listens to. Ever. He's also in the Edition War, What Do You Want to Talk About, and was in (Controversial Statement). |
| #34terronusApr 21, 2009 17:52:43 | I was gonna say there ought to be titles or categories. Like... Most fun - pigknight Best blogger - baneofelves (we sure know a lot about what goes on at bane's home, don't we? :P) etc. etc. And you will forgive me, but the edition wars just never were very intriguing to the point I wanted to join (which isn't to say they aren't fun for the thousands of posts in them ). That just seems like a biased criteria.But it's true, I don't post too often in the OTT myself. 1 ton ghost and Cherubaddon at least deserve mention |
| #35baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:53:24 | Hey, I participated in all of those threads, too. *looks at pigknight expectantly* |
| #36pigknightApr 21, 2009 17:53:41 | Sure, I nominate Bane. |
| #37awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 17:54:38 | Resident funny-man sends a joke flying over entire sub-forum's head. News at eleven. |
| #38baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:56:09 | No, I got the joke. I'm just ignoring it. |
| #39toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 17:56:35 | Resident funny-man sends a joke flying over entire sub-forum's head. News at eleven. Hmmm, I don't rember making any jokes rescently. ![]() |
| #40dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 17:57:00 | No, I got the joke. I'm just ignoring it. Bane, if it's worth ignoring then it's not a joke. |
| #41pigknightApr 21, 2009 17:57:37 | Awesome_Dude, you aren't that funny, if at all. Also I don't know who you are, and I'm here a lot. |
| #42baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 17:59:01 | Awesome_Dude, you aren't that funny, if at all. |
| #43awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 17:59:45 | The players are now scuffling to recover from the shame of missing the Dude's joke. It's not looking good, Bill. |
| #44toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 18:00:20 | Do I need to make a new category for people voted as definetly in no way signifigant? |
| #45baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 18:01:12 | Yes. I nominate Awesome_Dude for that section. |
| #46awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 18:01:42 | Awesome_Dude, you aren't that funny, if at all. ![]() |
| #47dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 18:02:58 | Do I need to make a new category for people voted as definetly in no way signifigant? Oh, and you've been spilling significant wrong this whole time. ;) |
| #48toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 18:04:49 | Yah, I'm good like that. |
| #49stealthmarmotApr 21, 2009 18:05:44 | Vote for StealthMarmot! He is significant! And damned sexy! |
| #50baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 18:06:42 | I already put a recommendation up for you, but I'm not sure if TA put it on the list. |
| #51toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 18:08:10 | Current Proposed list changes: Additions: Current: dirtyfrank +1 ToastedAmphibian +1 KillerGM +1 pigknight stompie5 Zombie_Babies +1 Terronius 1TonGhost +1 StealthMarmot +1 baneofelves Cherubadon +1 Previous: Goblin Pride Minja +1 They are not worthy: Awesome_Dude +2 Discuss |
| #52dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 18:08:22 | Vote for StealthMarmot! I'll vote for StealthMarmot because he can get ladies like Minja and KillerGM to dance and cheer for him. Only a real man has that kind of talent. ;) |
| #53stealthmarmotApr 21, 2009 18:10:10 | Who is Stealth Marmmot? He is clearly ripping off my name! |
| #54awesome_dudeApr 21, 2009 18:11:34 | Current Proposed list changes: Looks like a rather lame attempt at establishing an elite. It's got the list of "unworthy critics" and everything. |
| #55baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 18:11:48 | I second the vote for Cherubadon. |
| #56stealthmarmotApr 21, 2009 18:11:58 | I'll vote for StealthMarmot because he can get ladies like Minja and KillerGM to dance and cheer for him. Only a real man has that kind of talent. ;) Yeah well it also leads to dirtyfrank dancing....in a cheerleading skirt.... The horror... |
| #57dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 18:14:07 | Yeah well it also leads to dirtyfrank dancing....in a cheerleading skirt.... It's not my fault you looked. Lets toss Minja up there as resident smarty pants & the OTT cheerleader even if her schedule doesn't allow for her to be on the forums all that often any more. |
| #58toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 18:14:21 | Looks like a rather lame attempt at establishing an elite. It's got the list of "unworthy critics" and everything. Good. Atleast your on the same page as everyone else now. Congrats on getting up to speed. |
| #59toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 18:16:03 | Lets toss Minja up there as resident smarty pants & the OTT cheerleader even if her schedule doesn't allow for her to be on the forums all that often any more. Should I put that down as a nomination for "past significants?" |
| #60baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 18:17:20 | I second Minja as a past significant. |
| #61dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 18:18:41 | Should I put that down as a nomination for "past significance?" Yeah, unless she all of a sudden becomes supper active again. |
| #62baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 18:19:26 | Toasted, I already nominated EscherEnigma as a current significant. Please add him to the list. Thank you. |
| #63pigknightApr 21, 2009 18:19:35 | We need more votes for the knight of pigs. |
| #64baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 18:20:15 | I need some more votes, too! |
| #65dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 18:21:28 | We need more votes for the knight of pigs. How much bacon will you give me if I give you more votes? |
| #66fenrir7139Apr 21, 2009 18:22:44 | Minja, Definitly. Also Bane, Pig, KillerGM, TA, DF, Stealth Marmot, Terronus, Cherubbadon, Goblin_Pride, Lord_Vetnor (Though I haven't seen him a whole lot anymore), and Awesome_Dude. I've seen him around a lot, personally, and, though I don't necessarily agree with the joke he made, it didn't offend me that much. Also, Bane. Like I said, I don't agree with the pirate joke, but I don't see why it's worth having this whole internet-grudge thing. Just my 2 cents. EDIT: Also, EE. Can't believe I forgot him. |
| #67baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 18:22:50 | In fairness, I think we should only be allowed to vote once for a specific person. |
| #68baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 18:24:28 | Also, Bane. Like I said, I don't agree with the pirate joke, but I don't see why it's worth having this whole internet-grudge thing. Just my 2 cents. I would ignore it, but he's made similar jokes about the Israelis. It's not really a "grudge" per se, I just think he has a messed up sense of humor. It's not funny when people die IRL. (It's only funny in stuff like South Park and Family Guy) |
| #69toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 18:25:58 | fenrir, let me make sure I tally your votes corretly. For which of the three categories are you nominating: Minja, Goblin_Pride, Lord_Ventor and Awesome_Dude. The three categories are Currently Significant Previously Significant and They are not Worthy |
| #70dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 18:26:56 | I would ignore it, but he's made similar jokes about the Israelis. It's not really a "grudge" per se, I just think he has a messed up sense of humor. It's not funny when people die IRL. (It's only funny in stuff like South Park and Family Guy) Actually it not bad news unless it happens to you so RL things like that can be funny. I just don't think A_D is funny because I think he needs to work on his delivery some. |
| #71fenrir7139Apr 21, 2009 18:29:07 | Yeah, but it's not like he's the only person that makes tasteless jokes before. I also don't see why it's funny on South Park, but not when someone says it on a forum. Unless you mean when they use allegories (metaphors? I don't know), but even then, they're funny because we KNOW what they are referring to. But, in the interest of not getting this thread locked or w/e, I'm just going to leave. Besides, I kind of agree with AD on the whole elitism thing. I realize it doesn't really effect anything, and I could care less about being on it, but it seems like the only reason you guys have put him on the "Not Worthy" list is because you dislike his particular brand of humor. *Shrug* |
| #72baneofelvesApr 21, 2009 18:29:25 | I just don't think it's funny when a person dies, and that jokes like that are tasteless. And yeah, he also needs to work on his delivery. EDIT: The deaths on South Park and Family Guy are (usually) completely random. In the cases that it isn't in South Park, the death is usually so overdone and ridiculous to where all you CAN do is laugh. OR stare in amazement. Making jokes about people dying IRL isn't OK (IMHO) |
| #73toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 18:30:38 | Current Proposed list changes: Additions: Current: dirtyfrank +3 ToastedAmphibian +3 KillerGM +3 pigknight +2 stompie5 Zombie_Babies +3 Terronius +1 1TonGhost +1 StealthMarmot +2 baneofelves +2 Cherubadon +2 EscherEnigma +2 Previous: Goblin Pride +2 Minja +3 Lord Ventor They are not worthy: Awesome_Dude +1 Discuss |
| #74dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 18:32:26 | I'll toss my hat in for Goblin Pride (as a Previous significant) cuz I like some of his political talk. |
| #75goblin_prideApr 21, 2009 20:55:10 | I'll toss my hat in for Goblin Pride (as a Previous significant) cuz I like some of his political talk. Shhh, Polyticks is verboten. |
| #76pigknightApr 21, 2009 20:58:39 | I'd like to add Otto. |
| #77stealthmarmotApr 21, 2009 21:10:42 | I endorse Toasted, Bane, dirty, KillerGM, Zombie_Babies, EE, pigknight, and Minja. I miss Minja's cheers. |
| #78Dark_StrykeApr 21, 2009 22:12:09 | I vote that Dark_Stryke fellow as unworthy. I mean, he posts in the Edition War, but other than that he'll maybe post in one other thread a week. Also he talks in third person occasionally. |
| #79toastedamphibianApr 21, 2009 22:28:06 | In accordance with official guidelines, dirtyfrank, ToastedAmphibian, and KillerGM have been added as Significant OTTers and Minja has achieved honorable distinction as a previously significant OTTer. Any other notions to achieve +3 by 11:30PM EST on Wedensday April 22, 2009 will be included. All other will be discarded pending re submission on the next approval cycle. |
| #80dirtyfrankApr 21, 2009 22:48:12 | I'm sure, but haven't checked, that I haven't voted for Z_B or EE yet so I'll vote for them being significant OTTers. |
| #81EscherEnigmaApr 21, 2009 23:52:06 | Bane, if it's worth ignoring then it's not a joke. You heard it from DirtyFrank, using EscherEnigma's sense of humor as the criterion, there are no jokes. Ever. Unless it's late at night, but then he'll laugh at linoleum. Oh that linoleum, how it cracks me up at night. The thing's it's said, the secrets we've shared... |
| #82EscherEnigmaApr 21, 2009 23:55:28 | Oh, and I'll nominate/vote for Awesome_Dude as currently significant, 'cause I think internet grudges over jokes made in poor taste are silly. I use my vote for spite. |
| #83Reg06Apr 21, 2009 23:59:16 | Link or it didn't happen. |
| #84zakhari_dupApr 22, 2009 1:51:25 | You have to love it when nerds herald other nerds for online significance. :D |
| #85EscherEnigmaApr 22, 2009 2:03:22 | No, I really don't. I have chosen to go with passive indifference. |
| #86cherubaddonApr 22, 2009 4:06:14 | My nominations: 1_ton_ghost might not post much, but he thinks before he posts. I think that deserves more than a mention. baneofelves. Who doesn't know him? goblin_pride as previous? I only noticed him when he became active again some time ago. But I think he posts enough to deserve a nomination. EscherEnigma and Terronus have been around enough to get mentioned, too. And what happened to Zombie_Babies? He's on the list with three votes, but not in yet? I vote for him. Oh, and finally, as previously significant, I nominate Crossroads_Wanderer and Rake. Anyone knows where they went? Note: These are only the ones that aren't in already. EDIT: Damn, I forgot krownhunter! Put him up there, too, he's awesome. |
| #87Cpt_MichaApr 22, 2009 7:16:32 | One of these threads? And I'm not in it?! I must be slipping. Vote for your friendly local OTT Cpt_Micha. What don't I make enough jokes for you people? I read FATAL for you guys! |
| #88zakhari_dupApr 22, 2009 7:33:47 | Oh! Oh! OH! I wanna be number one too!! l33thaxorz! |
| #89runcdfirstApr 22, 2009 8:25:24 | So, is this thread to single out the individuals that float in water while holding hands? If that's the case, I'll nominate Cpt Micha Yeah, but it's not like he's the only person that makes tasteless jokes before. I also don't see why it's funny on South Park, but not when someone says it on a forum. Unless you mean when they use allegories (metaphors? I don't know), but even then, they're funny because we KNOW what they are referring to. I think you're looking for "satire". |
| #90zombie_babiesApr 22, 2009 8:28:44 | Alright, first I support those already included in their respective categories (df, Minja, TA and KGM). Now, for my votes: Present Significant: EE 1_ton Goblin_Pride (glad to see you back) Terronous Stealth Micha Awesome_Dude Past Significant: C_W Rake Batshido Not Worthy: None currently. Go ahead, **** me off and see what happens. ;) |
| #91dirtyfrankApr 22, 2009 8:31:36 | I vote for Cpt_Micha, Lord Ventnor and Batshido as previous. They come back from time to time but they haven't been as active in the OTT as they were a few months ago. |
| #92The-Mage-KingApr 22, 2009 8:33:50 | I hereby put myself up for voting into 'Signifigant'. |
| #93boj0Apr 22, 2009 11:22:37 | lol getting votes in this is like the Special Olympics, even when you win you're still in the Special Olympics :P "Hey guys! Who wastes the most time on teh interwebz?!?!" Oh just so you know... this was sarcasm by the way |
| #94s-marrowApr 22, 2009 13:11:13 | I would like to campaign for the "Not Worthy" category, with the qualifications that I have only been posting here for about 5 days and not yet done anything worthy of notice. You know, because I am desperately lonely and attention seeking. And also nominate the lad who posted above me, because I think that's what he was aiming for. However, since boj0 appears to have had an entire year more of being desperately lonely and attention seeking on these forums, I will be able to console myself if he beats me out. |
| #95zombie_babiesApr 22, 2009 13:14:03 | I dunno. We had a fun (and admittedly stoopid) exchange about clowns, serial killers, mass murderers and John Wayne Gacy. That's pretty good in my book. ;) :D |
| #96EscherEnigmaApr 22, 2009 13:19:01 | Ok, S-Marrow, I have to ask. Did you choose your avatar because at a quick glance it reminds you of ********? 'cause that's what I think everytime I see it. I know that's not what it's supposed to be, but until I actually focus on it that's what it looks like. Edit: Apparently ******** is censored. Is oral sex? |
| #97Cpt_MichaApr 22, 2009 13:19:51 | I'm glad I'm not the only one that thought that about his avatar. |
| #98goblin_prideApr 22, 2009 13:23:04 | Edit: Apparently ******** is censored. Is oral sex? Ok then. The edit showed the context that was missing for ********. |
| #99zombie_babiesApr 22, 2009 13:25:16 | Just say it looks like a geezer on the wrong (or right, your choice ;)) side of a glory hole. That should get by just fine. |
| #100s-marrowApr 22, 2009 13:26:51 | Interesting, but no, it has never looked to me like that. Maybe because of my freakishly good eyesight it has only ever looked to me like an old man doing some appreciation. I earnestly await what further dirty jokes you can pull from this statement. |
| #101boj0Apr 22, 2009 13:27:49 | Ok, S-Marrow, I have to ask. Did you choose your avatar because at a quick glance it reminds you of ********? 'cause that's what I think everytime I see it. I know that's not what it's supposed to be, but until I actually focus on it that's what it looks like. it was one of those things that i wouldn't notice until you told me ![]() also, there have been quite a few of these "Who's kewl in the OTT" threads, unlike the other forums, OTTers are a tighter bunch so we feel like we can talk about each other more, but after a bit, I realized that jockying for a top spot in a D&D forum was not super high on my priority list |
| #102s-marrowApr 22, 2009 13:33:27 | Oh, I never meant what I said with any hint of malignant thought. Sorry if it sounded like I was ragging on you. I merely posted on a capricious whim that your post provided the perfect set up to, whatever your intentions were. |
| #103zombie_babiesApr 22, 2009 13:34:20 | I realized that jockying for a top spot in a D&D forum was not super high on my priority list And that's why you'll never truly be one of us. One of us. :P |
| #104EscherEnigmaApr 22, 2009 13:35:40 | Interesting, but no, it has never looked to me like that. Maybe because of my freakishly good eyesight it has only ever looked to me like an old man doing some appreciation. Well, it's rude to keep a man waiting. *ahem* Well, I certainly hope that when I'm old and graying with wispy white hair that I still take the time to 'appreciate' certain things. If you get what I mean. *****. |
| #105EscherEnigmaApr 22, 2009 13:37:06 | Wait, I'm not jockeying for any spot at all either, does that mean that I'm not one of us? Wait, that doesn't sound right... one of you? No, that's not quite right either... One of the group that you would identify as 'us' but I am not currently included in and as such it is not my 'us' but your 'us' that thus I am not a part of us. Your us that is. |
| #106s-marrowApr 22, 2009 13:39:53 | Well, it's rude to keep a man waiting. good show, old sport. I knew you wouldn't let me down. |
| #107EscherEnigmaApr 22, 2009 13:40:53 | I do my best to hold up my end of a bargain. |
| #108zombie_babiesApr 22, 2009 13:41:15 | Sorry, EE. No such luck for you, I'm afraid. You're one of us whether you like it or not. It just happens like that sometimes. OTTo is a strange master. |
| #109goblin_prideApr 22, 2009 13:47:20 | I do my best to hold up my end of a bargain. A good innuendo ruined by "of a bargain". |
| #110EscherEnigmaApr 22, 2009 13:50:03 | would it have helped if I had put "bargain" in quotes and added a ;) smiley? |
| #111lofgrenApr 22, 2009 13:59:15 | I'm going to assume this entire thread was started as a means of irritating Awesome_Dude, and not as the narcissistic group wank it otherwise appears to be. This allows me to register approval and not disgust. I am not significant now, but expect me to figure prominently in all of your lives after the revolution. |
| #112terronusApr 22, 2009 14:09:09 | Well, the OTT is a lot like a clique. More easy going, I guess, and not quite as judgmental. Which is why I sorta like posting here. |
| #113dirtyfrankApr 22, 2009 16:05:29 | I'm going to assume this entire thread was started as a means of irritating Awesome_Dude, and not as the narcissistic group wank it otherwise appears to be. This allows me to register approval and not disgust. It was started because of the Significant Other Lolcat that KillerGM posted in another thread. Otter is quite close to OTTer. What does it mean to be an Over-The-Topper? |
| #114toastedamphibianApr 22, 2009 16:10:05 | Current Proposed list changes: Additions: Current: dirtyfrank +3 ToastedAmphibian +3 KillerGM +3 pigknight +2 stompie5 Zombie_Babies +3 Terronius +3 1TonGhost +3 StealthMarmot +3 baneofelves +3 Cherubadon +2 EscherEnigma +3 KrownHunter +1 boj0 Previous: Goblin Pride +3 Minja +3 Lord Ventor +1 Crossroads_Wanderer +1 Rake +1 Batshido +1 Cpt, Micha +2 They are not worthy: Discuss |
| #115baneofelvesApr 22, 2009 16:11:04 | Another vote for Krownhunter! |
| #116dirtyfrankApr 22, 2009 16:11:56 | Wow, piggy is getting very little love. |
| #117toastedamphibianApr 22, 2009 16:13:06 | Congratulations to Zombie_Babies, Terronius, 1 ton ghost, Stealth Marmot, baneofelves and EscherEnigma as they have been voted into the currently significant list. Also, a happy salute for Goblin_Pride due to his inclussion in the previously significant hall. |
| #118EscherEnigmaApr 22, 2009 16:28:46 | Hrm... I don't see that anyone has nominated Bob_Loblaw (or whatever his name is) for Previously Significant. He used to be involved in the political/religion discussions, back when those were allowed, right? |
| #119pigknightApr 22, 2009 16:32:42 | VOTE FOR ME DAMNIT! |
| #120baneofelvesApr 22, 2009 16:33:21 | MMMMMM. No. :P |
| #121Cpt_MichaApr 23, 2009 7:52:14 | I vote Minja as previously significant. There be no Minja found here.... |
| #122zombie_babiesApr 23, 2009 8:10:30 | Hrm... I don't see that anyone has nominated Bob_Loblaw (or whatever his name is) for Previously Significant. He used to be involved in the political/religion discussions, back when those were allowed, right? Good point. Vote for Bob seconded. I do dislike the idea of using the "previous" tag for posters that may not post as much as they used to but still do show up from time to time, though. goblin_pride and Bob are both still around. Not that I think they'd care, of course, but this isn't about them, dammit! :P |
| #123boj0Apr 23, 2009 9:09:54 | Bob_Loblaw, the reason for his name is awesome |
| #124goblin_prideApr 23, 2009 9:29:56 | Scratch another vote up on the tally for the Porkchop Cavalry. |
| #125zakhari_dupApr 23, 2009 10:36:55 | Aw, I'm still not onboard yet? What the heck do I have to do to earn some nerdackowledgement!? |
| #126dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 10:37:11 | So who are all the people we have up for SOs? |
| #127Cpt_MichaApr 23, 2009 10:37:42 | I vote EscherEnigma as a Significant poster. |
| #128IdolisApr 23, 2009 14:34:49 | Hey dammit. How come I'm not on this list? Come on guys. Someone has to like me enough to nominate me. I know I've been busy for last couple of weeks but still. Can't Idolis at least get a shout out. |
| #129KillerGMApr 23, 2009 14:37:00 | How did I miss this thread? And I'm leet? ![]() I'll give Idolis a pity nomination. ;) ... is this just an excuse to call me (or others) your SO? |
| #130dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 14:37:19 | Oh, I just remembered that there is a guy named Idolis that sometimes posts in the OTT. He is kind of a cool guy. I guess I'll nominate him as a Significant OTTer aka SO. |
| #131dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 14:38:07 | How did I miss this thread? Rolled a 1 on your perception check? |
| #132IdolisApr 23, 2009 14:41:32 | Whooo Hoooo!!! I'm an SO. And yes KGM it was just a ploy to get you and Dirtyfrank to call me your SO's. Now, shhhhhhhhhh, my wife is coming. |
| #133dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 14:44:58 | The more SOs the merrier. :D |
| #134zombie_babiesApr 23, 2009 14:47:40 | I'll third the vote for Idolis. Yeah, why not? :P |
| #135toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 14:49:14 | Current Proposed Changes: Additions: Significant: Porkchop Cavalary Idolis +2 Previously Significant: Bob Loblaw +1 Cpt. Micha, could you please stop voting on non-changes? Thank you. |
| #136IdolisApr 23, 2009 14:55:29 | Yesssssssssssss, thanks Zombie. You rule, Dude. |
| #137KillerGMApr 23, 2009 14:56:40 | Oh what, only he gets the thanks? This is why people don't do nice things for you. :P |
| #138IdolisApr 23, 2009 14:59:58 | Oh sorry, KGM. Thank you very much for your support. I owe it all to you for being the first to nominate your's truly. Without you this wouldn't be possible. Also, I'd like to thank my mom for giving birth to the greatest living person in the world............my little brother. HAHA!! I also want to thank the producers of Law & Order for giving me the opp......Oh wait....wrong speech. Thank you KGM. |
| #139dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 15:03:06 | Idolis, you still need one more vote to be an SO. You have only been nominated and had a few votes. You need one more to make it on the list like I have. |
| #140IdolisApr 23, 2009 15:04:13 | Can I vote for myself? |
| #141dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 15:05:51 | You cannot nominate yourself but seeing as how you are already nominated I don't see anything saying that you can't vote for yourself. |
| #142toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 15:06:05 | No. |
| #143EscherEnigmaApr 23, 2009 15:06:07 | you can vote for yourself, but it won't be counted. |
| #144zombie_babiesApr 23, 2009 15:06:20 | Except that it's lame-o. ;) :P |
| #145IdolisApr 23, 2009 15:10:44 | Oh I see how it is. You all just want me to beg for another vote. Okay. Please vote for me. I'll kiss your baby, shake your hand, sign your boob, and smile while doing it. And if you do it within the next 15 minutes I'll double the offer and throw in a cookie absolutely free. That's a less than a cent value absolutely free. Vote now to get in on this truly awesome offer. Operators are waiting for your call. |
| #146EscherEnigmaApr 23, 2009 15:12:35 | Hey now! This is discrimination against those of us that don't have babies, boobs, or hands! I'm offended! Down with the oppressor! Down with him once and for all! |
| #147toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 15:13:46 | Should I accept that as a vote for Idolis' inclusion in the Not Worthy category? |
| #148IdolisApr 23, 2009 15:14:59 | And so another campaign falls thanks to the "gotcha media." |
| #149EscherEnigmaApr 23, 2009 15:15:10 | Nah. I don't think anyone belongs in that category and will actively vote to keep people out of it. I use my votes for spite. |
| #150KillerGMApr 23, 2009 15:16:02 | Nah. I don't think anyone belongs in that category and will actively vote to keep people out of it. I use my votes for spite. I agree. But I used my vote for pity. Can I nominate everyone? :D |
| #151toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 15:17:01 | Yes you may, but you have to name everyone specifically by name. |
| #152cherubaddonApr 23, 2009 15:17:29 | Yup, I feel offended, too. Unworthy. EDIT: Wow... either my internet or I am really damn slow... what, five posts while I wrote ONE sentence ? Whatever... |
| #153KillerGMApr 23, 2009 15:17:32 | Curses! My good intentions foiled by my laziness! |
| #154dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 15:18:15 | Does a person have to be an OTT poster to be nominated or do they have to be here often either now or in the past? |
| #155KillerGMApr 23, 2009 15:19:16 | Yup, I feel offended, too. Unworthy. I vote for Cherubaddon. :D |
| #156toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 15:19:43 | All guidlines for inclusion are to be determined by each individual judge as suits their fancy. |
| #157toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 15:23:41 | Current Proposed Changes: Additions: Significant: Porkchop Cavalary Idolis +2 Chubbadon Adelbert_Megaphonia +3 Erato +3 pigknight +3 RayneShadowleaf +3 RUMPLESTIX +3 Shadowheart_Maiden +3 KarateKari +3 CosmicChaos +3 Solik +3 Sheihel +3 ViolenceJack +3 Green +3 midnitepoison +3 WilwarinAndamar +3 annoyinglizardvoice +3 Touchfuzzy +3 StealthMarmot +3 jhkim +3 TeePeeKay +3 Stormbrand +3 ORC_Bethanna +3 ORC_KiRin +3 ORC_Paradox +3 ORC_Nashira +3 webster +3 zephyrs_whim +3 Previously Significant: Bob Loblaw +1 |
| #158toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 15:24:27 | New Honorific Proposition: "Most likley to mug grandma." |
| #159EscherEnigmaApr 23, 2009 15:27:14 | We can nominate anyone, regardless of whether or not they've been here at all? In that case, I nominate zephyrs_whim. |
| #160dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 15:29:00 | OK, I'll star nominating some random people for reasons I will not share. I nominate: Adelbert_Megaphonia Erato pigknight RayneShadowleaf RUMPLESTIX Shadowheart_Maiden KarateKari CosmicChaos Solik Sheihel ViolenceJack Green midnitepoison WilwarinAndamar annoyinglizardvoice Touchfuzzy StealthMarmot jhkim TeePeeKay Stormbrand ORC_Bethanna ORC_KiRin ORC_Paradox ORC_Nashira webster |
| #161KillerGMApr 23, 2009 15:30:05 | OK, I'll star nominating some random people for reasons I will not share. I vote for all of these people. :D EDIT: And zephyrs_whim |
| #162IdolisApr 23, 2009 15:31:14 | OK, I'll star nominating some random people for reasons I will not share. I vote for all these people too. Maybe one of them will give me the vote I need. |
| #163EscherEnigmaApr 23, 2009 15:32:51 | I think TA is gonna glare at us... |
| #164EscherEnigmaApr 23, 2009 15:33:36 | Though I do think Webster should get another vote. Whatever else ya want ta say about 'em, he does work to keep this place (and all the forums) running smoother. So throw on another vote for Webster, from me. |
| #165KillerGMApr 23, 2009 15:33:48 | Serves him right. :P |
| #166dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 15:36:03 | That whole list needs at least one more vote. |
| #167toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 15:37:27 | @Idolils and KillerGM, you have to list the people you are voteing for by name. |
| #168KillerGMApr 23, 2009 15:40:06 | *shrugs* I vote for: Adelbert_Megaphonia Erato pigknight RayneShadowleaf RUMPLESTIX Shadowheart_Maiden KarateKari CosmicChaos Solik Sheihel ViolenceJack Green midnitepoison WilwarinAndamar annoyinglizardvoice Touchfuzzy StealthMarmot jhkim TeePeeKay Stormbrand ORC_Bethanna ORC_KiRin ORC_Paradox ORC_Nashira webster |
| #169dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 15:40:35 | @Idolils and KillerGM, you have to list the people you are voteing for by name. What this means is that you need to hit edit and take out the quote code and take out my words then hit save or what ever. Then it will be you listing everyone there by name. |
| #170toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 15:43:16 | What this means is that you need to hit edit and take out the quote code and take out my words then hit save or what ever. Then it will be you listing everyone there by name. Exactly. |
| #171zombie_babiesApr 23, 2009 15:44:14 | I vote for all of the following to be placed on the "Not Worthy" list. Cuz I can. :P Adelbert_Megaphonia Erato pigknight RayneShadowleaf RUMPLESTIX Shadowheart_Maiden KarateKari CosmicChaos Solik Sheihel ViolenceJack Green midnitepoison WilwarinAndamar annoyinglizardvoice Touchfuzzy StealthMarmot jhkim TeePeeKay Stormbrand ORC_Bethanna ORC_KiRin ORC_Paradox ORC_Nashira webster |
| #172KillerGMApr 23, 2009 15:44:28 | Meh, I copy & pasted. |
| #173IdolisApr 23, 2009 15:45:41 | I vote for: Adelbert_Megaphonia Erato pigknight RayneShadowleaf RUMPLESTIX Shadowheart_Maiden KarateKari CosmicChaos Solik Sheihel ViolenceJack Green midnitepoison WilwarinAndamar annoyinglizardvoice Touchfuzzy StealthMarmot jhkim TeePeeKay Stormbrand ORC_Bethanna ORC_KiRin ORC_Paradox ORC_Nashira webster |
| #174EscherEnigmaApr 23, 2009 15:46:32 | (Idolis! You forgot zephyrs_whim!) |
| #175IdolisApr 23, 2009 15:47:31 | Okay, and I vote for zephyr's_whim |
| #176diltyflankApr 23, 2009 15:51:05 | I vote for: Adelbert_Megaphonia Erato pigknight RayneShadowleaf RUMPLESTIX Shadowheart_Maiden KarateKari CosmicChaos Solik Sheihel ViolenceJack Green midnitepoison WilwarinAndamar annoyinglizardvoice Touchfuzzy StealthMarmot jhkim TeePeeKay Stormbrand ORC_Bethanna ORC_KiRin ORC_Paradox ORC_Nashira webster zephyr's_whim |
| #177filthyfrank_dupApr 23, 2009 15:55:45 | I vote for: Adelbert_Megaphonia Erato pigknight RayneShadowleaf RUMPLESTIX Shadowheart_Maiden KarateKari CosmicChaos Solik Sheihel ViolenceJack Green midnitepoison WilwarinAndamar annoyinglizardvoice Touchfuzzy StealthMarmot jhkim TeePeeKay Stormbrand ORC_Bethanna ORC_KiRin ORC_Paradox ORC_Nashira webster zephyr's_whim |
| #178toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 15:58:15 | The current voteing cycle shall end at 5:00pm Eastern Standard Time on Friday April 24th of the two thousand and ninth year of the modern Gregorian calander. |
| #179KillerGMApr 23, 2009 15:59:21 | 5:00pm what zone? |
| #180dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 16:00:22 | My guess is 5:00pm Florida time. |
| #181zombie_babiesApr 23, 2009 16:02:46 | My guess is 5:00pm Florida time. Is Florida time different from EST? |
| #182dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 16:03:40 | Is Florida time different from EST? I don't think so but I do think that Florida is where TA is. |
| #183terronusApr 23, 2009 16:03:47 | I vote for everyone that has been mentioned (I just don't want to copy-paste). Why? Because I think we could all use a group hug. So if someone voted for a person, just add a +1... |
| #184toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 16:06:24 | The current voteing cycle shall end at 5:00pm Eastern Standard Time on Friday April 24th of the two thousand and ninth year of the modern Gregorian calander. ../\ ./||\ ..|| ..|| |
| #185dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 16:08:15 | We should get this thread stickied just for kicks and giggles. |
| #186zombie_babiesApr 23, 2009 16:12:18 | I don't think so but I do think that Florida is where TA is. I know. I was pokin' fun at "Florida time". We should get this thread stickied just for kicks and giggles. Yes. Yes we should. |
| #187EscherEnigmaApr 23, 2009 16:12:46 | well, maybe if someone was a forum lead or something they could try and get that done. Too bad the tavern doesn't have one, right? |
| #188terronusApr 23, 2009 16:15:05 | well, maybe if someone was a forum lead or something they could try and get that done. Too bad the tavern doesn't have one, right? Good point. I withdraw my +1 from Webster, seeing as he has the only sticky. Way to go, bud! |
| #189KillerGMApr 23, 2009 16:15:51 | Well, Webster is the VCL. |
| #190terronusApr 23, 2009 16:27:11 | Maybe I don't know enough about the CL's... but shouldn't there be more stuff stickied? I might not participate, but aren't the edition wars worthy of a sticky? |
| #191dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 16:29:49 | Maybe I don't know enough about the CL's... but shouldn't there be more stuff stickied? I might not participate, but aren't the edition wars worthy of a sticky? If they were stickied then there would be 4 or 5 stickied edition war threads. It would take up half of each page. |
| #192KillerGMApr 23, 2009 16:29:54 | Maybe I don't know enough about the CL's... but shouldn't there be more stuff stickied? I might not participate, but aren't the edition wars worthy of a sticky? Not really. Stickies are usually reserved for "important" threads that people should read to the benefit of the forums (FAQs, things like that). The OTT doesn't really call for those things. |
| #193terronusApr 23, 2009 16:42:20 | Well, not necessarily. Like Surreal's d20 CharOps thread "Some handy links..." One sticky can lead to dozens of important threads. Maybe OTT is just too fast-pasted to merit keeping such things alive with a sticky. |
| #194goblin_prideApr 23, 2009 18:12:09 | Current Proposed Changes: I've underlined and bolded somethin I had hoped would be a obvious vote. Does anybody see a similarity between this and Pigknight? |
| #195dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 18:13:38 | Who's pigknight? |
| #196toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 18:17:42 | I've underlined and bolded somethin I had hoped would be a obvious vote. Does anybody see a similarity between this and Pigknight? As has been stated many times, you have to specifically state, by name, the entity you wish to vote for. |
| #197EscherEnigmaApr 23, 2009 18:18:05 | I'm not sure I'm familiar with this Pig Knight fellow you speak of. |
| #198terronusApr 23, 2009 18:23:35 | My specific posts, as per the rules: pigknight RUMPLESTIX midnitepoison StealthMarmot Zombie_Babies Capt Micha (sp) TA 1 ton ghost cherubaddon hanzo I'm forgetting others, but you made me name names. Just putting in the ole vote |
| #199goblin_prideApr 23, 2009 18:24:23 | As has been stated many times, you have to specifically state, by name, the entity you wish to vote for. Then you get to tell him he has one less vote because I couldn't follow the rules. I don't think I could take those porcine eyes welling up with tears again. |
| #200dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 18:28:10 | My specific posts, as per the rules: You're forgetting some of these people. OK, I'll star nominating some random people for reasons I will not share. |
| #201toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 18:29:04 | Current Proposed Changes: Additions: Significant: Porkchop Cavalary +1 Idolis +2 Chubbadon +1 Adelbert_Megaphonia +3 Erato +3 pigknight +3 RayneShadowleaf +3 RUMPLESTIX +3 Shadowheart_Maiden +3 KarateKari +3 CosmicChaos +3 Solik +3 Sheihel +3 ViolenceJack +3 Green +3 midnitepoison +3 WilwarinAndamar +3 annoyinglizardvoice +3 Touchfuzzy +3 StealthMarmot +3 jhkim +3 TeePeeKay +3 Stormbrand +3 ORC_Bethanna +3 ORC_KiRin +3 ORC_Paradox +3 ORC_Nashira +3 webster +3 zephyrs_whim +3 Cpt. Micha Hanzo Previously Significant: Bob Loblaw +2 |
| #202dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 18:30:57 | Pigknight is on that list twice. |
| #203toastedamphibianApr 23, 2009 18:33:14 | I'm surprised Porkchop Cavalry hasn't gotten more votes. |
| #204terronusApr 23, 2009 18:34:36 | Dirtyfrank gets one, sorry to forget you. I do, especially, like your sense of humor! Dunno If I will vote on any of the others. Unless (and for the benefit of other voters...) You link something significant, because I don't recognize half those people. Which isn't to say that this should be a popularity contest, I just am not aware if they contributed something significant. I don't even think I'm that significant, unless you guys decide to place me within the context of posting about movies (and a couple times literature) because that is what I post about most often. I'm starting to feel corny about debating the semantics of this post ![]() |
| #205dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 18:35:10 | I'll vote for: Porkchop Cavalary Chubbadon Bob Loblaw |
| #206dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 18:37:26 | You link something significant, because I don't recognize half those people. Which isn't to say that this should be a popularity contest, I just am not aware if they contributed something significant. I don't think half the people on my list have ever posted in the OTT but that doesn't mean I can't vote for them. All I need is to think that they hare significant OTTers for me to vote for them. |
| #207terronusApr 23, 2009 18:44:11 | No, no, I'm not trying to be rude. I'd love to put ma' vote in if I knew what it was for... you know, anything. But if my best bud says: "Hey go out and by the new [band name's] CD! Its awesome!" I'd like to hear it first. I'm taking this too seriously. My shtuff is final. |
| #208dirtyfrankApr 23, 2009 18:47:20 | It is a way for us to boost our own egos. That's all this voting stuff is for. |
| #209Ragnar_LodbrokApr 23, 2009 23:04:36 | My Votes: Pigknight Idolis dirtyfrank baneofelves KillerGM Dark Stryke ================ And I haven't been nominated? Seriously? Wow. |
| #210IdolisApr 23, 2009 23:06:41 | I nominate Ragnar_Lodbrok. Sorry man, forgot about you. Not that your easily forgotten or anything. And thank you for putting me over the top as a SO. |
| #211EscherEnigmaApr 24, 2009 0:00:16 | MWA HA HA! ... crap, I laughed. I never laugh. Uh, that was a cough. |
| #2121_ton_ghostApr 24, 2009 12:53:39 | Loved the Otter jpeg. Helped when the coffee ran out at the museum today. So, for your karmic consideration: ![]() Cherubaddon: 1_ton_ghost might not post much... Thanks/respect btw. To be fair, I might have jumped in earlier, but damn if this thread didn't move double quick. You guys post warp speed. ...but he thinks before he posts. I think that deserves more than a mention. Not as often as I like/should .![]() Anyway, I'd vote (am voting?) for a good many of you, but I'd be further embarrassed if I left any off as there are a myriad of likely elligibles that get my thumbs up. ie)I say 'X' but forget 'Y' and wind up F'ed. Chances are, if we've had a good back n' forth, have been cool/civil, etc., reciprocity is insured; the well read, cinemaphiles, intelligencia, the homeless insane, gallant antagonists, clever gamers, impartial DMs, loyal oppositions, the living impaired, and a puppy. So, you earn an indulgence for services rendered, not a vote. That or I'll buy you a beer, whichever is cheaper. Plus, my vote might get earmarked w/ a fluff bill or the like (The Gary & Dave Golden d20 Mausoleum Fund?) attached and I would then betray the trust of my oppressed constituency. Even PigKnight does not traffic in pork barrel politics.;) Slight edit; is it me or does Ryan Seacrest look a Hell of alot like Vince "the Shamwow!" guy? Damned snakeoil salesmen... |
| #213dirtyfrankApr 24, 2009 19:17:54 | Is there any sort of updating that needs to be done here? |
| #214toastedamphibianApr 24, 2009 19:18:44 | Yes. |
| #215orenthesApr 24, 2009 19:20:49 | I veto AwesomeDude |
| #216toastedamphibianApr 24, 2009 19:29:43 | Congratulations to Adelbert_Megaphonia, Erato, pigknight, RayneShadowleaf, RUMPLESTIX, Shadowheart_Maiden, KarateKari, CosmicChaos, Solik, Sheihel, ViolenceJack, Green, midnitepoison, WilwarinAndamar annoyinglizardvoice, Touchfuzzy, StealthMarmot, jhkim, TeePeeKay. Stormbrand, ORC_Bethanna, ORC_KiRin, ORC_Paradox, ORC_Nashira, webster, zephyrs_whim, and Idolis on their inclusion into the significant OTTer list! |
| #217IdolisApr 24, 2009 19:32:16 | Hey I got the votes necessary for being an SO. Why am I not on the list? |
| #218toastedamphibianApr 24, 2009 19:33:15 | Because of fail. |
| #219IdolisApr 24, 2009 19:34:38 | Oh yeah, well you suck.:D |
| #220EscherEnigmaApr 24, 2009 19:40:33 | I thought zephyrs_whim got enough? |
| #221dirtyfrankApr 24, 2009 19:44:59 | Should we let some of these people know that they are significant? |
| #222EscherEnigmaApr 24, 2009 19:46:01 | Yay! my SO is now a SO! This amuses me greatly. |
| #223toastedamphibianApr 24, 2009 19:47:44 | The standard form for congratulatory private messages is: --------------------- Congratulations your one of the ![]() -------------------------- |
| #224EscherEnigmaApr 24, 2009 19:51:12 | The standard form for congratulatory private messages is: Fixed. |
| #225toastedamphibianApr 24, 2009 19:55:01 | Fixed. Negative. |
| #226toastedamphibianApr 24, 2009 19:56:32 | The standard form for congratulatory private messages is: Fixed |
| #227dirtyfrankApr 25, 2009 1:51:17 | I think I'm going to PM the people that I nominated to be on this list. I'll probably do it in the next day or two. I wonder how annoyed they'll be. |
| #228ViolenceJackApr 25, 2009 2:52:21 | Ah, heck. Can you nominate yourself off the list? I'm insignificant. Really, a little speck of a man with a tiny *****. I mean, I appreciate the thought, but I'm really unimportant. |
| #229toastedamphibianApr 25, 2009 4:56:29 | People can vote to remove you from the list, but you may not nominate or vote for yourself. |
| #230toastedamphibianApr 25, 2009 5:02:14 | .... pictures dont work in PM's![]() |
| #231dirtyfrankApr 25, 2009 23:20:16 | Pictures don't work in PMs? EE's pictures work when he PMs me them. |
| #232ellorinApr 26, 2009 5:18:17 | I don't know who's significant or not but I do know some people who know some people that can remove the annoying competition, negative voters etc. for a really nice price :D . |
| #233DralenanApr 27, 2009 3:26:36 | If you get nominated twice, does that make you just so-so? |
| #234dirtyfrankApr 28, 2009 22:40:03 | ![]() |
| #235krownhunter07Apr 29, 2009 8:13:46 | Hey now! How did I... I not know of this thread?!? I request, nay, I demand that I be put on the top of this list effective now! c'mon, MOVE! |
| #236ellorinApr 29, 2009 8:27:48 | Capitals? 10% discount if the vict...the client you wish inhumed DEMANDS a vote. P.S. I actually like krownhunter07. Still, business is business... |
| #237dirtyfrankMay 08, 2009 1:23:58 | Should we add anybody new to the list? |
| #238rayneshadowleaf_dupMay 11, 2009 4:30:04 | Wow, you guys were really f***ing bored, weren't you? And how the hell did I get nominated and voted into the list....I stopped posting for like a month and a half. O.o |
| #239dirtyfrankMay 11, 2009 9:20:15 | Probably because I have mad nomination skillz. :D |
| #240dirtyfrankMay 12, 2009 23:05:19 | I nominate: Urunwa, Frida, Krusk, and Caladors. |