| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1bait_the_bardMay 31, 2004 17:21:20 | Thanks to the other FAQ maintainers. Q: What is the purpose of this FAQ? A: The purpose of this FAQ is to answer the more commonly asked questions on this forum, relating to Oriental Adventures or Rokugan. Q: What is Rokugan? Rokugan is an Asian campaign setting based on the Legend of the Five Rings trading card game. It is published by Alderac Entertainment Group. The Legend of the Five Rings website can be found > here <. Q: Are there FAQs more appropriate to my other questions? A: Yes. The majority of the current FAQs can be found in the Boards FAQ & Archives Forum. Q: How can I submit new Q&A or corrections to this FAQ? A: Just reply to this thread with your Q&A or correction, and every so often I will incorporate it into this FAQ. Q: Where can I get online Errata for these books? A: The Oriental Adventures Errata is available at the Official D&D Website. As of this moment Rokugan has no online update available. Q: How is this FAQ organized? A:This FAQ is organized into 2 sections, one for Oriental Adventures, and one for Rokugan. These sections will progress similarly to the chapters of their books, eg Q&A on Oriental Adventures monsters will be near the end, while Q&A on classes will be near the front. Q: Why aren’t you doing anything on Kara-Tur? A: This FAQ does not include a section on Kara-Tur as Rokugan has ‘overtaken’ it as being the ‘standard’ Oriental Adventures campaign setting. [u]Note:[/u] This FAQ is written for 3.0, as both books are currently printed with that editions rules. However, there is a 3.5 rules update to Oriental Adventures, found in Dragon Magazine #318. Q: Can Hengeyokai use feats, such as Flying Kick while in animal form? A: In accordance with other rules, the Hengeyokai may use these feats if the animal would be able to use them. This means that the animal must have appropriate ability scores (such as Strength), and meet any other requirements. Q: How does Level Adjustment for Hengeyokai work? A: Basically you are 1 level higher, but instead of having an extra level in a class, you have a bunch of funky racial abilities. If you’re just starting a new campaign, this means that you will either be more powerful (and get less experience) than the other party members, or they will be 2nd level, while you will be 1st. For a more detailed answer please visit the Races Forum. Note: Dragon has released an update containing a hengiyoki without Level Adjustment. Q: I think there should be a Ninja core class. Why isn’t there? A: On his website, James Wyatt answers that question [link currently unavaliable]. Basically they wanted any character to be able to be a ninja, so made it a Prestige Class. In Rokugan there is a Ninja core class, and heretic8888 has created a very good Ninja core class, the The Shinobi No Mono. Q: I want to play a Geisha, how can I do this? A: There is no official Geidha core class, but there are a number of ways you could use to play one. You could use the Bard in the Players Handbook for this, but that is up to you and your DM.. Sleight modification of the abilities and skills will give you a decent Geisha character. Alternatively, in Rokugan there is a Courtier core class, which works very well for a Geisha. Q: There is now a Samurai class in Complete Warrior, should I use this or the one printed in Oriental Adventures or Rokugan? A: You may use either, as both are considered official. However, on a personal note, I prefer the Oriental Adventures version, as it is more flavourful. Q: Can Wu-Jen and Wizard swap spell lists, and vis versa? A: The official answer is no, but I like to allow them to do it. It just gives them more options, and why not do it? Q: Where is the great throw feat? A: It was accidentally not printed, but it can be found in the Oriental Adventures Errata. Q: How do I make, say, a Japanese campaign setting? A: It’s really pretty simple, just chose the core classes, prestige classes, etc that you feel you want in your campaign. After that you can add more if needed. Please refer to the Dungeon Masters Guide for more information, or page 201 of Oriental Adventures. Q: How does the Shadowlands Taint work? A: There are two types of Taint, one described in Oriental Adventures, and the other in Rokugan. The Oriental Adventure version has the effects of Taint listed on pages 234-235. The Taint Effects table on page 235 shows some physical effects of the Taint, but there is no mechanic governing this, and you (or your DM) will have to decide what happens and when. The physical effects shown on the table should have no in-game effects. The Rokugan Taint Effects are found on page 137 and have mechanics to govern the physical and mental effects. Q: In the Families section, each family has a favoured class. What does this mean? A: Because Rokugan is mostly human dominated, the designers decided to introduce a bit of variety, and so gave each family a different Favoured Class. This class overrules your race’s Favourite Class, and this may affect experience, and multi-classing abilities. Q: What stats for Nezumi do I use? There are stats in oriental Adventures and Rokugan. A: This is entirely dependant on your DM. However, if you are using the Rokugan version, remember that each of the tribes have different stats and abilities. Q: Some of the combinations of Void feats make very dangerous abilities. Is this legal? A: Yes, it is. Void feats (and points) are very powerful, as I once encountered with a certain PC of mine. |
| #2zombiegleemaxMay 31, 2004 17:40:01 | I've stickied this thread for these boards. Thanks for putting up the FAQ. ![]() |
| #3zombiegleemaxJun 02, 2004 9:52:31 | Which should be used now as the core class in oriental adventures, specifically Rokugan. Should the one in the Oriental Adventures be used, or should the one from the Complete Warrior be used? |
| #4heretic888Jun 02, 2004 12:12:57 | In Rokugan there is a Ninja core class, and heretic8888 has created a very good Ninja core class, the The Shinobi No Mono. W00t!! Mad props f'me!! ![]() Which should be used now as the core class in oriental adventures, specifically Rokugan. Should the one in the Oriental Adventures be used, or should the one from the Complete Warrior be used? Whichever your DM okays. Personally, and in terms of flavor, I'd use the one in OA/Rokugan. Laterz. |
| #5grimswordJun 02, 2004 21:03:15 | Bait the Bard - your link to James Wyatt's "Why there isn’t a Ninja Core Class", points to the races forum instead of his site. I also think that personal opinions should be clearly stated as such; like using a bard for a Geisha is purely just an opinion. Fallentopaz - The OA and Rokugan Samurai are still the official Samurai for the Rokugan setting and OA rules. Rokugan has not been updated to 3.5, but James Wyatt has published a 3.5 update for OA including updating the OA Samurai in #318 of Dragon Magazine. If the DM want to use the CW Samurai instead that is there call to make. CW is a collection of options for using in your campaigns if you want. Note: many people (myself included) don't like the CW Samurai as it is restricted to one fighting style and would only suit one type of Rokugan Samurai - those of the Dragon Clan. |
| #6zombiegleemaxJun 02, 2004 22:44:50 | can you tell me what 3.5 updates to the OA there was? Is Iajitsu focus still there, what changes to the samurai is there? |
| #7bait_the_bardJun 03, 2004 4:50:18 | Thanks for pinting those things out. I'd knew there would be something :embarrass - the annoying bard |
| #8lord_gwydionJun 07, 2004 22:23:33 | There seem to be quite a few threads popping up lately about Wu Jen--Wizard, Shugenja--Wizard, etc. classes swapping spells. You might want to add in a section about that with your next revision. |
| #9bait_the_bardJun 08, 2004 1:34:52 | Yes, I'll do it whn these boards speed up, and I have more time. |
| #10heretic888Jun 08, 2004 9:56:59 | can you tell me what 3.5 updates to the OA there was? The only "3.5 update" (a la Dragon #318) to the Samurai class is that the Samurai can now receive an Honorable enhancement to his ancestral daisho around level 3 or 4. Everything else in the class is unchanged. Is Iajitsu focus still there, what changes to the samurai is there? Yes, Iaijutsu Focus is still there --- although, now a few of the OA skills are obsolete. I suggest picking up Dragon 318 if you want all the details (as well as a horribly written Cheesy Ninjer class). Laterz. |
| #11nedlumJun 08, 2004 15:18:04 | Why are then Vanara not mentioned in the Monsters chapter, or indeed at any point after the class descriptions? What Type are they? |
| #12bait_the_bardJul 04, 2004 4:29:29 | Yeah, that is odd.. I don't know, it must have just been ommited. I assume they would be Monstrous Humanoids, but that's all I can tell. - Bait |
| #13lord_gwydionJul 05, 2004 20:05:15 | The "monster" writeup for Vanara was put in the Mahasarpa Campaign setting web enhancement since it was accidentally left out of the book. I'd have to check, but I'm pretty sure they're simply Humanoid type. If they were Monstrous Humanoids, it would have been noted in the Player Race section. I beleive stats for the goad were also put in the web enhancement, since the weapon was pictured, but no stats were given in the book. |
| #14zombiegleemaxJul 22, 2004 13:42:29 | ![]() What is this book? |
| #15dareoonJul 26, 2004 21:47:53 | Changes should be made to the question about Hengeyokai. The update from dargon has deleted the level adjustment. Also the taint rules for Rokugan are on page 137. |
| #16bait_the_bardJul 27, 2004 2:04:04 | In this FAQ I am not inculding any material from Dragon, unless it is avaliable online, as some people may not have acces to it, and it may be confusing. Thanks for the page. ![]() And Drizzit, no clue as to what that book is.. - Bait |
| #17zombiegleemaxJul 30, 2004 7:51:48 | Yeah, it's wierd. I saw that book in waldenbooks once, but postponed buying it, and next time I came back, only the normal copies were there. Now it's like it's been covered up by some government agency... Begins humming X-Files theme... |
| #18ranger_regJul 31, 2004 3:53:13 | Originally posted by Drizzt Clone The runner-up cover art for OA? You know, in case the current cover art cannot fulfill its duties, the runner-up becomes the new cover art. ![]() |
| #19robitusinzSep 13, 2004 14:25:17 | Perhaps an addition should be made to the FAQ in regards to which AEG books are actual supplements for the d20 Oriental Adventures Rokugan game, and which are for AEG's own propietary game. I'm a d20 player (obviously, hence why I'm on this board), but can't figure out which supplement books on AEG's page are for use with d20. I'm assuming the "secrets of..." books, are d20, while the "way of..." books are non-d20, but I'm probably incorrect. Any help with this? |
| #20bait_the_bardSep 14, 2004 3:19:04 | I'll look into it. However, I have a pretty busy scedule this week, so it will probably be up sometime next week.- the annoying bard |
| #21heretic888Sep 14, 2004 10:12:34 | I'm assuming the "secrets of..." books, are d20, while the "way of..." books are non-d20, but I'm probably incorrect. Hrmmm.... well, I can't speak for the "way of..." books as a whole, but the Way of the Ninja suplement that I have mostly contains material about D20 Oriental Adventures. L5R is only sparesely mentioned here and there. |
| #22zombiegleemaxSep 14, 2004 13:44:53 | Way of the Clans is d10 L5R. Way of the Samurai/Shugenja/etc. is more or less dual-system. |
| #23akumadaimyoOct 02, 2004 19:48:13 | I still like Kara-Tur more for a d20 setting. Are there any plans on a d20 version of it. I could also hardly say its over taken Kara-Tur. No one really plays it and if they do they seem to perfer the original version of Rokugan as opposed to the d20 rules, I know I perfer them. |
| #24bait_the_bardOct 03, 2004 4:21:32 | What's implied in that sentance is the currently (as far as I know) Wizards have no plans for making any further publications featuring Kara-Tur. So it has been 'overtaken' by Rokugan ;) -the annoying bard |
| #25akumadaimyoOct 03, 2004 18:59:55 | I havent seen that many plans for furthering Rokugan's line ethier though. ;) |
| #26bait_the_bardOct 04, 2004 3:55:02 | - shifty eyes - Damn.. ;) |
| #27akumadaimyoOct 07, 2004 15:40:46 | Are there plans to further the line? I've seen nothing mentioned whenever I look on the upcoming products list. |
| #28bait_the_bardOct 07, 2004 17:03:51 | Wizards (as far as I know) has no further plans to extend the Rokugan line, by AEG is always putting out various Way of the .., and ll sort of other books involving Rokugan. Some of them are pure d20, while others are half d20 / half d10 (AEG's Rokugan Roleplaying Game) |
| #29darczeroNov 08, 2004 1:03:54 | What's implied in that sentance is the currently (as far as I know) Wizards have no plans for making any further publications featuring Kara-Tur. So it has been 'overtaken' by Rokugan ;) Kara-Tur is mentioned in a few FR books, as it is a geographical region in that campaign setting (well outside the borders of most published maps, but it is there). |
| #30bait_the_bardNov 08, 2004 3:38:32 | Kara-Tur is mentioned in a few FR books, as it is a geographical region in that campaign setting (well outside the borders of most published maps, but it is there). Yes, tha is true, but Wizards arn't about to publish Kara-Tur; the campaign setting. I know its in some books, and is a location, but no books are going to be released specifically around it. ![]() - the annoying bard |
| #31ranger_regJan 27, 2005 4:10:44 | It appears that Hidden Emperor will be the last [dual-stat] product for Rokugan d20 to be released by AEG (IP owner of L5R). A new edition (3rd) of L5R RPG will be released in the summer, using the d10-based Roll-&-Keep System. No words on reprinting or revising OA. |
| #32lord_zeb_02Feb 03, 2005 18:31:51 | Just cause it bears saying whenever there is a stickied thread ;) (really, any thread that mentions it at all) - bring back Kara-Tur! I like my old idea of "Beyond Faerun" and putting Maztica, Al-Qadim (never spell that one right) and Kara-Tur in one nice hardback. :D Zeb or would that be "the annoying Zeb"? :P |
| #33bait_the_bardFeb 03, 2005 23:13:44 | :D Zeb ![]() :nono: Very smoothe there, though I don't think Wizards will take much notice of you ![]() - the annoying zeb? |
| #34the_simple_seeker_iiFeb 06, 2005 17:45:27 | It appears that Hidden Emperor will be the last [dual-stat] product for Rokugan d20 to be released by AEG (IP owner of L5R). So...I...see |
| #35loren_soth_02Mar 10, 2005 12:45:23 | Just cause it bears saying whenever there is a stickied thread ;) (really, any thread that mentions it at all) - bring back Kara-Tur! I like my old idea of "Beyond Faerun" and putting Maztica, Al-Qadim (never spell that one right) and Kara-Tur in one nice hardback. Oh yeah. That would be sweet! |
| #36ZyphusApr 25, 2005 3:41:55 | Three times in Rokugan it mentions a berserker class, and is kind enough to put it in the index. I cannot find such a class and wonder where is it described? |
| #37zombiegleemaxApr 25, 2005 6:08:30 | AFAIK, it's just another word for barbarian, with less of a pejorative connotation. |
| #38bait_the_bardApr 25, 2005 16:46:08 | Three times in Rokugan it mentions a berserker class, and is kind enough to put it in the index. I cannot find such a class and wonder where is it described? Yes, it is just their word for the Barbarian, if you look near the front of Oriental Advemntures (page 17), it has a little note on Barbarians in Rokuag/OA. Also, on page 29 of Rokugan, thee is a paragraph on Barbarians in Rokugan, and why they're called Berserkers. |
| #39zombiegleemaxJun 05, 2005 16:43:23 | The naga in the Rokugan book are listed as Large creatures, yet the Constrictor is clearly (according to the MM3.5 chart on sizes) a Huge creature. My only problem is having a 2000+ pound snake-man in a tea house? ;) Seriously though, as naga are large do they get the +4 to grapple and -4 to Hide that's listed in the MM3.5 size chart? Also, if a naga constricts an opponent, do they start causing damage right away or the next round? |
| #40narukagamiJun 05, 2005 17:03:19 | My only problem is having a 2000+ pound snake-man in a tea house? ;) If the naga even gets out of the Shinomen forrest without being attacked, he would need to get into town, that right there will be a whole new set of problems. Unlike standard DnD races, the non-human races of Rokugan are met with a great deal of prejudice. If your not openly attacked you will be shunned, though there are certain exceptions with great heros and alliances and Nezumi courtiers in the Emperor's court, the common villager, ashigaru, or outpost samurai aren't going to give a d*mn. Your not human, so you must be an oni. Seriously though, as naga are large do they get the +4 to grapple and -4 to Hide that's listed in the MM3.5 size chart? Yes, and yes. |
| #41zombiegleemaxJun 05, 2005 17:18:57 | My impression was that the naga weren't despised. Maybe I'll change that. I'm allowing all of the races and classes in OA and Rokugan d20. For the kokoburoru (sp?) they're the servants of the Lions and are generally high-ranking ashigaru at best. The spirit folk are on equal footing with humans and in some cases are either elevated or discriminated against, depending on typical human whim. The vanarans live in the Shinomen Forest with the naga and are generally the only race to ever be shaman, although there are the rare exceptions. I'm still working on hengeyokai and any suggestion would be great. BTW, which part of my constriction question was your "yes" for? |
| #42narukagamiJun 05, 2005 17:23:40 | Er, right away. |
| #43zombiegleemaxJun 05, 2005 17:24:26 | Er, right away. :D Thanks a million! |
| #44azzyJun 08, 2005 15:40:51 | Can we add a bit to the FAQ listing Dragon and Dungeon issues with OA material? To my knowlege, there's been: Dragon 289 (3.0)
Dragon 315 (3.0/3.5)
Dragon 318 (3.5)
Dungeon 89 (3.0)
I haven't bothered listing the 1st & 2nd edition issues (mainly because I don't want to dust them off, and doubt too many people are going to be concerned with them). |
| #45glimeral_dupJun 29, 2005 20:43:01 | I still like Kara-Tur more for a d20 setting. Are there any plans on a d20 version of it. I could also hardly say its over taken Kara-Tur. No one really plays it and if they do they seem to perfer the original version of Rokugan as opposed to the d20 rules, I know I perfer them. The only thing they have done in respect to Kara-Tur is to publish the Unapproachable East Sourcebook, although from what I have read in it, it doesnt seem to highlight much about Kara-Tur at all. |
| #46zombiegleemaxAug 07, 2005 15:11:36 | Hello, i love dnd, but i love the orient even more! When i found out that there was an Oriental Aventurer's Guide my day was made. The unfortunate thing is... my local gaming store havn't heard of it. It cant be out of print cant it? |
| #47narukagamiAug 07, 2005 15:42:11 | Next time rather than asking for an Oriental Adventurer's Guide, ask for the book Oriental Adventures. :P |
| #48zombiegleemaxAug 07, 2005 18:45:42 | Yup, you get fewer odd looks if you ask for books that actually exist. :P |
| #49zombiegleemaxAug 10, 2005 12:51:40 | yes, that was very foolish of me... but thats what i was told the book was called, so i guess thats why i couldn't find any articales about it. Anyways... is the a jitte in the equipment section? |
| #50rechanSep 10, 2005 15:34:01 | Messed up post. |
| #51mhacdebhandiaSep 11, 2005 7:36:11 | Anyways... is the a jitte in the equipment section? Yes. |
| #52zombiegleemaxSep 12, 2005 11:42:34 | hi people im a bit of a noob at this but cud sumone answer this 1 question plz Q.when determining how many skill points you have to spend when creating a new character what is the class modifier for the samurai class?? thanks =-) |
| #53ephealySep 25, 2005 16:10:27 | Q: I think there should be a Ninja core class. Why isn’t there? Here's the link: http://www.aquela.com/roleplaying/OA/ninja.html |
| #54ephealySep 25, 2005 16:37:55 | Can we add a bit to the FAQ listing Dragon and Dungeon issues with OA material? I agree. This might be a good idea. I haven't looked at all the articles (recently) that Azzy listed, but it'd be good to have them in the FAQ. |
| #55ephealySep 25, 2005 16:40:58 | I had started a thread (right here) asking whether I had a complete list of the d20 Rokugan books. If the list is complete, could you include that in the FAQ as well? |
| #56kangsthegreenDec 29, 2005 16:32:11 | I want to answer the question about why there aren't ant Geisha classes.(as I am a researcher that dive into Japanese history and one of the oldest Rokugan D20 player/DM) It is probably because geishas are Eta(hinin, non-people), they are entertainers that has the special treatment but that is all. In Rokugan campaign you are playing a samurai(not class) caste character(if you want it other way it is posible but you are ignored or harresed by samurais). The playable version of geisha is generally assasins and spies that pretending to be geisha and they are generally multi class ninja/courier or rouge/courier.(even though it is a core class in Rokugan bards are justified as hinin and they are generally harresed by other people except other hinins) |
| #57roxlimnJan 21, 2006 12:25:00 | The question of 3.5e updates tends to get asked regularly, so I think it should be included in the FAQ. Q: Has the material in the original Oriental Adventures been updated to 3.5e D&D? A: Yes. Official updates from James Wyatt was published in the 318 issue of Dragon Magazine. Back issues may be available upon request from paizo.com. |
| #58ravinrayJul 08, 2006 19:48:36 | I just got a copy of OA, and I'm hoping you can add to the FAQ which 3.5 books have the updated base classes and PrCs, ie. Complete Arcane for the wu jen, Complete Divine for the shugenja and void disciple, etc. Curious, how significant are the updates? |
| #59heretic888Jul 08, 2006 23:11:11 | I just got a copy of OA, and I'm hoping you can add to the FAQ which 3.5 books have the updated base classes and PrCs, ie. Complete Arcane for the wu jen, Complete Divine for the shugenja and void disciple, etc. Curious, how significant are the updates? They have no bearing whatsoever on Oriental Adventures. Laterz. |
| #60zombiegleemaxJul 08, 2006 23:18:03 | Question: I have Dragon #318; don't have Complete Adventurer. Is the ninja class in 318 identical to the ninja class in CA? |
| #61ranger_regJul 09, 2006 3:02:41 | Question: More or less, yes. It got Jesse Decker's prints on both of them. But the ninja class in #318 is not an update to OA. It's a separate article, along with the pirates and dinosaur in that issue. |
| #62zombiegleemaxJul 09, 2006 8:40:49 | Domo arigato, Ranger-san. I also like the Shinobi-no-bushi class. I like it when you go looking for the answer to a question, and you find a better answer than the question you originally asked (i. e. the shinobi-no-bushi). |
| #63heretic888Jul 09, 2006 10:48:20 | Domo arigato, Ranger-san. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| #64zombiegleemaxAug 13, 2006 16:15:11 | I analyzed both the fighter class and the samurai, and I don't understand why the samurai loses so 4 extra feats in exchange for an extra 2 skill points per level, a better will save base and better starting eq. (which doesn't matter any more near the mid levels). Also, he has a lot more restrictions than the fighter does too. Can someone explain this to me, since I would have expected the Samurai, whose life devotion is to war, should at least be equivalent to a fighter in battle. Thanks |
| #65ranger_regAug 13, 2006 19:37:55 | Can someone explain this to me, since I would have expected the Samurai, whose life devotion is to war, should at least be equivalent to a fighter in battle. A samurai's life is not always devoted to war, only to achieve glory and honor for himself and his family. In peacetime they don't war as much, so they pursue other interests, usually in government positions or improves one cultural refinement in arts, poetry, calligraphy, etc. ... or simply freeloads at their local fire squad-house. That's not to say a samurai cannot multiclass to a fighter, especially if he's not into arts & craft. He can then improve his combat skills (through weapon specialization and stuff). All he cares about is bringing great honor to his line of ancestors as well as his descendents. War is just one method. Of course, there was a time when samurai are simply farmers who fight. Then I believe someone like Nobunaga brought samurai out of their farming root and make professional armies out of them. |
| #66zombiegleemaxAug 13, 2006 20:25:30 | Oh, putting it in that way I understand. Thanks |
| #67zombiegleemaxSep 07, 2006 13:43:24 | I read a book that had a new template system for creating hengeyokai. It wasn't the oriental adventures main book. it had two sets of rules for everything so you could use d20 or l5r, and you could take taboos in exchange for more abilities. however i cannot find it anywhere now. Some one please help me out. where can i find it again! |
| #68zombiegleemaxSep 20, 2006 0:08:30 | ok i found it. the hengeyokai shapechanger template is in fortune and wind. |
| #69katowiceNov 02, 2006 9:44:48 | With all the other Wizards books (Complete series, for example) that have updated material from 3.0 to 3.5 (including stuff from Dragon Magazine), it would be nice to see a Oriental Adventures 3.5 book. Alderac has gone back to their own system for Legends of the Five Rings/Rokugan, so the new OA3.5 book could instead of Rokugan material, have some campaign info for Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk and Eberron. It would be a lot easier IMHO if all the various OA updates were in one volume, instead of spread out amongst Dragon and some of the other WOTC books. Does anybody know if (NDA's notwithstanding) such a book is planned? |
| #70ranger_regMar 15, 2007 3:29:13 | Does anybody know if (NDA's notwithstanding) such a book is planned? Doubt it. The chance of having a 3.5e OA book is about the same as having a 3.5e Deities and Demigods book. |
| #71akumadaimyoApr 22, 2007 23:56:48 | There was a very cool Steampunk Musha book I saw that was non D&D. I think it's Iron Gauntlet but the setting could easily be adapted to D20 in some way. |
| #72imakuni67Jun 04, 2007 18:44:36 | Are there any parts of the OA book that are under the OGL? More specifically, the martial arts styles? Could I make my own styles if it isn't under the OGL? |
| #73azzyJun 04, 2007 22:28:04 | Are there any parts of the OA book that are under the OGL? No. More specifically, the martial arts styles? No. Could I make my own styles if it isn't under the OGL? Sorta. For you home games, and for sharing on these boards, etc., no problem. If you wanted to publish them, on the other hand, you'd have to call it something else (say, "combat style," or something) and describe it a bit differently. Anyone else want to chime in? |
| #74CendragonFeb 22, 2008 13:22:40 | I just got the Oriental Adventures book and I'm surprised by how much I like it. Since the characters in my campaign are adventuring in the Forgotten Realms near Kara-Tur, I'm think of using Rokugan as Kara-Tur in my FR campaign. However, I have a question about taint as discussed for Rokugan. It doesn 't appear that there is any limit on how much taint one can acquire by casting blood spells and thus decreasing one's Wisdom to 0 and effectively immobilizing oneself. Is this talked about anywhere? |
| #75aarondirebearJun 07, 2008 10:31:55 | I still don't see why you had to make such an incompatible world the default oriental setting. What would have been wrong with a generic oriental setting that could be added to an existing dungeons and dragons world, or focusing on Kara Tur? I mean come on 90% of the stuff in the book isn't even FOUND in Rokugan! |
| #76ORC_SporkFeb 27, 2009 6:30:34 | Stickied per VCL Request. |
| #77CmdrCorsikenFeb 28, 2009 13:48:36 | I just got the Oriental Adventures book and I'm surprised by how much I like it. Since the characters in my campaign are adventuring in the Forgotten Realms near Kara-Tur, I'm think of using Rokugan as Kara-Tur in my FR campaign. However, I have a question about taint as discussed for Rokugan. Having only read the 'taint' rules once, I can't say with certainty. However, one's Wisdom score is the limiting factor. If you are willing to sacrifice Wisdom, then you can cast more of those spells. That said, here is an answer to a question you didn't ask. AaronDireBear makes a good point. There really is no need to simply drop Rokugan into Forgotten Realms. If you strip all the Rokugan-specific stuff out of the OA book, that leaves 75-90% of it. All of which is based on the original AD&D OA material which itself was defaulted as Kara-Tur. Such classes as Wu Jen and races as spirit folk were and are part of Kara-Tur. So, by ignoring (or adapting) Rokugan material, you already have what you need to be relatively faithful to Kara-Tur. This is what I would recommend, but it is your world regardless. So, enjoy whatever you do with it! |