| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1rauricSep 15, 2008 13:45:50 | I have an odd feeling that Planescape and Spelljammer is going to be merged a bit in 4E. I think we will see "jamming" vessels still, but they will be travelling across the Planes to get to other Worlds and I think that they will be using the Astral Sea not Space as a means to get there. This is just a hunch I have. |
| #2subtleSep 15, 2008 14:11:11 | That sounds disgusting but I wouldn't mind that much. I consider planescape to be two campagin settings. One is the planes, the other is Sigil. Sigil is what I love. |
| #3nerdicusSep 15, 2008 14:22:56 | I think this would be ab awesome an idea on their part. It makes sense to merge two smaller fringe settings into one setting in order to get advocates of both. That said, I hope Planescape is still all about the factions. I am actually planning on sticking some faction action in my first 4th edition game I will be running starting this week. The planer awesome won't begin until around level 10, but it's the plan. |
| #4barthalasSep 15, 2008 14:38:25 | I have an odd feeling that Planescape and Spelljammer is going to be merged a bit in 4E. I think we will see "jamming" vessels still, but they will be travelling across the Planes to get to other Worlds and I think that they will be using the Astral Sea not Space as a means to get there. This is just a hunch I have. I really hope the combine the two. I always thought they two kind of canceled each other out when it came as a way to venture to other worlds. I mean why travel on a Spelljamming ship, when you can go through a couple of planar doors and arrive at the same destination? |
| #5suin_bahhar_02Sep 15, 2008 15:01:22 | Sigil made it to 4E, right? Than the whole multiverse can easily fit within that astral sea, effectively making most of the planes domains of dieties. Natural worlds could still be surrounded by "space" but suns might not be holes to the planes of radiance (quasiplane of positive energy and fire) anymore, but real superheated gasballs. This means spelljamming might still be needed to go explore "nearby" planetoids and to put down portals on habitable worlds. And the fun part is, in a astral soup the planar alignments are more easily imagined to adjust, like a waxing and waning of a shoreline, with domain boundaries rising and lowering away from the primes. |
| #6rauricSep 16, 2008 0:05:47 | I really hope the combine the two. I always thought they two kind of canceled each other out when it came as a way to venture to other worlds. I mean why travel on a Spelljamming ship, when you can go through a couple of planar doors and arrive at the same destination? Yep. Plus you can swashbuckle through the Planes. Lots of fun exploration to do on the journey to whichever planet you need to get to. ;) |
| #7nymrohdSep 16, 2008 12:25:10 | I've been all about astraljamming+sigil=new campaign setting idea for months. But it would not be planescape, just a cool new setting. Planescape will always be as it was before Faction War (and Die, Vecna, Die or what's its name) for me. And you can quite easily have that in 4E if you are just willing to drop the nerd rage and refluff everything back to the original![]() So who is up for stating planar races and monsters? |
| #8nymrohdSep 16, 2008 16:43:53 | And since I was bored, let's start with this fellow: Arcanoloth Level 19 Elite Artillery Medium immortal humanoid (yugoloth) XP 4,800 Initiative +9 Senses Perception +18; darkvision HP 270; Bloodied 135 AC 31; Fortitude 29, Reflex 33, Will 33 Immune acid, poison; Resist 15 variable (1/encounter); Vulnerable 10 cold Saving Throws +2 Speed 6 Action Points 1 Melee Basic Poisoned Claws (standard; at-will) Poison +22 vs. AC;1d6 + 7 damage, and ongoing 5 poison damage (save ends). Ranged Basic Magic Missile (standard; at will) Arcane, Force Ranged 20; +24 vs Reflex; 3d4 + 7 force damage. Area Acid Wave (standard; daily) Acid, Arcane Close blast 5; +24 vs Reflex; 5d6+7 acid damage, and ongoing 10 acid damage (save ends). Miss: Half damage, and ongoing 5 acid damage (save ends). Area Combust (standard; encounter) Arcane, Fire Area burst 2 within 20; +24 vs Reflex; 5d6+7 fire damage. Ranged Mesmeric Hold (standard; encounter) Arcane, Psychic The arcanoloth targets up to three creatures within 10 squares, or a single creature (and gains a +4 bonus to the attack roll)l +24 vs. Will; 2d6+7 psychic damage, and the target is immobilised until the end of the arcanoloth’s next turn. Arcane Gate (standard; daily) Arcane, Illusion As the wizard power arcane gate (Player’s Handbook 163). Greater Invisibility (standard; daily) Arcane, Illusion As the wizard power greater invisibility (Player’s Handbook 165). Cantrips As the wizard class feature (Player’s Handbook 158). Spellbook As the wizard class feature (Player’s Handbook 158). The arcanoloth’s spellbook also holds resistance (as the wizard power, Player’s Handbook 164), stoneskin (as the wizard power, Player’s Handbook 166), and disintegrate (ranged 10; +24 vs. Reflex; 5d10 + 7 damage, and ongoing 10 damage (save ends). Aftereffect: Ongoing 5 damage (save ends). Miss: 3d10 + 7 damage, and ongoing 5 damage (save ends) ). Alignment Evil Languages Common, Abyssal, Infernal, any three others Skills Arcana +24, Bluff +20, Insight +18, Intimidate +20 Str 10 (+9) Dex 11 (+9) Wis 19 (+13) Con 18 (+13) Int 25 (+16) Cha 22 (+15) |
| #9rhialtoSep 17, 2008 1:14:18 | Merge them? You might end up with something that is neither if you merge the two, and end up being disliked by fans of both settings. Your suggestion is almost like merging Greyhawk and Dragonlance in order to make something "cooler". |
| #10aseranSep 17, 2008 1:55:01 | Your suggestion is almost like merging Greyhawk and Dragonlance in order to make something "cooler". It's not like that at all, actually. Planescape and Spelljammer share a similar concept: adventures based on travel between many different worlds. While there are definitely nuances that they don't share (Spelljammer's off-the-wall swashbuckling, Planescape's quirky philosophical bent), there's something to be said for taking the big picture and throwing in what made both of these good. It's not hard to imagine, in the 4e cosmology, sailing the Astral Sea, testing your mettle against aberrant marauders, matching wits with Yugoloth pirates, and out-maneuvering the over-inquisitive Harmonium privateer over a bottle of rum and a logic puzzle. So to speak. |
| #11rhialtoSep 17, 2008 2:55:46 | You focus on travel as the common aspect for PS and SJ. You could equally say DL and GH have swords and sorcery as a common aspect. I say SJ is about the journey, while PS is about the destination. Think about it; the nature of PS travel means nothing can happen while travelling between places. they aren't as similar as you imagine. I may be wrong. It may work beautifully. But I'm not going to hold my breath. |
| #12colmanSep 17, 2008 6:03:30 | Well, the FRCG doesn't indicate that:In the beginning existed a misty realm of timeless Sounds like the SJ universe to me, so what official stuff we have so far doesn't support the contention that the two would be merged. The concepts for Planescape and SJ seem pretty distinct to me: merging them doesn't seem sensible. Doesn't mean they won't do it, but that's another matter! |
| #13jiggawha_dupSep 17, 2008 12:20:16 | I wouldn't mind seeing more about alternative ways of traveling planes, not that they were completely ignored before but that shouldn't be the main focus of the setting, ''philosophers with clubs'' and intrigue should |
| #14rauricSep 17, 2008 15:47:48 | Merge them? You might end up with something that is neither if you merge the two, and end up being disliked by fans of both settings. It is not like either setting has that many fans that it would make a dent in WOTCs bottom line. They slew many cacred cows for 4th and also for the FR setting which is probably their biggest "money making" setting. IMO if they would change things in FR don't look for Dark Sun, Planescape or Spelljammer to be spared. The merging of the two seems logical to me since the Astral Sea was made for traveling on. I was a fan of Spelljammer when I was in my teens but (30 something now) now that I look back on the setting I cringe. Planescape was much cooler but seemed a place to use when I wanted to send my FR players somewhere different. Different strokes is all. |
| #15Brom_BlackforgeSep 18, 2008 13:05:52 | Different strokes is all. I hope WotC remembers that, and allows the different settings to REMAIN different. And perhaps I should clarify: different from EACH OTHER, not necessarily different from HOW THEY USED TO BE.... |
| #16rauricSep 18, 2008 19:45:14 | If different from how they used to be sells more books than you can bet that is the route they will go. They obviously are trying to widen their fanbase and not just focus on diehard fans of older settings. |
| #17Brom_BlackforgeSep 19, 2008 13:13:00 | If different from how they used to be sells more books than you can bet that is the route they will go. They obviously are trying to widen their fanbase and not just focus on diehard fans of older settings. They can put out new stuff, but then give it a new name. For instance, you can do planar adventuring without getting into the philosophy and the factions, but without those things, why bother calling it Planescape? The name is only going to mean something to those "diehard fans" you mentioned, so if you're not angling for their business, why use the name? |
| #18nerdicusSep 19, 2008 18:28:45 | They can put out new stuff, but then give it a new name. For instance, you can do planar adventuring without getting into the philosophy and the factions, but without those things, why bother calling it Planescape? The name is only going to mean something to those "diehard fans" you mentioned, so if you're not angling for their business, why use the name? But if PS and SJ were combined it would still most likely have the factions and what not, but it would also mean that you could spelljam two different planes while on that mission for the Harmonium or double crossing that berk from the Guvners before hopping the next ship to where ever. And to the comment on combining GH and DL, why not? :D Just kidding....kinda. I mean, I feel both those settings are pretty much simple fantasy and generic at best. But then again, I'm just that sort of a nerd. I support what ever gets the Planescape books out the fastest. |
| #19rauricSep 21, 2008 6:47:42 | They can put out new stuff, but then give it a new name. For instance, you can do planar adventuring without getting into the philosophy and the factions, but without those things, why bother calling it Planescape? The name is only going to mean something to those "diehard fans" you mentioned, so if you're not angling for their business, why use the name? I bought the Planescape stuff because it gave some nice detail on the Planes and the concept of working alongside great Planar beings was interesting. Plus at the time I liked the idea of connecting all of the TSR worlds (now at 33 I hate the idea). I always felt like Planescape was an accessory that you used to send your PCs somewhere different. I never used or liked the philosophy angle that was the Factions. Anyway the idea of sailing to new places (worlds and Planes) on the Astral Sea using Spelljamming vessels appeals to me greatly. It is definitely my cup of tea now. |
| #20burningtiger_dupSep 22, 2008 16:51:45 | Anyway the idea of sailing to new places (worlds and Planes) on the Astral Sea using Spelljamming vessels appeals to me greatly. It is definitely my cup of tea now. And have Sigil as a big port city in the middle of it all. ![]() ![]() ![]() I think it'd be great, but no matter what they've done with them, I can't wait for Manual of the Planes. It'll be a nice christmas gift. |
| #21Shemeska_the_MarauderSep 23, 2008 0:35:23 | I think it'd be great, but no matter what they've done with them, I can't wait for Manual of the Planes. I wish I shared your enthusiasm. Given the flavor text in 4e thus far (or lack thereof), their willingness to have change for the sake of change, and the comments of several members of the 4e design team on various planar topics (see "bullet in the head" of the guardinals), I really don't expect much at all. |
| #22rauricSep 23, 2008 17:40:28 | Like the other settings I don't need much to run a campaign on. Bare bones has been working very nicely for me. I can always supplement missing stuff (City of Brass) with 3PP stuff if WOTC does not cover it. DDi articles will help alot for me in that case also. |
| #23burningtiger_dupSep 26, 2008 15:29:59 | I agree with Rauric, and I for one really enjoy the new cosmology and all the fluff that there has been so I'm excited to see more. On a related note the new Realmslore article in Dragon "Hall of the Frostmaiden" which is about the goddess Auril's domain in the Astral Sea, specifically mentions "astral-jammers". It's only one line and doesn't really describe anything about them but they exist. :D For those interested it can be found on the 3rd page (listed as page 29) in the paragraph under the first heading (The Nest). |
| #24rauricSep 26, 2008 21:19:16 | Good stuff. |
| #25quale_Sep 27, 2008 10:15:17 | liked the Winter Hall article, I'll use it somehow in a different cosmology, still not sure about the merging of Auril and QoAaDcan always supplement missing stuff (City of Brass) with 3PP stuff if WOTC does not cover it. ok City of Brass is covered, but what else? |
| #26burningtiger_dupSep 27, 2008 21:28:00 | liked the Winter Hall article, I'll use it somehow in a different cosmology, still not sure about the merging of Auril and QoAaD From an FR stand point I'm not sure how I feel about it either, but I'll definitely use Auril as the Queen of Air and Darkness for a future campaign based in the core PoL setting |
| #27oklosoxOct 01, 2008 14:23:15 | And since I was bored, let's start with this fellow: Ultroloth, please? :p |
| #28isran_imradorOct 06, 2008 14:57:39 | Sigil: Spellscape tCS ;) Nice name... ![]() |
| #29AegeriOct 12, 2008 6:51:49 | I think this would be ab awesome an idea on their part. It makes sense to merge two smaller fringe settings into one setting in order to get advocates of both. I hope if they bring back Planescape they ignore the whole faction war nonsense, because that really drove me nuts at the time. |
| #30addle-cove-anarchistOct 26, 2008 13:18:31 | nothing wrong with Faction war it's not Spellplague and in PS isn't a problem to play pre or post FW cause the world doesn't change always wanted to make a list of those fifty factions |
| #31AcryliumSep 28, 2009 5:27:11 | Are the events of "Die Vecna Die!" ignored in 4th Edition? So has the question found an ending why the Lady of Pain didn't threw Vecna out of Sigil? And is Aoskar still a dead god in the 4th Edition or has he never existed? |
| #32SaricJan 20, 2010 23:15:57 |
Quoted from Draconomicon 2 p.74 History: The Guardians of the Gates formed shortly after the god Vecna managed what no deity had ever done: He entered the City of Doors. Though Vecna was eventually thrown out of Sigil, the steel dragon Virtraxentyr started the Guardians of the Gates to protect the City of Doors. |
| #33The_SilverswordMar 12, 2010 1:24:27 | Planescape is alive and well in 4e. |
| #34blueznlJul 13, 2010 15:10:28 | So am I, but that doesn't seem to matter much :-) |
| #35alexander_sibeliusAug 27, 2010 6:43:44 | Where does a berk buy the campaign setting for 4e? Online that is... |