| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1puddDec 19, 2014 7:06:11 | So I've seen a few builds of this type with a few variations on it but I was wondering what people thought of my take on it. |
| #2BaphogoatDec 19, 2014 13:44:04 | The warcaster feat stats when you are using weaponS in both hands or a weapon and a shield. I take this to mean that with a two-handed weapon you can freely remove a hand to cast a spell with S/M components, as it only takes one hand to hold the weapon even if it takes both to use the weapon. If you want advantage on concentration and the spell AoO reaction then it is still a good feat for you.
I have a warlock who is going this route as well (MC fighter with two handed sword) and I do not plan on having warcaster. |
| #3puddDec 19, 2014 14:37:19 | Stupidly I didn't even realise it gave me advantage for concentration saves, that makes it even better. Thanks! |
| (Reply to #3)Baphogoat |
|
| #5Mephi1234Dec 20, 2014 4:14:25 | Just be careful with spells that use a material component - War Caster does nothing for material components, only somantic.
Darkness is a V, M spell, meaning that you need to be holding an arcane focus or the material components for the spell to work. Now, you do get one free "interact with object" a turn, but your GM could rule that switching between the material component and your blade takes up the full action. Or you miss an attack of opertunity because "drawing" the material component means you're not holding your weapon for a full round.
Hex, likewise, is a V, S, M spell, meaning you'll need the material component, and (depending on how your GM runs things) pulling out the material component and casting the spell shouldn't be a problem, but you could run into issues with dropping the component, gripping your sword, and then swinging your sword after casting the bonus action spell.
I suggest talking to your GM on the issue, since that could be conisidered interacting with more than one object a turn. Also, though, keep in mind that there are a lot of spells in the warlock list that are only V, S; its more than possible to build one that never needs a material component. |
| (Reply to #5)Yunru |
|
| #7YunruDec 20, 2014 6:14:35 | That and it only requires a free hand to access the components, but you don't need to do that if you've say tied a wand to your sword hilt. |
| #8Mephi1234Dec 20, 2014 7:16:43 |
|
| (Reply to #8)Yunru |
|
| #10Mephi1234Dec 20, 2014 7:57:55 |
|
| #11puddDec 20, 2014 18:07:22 | There's an easy way around this. I start a battle with my sword sheathed, cast Darkness as my action, both move towards enemy and draw weapon as the move action, use Action Surge to attack, and if I kill or crit then I use my bonus action to attack again. |
| #12Ghost_GallusDec 20, 2014 19:32:22 | Get a sheild or weapon made with a focus built into it. Take an orb and make it the pommel of you sword. |
| #13Mephi1234Dec 21, 2014 5:07:02 |
|
| #14YunruDec 21, 2014 5:14:37 | Sure there is, it's called Duct Tape. |
| #15Ashur420Dec 21, 2014 7:01:13 |
|
| #16YunruDec 21, 2014 7:47:16 | I was thinking more "tape wand to sword" (so you're holding both at once), but that eorks too. |
| #17Ashur420Dec 21, 2014 9:31:06 | In all seriousness I don't understand why you can't just use an arcane rod as the handle of your shield. Sure you'd probably have to reinforce it so it doesn't break, but I can't think of any other reason why that wouldn't work with war caster. |
| #18Ghost_GallusDec 25, 2014 17:23:37 | Make a sword. Use an orb as the pommel. Done. No such thing indeed. Just because it takes more than a paint brush doesn't mean it doesn't exist. |
| #19YunruDec 26, 2014 2:31:26 | Hell their are a type of foci specifically called Rods. Just have one run through the centre of your sword. |
| #20Swamp_slugDec 27, 2014 7:23:07 | Wizards, Warlocks and Sorcerers all have a paragraph included within their spellcasting class feature stating "You can use an arcane focus as a spellcasting focus for your <class> spells". The Eldritch Knight does not have such a paragraph. To me this means that an Eldritch Knight cannot use an arcane focus for their spells and that a Wizard/Eldritch Knight multiclass could only use an arcane focus when casting their Wizard spells, not their Eldritch Knight spells.
Page 151 supports this by stating that "a sorcerer, warlock, or wizard can use such an item as a spellcasting focus". |
| #21ZaruthustranDec 29, 2014 11:36:29 | Wear an orb as a necklace. Briefly grasp it when you cast a spell with a material component. That's your one "interact with an object" per turn.
Taking a hand off your greatsword for a moment to do the above--and then placing your hand back on the sword--is a nonaction. It's not "drawing or stowing a weapon", because the weapon is already drawn (and held). It's not "interacting with an object" because you're not opening the sword, closing the sword, or otherwise interacting. You're just placing your hand on the grip instead of placing your hand at your side / throwing the devil horns / high-fiving / doing something else with your hand, now that you're done interacting with the orb.
You're good, in other words. |