Cloud of Daggers + "grapple"

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

Morukai

Nov 08, 2014 12:46:17

I keep seeing threads that talk about grappling someone and "moving them into" a Cloud of Daggers spell and/or "holding them there" so they take damage.

 

I can't see the reason the grappler would not take the same damage. Would someone care to explain to me how the grappler would avoid taking the same damage from the Cloud?

#2

raleel

Nov 08, 2014 13:18:44

Nothing says the grappler is in the same space as the grappled. There is no "step into" part. so, they are next to each other. CoD is a single square

#3

mellored

Nov 08, 2014 14:00:08

It's even better, since you can drag them out and into the squre, dealing damage both on the grappler's turn, and at the start of the creatures turn.

(Reply to #2)

Morukai

raleel wrote:
#5

Elfcrusher

Nov 08, 2014 20:56:21

As a DM I wouldn't allow this.  In some cases RAW simply defies common sense.

#6

Jay_Ibero_911

Nov 08, 2014 21:04:31

So many people adding things to grapple that just aren't in the rules. The ONLY consequence of grappling is that the target's speed is 0. No space sharing, no attack penalties. Absolutely NOTHING esle mechanically.

#7

raleel

Nov 08, 2014 21:41:07

There is a lot of baggage from previous editions. A lot. We experienced several examples in our friday night game yesterday.

#8

Jordan175

Nov 09, 2014 1:55:51

Elfcrusher wrote:
(Reply to #6)

Morukai

Elfcrusher wrote:
(Reply to #9)

Yunru

Morukai wrote:
#11

Jay_Ibero_911

Nov 09, 2014 7:01:30

Morukai wrote:
#12

mellored

Nov 09, 2014 9:00:19

Elfcrusher wrote:
#13

raleel

Nov 09, 2014 9:40:25

Arm bar!

 

GET INTO THE CLOOOUUUUD!

#14

Elfcrusher

Nov 09, 2014 9:58:23

raleel wrote:
#15

Ganymede425

Nov 09, 2014 14:43:21

Yunru wrote:
#16

Elfcrusher

Nov 09, 2014 18:20:42

Ganymede425 wrote:
(Reply to #15)

Morukai

Ganymede425 wrote:
#18

mellored

Nov 10, 2014 6:53:19

Morukai wrote:
#19

raleel

Nov 10, 2014 7:16:03

Having personally done and been a victim of the one that I posted, you are not in the same 5' space because you have portions of your bodies that are more than 5 feet apart. Just because you are interacting with your hands doesn't mean you are within the same 5' space. Otherwise monks would have to enter to punch someone. 

Perhapthis his one will help

 

Really, totally doable. The 5' space is an abstraction. You have a reach of 5'. It works fine

(Reply to #18)

Morukai

mellored wrote:
(Reply to #19)

Morukai

raleel wrote:
#22

mellored

Nov 10, 2014 7:36:51

They're also occupying the same space.
(Reply to #22)

Morukai

mellored wrote:
#24

mellored

Nov 10, 2014 8:33:46

Morukai wrote:
#25

slumgum

Nov 10, 2014 9:11:06

Honestly when it was brought up whether allies take damage attacking into moonbeam or not I was so uninterested in the argument I just never prepared the spell again.  Arguing over whether the grappler will take damage when putting the grapplee into the cloud is so much more immersion breaking and disruptive than the idea that someone might be able to shove another person into a cloud of daggers without getting hit by the daggers themself.

 

For some people arguing *is* fun, and if that is you and your group then by all means keep arguing - otherwise two players working in tandem to deal 4d4 damage to creature just isn't that big of a deal.  

(Reply to #25)

Morukai

slumgum wrote:
(Reply to #24)

Morukai

mellored wrote:
#28

Elfcrusher

Nov 10, 2014 9:26:45

I think we need videos.

 

Those of you who think Cloud of Daggers + Grapple is legitimate, go to your favorite SCA gathering, shine a spotline in a circle, and try to hold somebody in the circle without the light touching you.

 

Then post the videos.  

 

I'm going to go start making popcorn.

#29

mellored

Nov 10, 2014 9:47:09

Morukai wrote:
(Reply to #29)

Morukai

mellored wrote:
#31

mellored

Nov 10, 2014 10:09:08

Morukai wrote:
(Reply to #31)

Morukai

mellored wrote:
#33

Yunru

Nov 10, 2014 10:49:30
You're trying to argue the absense of something as support for the neccessity of something else. Unless you've two mutually exclusive outcomes, one of which must be true, that is a logical fallacy.
#34

Smashpunk

Nov 10, 2014 10:58:19

I liked the monk example given above that seemed to be overlooked. 

 

raleel wrote:
#35

Jay_Ibero_911

Nov 10, 2014 11:00:33
SSince you are only using one hand to grapple someone, at worst you would only have that hand in the cloud of daggers. So if you think having only a tiny percentage of your body in the cloud is enough to take damage, then to be conceptually consistant you would have to do damage to anyone making a melee attack against someone in the cloud without a reach weapon, which is obviously not RAW or RAI.
#36

mellored

Nov 10, 2014 11:25:01

Morukai wrote:
(Reply to #33)

Morukai

Yunru wrote: