| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1MorukaiNov 08, 2014 12:46:17 | I keep seeing threads that talk about grappling someone and "moving them into" a Cloud of Daggers spell and/or "holding them there" so they take damage.
I can't see the reason the grappler would not take the same damage. Would someone care to explain to me how the grappler would avoid taking the same damage from the Cloud? |
| #2raleelNov 08, 2014 13:18:44 | Nothing says the grappler is in the same space as the grappled. There is no "step into" part. so, they are next to each other. CoD is a single square |
| #3melloredNov 08, 2014 14:00:08 | It's even better, since you can drag them out and into the squre, dealing damage both on the grappler's turn, and at the start of the creatures turn. |
| (Reply to #2)Morukai |
|
| #5ElfcrusherNov 08, 2014 20:56:21 | As a DM I wouldn't allow this. In some cases RAW simply defies common sense. |
| #6Jay_Ibero_911Nov 08, 2014 21:04:31 | So many people adding things to grapple that just aren't in the rules. The ONLY consequence of grappling is that the target's speed is 0. No space sharing, no attack penalties. Absolutely NOTHING esle mechanically. |
| #7raleelNov 08, 2014 21:41:07 | There is a lot of baggage from previous editions. A lot. We experienced several examples in our friday night game yesterday. |
| #8Jordan175Nov 09, 2014 1:55:51 |
|
| (Reply to #6)Morukai |
|
| (Reply to #9)Yunru |
|
| #11Jay_Ibero_911Nov 09, 2014 7:01:30 |
|
| #12melloredNov 09, 2014 9:00:19 |
|
| #13raleelNov 09, 2014 9:40:25 |
GET INTO THE CLOOOUUUUD! |
| #14ElfcrusherNov 09, 2014 9:58:23 |
|
| #15Ganymede425Nov 09, 2014 14:43:21 |
|
| #16ElfcrusherNov 09, 2014 18:20:42 |
|
| (Reply to #15)Morukai |
|
| #18melloredNov 10, 2014 6:53:19 |
|
| #19raleelNov 10, 2014 7:16:03 | Having personally done and been a victim of the one that I posted, you are not in the same 5' space because you have portions of your bodies that are more than 5 feet apart. Just because you are interacting with your hands doesn't mean you are within the same 5' space. Otherwise monks would have to enter to punch someone. Perhapthis his one will help
Really, totally doable. The 5' space is an abstraction. You have a reach of 5'. It works fine |
| (Reply to #18)Morukai |
|
| (Reply to #19)Morukai |
|
| #22melloredNov 10, 2014 7:36:51 |
|
| (Reply to #22)Morukai |
|
| #24melloredNov 10, 2014 8:33:46 |
|
| #25slumgumNov 10, 2014 9:11:06 | Honestly when it was brought up whether allies take damage attacking into moonbeam or not I was so uninterested in the argument I just never prepared the spell again. Arguing over whether the grappler will take damage when putting the grapplee into the cloud is so much more immersion breaking and disruptive than the idea that someone might be able to shove another person into a cloud of daggers without getting hit by the daggers themself.
For some people arguing *is* fun, and if that is you and your group then by all means keep arguing - otherwise two players working in tandem to deal 4d4 damage to creature just isn't that big of a deal. |
| (Reply to #25)Morukai |
|
| (Reply to #24)Morukai |
|
| #28ElfcrusherNov 10, 2014 9:26:45 | I think we need videos.
Those of you who think Cloud of Daggers + Grapple is legitimate, go to your favorite SCA gathering, shine a spotline in a circle, and try to hold somebody in the circle without the light touching you.
Then post the videos.
I'm going to go start making popcorn. |
| #29melloredNov 10, 2014 9:47:09 |
|
| (Reply to #29)Morukai |
|
| #31melloredNov 10, 2014 10:09:08 |
|
| (Reply to #31)Morukai |
|
| #33YunruNov 10, 2014 10:49:30 | You're trying to argue the absense of something as support for the neccessity of something else. Unless you've two mutually exclusive outcomes, one of which must be true, that is a logical fallacy. |
| #34SmashpunkNov 10, 2014 10:58:19 | I liked the monk example given above that seemed to be overlooked.
|
| #35Jay_Ibero_911Nov 10, 2014 11:00:33 | SSince you are only using one hand to grapple someone, at worst you would only have that hand in the cloud of daggers. So if you think having only a tiny percentage of your body in the cloud is enough to take damage, then to be conceptually consistant you would have to do damage to anyone making a melee attack against someone in the cloud without a reach weapon, which is obviously not RAW or RAI. |
| #36melloredNov 10, 2014 11:25:01 |
|
| (Reply to #33)Morukai |
|