Holding both rod and wand and still casting spells ?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

Guigui_le_Yoyome

Feb 14, 2015 12:59:36

Hi all,

 

I am a french D&D player discovering this all new 5th edition. I'm a seasoned player of 3.5 ed. and Pathfinder, but in the 3.5 game I play, the team decided to convert to 5th edition. Then I discovered that my 3.5 halfling 7th level support mage had a lot to lose while going 5th (mostly because of concentration spells and the disappearance of glitterdust, which I used to spam all day), so I wonder building an all new character.

Trying to stay in the same global role of an arcane caster, I've read a lot and focused on the warlock 2 / draconic sorcerer X, which seems to be a quite solid build, especially since damage spells seem to be much more powerful than in previous editions (4th excepted).

Speaking of magic items, the DM allowed us 2 rare, 3 uncommon and 4 common items. I do not have access to the DMG yet, but I've read this very good guide about magic items (it should be added to the guide compilation thread, btw) : http://community.wizards.com/forum/player-help/threads/4179391

 

The author says that the to-hit bonuses of the rod of the pact keeper and the wand of the war mage do stack, and it seems to be true, but here is my question : if I hold the rod in one hand and the wand in the other, how can I cast spells ? I have no free hand left... Is there something I missed or didn't notice ?

 

Thanks,

 

Guigui

 

PS : sorry for the possible grammatical mistakes... I read english better than I write it... or speak it !

#2

ShinQuickMan

Feb 14, 2015 13:45:00

Warlocks can use Rods or Wands as a Spellcasting Focus, which can both be used in place of Material components without a specified price and can be cast in the same hand with which the Warlock uses their Somatic components. So for a number of spells, that Rod/Wand combo would function, but it won't work if the spell has Somatic components yet no Material components., nor will it work for spells with expensive material components.

#3

Yunru

Feb 14, 2015 14:08:21
Hold both in the same hand. Problem solved.
(Reply to #2)

ZHDarkstar

ShinQuickMan wrote:
#5

Yunru

Feb 14, 2015 16:31:11
Unless you go by logic and the dev's tweets in which just because it lacks material components doesn't mean foci can't be used for somatic components.
#6

ShinQuickMan

Feb 14, 2015 18:21:12

Yunru wrote:
#7

cowleymen

Feb 14, 2015 20:10:51

For my games, foci also take the somatic components, as your channeling your magic through said foci, so you instead point that foci instead of your hand/fingers.

#8

Archon007

Feb 14, 2015 20:33:17

I think this is more of a DM by DM case. By RAW you need an open hand for S casting, but I'd guess a lot of DMs wouldn't care. 

(Reply to #6)

Yunru

ShinQuickMan wrote:
#10

Yunru

Feb 15, 2015 1:58:18
Also not that Somatic components don't require a free hand, but free use of a hand:
S o m a t i c (S)

Spellcasting gestures might include a forceful gesticulation or an intricate set of gestures. If a spell requires a som atic com ponent, the caster must have free use of at least one hand to perform these gestures.

(Reply to #10)

Guigui_le_Yoyome

Well, thank you all, and especially ShinQuinckMan ! It's clearer to me now.

 

I dislike the idea of holding both items in one hand. Doesn't seem to be the spirit, imho. If you could do this, where is the limit ? How many rods and wands could you hold together ? As the DM, I would not accept it.

#12

Yunru

Feb 15, 2015 9:57:53
Well they require attunement, so there's your limit.
#13

Guigui_le_Yoyome

Feb 15, 2015 11:39:29

Yunru wrote:
#14

ShinQuickMan

Feb 15, 2015 12:20:44

Yunru wrote:
#15

Kalani

Feb 15, 2015 13:05:49

AFAIK, you can only benefit from one focus at a time - as you only cast the spell using a single focus/material component. It doesn't matter how many foci you possess, they do not stack, as your focus acts as a substitute for the spells normal material component(s). 

 

#16

Yunru

Feb 15, 2015 13:30:25
Does the spell have verbal components? If not, hold one in your teeth.