| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1CrimsonAssassinOct 20, 2014 23:48:40 | Hello again, all!
Daggermaster
|
| #2NevvurOct 21, 2014 2:24:57 | I feel that 5e rogues were designed to be more utility than DPR, with sneak attack supplementing a suite of situational and non-combat class features. Giving a rogue subclass nothing but DPR combat features looks highly overpowered without even number crunching.
The most striking (hur hur) imbalance is Improved Critical. Since you get to roll all the damage dice on a critical hit, including sneak attack dice, this is just too much, too soon. I'd either go 19-20 for the entire subclass career, or switch levels with Hidden Blade, linking the 18-20 range to using cunning action. More on this below...
Dagger Tosser and Dagger Flurry seem reasonable given their limitations to daggers. I'm not keen on the idea of giving rogues Extra Attack on general principle, but then lots of rogues MC fighter to gain that perk and more, so why the hell not.
Hidden Blade defeats the purpose of imposing limitations on sneak attack in the first place. The rogue is effectively gaining advantage on every attack against every enemy. Seems a bit much. Compare to Oath of Enmity, which at least has a 1 use/short rest limitation. Despite being a much higher level class feature than Oath of Enmity, I'd impose a uses/frequency/target restriction. Taken with the above suggestion about linking Improved Critical to cunning action instead, and you need not choose between the two subclass features.
In fact, I'd rather see Hidden Blade as the level 3 feature, usable once and lasts a minute against a target you declare, and recharges on short rest. Fluff it up as saying enemies are wise to your maneuvers after killing one of their buddies with it. Then make Improved Critical your level 13 ability, granting an 18-20 crit range with cunning action.
Counterstab seems okay.
Overall, I think this subclass would balance out by replacing any of the features with something not expressly made for stabbing. Or if you're enamored with all these combat features, at least grant expertise to performance when the rogue is juggling knives. |
| #3YunruOct 21, 2014 2:25:46 | Hidden Blade+Improved Critical=27.75% chance of getting a critical. Hidden Blade+Improved Critical+Dagger Flurry=52.200625% chance of getting at least one critical. That's over 50% chance of doubling ALL you damage dice for one attack, and thus your insane amounts of SA dice. |
| #4Jay_Ibero_911Oct 21, 2014 5:46:46 | There is a drawback to critfishing with sneak attack though. Every time you hit but don't crit you have the hard decision to make of either applying your sneak attack to the non-crit, or saving it for another attack and risk not getting another hit and thus wasting your sneak attack. So while the chance of getting at least one crit is high, the odds of saving sneak attack just for crits or your lastsneak attack and having it go to waste are more difficult to calculate. |
| #5YunruOct 21, 2014 6:06:40 | Yeah but the chances of missing with advantage are low enough that that's a negliable concern. |
| #6Jay_Ibero_911Oct 21, 2014 6:38:55 | Well lets see. Starting with two attacks with advantage, the odds of hitting but not critting on the first attack and missing on the second: Assuming base 50% hit chance and the 18-20 crit range, you hit but not crit on 11-17. So the odds of rolling in the 11-17 range on at least one and not rolling 18-20 on either would be: 1-.25(the odds of missing)-.2775(the odds of critting)=.4725
The odds of missing on the second attack is a simple .25. So the odds of hitting but not critting on the first attack and missing on the second attack then are:.25*.4725=.1181, or roughly 12% chance of wasting sneak attack if not applies to the first hit.
When you have 3 attacks it becomes trickier. You could have a non-crit hit and 2 misses, or 2 non-crit hits and a miss. Non-crit and 2 misses=.0295, roughly 3% chance 2 Non-crits and a miss=.0558, roughly 6% chance. Total chance of wasting SA if only applied to crits or last attack if non-crit hit=.0853, roughly 9% chance.
So once you have 3 attacks with advantage, it's a small but still noticeable risk of wasting sneak attack if not applied if you hit with your first attack. If you get 2 non-crit hits first, then your odds of your last attack being a miss are nearly doubled from the previous attack. So this proves that waiting to apply sneak attack only on a crit or your last attack does have a significant risk of not getting to use it at all. Obviously this is less of an issue against lower AC targets, and more of an issue against higher AC targets (although against very high ACs it becomes less of an issue when your chance of critting is greating than your chance of hitting but not critting). |
| #7YunruOct 21, 2014 7:57:57 | It still givess you slightly more than a 1 in 4 chance of critting with each attack, for slightly more than 1 in 2 chance of getting double SA damage as long as you're willing to risk a 10% chance of doing no SA damage. That's most definitely OP. |
| #8melloredOct 21, 2014 8:19:06 |
|
| #9CrimsonAssassinOct 21, 2014 10:23:27 | Thanks everyone for the input! And yes, I did try to think of fluffy stuff to put into the archetype, like performance with juggling knives, but I couldn't really think of anything too useful other than it's actual use (stabbing people). I do not aim to make it an overpowered archetype and I know the rogue is more utility than combat-oriented. If anyone has any ideas on how to use a dagger in a non-combat situation, I am all ears! |
| #10CrimsonAssassinOct 22, 2014 11:10:00 | Idea on editing Dagger Flurry and removing Counterstab |
| #11melloredOct 22, 2014 11:48:25 |
|
| #12ElfcrusherOct 22, 2014 20:11:42 | Slightly off-topic, but this thread made me think of something: the description of the Attack Action says that if you may make multiple attacks you can do so with one action. Does that mean you roll and resolve each attack indepenently, or can you do so all at once? I.e., serial or parallel?
This matters because if you do it in parallel you can indeed go "crit fishing" but waiting to see if either attack is a crit, and then say, "I'm using my Sneak Attack on that one."
Is there anything in RAW that either makes this valid or illegal? |
| #13NevvurOct 22, 2014 23:35:43 | Serial.
"...you can attack twice, instead of once, whenever you take the attack action." Interpret this as, the second attack is an option, but only after making the first attack. |
| #14ElfcrusherOct 23, 2014 8:46:28 |
|
| #15cowleymenOct 24, 2014 5:27:34 | Unless your swinging two weapons at once, you cant hit at the same time. As far as I can read into your querry though, thats just all about what order dice are rolled in, or what grouping you should roll them in. I would still do one at the time, cause if you kill a creature with 1 out of 3 attacks, and you rolled/declared all three attacks at once on it, could say you just continue to hack away at a dead body.
For sneak attack though, you can declare it after rolling the two hit. One of the advantages of duel weilding as rouge, if you do miss with first attack, you can try for the second (bonus action) attack to get it in. |