How is this build?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

Tal-eth

Oct 10, 2014 13:40:36

Hello all

 

I have been trying to plan a character's 20 levels, and I thought I would get your feedback.

 

Race:  Variant Human

 

Starting Stats:

Str:  12

Dex: 16

Con: 14

Int:    8

Wis:  10

Cha: 14

 

Feats:

Dual Wielder

 

Proposed Level Progression:

1   Paladin     11 Paladin

2   Paladin     12 Paladin

3   Paladin     13 Paladin

4   Paladin     14 Paladin

5   Figher       15 Paladin

6   Rogue       16 Paladin

7   Rogue       17 Paladin

8   Rogue       18 Fighter

9   Rogue       19 Fighter

10 Rogue       20 Fighter

 

The character would dual wield rapiers beginning at level 5--at that level he would pick up the Two-Weapon Fighting feature from the Fighter class.  The Rogue levels are to add some bonus damage (Sneak Attack), and the Uncanny Dodge class feature.  In order to hold on to an ASI, 4 levels of fighter are taken, which nets 4 Superiority Dice if Battle Master is taken.  The 11 levels of Paladin are for the Improved Divine Smite and some of the defensive class features.

 

Thanks for any and all help!!

#2

Gruff_Ironfist

Oct 10, 2014 14:19:09

At a glance, I'd say take Paladin at 5th level, so you get the Extra Attack much, much sooner. Otherwise, you are waiting until 11th character level to get it (once you are finally paladin class level 5). Mutliclass rules are clear about the fact you don't get this feature merely by being Paly 4 / Fighter 1.

 

You can also start dual-wielding at level 1, even without the fighting style. You simply don't get to add the DEX mod to your off-hand rapier attacks until you do have the fighting style, but that doesn't stop you from dual-wielding.

#3

Tal-eth

Oct 10, 2014 14:04:41

Gruff_Ironfist wrote:
(Reply to #3)

Gruff_Ironfist

I think Fighter 2/Rogue 3 or Ranger 3/Rogue 2 will put out more damage in the low levels than trying to squeeze in Paladin, unless that is a prerequisite of Adv.League (I don't know anything about AL).

 

If pure Paladin, after you switch progressions, I'd also suggest going straight to Paladin 6 by 6th character level, as that aura is amazing and very useful early on.

 

I'm also not (personally) sold on the idea of Fighter Battle Master as the best investment. Rather than Fighter 4, you could grab 3 levels of Ranger for Hunter's Mark spell and Hunter archetype and Colossus Slayer or Horder Breaker, whichever damage add you like more. And it still leaves you able to get 1 level of Fighter for another fighting style (+1 AC from Defense) or 1 more level of Rogue for another 2 Expertise skills or 1 more level of Paladin for a feat.

#5

Coredump00

Oct 10, 2014 14:38:53

If getting fighter 1, it is hard to pass up Action Surge at Fighter 2.

 

 

#6

Tal-eth

Oct 10, 2014 14:42:31

Gruff_Ironfist wrote:
#7

Tal-eth

Oct 10, 2014 14:46:47

Coredump00 wrote:
#8

Tal-eth

Oct 11, 2014 9:35:58

Any other comments or suggestions?  I value your feedback

#9

Yunru

Oct 11, 2014 9:51:59

Why the four levels of fighter? I can possibly get the one level dip for Two-Weapon fighting (although it only adds +5 damage to one attack per round, and thus really isn't worth it), two for Action surge but four? You're probably better off ignoring Fighter completely. Pick up some more rogue or Paladin why not?

(Reply to #9)

Tal-eth

Yunru wrote:
#11

Yunru

Oct 11, 2014 10:13:59

Eh, one of paladin, then three of another. Could be Rogue, if you've high Cha and your table thinks invocation prerequisites works off of character level, three in Warlock to add Cha to your damage.

 

EDIT: Hell, 1 in Paladin and 3 in Fighter gets you the dice and the ABI, but you can get the ABI earlier.

(Reply to #11)

Tal-eth

Yunru wrote:
#13

Gruff_Ironfist

Oct 11, 2014 16:02:18

You might want to prioritize the elements of the build you think are most important. This will help plot out when to take various class levels for their features. For example, if you think Improved Divine Smite is very important, recognize that your build in the original post doesn't get that until 17th level. Thus, you don't get to enjoy it that long (for just 4 levels). This feels kind of late for something like that.

 

Additionally, it is worth taking time to make sure you'll enjoy the character at different levels of play, especially after you've locked in your AL build.

 

If you really want heavy Paladin in the mix, I would recommend Paladin 11 (vengeance) / Fighter 2 / Rogue 3 (assassin) / Ranger 3 (hunter) for 19 levels, then for level 20 you get another ASI from either Paladin 12, Rogue 4 or Ranger 4. But it honestly won't matter at that point (grin). Instead of Uncanny Dodge class ability from Rogue (which uses a reaction to halve damage), take the Defensive Duelist feat (which uses a reaction to make an attack possibly miss altogether, and works with your finesse/rapier). This build gets you the Improved Divine Smite, burning paly slots for divine smites, vow of enmity, +2d6 sneak dice, action surge, colussus slayer (or horder breaker), hunter's mark, cunning action, expertise, second wind, LoHands, and the 2 paly auras. You also get 3 fighting styles (defense +1 AC from paladin, two-weapon fighting from fighter, and +2 archery ranged attacks from ranger for thrown/returning weapons or bow attacks).

 

While the build has huge benefit in class features, you are weak on ASI. You'll only get 3 of them (human variant and two more from paladin 4th/8th). So its pretty light there. Personally, I'd probably dual-wield scimitars (which are both light and finesse, allowing you to skip DW feat), and grab Defensive Duelist and then pump DEX from 16 to 20 with the other two ASIs. This boosts attack, damage, DEX saves, DEX skills and AC.

 

Just some thoughts.

(Reply to #13)

Tal-eth

Gruff_Ironfist wrote:
#15

ppaladin123

Oct 11, 2014 18:38:32

You cannot multiclass at all unless your strength is 13 so you'll find to spend an ability boost to do this. You have to meet the multiclass stat requirements for ALL classes, even the one you start with.

#16

Gruff_Ironfist

Oct 11, 2014 19:44:27

ppaladin123 wrote:
(Reply to #15)

Tal-eth

ppaladin123 wrote:
(Reply to #17)

Gruff_Ironfist

Tal-eth wrote: