New to 5E when is a good time to multiclass?

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

atuthaj

Jun 26, 2015 14:11:30

Just started playing 5E last night and I'm gonna be a Swashbuckling rogue, dual wielding of course. Just had a few questions.

1. I was thinking of multiclassing into fighter, I've never Multiclassed but I'm told it's very well balanced in 5E. Some of the benefits seem really well for DW rogue. But I'm having a hard time deciding when a good time to Multiclass would be? The soonest I can think of is lvl 5? If I dont want to miss a stat/feat oppertunity.Furthermore how much time should I spend in fighter? It would be nice to get the manuvers from battermaster. would I be sacrificing much if I go fighter from 5-8? Would it be better to go 4-7?

 

2. Also is it pointless trying to get DW feat before my dex is 20? (it's 18 now) I was reading and my friend/DM was telling that it really isn't that big of a benefit if you don't have a 20 dex and getting to 20 should be more important.

 

3. Can I even be a Swashbuckler and battlemaster? If the answer to this is yes, and the answer to should I do it is also yes, what manuvers should I look at?

 

Thanks that's all i've got for now, it feels really good to be playing again. Cant wait for next week.

#2

drizzt_zylo

Jun 26, 2015 15:17:27
1 there is a rogue guide that might give u a clue as to how far you want to take fighter. 2 as far as I can tell you can take or leave DW the fighter fighting style is much more worth it. 3 yes take what u like just try not to overlap.
#3

FrogReaver

Jun 26, 2015 15:19:40

atuthaj wrote:
#4

atuthaj

Jun 26, 2015 23:26:26

When you suggest fighter 5 or 6? Are you suggesting I go fighter dureing level 5 or 6? Or that I take 5 or 6 levels in fighter? Or perhaps that I just be a fighter for levels 5-6? Sorry I'm probably over analyzing..

#5

Weezel

Jun 27, 2015 6:38:27

I think you can get pretty good mileage out of Rogue 3, then Fighter 5, then back into Rogue (and you can pick up a 6th fighter level for stats/feats whenever you feel it's worth it later on).  That will get you Fighting Style, Extra Attack, and Battlemaster moves (some of which can be used to sneak attack), all good stuff!

#6

jaappleton

Jun 27, 2015 6:45:50

Anyone suggesting to take five levels of Fighter is because they want you to have two attacks. Let's say you're rocking two rapiers. So call it 1d8+4 with each attack, that's an average of 9 damage. Nine extra damage per round, PLUS another swing with which to get Sneak Attack (Granted, you can only apply its damage once per turn... But every chance to do it is important).

#7

Nevvur

Jun 27, 2015 9:25:35

They're suggesting you take rogue for the first 3 levels, and fighter for the next 5 or 6, switching back to rogue when you hit Character Level 8 or 9. I agree this is a pretty optimal progression.

 

As for maxing dex vs. DW... It's more beneficial to go dex first. Either route provides equal damage (assuming you are choosing 2xrapier with DW), but dex will improve several skills, a saving throw, AC at all times (not just when you are wielding two weapons), and initiative. The only advantage DW has over dex is the ability to draw both weapons on your turn without spending an action, so it may be more attractive if you like the idea of switching between ranged and melee combat. 

 

 

#8

atuthaj

Jun 27, 2015 13:15:33

Will it hurt my progression much to jump to fighter at 4? I mean, to not get the Dex upgrade? Or should I be fine since I have a 18 in my dex already?

#9

Coredump00

Jun 27, 2015 13:39:22

If you are planning on being more rogue than fighter...I would start rogue. 

Then don't worry about the order.... there really isn't a 'best' option.  Each of those early fighter and rogue levels have some goodness for you.

 

You will want to get to fighter 5 or 6 at some point.... but pick whatever order seems fun to you.  (I would suggest at somepoint being Rogue 5/Fighter 5-6..... how you get there is up to you.)

 

(Reply to #9)

Nevvur

Coredump00 wrote:
#11

Enevhar_Aldarion

Jun 28, 2015 16:36:13

You do not mention what level your DM expects the characters to reach before the campaign ends, but it is a big difference on what to take if the characters are expected to only hit 10th level versus 12th or 15th, etc.

#12

Sorsohka

Jun 29, 2015 7:31:28

atuthaj wrote:
#13

Yunru

Jun 29, 2015 7:38:54
Note that there are feats (Crossbow Expert, Polearm Master, possibly Sentinel) that grant an extra attack. Having one of those gives you a lot of slack when multiclassing with class that get Extra Attack. The easiest way to get these is as a variant Human.

As a Rogue/Fighter the optimal first five levels is Rogue 1/Fighter 2/Rogue 3 though. Rogues are a special case because they don't rely on Extra Attack for their power boost.

(Reply to #13)

Sorsohka

Yunru wrote:
#15

Yunru

Jun 29, 2015 8:11:33
Rogue 1/Fighter 2/Rogue 3 has a nova of 2 attacks with an extra 2d6 each once per rest. Rogue 1/Fighter 4 doesn't get +2d6, they get +1d6. Not sure where you were getting an extra d6 from.
(Reply to #15)

Sorsohka

Yunru wrote:
#17

Yunru

Jun 29, 2015 9:48:15
You ready an attack with one action, attack with the other. Readied action goes off on someone else's turn; voila, double Sneak Attack.

Not to mention my way gets you the L3 subclass feature which is definitely comparable (when combined with the extra sneak attack damage) to simply swinging again. AND comes earlier than your build's Extra Attack.

#18

mellored

Jun 29, 2015 10:15:42

Precision attack is pretty good for rogues, who have a lot riding on a single attack.

(Reply to #17)

Sorsohka

Yunru wrote:
(Reply to #19)

Yunru

Sorsohka wrote:
(Reply to #20)

Sorsohka

Yunru wrote:
#22

Yunru

Jun 29, 2015 11:04:58
The wall o' text response, the typos caused by fast typing, the aggressive langauge, etc.

The signs are all there. Especially since it happened twice.

(Reply to #12)

Coredump00

Sorsohka wrote:
(Reply to #19)

Coredump00

Sorsohka wrote:
(Reply to #21)

Coredump00

Sorsohka wrote:
(Reply to #22)

Sorsohka

Yunru wrote:
#27

Yunru

Jun 30, 2015 8:24:48
Je ne comprende pas tu. Je ne pas francais.

...

I think.

#28

Mommy_was_an_Orc

Jun 30, 2015 8:34:53

Coredump00 wrote:
(Reply to #27)

Sorsohka

Yunru wrote:
(Reply to #28)

Coredump00

Mommy_was_an_Orc wrote:
(Reply to #29)

Coredump00

Sorsohka wrote:
#32

Mommy_was_an_Orc

Jun 30, 2015 13:50:54

 

 

 

Coredump00 wrote: