| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1NirvanSNov 20, 2014 8:22:57 | I did not realize that their spells are fixed like Sorcerers. I don't understand the reasoning behind that. I think they should be able to change spells freely as Clerics, Druids, Paladins, and Wizards. What are your thoughts. |
| #2melloredNov 20, 2014 8:45:55 | IMO, only wizards should be able to swap spells. |
| #3cowleymenNov 20, 2014 10:16:16 | Im actually surprised rangers arent a 1/3rd caster with a subclass that gives you the spells. But rangers have never been the knees bees at casting, and I think having their spells fixed is an extension of their outdoors man with awesome tricks theme. To me their spellcasting should just be secondary to their physical powers. |
| #4NirvanSNov 20, 2014 10:26:32 | But it is interesting that ( excluding Bard) the spellcasters who are allowed to change spells can increase the number they know based on their wisdom/intelligence. But the casters who can't change their spells can't increase their number. They are being penalized twice. That is not fair. I know, nothing is fair in love & war |
| #5NirvanSNov 20, 2014 10:36:52 | Additionally, Paladins have just as many abilities but can know more spells and change them after rest. |
| #61eejitNov 20, 2014 10:49:52 | Why are you making threads for every thought that pops into your head as well as posting the same thing in the more general class threads? Spam is bad. |