| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|
| #1MasterNamerApr 23, 2015 9:57:10 | Wild shape has a lot of text and it seems like there's some room for clarification. Which category of weapon do natural weapons fit into? The PHB says that there are only two weapon categories, simple and martial (pg. 146). If there are only two categories, and a character is proficient in both, would the character be able to use his or her proficiency instead of those of the wild shape form? |
| #2Tempest_StormwindApr 23, 2015 10:07:24 | |
| #3melloredApr 23, 2015 10:07:52 | |
| #4NoctaemApr 23, 2015 10:24:00 | |
| (Reply to #4)MasterNamer | |
| (Reply to #2)MasterNamer | |
| #7Tempest_StormwindApr 23, 2015 11:49:21 | |
| #8MasterNamerApr 27, 2015 9:23:55 | @Tempest_Stormwind. The chain example is interesting, but I'm not entirely convinced. The improvised weapon rules seem to cover the chain (PHB, p. 147).The alter self spell seems to suggest that natural weapons are unarmed strikes (PHB, p. 211). |
| (Reply to #7)MasterNamer | |
| #10melloredApr 24, 2015 7:04:53 | |
| (Reply to #10)MasterNamer | |
| (Reply to #10)MasterNamer | |
| #13melloredApr 27, 2015 9:39:46 | |
| (Reply to #13)MasterNamer | |
| #15Kentor_Slowhand_02Apr 28, 2015 13:57:42 | I would say no. Armour profencies, I would think are referring to humanoid type armour. |
| (Reply to #15)MasterNamer | |