| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1dugald_the_lexicographerMay 26, 2004 17:54:45 | A player in our group is arguing that his mage should have an extra bonus to dispel other magics, because his mage's magic is "potent" per the class/kit description (Halruaan Mage from Wizards and Rogues of the Realms). The same argument should apply to any wizards with special focus, so here it is in general terms:
|
| #2zombiegleemaxMay 26, 2004 19:00:10 | I wouldn't allow it. It just looks like a case of a clever rules lawyer jockying for extra powers the rules clearly do not intend for him to have (Otherwise they would have said so.) using a cleverly put together argument in his favor (Citing source which are not only optional, but unrelated-sans spin doctoring to the issue at hand.). It reeks of 3e, the attempted use of a "universal" logic in a system where logic was not nessecirly based on percieved notions of class equality or congruency of applied terminology ("Potent".). Edit: Fixed spelling. |
| #3zombiegleemaxMay 27, 2004 1:45:32 | Falstaff said it all...I agree 100%. |
| #4dugald_the_lexicographerMay 27, 2004 9:57:43 | Thanks for weighing in gents! |