| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1zombiegleemaxNov 25, 2006 13:11:13 | Could some one help me if possible... I'm trying to find the name of the artist that did the cover of Red cover of the Basic Box set (you know, the one with the male wizard and female fighter with spear fighting the ddragon). Google is not being much help. Many thanks for anyone who can help me.. |
| #2zombiegleemaxNov 25, 2006 13:37:48 | http://www.fierydragon.com/db/2003-07-09.htm could be wrong has a male fighter with spear and female wizard Erol Otus did that artwork |
| #3agathoklesNov 26, 2006 2:10:09 | http://www.fierydragon.com/db/2003-07-09.htm Actually, all D&D Basic sets have adventurers fighting a dragon -- and all except the Red Box (BECMI, fourth edition) feature a fighter and a wizard. But the Erol Otus cover seems nearest to what described by the OP. |
| #4realmasterNov 28, 2006 23:09:04 | Red cover of the Basic Box set Elmore |
| #5robertfisherNov 29, 2006 9:12:21 | If I recall correctly, identifying the sets by their editors: Holmes (1st) Basic Set: Sutherland Moldvay (2nd) Basic Set: Otus Mentzer (3rd) Basic Set: Elmore Later ("The Classic D&D game"), I don't know. |
| #6zombiegleemaxNov 29, 2006 11:42:35 | the red boxed set is the Mentzer version. so the answer would be Elmore. |
| #7caeruleusNov 29, 2006 14:14:12 | To show the pictures for each of these (and maybe allow the OP to state which one he had in mind):Holmes (1st) Basic Set: Sutherland ![]() Moldvay (2nd) Basic Set: Otus ![]() Mentzer (3rd) Basic Set: Elmore ![]() |
| #8caeruleusNov 29, 2006 14:16:08 | the red boxed set is the Mentzer version. But the Moldvay Basic booklet was also red. |
| #9zombiegleemaxDec 01, 2006 12:35:46 | But the Moldvay Basic booklet was also red. some would argue the box was magenta. :P |
| #10caeruleusDec 02, 2006 18:34:35 | some would argue the box was magenta. :P Sure. But given that the booklet was red, some people mistakenly say that the box was red, even though they nonetheless mean to refer to the Moldvey set. |