Melnibonean Mythos from D&DG posted.

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

Kamelion

May 25, 2004 11:21:03
Hey folks. You may have seen this - if not, enjoy ;)

If you scroll down you'll see that the Melnibonean mythos is reproduced directly from the original version of Deities & Demigods. The second half is on the next page...

Link.
#2

jeff

May 27, 2004 13:04:39
Seems that your link is broken.
#3

Kamelion

May 27, 2004 13:10:09
Works for me. Odd. This is the url:

http://www.multiverse.org/content-45.html

You can also reach it from the multiverse.org frontpage by taking the "Gaming" link to the left. Ho hum...
#4

zombiegleemax

May 27, 2004 17:52:04
Excellent. I have always wanted to see thier old D&DG write ups. Thanks.
#5

snowbeark

May 28, 2004 0:11:37
Old news.



(ducks the d12 pun-damage)
#6

zombiegleemax

May 28, 2004 9:20:43
Here's a tasty tidbit of info on the subject, quoted from Ye One True Boss on another site's forum, italics are mine, for emphasis and I have edited out a personal reference and clarified Brian Blume's role:

There were no royalties involved in the dropping of the two authored fiction pantheons from the book. I had a letter from Michael Moorcock granting the Melnibonean Pantheon rights gratis because of my plugging his books. [The boss of another game company] wasn't happy, as they had licensed the Elric material from Michael's agent. I said we would mention their game, and he agreed they would then do the same for our book. Brian [Blume, majority partner in TSR] refused to plug any other game company, so he personaly ordered the removal of that section from the DEITIES & DEMIGODS book.
The HPL material used was all out of copyright, but we agreed with Arkam House that protecting the property was a good idea, so the Lovecraftian material was voluntarily removed.

So the Chthulu stuff was axed out of altruism, and the Elric stuff could have stayed if not for one fella's jealousy. Gotta love these historical anecdotes.
#7

greylord

May 28, 2004 17:09:09
Thanks, nice link.
#8

zombiegleemax

May 29, 2004 17:05:38
Ok, I'm going to leave the link since the link has stated their copyright stance - itwould be advisable to review. However, let refrain from discussing copyright infringement and examples of such on the boards. Thanks.
#9

zombiegleemax

Jun 06, 2004 11:40:50
Dear all. This is the webmaster of multiverse.org and I appreciate the conversation in this thread. I noticed because we get a steady flow of hits from this site. The reason that link didn't work is because we were having an outage. Sorry about that.

At Moorcock's Weekly Miscellany you'll find Michael's comments on this very subject by performing a search at our forum. As the Elric movie approaches, I expect a rejuvenation in interest in this material and have preserved it for the future with permission. I hope gamers find it useful. This stuff, overall, is forgotten lore and deserves to be remembered.

Best,
Berry Sizemore
#10

caeruleus

Jun 06, 2004 12:45:00
Originally posted by multiverse
As the Elric movie approaches,

An Elric movie?!? Where can we find details about this???
#11

solaris

Jun 07, 2004 1:08:57
An Elric movie?!? Where can we find details about this???

A year and a half ago, or thereabouts, it was announced that Universal Studios had optioned Elric for a movie. That doesn't, of course, mean it will ever get made, and I haven't found any other details since then.

[ Edit: http://www.multiverse.org/article30.html ]

My pessimistic side guesses that Universal Studios may have only acquired the rights as a just-in-case measure with a view towards possibly cashing in on the success of the Lord of the Rings.

Here's CNN talking about it (and talking out of its ass, calling the Elric saga "Tolkien-esque"): http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/24/film.elric.reut/

I'd really like to see such a movie, if it were done well. But I have very little faith that it would be.
#12

Kamelion

Jun 07, 2004 2:11:29
There is a thread about the movie over on the multiverse site (well, a few actually). Here is the largest .
#13

solaris

Jun 07, 2004 2:16:17
WARNING: Fan casting suggestions.
#14

Kamelion

Jun 07, 2004 2:39:50
Heh heh. Pages and pages of the flipping things .
#15

robertfisher

Jun 07, 2004 13:34:17
Originally posted by multiverse
At Moorcock's Weekly Miscellany you'll find Michael's comments on this very subject by performing a search at our forum.

Hmm. I did find a thread on the D&DG, but no posters seemed to me Michael. Can you suggest a keyword? Or maybe just give the title of the thread? Or--I know, crazy idea--maybe a link?
#16

zombiegleemax

Jun 07, 2004 23:16:24
Originally posted by RobertFisher
Hmm. I did find a thread on the D&DG, but no posters seemed to me Michael. Can you suggest a keyword? Or maybe just give the title of the thread? Or--I know, crazy idea--maybe a link?

Sorry. The specific question was posed in my old database. I have yet to port that. But I looked at it manually. Here's the comment I was referring to:

Vistor to multiverse.org asked -

Q: I used to play role playing games in the late 70's and I came across one of my old books at the weekend called Deities,Demi-gods and Heroes by TSR. Inside it had Statistics for your some of characters, I seem to recall you saying that this copy was withdrawn due to copyright issues. Is this correct? If so I wonder if its worth a few quid! You'll be glad to know that Elric has some of the most potent stats ever recorded in the role playing world.

Michael Moorcock replied -

A: I gave both TSR and Chaosium the okay to use my characters. In those days it wasn't big business. Then Chaosium threatened to sue TSR (even though both had equal rights) and because I hardly knew what was happening suddenly Chaosium 'own' the game rights. They have controlled the board and card game rights ever since. I haven't been happy with their presentation or distribution, though have no quarrel with most of the texts, though they are currently breaking their contract terms by not showing
them to me before they come out. I'm going to have to deal with all this soon. I don't know if the book's worth a few quid or not. You could see if anyone makes you an offer. I don't think I ever had one.

That is the extent of his remarks. Universal have optioned all rights. I suspect Chaosium are going to find themselves fighting some big time legal battles eventually.
#17

robertfisher

Jun 08, 2004 12:46:00
Thanks, mulitverse. Very interesting.
#18

zombiegleemax

Jun 11, 2004 7:33:36
So, what did you guys think of the website? Isn't it amazing that this guy is busy answering readers questions? BTW, if you know alot about ELRIC and STORMBRINGER RPGs, your threads would be appreciated.

Cheers!
#19

Kamelion

Jun 11, 2004 11:27:42
Long-time lurker and occasional poster on the old Q&A boards(long-gone black & white simplicity, heh heh). Mike is the man .
#20

robertfisher

Jun 11, 2004 12:06:11
So, what did you guys think of the website?

Well, I'd already been there a few times. I like it, except when it makes me scroll left & right.

Isn't it amazing that this guy is busy answering readers questions?

No. It's amazing that others don't do likewise. Mr. Moorcock has always left a good impression on me.

I am always amazed when I recall that Lin Carter & Fritz Lieber wrote articles for Dragon. Not fiction, mind you, but gaming articles. Fletcher Pratt was a gamer too.
#21

zombiegleemax

Jun 12, 2004 15:19:50
Originally posted by Kamelion
Long-time lurker and occasional poster on the old Q&A boards(long-gone black & white simplicity, heh heh). Mike is the man .

I remember you handle. The black version of the site exists now. When you create a membership at the site, you can go to "Your Account" and choose a theme. There is one called "Black Blade". That has a little flash in it. It is a popular theme, though it is a stylistic black version of the plain white one, not an exact duplicate of multiverse.org's pleasant high contrast, but a great inversion. Though it isn't the simplicity some of us crave (can you believe I used to get complaints about how difficult the old site was to use?), the new one is easy on the eyes for all you long time lurkers...
#22

Kamelion

Jun 12, 2004 16:44:50
Nice one I'll give it a try. Those old boards could be a little odd to navigate ("Hmmm, I need the little rocket icon...") but they were pretty basic ;).
#23

shadowfoot

Jun 12, 2004 17:02:11
So who should play Elric?
#24

zombiegleemax

Jun 12, 2004 20:05:00
Originally posted by multiverse
I remember you handle. The black version of the site exists now. When you create a membership at the site, you can go to "Your Account" and choose a theme. There is one called "Black Blade". That has a little flash in it. It is a popular theme, though it is a stylistic black version of the plain white one, not an exact duplicate of multiverse.org's pleasant high contrast, but a great inversion. Though it isn't the simplicity some of us crave (can you believe I used to get complaints about how difficult the old site was to use?), the new one is easy on the eyes for all you long time lurkers...

You now also have the honor of being our 600th registered user. Congrats!
#25

zombiegleemax

Jun 20, 2004 4:27:57
..yes I'm lame and know nothing...what are Elric's stats?
#26

solaris

Jun 20, 2004 15:38:45
Originally posted by Glorified_Suffering
..yes I'm lame and know nothing...what are Elric's stats?

They're at the webpage linked in the original post.
#27

zombiegleemax

Jun 29, 2004 19:00:12
I was lucky enough to buy the DDG with the Elric and Lovecraft in it.
What were the odds, eh?
#28

deafbymetal

Jun 29, 2004 19:53:59
I also have the DDG with Elric, etc. A guy my brother went to school with gave it to him, he gave it to me about 20 years ago. Glad I kept it, did not know at the time it was discontinued. What does one go for now in good condition? Just curious, I'd never sell mine. I have to much fun letting the guys I play D&D with know I have it, and they don't ;) Also, how many copies were released before it was pulled from the shelves? Anybody know?
#29

Kamelion

Jun 30, 2004 1:42:44
It is estimated that between 10,000 and 15,000 were printed. The Acaeum lists mint price as $55 but also notes that they have changed hands for as much as $91. Check here for more info
#30

robertfisher

Jun 30, 2004 13:07:35
Originally posted by TheVillageofHommlet
I was lucky enough to buy the DDG with the Elric and Lovecraft in it.
What were the odds, eh?

I dunno, but for me the odds were pretty good. It was the only kind in existance at the time.