| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1KamelionMay 25, 2004 11:21:03 | Hey folks. You may have seen this - if not, enjoy ;) If you scroll down you'll see that the Melnibonean mythos is reproduced directly from the original version of Deities & Demigods. The second half is on the next page... Link. |
| #2jeffMay 27, 2004 13:04:39 | Seems that your link is broken. |
| #3KamelionMay 27, 2004 13:10:09 | Works for me. Odd. This is the url: http://www.multiverse.org/content-45.html You can also reach it from the multiverse.org frontpage by taking the "Gaming" link to the left. Ho hum... |
| #4zombiegleemaxMay 27, 2004 17:52:04 | Excellent. I have always wanted to see thier old D&DG write ups. Thanks. |
| #5snowbearkMay 28, 2004 0:11:37 | Old news.![]() (ducks the d12 pun-damage) |
| #6zombiegleemaxMay 28, 2004 9:20:43 | Here's a tasty tidbit of info on the subject, quoted from Ye One True Boss on another site's forum, italics are mine, for emphasis and I have edited out a personal reference and clarified Brian Blume's role:There were no royalties involved in the dropping of the two authored fiction pantheons from the book. I had a letter from Michael Moorcock granting the Melnibonean Pantheon rights gratis because of my plugging his books. [The boss of another game company] wasn't happy, as they had licensed the Elric material from Michael's agent. I said we would mention their game, and he agreed they would then do the same for our book. Brian [Blume, majority partner in TSR] refused to plug any other game company, so he personaly ordered the removal of that section from the DEITIES & DEMIGODS book. So the Chthulu stuff was axed out of altruism, and the Elric stuff could have stayed if not for one fella's jealousy. Gotta love these historical anecdotes. |
| #7greylordMay 28, 2004 17:09:09 | Thanks, nice link. |
| #8zombiegleemaxMay 29, 2004 17:05:38 | Ok, I'm going to leave the link since the link has stated their copyright stance - itwould be advisable to review. However, let refrain from discussing copyright infringement and examples of such on the boards. Thanks. |
| #9zombiegleemaxJun 06, 2004 11:40:50 | Dear all. This is the webmaster of multiverse.org and I appreciate the conversation in this thread. I noticed because we get a steady flow of hits from this site. The reason that link didn't work is because we were having an outage. Sorry about that. At Moorcock's Weekly Miscellany you'll find Michael's comments on this very subject by performing a search at our forum. As the Elric movie approaches, I expect a rejuvenation in interest in this material and have preserved it for the future with permission. I hope gamers find it useful. This stuff, overall, is forgotten lore and deserves to be remembered. Best, Berry Sizemore |
| #10caeruleusJun 06, 2004 12:45:00 | Originally posted by multiverse An Elric movie?!? Where can we find details about this??? |
| #11solarisJun 07, 2004 1:08:57 | An Elric movie?!? Where can we find details about this??? A year and a half ago, or thereabouts, it was announced that Universal Studios had optioned Elric for a movie. That doesn't, of course, mean it will ever get made, and I haven't found any other details since then. [ Edit: http://www.multiverse.org/article30.html ] My pessimistic side guesses that Universal Studios may have only acquired the rights as a just-in-case measure with a view towards possibly cashing in on the success of the Lord of the Rings. Here's CNN talking about it (and talking out of its ass, calling the Elric saga "Tolkien-esque"): http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Movies/02/24/film.elric.reut/ I'd really like to see such a movie, if it were done well. But I have very little faith that it would be. |
| #12KamelionJun 07, 2004 2:11:29 | There is a thread about the movie over on the multiverse site (well, a few actually). Here is the largest . |
| #13solarisJun 07, 2004 2:16:17 | WARNING: Fan casting suggestions. |
| #14KamelionJun 07, 2004 2:39:50 | Heh heh. Pages and pages of the flipping things . |
| #15robertfisherJun 07, 2004 13:34:17 | Originally posted by multiverse Hmm. I did find a thread on the D&DG, but no posters seemed to me Michael. Can you suggest a keyword? Or maybe just give the title of the thread? Or--I know, crazy idea--maybe a link? ![]() |
| #16zombiegleemaxJun 07, 2004 23:16:24 | Originally posted by RobertFisher Sorry. The specific question was posed in my old database. I have yet to port that. But I looked at it manually. Here's the comment I was referring to: Vistor to multiverse.org asked - That is the extent of his remarks. Universal have optioned all rights. I suspect Chaosium are going to find themselves fighting some big time legal battles eventually. |
| #17robertfisherJun 08, 2004 12:46:00 | Thanks, mulitverse. Very interesting. |
| #18zombiegleemaxJun 11, 2004 7:33:36 | So, what did you guys think of the website? Isn't it amazing that this guy is busy answering readers questions? BTW, if you know alot about ELRIC and STORMBRINGER RPGs, your threads would be appreciated. Cheers! |
| #19KamelionJun 11, 2004 11:27:42 | Long-time lurker and occasional poster on the old Q&A boards(long-gone black & white simplicity, heh heh). Mike is the man . |
| #20robertfisherJun 11, 2004 12:06:11 | So, what did you guys think of the website? Well, I'd already been there a few times. I like it, except when it makes me scroll left & right. Isn't it amazing that this guy is busy answering readers questions? No. It's amazing that others don't do likewise. Mr. Moorcock has always left a good impression on me.I am always amazed when I recall that Lin Carter & Fritz Lieber wrote articles for Dragon. Not fiction, mind you, but gaming articles. Fletcher Pratt was a gamer too. |
| #21zombiegleemaxJun 12, 2004 15:19:50 | Originally posted by Kamelion I remember you handle. The black version of the site exists now. When you create a membership at the site, you can go to "Your Account" and choose a theme. There is one called "Black Blade". That has a little flash in it. It is a popular theme, though it is a stylistic black version of the plain white one, not an exact duplicate of multiverse.org's pleasant high contrast, but a great inversion. Though it isn't the simplicity some of us crave (can you believe I used to get complaints about how difficult the old site was to use?), the new one is easy on the eyes for all you long time lurkers... |
| #22KamelionJun 12, 2004 16:44:50 | Nice one I'll give it a try. Those old boards could be a little odd to navigate ("Hmmm, I need the little rocket icon...") but they were pretty basic ;). |
| #23shadowfootJun 12, 2004 17:02:11 | So who should play Elric? ![]() |
| #24zombiegleemaxJun 12, 2004 20:05:00 | Originally posted by multiverse You now also have the honor of being our 600th registered user. Congrats! |
| #25zombiegleemaxJun 20, 2004 4:27:57 | ..yes I'm lame and know nothing...what are Elric's stats? |
| #26solarisJun 20, 2004 15:38:45 | Originally posted by Glorified_Suffering They're at the webpage linked in the original post. |
| #27zombiegleemaxJun 29, 2004 19:00:12 | I was lucky enough to buy the DDG with the Elric and Lovecraft in it. What were the odds, eh? |
| #28deafbymetalJun 29, 2004 19:53:59 | I also have the DDG with Elric, etc. A guy my brother went to school with gave it to him, he gave it to me about 20 years ago. Glad I kept it, did not know at the time it was discontinued. What does one go for now in good condition? Just curious, I'd never sell mine. I have to much fun letting the guys I play D&D with know I have it, and they don't ;) Also, how many copies were released before it was pulled from the shelves? Anybody know? |
| #29KamelionJun 30, 2004 1:42:44 | It is estimated that between 10,000 and 15,000 were printed. The Acaeum lists mint price as $55 but also notes that they have changed hands for as much as $91. Check here for more info ![]() |
| #30robertfisherJun 30, 2004 13:07:35 | Originally posted by TheVillageofHommlet I dunno, but for me the odds were pretty good. It was the only kind in existance at the time. ![]() |