"The Ten Commandments of Optimization" (redux)

Post/Author/DateTimePost
#1

jgumbyrx

Dec 01, 2009 14:08:06
Thanks to the board change, we have lost yet another bit of greatness; so I'm going to reprint it here:
from the original post by Caelic (from 10/05):


I. Thou shalt not give up caster levels.

II. Wieldest thou thy two-handed weapon with alacrity; but two weapons shalt thou not wield, excepting that thou hast a source of bonus damage such as Sneak Attack.

III. Doubt not the power of the Druid, for he is mighty.

IV. Avoid ye the temptation of Gauntlets of True Strike, for they shall lead thee astray down the Path of Non-Rule Cheese.

V. Thou shalt not give up caster levels. Verily, this Commandment is like unto the first; but of such magnitude that it bore mentioning twice.

VI. Makest thou no build with an odd number of fighter levels, for such things are not pleasing to the Spirits of Optimization.

VII. The Rules of 3.5 are paramount; invoke not the rules of 3.0 if a newer version be available.

VIII. When beseeching the Bretheren of Optimization, come thou not empty handed, lest they smite thee; rather, bringest thou thine own build, that they may offer suggestions and guidance.

IX. Invoke not "common sense," for it is not common.

X. Thou shalt call no build "The Ultimate X" unless his name be Pun-Pun, or thou shalt see thine "Ultimate" build topped by the Bretheren within five minutes of posting.

Yea, verily.
#2

anodai

Dec 01, 2009 20:19:08
Wow, that brings back memories. Sigging that...
#3

lycanthrope0

Dec 05, 2009 9:08:17
and now we need the other one that has the dont tell sme one thier choice is stupid play this instead and your DM is bad since he banned books kill him and find a new group
#4

jgumbyrx

Dec 05, 2009 16:04:45
and now we need the other one that has the dont tell sme one thier choice is stupid play this instead and your DM is bad since he banned books kill him and find a new group


do you mean this one?
#5

streamofthesky

Dec 05, 2009 22:47:35
How come commandment VI has no exception for Fighter 1?  It's a fine dip if you just need another feat slot, or for +1 BAB as a filler level to get into a prestige class.  Or to get the proficiencies, possibly to qualify for a prestige class.
#6

jgumbyrx

Dec 06, 2009 22:32:14
How come commandment VI has no exception for Fighter 1?  It's a fine dip if you just need another feat slot, or for +1 BAB as a filler level to get into a prestige class.  Or to get the proficiencies, possibly to qualify for a prestige class.



BLASPHEMY!!!  Thou shalt not question the gods of optimization, nor Their Commandments!  It suffices that the Commandments are what they are -- go forth, brother, and keep the Commandments holy.




on a serious note: this was clearly a parody -- satire, if you will (so your question is kind of a moot point; never mind that it kinda breaks the spirit of the whole thing).  To answer your question -- because taking only one more level will get you another feat, and feats rule (especially for melee builds).
#7

18DELTA

Dec 07, 2009 1:21:09
Amen brutha!
#8

innabinder

Dec 07, 2009 10:20:09
Oh, my brother, testify!
#9

lycanthrope0

Dec 08, 2009 15:22:10
and now we need the other one that has the dont tell sme one thier choice is stupid play this instead and your DM is bad since he banned books kill him and find a new group


do you mean this one?





yes thats the one
#10

datenshi_no_kai

Dec 09, 2009 16:20:48
Very Awesome, +1
#11

jgumbyrx

Apr 07, 2010 17:58:51
WOO-HOO! -- I found the archive of the original post -- HERE.
That is all.