| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1cartolisMay 19, 2009 11:53:01 | Ok, so i got a little more info about the setting we will be running in. it is going to be either totally or in part based on The Riftwar Saga by Raymond E. Feist. from what I have been able to read on the internet so far and what the gm has told me magic users will be rare. He has said that he might allow a druid but with the party makeup the others are looking at using we lack a skill monkey. using core only are there any decent druid/rogue builds or would i be better server by going rogue only? we will need a skill monkey and noone else looks to be stepping up. thus far it looks like we will have a fighter, sorceror and ranger. While I would love to play the druid of pwn I would rather not play the druid of pwn impailed in a pit trap because we didnt have a rogue. so, core only rogue druid builds? or should I go rogue only? Thanks in advance all. |
| #2phaedrusxyMay 19, 2009 12:14:55 | Bah, tell the ranger to take a level of rogue. If he doesn't, let him go first and set off all the traps. Seriously. He is the one that should be taking care of this, as his main class perfectly complements it. |
| #3cartolisMay 19, 2009 12:16:50 | Is one level going to be enough? Its been a while since I have played 3.5, but with the cross class restrictions on skill points will one level be able to beat the trap dc's we see later on? |
| #4cruMay 19, 2009 12:30:58 | Complete Adventurer has the Daggerspell Shaper PrC. Requires 2 bad feats. Gives 6+Int skills. 9/10 druid casting, wild shape, 3d6 sneak. You'll probably do better with Rogue 1/Druid 19. (Maybe martial rogue- replaces sneak with fighter feat). Also consider (if available) skilled city dweller variant skills. |
| #5magicdealerMay 19, 2009 12:39:35 | The level of Rogue is to give your ranger friend Trapfinding, which allows him to use search to find traps with a dc greater than 20. As a Ranger, he'll already have search as a class skill. If you're worried about things like open lock or... something else cross class to a ranger, you could always try to talk him into taking the Versatile feat. But seriously, rogue is great for a level dip. Bunch of extra skills, trapfinding, 1d6 sa...heck, might as well make it two for evasion. ^^ |
| #6pyro_azerMay 19, 2009 14:52:07 | Druid 20 You have summon natures ally to find traps with. |
| #7phaedrusxyMay 22, 2009 21:30:39 | Is one level going to be enough? Its been a while since I have played 3.5, but with the cross class restrictions on skill points will one level be able to beat the trap dc's we see later on? The main role of a trapfinder is to find the traps, and tell everyone else "Hey, don't step there. That's a trap!" Since Search is a Ranger class skill, a Rogue 1/Ranger 19 can do this as well as a Rogue 20 can. Then you can avoid/set off/destroy the traps however you see fit. He won't be able to pick locks or disarm traps without setting them off, but that stuff doesn't matter nearly as much as just finding them and warning the party about them. |
| #8dr_rocktopusMay 22, 2009 22:52:59 | Er. I'm famous for using trap triggers well past where the trap hits. This precise line of thinking has nearly gotten a number of my players wiped out. There was this time.... With this fuel-air bomb..... |
| #9jgumbyrxMay 22, 2009 23:28:04 | well, i think that Daggerspell Shaper + savage grapple + 2 magic daggers = pretty cool (not awesome; not broke; just cool). also, if you have a ranger in the party, see what they think of doing a Swift Hunter. if the task really is up to you, a level of scout will take care of it as well, and would be more thematic than rogue with your druid (and it's only one level). i know i just commited blaspemy, but oh well. also, what is the rest of the party? |
| #10petalredMay 23, 2009 3:20:27 | If nobody in the party wants to play a rogue, your DM should go easy on setting up situations that require a rogue. The notion that people should play a particular character to fill a certain role is bogus. People should play the characters they're going to have fun with and the DM should plan encounters and dungeons based on what his or her players are playing. |
| #11carnivoreMay 23, 2009 6:02:17 | try using Timber Rogue:Ballad of Log, The Timberrogue! :D |
| #12phaedrusxyMay 23, 2009 9:32:57 | Er. See, I think that's just the DM being annoying. It does bring up a good point, though. How trap-happy is your DM? Does he use simple traps, or complicated ones that are difficult to bypass without a dedicated trap-disarmer? I've been in some games where I don't think we encountered a single trap during the entire campaign. On the flip side, there is the Tomb of Horrors. |
| #13magicdealerMay 24, 2009 5:24:00 | This also begs another question... Just how dedicated to being good are you? One zombie makes for a very effective trap activating mechanism, and allows you to put some major distance between yourself and the trigger mech... err... the zombie. Ever used raise undead on a squirrel? Or the remains of last nights dinner? Of course, granted abilites that bypass the material component do this best. You can charm animals, use trees, and even the occasional captured foe *or peasant* to trigger those not so nice traps. Of course, possibly the best way to avoid traps in a campaign is this: player "I'm searching for traps" DM "You find a trap in the stonework ahead" players in unison" Traps!? Everyone out!" DM "Wait... where are you going? You have to *so and so*" player "Are you kidding? Someone else will have to do it! We don't do traps!" DM "You're kidding, right? Right?... Well... *throws four pages across the room* that was a good session." Or, if the DM wants to be mean... DM "As you turn to leave, the exit way collapses, leaving you trapped." player "I make camp. We have supplies for the next few weeks... I'm sure someone will come and free us." DM "You'd rather sit there and wait than deal with one trap?" player "So, are we saved yet, or do we have to start rolling versus starvation?" DM *throws four pages across the room* "Why do I game with you guys?" player "Because you work in retail, and this is the only thing that makes customer service seem good in comparison." |