| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| Original thread found HEREgideon_gideonsonJul 31, 2007 18:16:47 | The following appears almost word-for-word as LordofProcrastination wrote it: This thread has a very specific purpose. It is to be a nexus for all of the tricks, combinations, and builds which, if allowed as-is, can almost immediately ruin a game. [color=blue]Disclaimer:[/color] Intentionally ruining a game is an immature and selfish thing to do. We don't condone it. However, since there is a significant demand on the CO Board for such techniques, we might as well be efficient about it. Background: While the majority of Character Optimization either occurs in the realm of theoretical exercise or play-enhancing-build-improvement, we are continually flooded with requests for options which downright destroy the game. The requesters might be trying to prove a point to someone back home, "challenging" the capability of the CO Board in general, or just curious. The problem is that every time these requests pop up, they are either ignored or haphazardly replied to, frequently producing a whole new round of re-explanation, cross-linking, and debate. This thread aims to make the whole process a lot smoother. Methodology: The "Campaign Smashers" thread will provide a list of major combos/builds which have the capability to utterly disrupt a game. The list will include a brief explanation of each combo/build and a link to the major thread(s) discussing them. For the combos/builds which don't have their own threads, or are hard to read/access, members of the CO community can contribute their own short write-ups/explanations which will then be inserted into the main listing. Criteria: Deciding what really smashes a campaign is a tricky thing. Many optimized builds are really powerful or completely dominate in a single aspect of the game. However, this list will be dedicated to the ones which most directly and immediately can unbalance any semblance of reasonable play. Yes, having a +300 Jump check, top-notch spellcasting capabilities, or all-around-robustness is a major optimization success, and may even be "broken" in some respects, but it won't instantly make the character/game unplayable. For now, we're using a working definition of a "Campaign Smasher" as: [indent][/indent] Some "benefit of the doubt" will be given to semi-disputed combos/builds. This thread isn't about debating particular options, it's about coordinating access to them. Format: Divided by general level-availability, and then alphabetically. Note that some builds are clearly powerful both at high and low levels. Placement in the listings here is based on where they "come into their own."
And Now... This is going to be a growing list. No doubt I've missed some worthy entries and no doubt more will grow over time. By all means, please post to fill in the blanks or expand the ranks. And remember, next time someone asks for "teh most bahroken stuff CO can doo!!," save yourself the trouble and send them here. |
| #2gideon_gideonsonJul 31, 2007 18:17:22 | Semi-Smashers: This section is reserved for the assorted combinations and builds which can seriously tip the balance of a game in non-optimized play and give even CO-wary DMs and fellow players a chance to gape in awe. However, these "Semi-Smashers" are less likely to immediately and irrevocably render a campaign unplayable.
|
| #3gideon_gideonsonJul 31, 2007 18:18:08 | *Recent updates* 7/31/07 Added "Jovoc Generator" to the list "Energy Transformation Field" has moved up from Semi-smasher Added "Candle of Invocation" Added "Monty" 8/2/07 Added "1d2 Crusader" Added Epic Leadership/Epic Spellcasting combo "Component Free Wishing" has moved up from Semi-smasher Added "Outcharging the UberER Charger" to Charge builds Added "The Ghola Character" Added "Behold!" Added "Dirty Trick #5: 'Save' Game Mechanics" Added Permanent Emanation trick |
| #4gideon_gideonsonJul 31, 2007 18:19:14 | -reserved- |
| #5gideon_gideonsonJul 31, 2007 18:20:48 | To get something on this list, remember to post a link to the thread. I do not have time to go thread-hunting for something. Thanks in advance. Posting may now begin. |
| #6psly4mneJul 31, 2007 21:49:27 | Links for Monty, The Big Guys, and Teleporting Theives (probably a semi-smasher) are in my sig. [thread=777565]The Ghola Character[/thread] [thread=540563]Behold![/thread] (semi-smasher?) [thread=737126]Save Game mechanics[/thread] (semi-smasher?) [thread=705721]Candle of Invocation[/thread] [thread=347044]Permanent Emanation abuse[/thread] (scroll down to my first post) Energy Transformation Field should really be a full smasher, not a semi-smasher. You should include a link to the original. Also, I think your last post should say "posting may now begin" |
| #7gideon_gideonsonJul 31, 2007 22:31:16 | While his work impresses me, I must admit that the Ghola character gives me a headache. Probably the first post. :D Anyway, it never mentions a build that I could see. Any ideas at what level it can be accomplished? Also, while impressive, the Permenant Emanation really falls more in line with the Epic Spell/Leadership abuse. Once we find a link to that thread (or a new one about it), I think that should cover it. About your builds...Monty is in, but the others I'm not sure about. Infinite cohorts is a nice one, but may rely on to much DM interpretation. Without such DM rules, it's actually a pretty easy one to catch. The Thief one is interesting, but seems more like a neat trick that a way to smash a campaign. Opinions? |
| #8crow04Aug 01, 2007 0:08:39 | component free wishing needs to be in the full smasher category. It's been bugging me for a year, but LoP was not around |
| #9gideon_gideonsonAug 01, 2007 0:12:43 | To get something on this list, remember to post a link to the thread. I do not have time to go thread-hunting for something. I really don't want to have to go hunting for stuff. I don't know where most of this is, and haven't seen most of it to begin with. If you can, PLEASE post a link. |
| #10psly4mneAug 01, 2007 0:37:49 | While his work impresses me, I must admit that the Ghola character gives me a headache. Probably the first post. :D The intention is to get it down to level 1, but it's not there yet. I'm pretty sure it's done by level 10 anyway, so you can put it in the 1-10 section. As for the readability, that's just T_G's style. Too much overcomplication. Also, while impressive, the Permenant Emanation really falls more in line with the Epic Spell/Leadership abuse. Once we find a link to that thread (or a new one about it), I think that should cover it. It's really a different abuse, showcasing Permanent Emanation more than Epic Spellcasting. Your call though. Also, I'm pretty sure someone did at least a partial writeup of Epic Spellcasting / Mitigation in the original thread, after LoP stopped upd ated the OP. About your builds...Monty is in, but the others I'm not sure about. Infinite cohorts is a nice one, but may rely on to much DM interpretation. Without such DM rules, it's actually a pretty easy one to catch. Yeah, good call on those. I'm just fond of the thief trick because it was one of my first ideas in optimization. I skimmed the builds portion of the Handy Links thread for recent material and posted what I found. |
| #11bassetkingAug 01, 2007 19:40:51 | The 1d2 Crusader : Bassetking Non-charge-based infinite damage, produced through a combination of the Aura of Chaos stance, and the feat "Imbued Healing: Luck" Level 12, infinite damage on hit. Smasher. |
| #12lyinginbedmonAug 02, 2007 11:08:29 | I'm glad to see my old JG is still up there ![]() Here's a newer submission, utilising the wealth/level rules to achieve nigh-infinite wealth and a global workforce: The Monstrous Workforce. Available at exactly level 5. |
| #13scrulooseAug 02, 2007 13:15:27 | Glad to see the new thread. Thanks for the work that you are doing. Here is the link for epic spellcasting writeup I did a while back in the old smasher thread. Epic Spellcasting with Leadership |
| #14gideon_gideonsonAug 02, 2007 13:39:35 | sCRuLooSe: Thanks for that link. Would you mind editting to include something about the Permenant Emanation feat? I think it belongs in that write-up rather than making a new link simply for it, since to really break it requires the Epic Leadership trick to begin with. Also, would we consider the Epic Spellcasting trick to be Campaign Smashing or only Semi-Smashing? It's rather tame by most of the Epic Smashing standards, but it's still really powerful. I'm kind of torn. The Monstrous Workforce is interesting, but not exactly Campaign Smashing due to the sheer amount of time involved. Unless I get a lot of people saying otherwise, I'm not sure it merits a spot, interesting though it is. Opinions? Also, the formatting of the list keeps getting messed up whatever I do. I have NO idea what's wrong. See the 1d2 Crusader entry for an example. Any ideas on how to fix that? |
| #15psly4mneAug 02, 2007 13:45:46 | sCRuLooSe: Thanks for that link. Would you mind editting to include something about the Permenant Emanation feat? I think it belongs in that write-up rather than making a new link simply for it, since to really break it requires the Epic Leadership trick to begin with. Breaking Permanent Emanation does not require Epic Leadership. The whole point is that, since you never have to actually cast the spell chosen, you don't need to be able to producer the helper casters (if you use a ritual spell) or the XP (if you use a spell with an XP cost). That's why ES+PE is so much more broken than ES+EL. You can just research a spell that costs any amount of XP and get the effect, rather than finding followers and starting a feedback loop. For this reason, I would consider the Leadership version a semi-smasher, and the Emanation version a smasher. |
| #16gideon_gideonsonAug 02, 2007 13:56:34 | Ah. Somehow I missed that part of it. I'll fix that just as soon as I figure out my formatting problem...I can't seem to add anything in front of the rest without it breaking the list format. |
| #17psly4mneAug 02, 2007 15:27:27 | Ah. Somehow I missed that part of it. You seem to be adding {list} tags. There should only be one {list} tag at the beginning of the whole list, so if you want to add something at the beginning of the list, you have to put it after the {list} tag. To add something at the end, likewise put it before the {/list} tag. I hope that helps. |
| #18gideon_gideonsonAug 02, 2007 15:35:13 | Thanks. When I get a minute, I'll try to fix that. EDIT: Fixed. Thanks again. |
| #19gideon_gideonsonAug 02, 2007 17:07:00 | Okay. We're now up-to-date with everything I've recieved, except possibly the Monstrous Workforce, whose status I'm still debating. Again...opinions? Is it in or not? |
| #20psly4mneAug 02, 2007 17:19:34 | Epic Spellcasting + Epic Leadership is listed as a semi-smasher and a smasher. As a smasher, the linked is listed AWOL. The entry in semis should be removed and the link in smashers should point to sCRuLooSe's post. Also listed as AWOL are the component-free wish tricks. Since this entry is not a single trick, you should include several links: [thread=655556]Shadowcraft Mage Handbook[/thread] by NineInchNall [thread=248239]Cheater of Mystra[/thread] by Funny Slaughter I'm sure there are more. Mercantile Background is listed as AWOL. I'm not sure what trick that was referring to. [thread=755481]Shadow's Hidden Power[/thread] (tiluvias99) might qualify as a smasher or semi-smasher. |
| #21lyinginbedmonAug 02, 2007 17:56:10 | The Workforce can be expedited by cutting the cost of the scroll down, there's quite a few ways of doing that. Presently, it takes about 45.53 years to get exponential, which a Necropolitan human could do without a problem. Heck, there's a Warforged player of mine who's over 450 years old. |
| #22crow04Aug 02, 2007 19:04:08 | Thanks for moving the free wishes, it's been like an itch I can't scrach for like a year. edit:Maybe add Planar Shepherd in the semi-smashers cat.? I'm not sure, but it's at least on the bubble |
| #23soluphobeAug 05, 2007 14:03:41 | I'd like to petition my Immoth Break as a semi-smasher... And thanks for updating this! |
| #24scrulooseAug 06, 2007 16:59:36 | sCRuLooSe: Thanks for that link. Would you mind editting to include something about the Permenant Emanation feat? I think it belongs in that write-up rather than making a new link simply for it, since to really break it requires the Epic Leadership trick to begin with. If you would like me to, I will; but I tend to agree with psly4mne. These are two different ways to break Epic, and should probably each get their own thread. I would consider them both to be smashers, but using Permenant Emanation to bypass casting the spell entirely is a faster break. Using Epic Leadership to actually cast the spell may take more preparation, but once you have the combo cast, your CR jumps well beyond your level. I would also second the Planar Shepherd, although I consider it a full smasher, for the temporal abuses primarily. Here is the link to the handbook Planar Shepherd Handbook I would also propose the use of White Raven Tactics by 2 warblades on one another granting the characters infinite attacks to be a semi-smasher. This can be accomplished by two characters by 5th level (you only need one person if you choose to ignore the new sage ruling). Unfortunately, I do not have a link to a thread that directly describes how to do this. Basically, one of two warblades uses his swift action to give a secon warblade a new initiative that round, makes a single attack, and reset his maneuvers. The other warblade returns the favor on his new action. Rinse and repeat. This assumes a character gets one swift action when they receive initiative, not one swift action per turn. |
| #25gideon_gideonsonAug 06, 2007 22:03:37 | When I have time, I'll add the latest stuff. sCRuLooSe, nevermind the spell stuff. I worked it in as it is, and it's fine. |
| #26zombiegleemaxAug 21, 2007 3:49:26 | Bobs the Many. I'm very sad. No-one ever cares about my baby. |
| #27zombiegleemaxAug 27, 2007 12:05:08 | Chuck the whirling hurler (fastest man alive, and out damages the hulking hurler) http://forums.gleemax.com/showpost.php?p=12657563&postcount=321 Also the King of smack should probably be there, don't have the link tho |
| #28phaedrusxyAug 27, 2007 13:46:37 | The King of Smack is quite far from being a campaign smasher, or even a semi-smasher. It's just a good build. |
| #29zombiegleemaxAug 27, 2007 21:23:37 | The King of Smack is quite far from being a campaign smasher, or even a semi-smasher. It's just a good build. really, I remember him being really good, maybe its because he was the first optimized build I saw. |
| #30Tempest_StormwindAug 27, 2007 22:21:09 | He's pretty much the quintessential glass cannon. That said, Chuck is certainly better. It doesn't take anywhere near as many resources to pull off (except in the extreme case presented; one could say *exactly* the same thing about the UberERcharger, which is at its core just a simple lancer) and thus can be more robust in other areas. |
| #31NiteCyperOct 13, 2007 13:19:12 | Shadowcraft Mage. Epic Sleight of Hand to move other person 10 ft as a free action. Then they do the same. Quick Draw, assuming the feat works backwards (which I'd say has a good reason not to), lets you steal anything in the universe along the way. Your arms would probably turn to mush. |
| #32phaedrusxyOct 15, 2007 13:25:24 | Quick Draw does not work backwards, and there is no official "quick sheath" feat. |
| #33hotsakeOct 15, 2007 16:17:32 | Quick Draw does not work backwards, and there is no official "quick sheath" feat. So it's not so much "steal everything" as "strew everything about" since dropping things is a free action. |
| #34crimsondeathOct 15, 2007 18:00:17 | Just use Sleight of Hand to conceal the objects you grab on your person, taking a -20 penalty to do so as a free action. There's not even a set DC for it; it's just opposed by a Spot check for anyone who wants to notice where they are (and you probably don't care if anyone sees where they are). |
| #35hotsakeOct 16, 2007 9:56:51 | Just use Sleight of Hand to conceal the objects you grab on your person, taking a -20 penalty to do so as a free action. There's not even a set DC for it; it's just opposed by a Spot check for anyone who wants to notice where they are (and you probably don't care if anyone sees where they are). Eeeeeeexcellent... |
| #36commxOct 16, 2007 11:22:57 | Hmm, how are "they" going to use their Free Actions when its your turn? The only way in which I see this working is with a pair of Dvanti twins (Dragon Compendium) as they act together, meaning they can use their free actions on eachother. |
| #37ancientdragonNov 11, 2007 7:01:10 | Sorry, i didn't saw that build to have infinite arcane spells... Does it yet exist on this forum or not? |
| #38soluphobeNov 11, 2007 12:38:27 | You mean the Arcane Nova? Yeah...it exists. The first few versions got shot down, but T_G reincarnated it a while ago (I think he used Triad Spell combined with free metamagic cheese to get a ton of Absorptions, which he discharged as Triad Absorptions and Arcane Fusions of damaging spells into himself, gaining more slots for Triad Absorptions...). Yeah, you'd have to ask him. |
| #39the_mad_linguistNov 11, 2007 12:56:13 | IIRC, one of the earlier arcane novas works again thanks to the errata on arcane thesis. |
| #40ancientdragonNov 11, 2007 14:38:44 | You mean the Arcane Nova? No, it isn't Arcane Nova... and Absorption doesn't figure in it. It's a Bard-based build... I think I'll post it. |
| #41billthemaniacNov 14, 2007 20:26:25 | According to the thread "Outcharging the UbERCharger" is non-RAW-legal, due to the use of weapons too large to wield. Might want to remove it. |
| #42austin_sjNov 19, 2007 23:17:36 | I'm glad that this list is here as all I have to do is add it to my home rules for what is not included, this stuff is crazy, if there is anyone out there who has used one of these things in a campaign, did your DM resort to the real life tactic of punching you? |
| #43KazunNov 28, 2007 13:33:04 | This is something that came to me the other day... certainly not a campaign-smasher (to be honest, I was proud of coming up with it, but when I got on these forums I felt a bit... outclassed? ;) ). Anyway, a lesser bag of holding can hold 250lbs or 30 cubic feet (whichever comes first). I would think it's safe to assume that if you dangled a rope into one, it would be 30 feet to the "back wall" of it. Then, you take a rope of the appropriate length (with about a foot to spare), dip one end in some sovereign glue, and lower it into the bag until it is secure on the far side. Your next step is getting all the air out of the bag. The DMG say that there is "ten minutes of air" inside a bag, which is pretty vague considering different creatures will have different oxygen requirements. Anyway, I would think putting a creature inside and waiting ten minutes should get rid of it. Then you take your 250 servings of alchemist fire (you probably saw that coming) and find a way to get it into the bag without introducing any air (as alchemist fire is, I believe, ignited upon contact with air). The result? You hold the extra foot of rope, throw the bag 30'. When it reaches the end of its rope, its inertia will turn it inside out (no ruling there, just how I perceive physics to operate) depositing the 250 servings of alchemist fire on its target (which, on a direct hit, is enough average dice damage to kill a tarrasque [minus the miracle/wish portion]). This costs about 7700 gp or so; I don't have the paper in front of me. It's cheaper with iterative uses, as the glue, the bag, and the rope (if it's at all magical) are undamaged by the nonmagical fire. Also, fabricate is a good way to make alot of alchemist's fire pretty quick. One problem I can foresee is if the DM rules that there is no "back" of the bag, and you can continue feeding rope into it until the volume of the rope in the bag equals 30ft^3 (which of course wouldn't leave any room for alchemist fire). So yeah, basically alot of words for a simple, and probably flawed, idea. Rip it apart, guys! |
| #44mikeypNov 28, 2007 13:45:23 | One problem I can foresee is if the DM rules that there is no "back" of the bag, and you can continue feeding rope into it until the volume of the rope in the bag equals 30ft^3 (which of course wouldn't leave any room for alchemist fire). So yeah, basically alot of words for a simple, and probably flawed, idea. Rip it apart, guys! Personally, I'm of a mindset that multiple applications of alchemist's fire in a single attack don't all inflict their full dice of damage simultaneously. I don't think there's any rule prohibiting it, but common sense would have to win out, I would think. But hey, that's just me. |
| #45phaedrusxyDec 03, 2007 18:02:29 | Personally, I'm of a mindset that multiple applications of alchemist's fire in a single attack don't all inflict their full dice of damage simultaneously. I don't think there's any rule prohibiting it, but common sense would have to win out, I would think. "Common sense" is kind of a foreign concept for this board... whose entire purpose is to find weird ways to break the rules. Of course the vast majority of this stuff would never be allowed in a real game. That's kind of the point... One problem I can foresee is if the DM rules that there is no "back" of the bag, and you can continue feeding rope into it until the volume of the rope in the bag equals 30ft^3 (which of course wouldn't leave any room for alchemist fire). So yeah, basically alot of words for a simple, and probably flawed, idea. Rip it apart, guys! You could just crawl into the bag and attach the rope by hand. Heck, why not just attach the rope to the bottom of the bag, on the outside? I'm pretty sure you can dump their contents out by turning them upside down, right? |
| #46hotsakeDec 03, 2007 19:57:22 | I think the idea was the have all the contents of the bag suddenly appear with the bag's original velocity when it hit the end of the rope and turned inside out. It would be harder to engineer that with the rope attached to the outside. |
| #47NiteCyperJan 22, 2008 0:14:38 | This is something that came to me the other day... certainly not a campaign-smasher (to be honest, I was proud of coming up with it, but when I got on these forums I felt a bit... outclassed? ;) ). Anyway, a lesser bag of holding can hold 250lbs or 30 cubic feet (whichever comes first). I would think it's safe to assume that if you dangled a rope into one, it would be 30 feet to the "back wall" of it. Then, you take a rope of the appropriate length (with about a foot to spare), dip one end in some sovereign glue, and lower it into the bag until it is secure on the far side. Your next step is getting all the air out of the bag. The DMG say that there is "ten minutes of air" inside a bag, which is pretty vague considering different creatures will have different oxygen requirements. Anyway, I would think putting a creature inside and waiting ten minutes should get rid of it. Then you take your 250 servings of alchemist fire (you probably saw that coming) and find a way to get it into the bag without introducing any air (as alchemist fire is, I believe, ignited upon contact with air). The result? You hold the extra foot of rope, throw the bag 30'. When it reaches the end of its rope, its inertia will turn it inside out (no ruling there, just how I perceive physics to operate) depositing the 250 servings of alchemist fire on its target (which, on a direct hit, is enough average dice damage to kill a tarrasque [minus the miracle/wish portion]). Cool idea. Erm... Prestidigitation can fill in mind gray areas like, how to put it in the bag without air entering. Around the same vein as placing hurtful objects in miniature portable containers or shrinking them and letting their full force be unleashed at the right moment. We need to compile a list of ways a Commoner 20 could actually be a viable PC with ingenuity. |
| #48NiteCyperJan 26, 2008 17:12:44 | http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=966613 |
| #49NiteCyperJan 26, 2008 23:09:40 | http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=977225 |
| #50JanusJonesJun 23, 2008 19:49:01 | Can I get my infinite damage at 1st level thread added? Not sure if it qualifies, but I thought I'd apply. |
| #51EndarireJun 23, 2008 22:48:18 | (Bah, oops! See the next post.) |
| #52EndarireJun 23, 2008 23:10:00 | The Wish and the Word got moved. Also, some links are gone, like Mercantile Background. |
| #53aelryinthJun 24, 2008 3:41:54 | Alchemist fire is mundane fire, not magical, so the max dmg you'd take would be immersion in fire, just like alchemical acid. Probably max out at 10d6, same as being inside a raging bonfire. It was a good thought, however. There's also the fact that the objects in the bag are in a non-dimensional space, not in your space. Ergo, they don't have inertia or velocity. If they did, if you were walking and suddenly stopped, 250 lbs of stuff in the bag at your side would probably drag you off your feet as it kept moving. ===Aerlyinth |
| #54somethings90Jul 12, 2008 14:20:55 | Some of these links are giving me a blank screen and others go to the gleemax error page. This list is all from levels 1-10. I would kind of like to see some of these. I hope to find links for these. Bestow Power:RadicalTaoist,psly4me,cyberpunk The Cheesewrought Instabold Festering Strength: Dark Kyosuke The Ghola Character Dirty Trick #2 The Omniscificer The Synchronicity Shuffle:DisposableHero_ Tainted Spellcasting:Kresalak |
| #55somethings90Jul 15, 2008 15:43:40 | Can I get my infinite damage at 1st level thread added? I second that. |
| #56awaken_D_M_golemAug 12, 2008 19:00:18 | bump-o Some of the links on the OP are dead. Some of the links on the OP go to White Screen Of Death. someone want to find them ?? |
| #57ookamikibaAug 12, 2008 19:09:09 | I may as well add my unkillable Troll... Eighth-Red Dragon, Eighth-Green Dragon, Eighth-Stone Golem, Eighth-Clay Golem. Captured One (take your pick). Carry around an item of Antimagic Field for extra annoyance. As it is, he's immune to damage and magic. ECL 17, if I recall correctlly. |
| #58SenevriAug 13, 2008 14:23:22 | I may as well add my unkillable Troll... Well... not really. First of all, you can't really play as one very well (you'd need a rather silly DM, ) and DM can whip out unkillable opponents anyway. Besides, a half-green Wartroll is a better base, IMO. Would an Assassin... yes, an assassin's death attack could still work, presuming the creature has discernible anatomy, although I think it may have gone Construct type from half-golem templates. Hm. Are there feats which let SA work on constructs? |
| #59bauglirAug 13, 2008 14:34:15 | Not sure, but there are items. Those'd do it, except that (while not actually being a construct, because then it'd lose it's Con score and thus Regeneration), it's immune to an effect that allows a Fort save unless it also works on objects (because a Captured One gets Construct traits), and Death Attack does not work on objects. A simpler one is just a Quarter-Red Dragon Quarter-Clay Golem Captured One Troll. Half-Clay Golem gives immunity to magic and gives Acid Healing, plus the flat immunity to Slashing and Piercing. Although, you COULD always just kill the Raggamoffyn and THEN the troll, since they keep different HP totals and the Raggamoffyn doesn't gain the troll's special abilities. EDIT: My complicated version that dodges that weakness, but has one of its own, quoted from an old thread. The final creature is an Incarnate Construct-Warforged Scout (the creature in MM3, not a Warforged with Scout levels) Fighter 10/Psychic Warrior 1/Warforged Juggernaut 2 as the guest in a Symbiotic creature with a host consisting of a Yellow Musk Zombie-Half Clay Golem-War Troll that succeeded on its Will save. (I've put hyphens between different templates/base creatures for clarity) |
| #60ookamikibaAug 14, 2008 9:02:48 | Well... not really. First of all, you can't really play as one very well. Completely game-legal. Just to note, it still has a Con score. Half-Golem doesn't have to grant Construct traits. So it has regen and Construct traits. Besides, a half-green Wartroll is a better base, IMO. Yours is Epic, mine isn't. EL 11+3+3< EL 21 | EL18+3=EL 21 As a side, it should be pointed out that there's no damage type that can touch him because of his regen and he's immune to subdual damage. Also, no magic can get past his overlaping magic immunities.:D |
| #61bauglirAug 14, 2008 11:01:05 | Also, no magic can get past his overlaping magic immunities. Ohhhhh, THAT'S what a pair of Half-golem Templates are for. I missed that. |
| #62ookamikibaAug 14, 2008 18:19:22 | Ohhhhh, THAT'S what a pair of Half-golem Templates are for. I missed that. I was kinda proud of that one. :D |
| #63SenevriAug 15, 2008 11:09:15 | er, regen + subdual immunity --> fast healing. Anyone got the ruling? |
| #64t_bagginsAug 15, 2008 12:05:57 | http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1072877 This is the beginning of a thrallherd combo. My addition is the 2 druid thralls. A psion 5, thrallherd 10 that can bring 14th & 13th lvl druids, both of their animal companions, and a 16 HD astral construct (in the 2nd round) should be worthy of a semi-breaker. You may outnumber your group, 2 of which are the disputed best class. Work in undead thralls and dreadmaster, and you bring a small army with you. Its not really a specific build, but the main post said this is a guide to broken combos, not a critique forum. |
| #65aelryinthAug 15, 2008 12:40:48 | er, regen + subdual immunity --> fast healing. Anyone got the ruling? It was ruled that if, via regeneration, you become immune to a dmg type, then regeneration is simply fast healing. I.e. a troll with fire and acid immunity has fast healing, not regeneration. ===Aelryinth |
| #66syrkresAug 15, 2008 14:07:16 | A lot of the links seem broken (going to blank pages). Probably due to the lastest update by WoTC. Any chance to get these updated? |
| #67Omen_of_PeaceAug 17, 2008 9:18:27 | If they go to blank pages it means they're not around anymore - except maybe in Google cache. Everyone is encouraged to try to dig them up and post them... well, either here or in their own thread.Also, no magic can get past his overlaping magic immunities.:D I didn't check your templates, but how do you avoid the Searing Spell'ed Orb of Fire ? And then there's Vile damage. ![]() |
| #68ookamikibaAug 17, 2008 19:21:50 | It was ruled that if, via regeneration, you become immune to a dmg type, then regeneration is simply fast healing. Where? And, as a side note, drop the immunities, he's immune to subdual anyway. Just buy a couple Rings of Energy Immunity. They're expensive, probably out of his purchasing power, but really, since he has an Antimagic Field around him permenantly, it won't matter too much. It'll be hard to hit him with magic that could duck past his immunities. |
| #69Omen_of_PeaceAug 17, 2008 19:35:43 | *nudges OokamiKiba* Did you not see my post above ? Searing Spell (PHB2) partially bypasses Fire immunity. Orb of Fire (SC) is an instantaneous conjuration with SR:No so it bypasses the AMF and the Magic Immunity. |
| #70ookamikibaAug 17, 2008 19:41:51 | *nudges OokamiKiba* I saw, that's why the guy carries his item of Antimagic Field. He doesn't like things that can bypass his immunity to magic. By the way, can your spell get past two golems' magic immunity (they're mutually exclusive :D) |
| #71Omen_of_PeaceAug 17, 2008 19:55:38 | Orb of Fire (SC) is an instantaneous conjuration with SR:No so it bypasses the AMF and the Magic Immunity. The sad (ok, not really) truth is that full immunity to damage is impossible to obtain at reasonable levels. Reading assignment: - the AMF spell - any Golem's Magic Immunity quality |
| #72ookamikibaAug 17, 2008 20:01:02 | The sad (ok, not really) truth is that full immunity to damage is impossible to obtain at reasonable levels. Bypasses AMF? I'm pretty sure that AMF simply negates magic. An invisible barrier surrounds you and moves with you. The space within this barrier is impervious to most magical effects, including spells, spell-like abilities, and supernatural abilities. Likewise, it prevents the functioning of any magic items or spells within its confines. Not to mention that he's immue to fire/acid/etc |
| #73jaronkAug 17, 2008 20:30:15 | I didn't see it mentioned, so I might as well do so here. Genesis (arcane version) lets you create anything you can imagine in the environment of the created plane. This includes planar traits... such as Flowing Time. By making a Flowing Time 100,000 plane, you get many days in the time when others get single rounds. Add in Timeless and you don't age faster. From here, open up gates to attack whatever you want, and your targets can't react at all. JaronK |
| #74anyrandomelfAug 17, 2008 20:57:49 | did anyone else notice many of the links are now white screens of death? |
| #75ookamikibaAug 17, 2008 21:23:05 | I didn't see it mentioned, so I might as well do so here. Oooooh. I like. Gate opens Suprise Round:Maximized, Widened, Enlarged, Empowered Evocation, Maximized, Widened, Enlarged, Empowered Evocation, Quickened, Maximized, Widened, Enlarged, Empowered Evocation, Quickened Gate x4 (Legion Devils), etc... One hundred thousand swift actions later: Portal closes Survivors? Nahh... |
| #76Omen_of_PeaceAug 17, 2008 22:27:02 | Bypasses AMF? I'm pretty sure that AMF simply negates magic. The effects of instantaneous conjurations are not affected by an antimagic field because the conjuration itself is no longer in effect, only its result. (yes, it's strange, but it's RAW) And Searing Spell bypasses the immunity partially (deals 1/2 damage). *grumbles* When I give sources and reading assignments you can check them out... |
| #77ookamikibaAug 17, 2008 23:18:45 | (yes, it's strange, but it's RAW) Subdual... weeeee (immune) |
| #78Omen_of_PeaceAug 18, 2008 7:44:17 | I feel bad for polluting this thread, but... It's fire damage he's not immune to. It bypasses Regeneration. Before you go looking for Regeneration that's only bypassed by acid, Vile damage always bypasses Regen, as well as Trollbane (Dungeonscape, alchemical item). |
| #79ookamikibaAug 18, 2008 11:19:11 | I feel bad for polluting this thread, but... Ok, he'll spend the rest of his wealth on healing. Not really an issue since it'll be rare time he'll need it. |
| #80SenevriAug 18, 2008 12:42:32 | Where? Wait, did you just say he buys a pair of magic rings to use in an anti-magic field? |
| #81Omen_of_PeaceAug 18, 2008 15:13:05 | Ok, he'll spend the rest of his wealth on healing. Not really an issue since it'll be rare time he'll need it. While I'm at it, a question of my own: where did you get the LA for the Half-Golem and Captured One templates ? The MM2 update says LA - but I assume there's a later printing. You mentioned the build was ECL 17, which could imply you think LA - is equivalent to LA +0... that would be funny. (Hint for the unwary: LA - means it doesn't have a defined LA, i.e. it's not playable by PCs.) Also, what does the build contribute to a party ? |
| #82ookamikibaAug 18, 2008 15:53:57 | While I'm at it, a question of my own: One problem. Half-Golem, by RAW, can be used by PCs. If it has an LA of "-" then there's something wrong here, because PCs can use it. |
| #83Omen_of_PeaceAug 18, 2008 16:52:17 | In the original MM2, yes. The update to 3.5 wisely gave them LA - : immunity to magic is not very appropriate for players. Too much of an advantage and too much of a hindrance (how do you teleport/planeshift ? it's only possible if you are the caster. Healing is not fun either.). |
| #84ookamikibaAug 20, 2008 20:55:19 | In the original MM2, yes. The update to 3.5 wisely gave them LA - : immunity to magic is not very appropriate for players. Too much of an advantage and too much of a hindrance (how do you teleport/planeshift ? it's only possible if you are the caster. Healing is not fun either.). Once again, it's appliable. The fact that it'd be a hindrence is something that a PC would have to think about. Most wouldn't and would regret it. Regarless, the wording of the template makes it clear that it's designed to be player-usable. If it isn't, then listing a lot of the fluff (among other things) would make it pointless. Not to mention that requiring saves to avoid becoming a construct is stupid if no one would ever need to roll it. DMs can just choose the outcome they want, so it becomes a moot point. As a side note, your fire will simply slow him for 2d6 rounds. He can wait. You'll run out of spells eventually. |
| #85bauglirAug 20, 2008 23:26:19 | Trollsbane is poison. Constructs are immune to poison. The creature has Construct traits, and so is immune to Trollsbane. We can start with a War Troll if you'd prefer, which negates the Searing Spell vulnerability, even if the DM allows an equivalent feat for Acid damage (which now heals you, thanks to Half-Clay Golem). Makes the ECL epic, but the CR stays low enough that it can still be fun for a DM (although, in all fairness, the Captured One template pretty much means it HAS to be an NPC). I'm also not seeing where it says that Vile damage overcomes Regeneration. Yes, it only heals in a holy area, but the creature never takes the damage in the first place so it doesn't need to heal. |
| #86Omen_of_PeaceAug 21, 2008 19:05:44 | Once again, it's appliable. The fact that it'd be a hindrence is something that a PC would have to think about. Most wouldn't and would regret it. Regarless, the wording of the template makes it clear that it's designed to be player-usable. If it isn't, then listing a lot of the fluff (among other things) would make it pointless. Not to mention that requiring saves to avoid becoming a construct is stupid if no one would ever need to roll it. DMs can just choose the outcome they want, so it becomes a moot point. I'm not sure what you expect from me. LA - means not playable ; talk to your DM to make it playable if you want but we deal with RAW here. But I'm pretty sure Captured One is not meant to be played (Bauglir seems to confirm that) and it's fairly integral to your combo, right ? Trollsbane is poison. Constructs are immune to poison. The creature has Construct traits, and so is immune to Trollsbane. We can start with a War Troll if you'd prefer, which negates the Searing Spell vulnerability, even if the DM allows an equivalent feat for Acid damage (which now heals you, thanks to Half-Clay Golem). Makes the ECL epic, but the CR stays low enough that it can still be fun for a DM (although, in all fairness, the Captured One template pretty much means it HAS to be an NPC). I'm also not seeing where it says that Vile damage overcomes Regeneration. Yes, it only heals in a holy area, but the creature never takes the damage in the first place so it doesn't need to heal. Apologies if I was wrong. I'm AFB right now so I can't check. A DM should use them if it rocks his boat. I'm simply pointing out (theoretical) DM counter-tactics if a player tries to use those. I haven't mentioned one of my favorites, which is Gate (travel) + a bull-rush to a desolate plane/demi-plane, leaving the poor thing stranded - Invincibility is overrated when you can't go anywhere. Given the LAs, this kind of build is also fair game for a supernatural Holy Word/Blasphemy, but that's cheese of its own. Oh, and I said before that I wasn't considering epic. ![]() edit: and I still wonder how these builds are campaign-smashers given that their abilities are extremely passive. |
| #87ookamikibaAug 24, 2008 23:04:20 | But I'm pretty sure Captured One is not meant to be played (Bauglir seems to confirm that) and it's fairly integral to your combo, right ? As far as I know, the template implies that it's an NPC, in fact it says it...almost. It could, in theory, be playable, just if you don't mind being a really, really wierd thing...:D But really, as far as I can tell, the easiest way to annoy him is the Gate-him-into-nowhere plan. If you can manage to do it outside his AMF then he's really, quite helpless when he lands. :D Also, Never, EVER allow a party of Legion Devils :D...or someone to have Gate LEARN of Legion Devils. 64 of the guys will wipe the Tarrasque off the face of the Material Plane if you give them weapons. If some jerk (read: me) ever thinks of the idea of giving them Half-Troll? ![]() Now we have a pool of 1280 hp that has Fast Healing 320. |
| #88PlzBreakMyCampaignAug 25, 2008 2:20:28 | Half the Links are dead, just like this thread. |
| #89bauglirAug 25, 2008 7:31:03 | Apologies if I sounded overly condescending. Half the time I'm talking to idiots, and the other half I'm talking to reasonable people, and occasionally the proper attitude for one bleeds into the other. This is something I have to work on. And yeah, Gate + bullrush is pretty much a win. As is Supernatural Blasphemy; it's immune to the death and paralysis, but weakening (somehow) and daze still work, giving you ample time to run away/making its attacks easier to absorb. I'd imagine, however, a creature that can walk into any given royal palace and murder everyone in the place before the wizard has time to get there and cast the gate spell would be fairly campaign smashing. This discounts, of course, magocracies and kings who have wizards always on hand. So actually only minor kingdoms. Still pretty annoying. Best used as a means of forcing those characters who are campaign smashers by right of doing obscene damage into compliance, however. |
| #90Omen_of_PeaceAug 25, 2008 20:36:04 | Apologies if I sounded overly condescending. Half the time I'm talking to idiots, and the other half I'm talking to reasonable people, and occasionally the proper attitude for one bleeds into the other. This is something I have to work on. I wasn't shocked by your tone at all. I still haven't checked :embarrass but I'd rather people tell me when I'm wrong. And yeah, Gate + bullrush is pretty much a win. As is Supernatural Blasphemy; it's immune to the death and paralysis, but weakening (somehow) and daze still work, giving you ample time to run away/making its attacks easier to absorb. Oh, I forgot the death by Blasphemy was only for living creatures. How troublesome. Actually, are you not still living ? Any creature with a Con score is living, no ? If not, I guess the only way I can think of to kill it (without attacking the raggamuffyn) right now is a Supernatural Greater Humanoid Essence (RoE) followed by any kind of supernatural save-or-die (targetting Fort makes that part easy). I'd imagine, however, a creature that can walk into any given royal palace and murder everyone in the place before the wizard has time to get there and cast the gate spell would be fairly campaign smashing. This discounts, of course, magocracies and kings who have wizards always on hand. So actually only minor kingdoms. Still pretty annoying. But at this high a level most wizards can do the same. Shapechange+Veil of Undeath+Energy Immunity makes you invulnerable to most damage (not the combos I listed though). Ghostform and/or Superior Invisibility to go wherever. You have other spells to deal with the rest. Best used as a means of forcing those characters who are campaign smashers by right of doing obscene damage into compliance, however. That I like. :D "Your 1d2 Crusader strikes. The creature grins." |
| #91bauglirAug 25, 2008 21:03:22 | Ok, well, I agree with you on all points. I forgot that Blasphemy is not, technically, a death effect, so this thing is not immune. And that wizard thing is true. Ah, well. |
| #92EndarireOct 26, 2008 1:47:51 | Does the Powertool build from Little Red Raiding Hood qualfiy? I'm fairly certain being able to kill any officially published creature (maybe even deities) in one round counts. |
| #93ancientdragonOct 26, 2008 10:20:43 | Hey... I don't know if you would add it, but maybe this effort to repeat Pun-Pun without the sharruk (and with more levels in it :P) may qualify for being a Champaign Smasher? Majere Crystalblaze - The Savant Priest I hope yes... |
| #94Omen_of_PeaceOct 26, 2008 11:29:09 | @Endarire: Yeah, it can join its ubercharger buddies. :D (I just skimmed through the build - please correct me if it belongs in another category.) |
| #95EndarireOct 26, 2008 18:23:13 | Hood is an awesome charger build with more mobility than the standard UberERcharger, and while Hood probably does less damage overall, the difference is negligible in standard play. |
| #96ancientdragonOct 31, 2008 4:35:14 | -er Is Gideon actually still updating this thread? |
| #97EndarireOct 31, 2008 18:57:38 | Probably not, but you're welcome to take over! |
| #98ancientdragonNov 01, 2008 4:43:47 | Well... This is not a bad idea! I'll do it! |