| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 17:28:35 | There comes a time when everyone has to play a character with ability scores that suck. This is a simple guide with compiled information on how to bypass or reduce some of the penalties to maximize your character's playability. First of all note that your attributes govern most of your abilities, but the most important are attack rolls, damage, saving throws, hit points and spellcasting. Most of the times the key attributes of these abilities are fixed; there are however various feats and class features that tweak them, letting you change the base attribute for a certain save or skill (e.g. insightful reflexes from complete adventurer makes you able to swap your dexterity with your intelligence modifier to determine your reflex saves). The best resource for this kind of abilities is the great LordKiwi's thread, x stat to y bonus. Another important topic is the selection of your class. Surely you can't expect to play a character who suffers from MAD, like a paladin or a dual caster and be good at it. Classes that depend on one or two attributes to fill their role, like druid, cleric, wizard, beguiler, etc are probably your best bets. What really helps even further is when an important attribute of your class is also the base of a saving throw (like constitution and wisdom). Class features is probably your best bet improving your attributes. That is because classes offers various ways of improving or changing your scores (wild shape, polymorph, metamorphosis, etc), especially your physical statistics. A great ally to low scores are alternative class features, replacing the abilities you don't need because you lack the attribute required (such as turn undead and really low charisma) or replacing abilities to reduce MAD. Last but not least, the selection of race must be addressed. There are races that bypass some of the negative effects of bad attributes, such as undead characters and constitution, or incorporeal races and strength. Moreover an important mechanic to boost weak ability scores is the aging effects and there are ways to bypass them with spells and other abilities. Templates is probably the easiest way of boosting your weak areas and filling the gaps. Attributes: The question is, what can you really dump? As i see it, there are two ways to deal with this problem:
Now you'll probably need to focus on your mental attributes and be some kind of spellcaster that depends on wisdom (e.g. druid, cleric, psychic warrior). Wisdom and constitution are keys to your most useful saves, so naturally they receive priority. Intelligence is all about skill points and usually arcane spelcasting, so it would be wise to keep it at third place. Charisma is also a nice attribute, but depends on your class features and abilities, so it can be actually dumped. Dexterity and then strength are of the least importance, because they are easily replaceable. So to wrap it up, the stat importance is:
Of course the order of the last four attributes can be easily changed, according to your character's style. Class: Classes that depend on two or more attributes (constitution excluded) are right out. So naturally favored souls, spirit shamans, warmages and most martial classes are bad choices. Typically you can't go wrong with:
Also, these classes focus usually on constitution and wisdom and they deserve special mention:
Races: It should be relatively easy to choose a race with the above attribute guidelines. Typically anything with a bonus to constitution is a fine choice, as long as it doesn't lose out on wisdom. Small intelligence hits should be ok if you aren't a skill type character and the rest are more or less dump attributes. Some obvious choices:
A very important mechanic, mentioned earlier, are the aging effects. See if you can play a venerable character of your race, receiving -6 to physical scores and +3 to your mental ones. Then you can go necropolitan to offset the constitution loss and use spells and class features to get alternate forms to boost your attributes back to normal ranges. Another way is through dragonwrought kobold, but kobolds are generally not very easy to play with bad ability scores. Also if you play a venerable kobold you'll need to find a way to immortality fast, as you'll have just a few years of life before your time is up. Finally, if LA buyoff is allowed in your game, consider taking a template or a race with level adjustment. Of all the templates, two are probably the most useful:
Other templates of particular importance are:
|
| #2magius_rerecrosNov 01, 2007 17:53:41 | Hmm. Good information in here. However, I feel that Divine Minion deserves a 'special mention', as it allows for Pun-Punification, although it's very true that Pun-Pun (whilst he is the most powerful character ever, especially since you can ascend at level 1, which basically negates the concept of the Omniscifer) is unplayable due to his extreme broken-ness. But looking at Pun-Pun always makes me chuckle and say, "Why didn't I think of that?" (probably because I didn't have access to all the necessary books at the time). :D |
| #3Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 17:57:37 | this is not the theoritical boards, no pun pun tricks here. This is information for casual players that have trouble with their scores. |
| #4magius_rerecrosNov 01, 2007 17:59:23 | True. Only reason why I brought up Pun-Pun (besides the fact that I forgot that a board was created for theoretical builds like Pun-Pun :P) is that he's amusing, and related to the Divine Minion. Nothing more then that, really. |
| #5archerpwrNov 01, 2007 18:02:18 | Warlock- the class that is independant of its ability scores Artificer- rocks too hard to be held back by low scores Bard- Aside from a few feats, inspire courage doesn't need much Dragonshaman- like warlock, but con helps more and needs to be closer to the fray. Second best IMO Everything you listed is SAD, not "I don't need stats" |
| #6Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 18:06:54 | Warlock- the class that is independant of its ability scores Damn, i forgot about eberron. I'll include artificer. Warlocks are ok, too. Bards are a little attribute dependent, unless you want only to sing :D. Dragon Shamans are already listed. What does SAD stands for :P? Seriously attribute dependent :P? |
| #7archerpwrNov 01, 2007 18:11:02 | Damn, i forgot about eberron. I'll include artificer. Warlocks are ok, too. Bards are a little attribute dependent, unless you want only to sing :D. Dragon Shamans are already listed. Single attribute dependant. That 18 is f***ing everything to those classes. What bard doesn't want to sing? |
| #8magius_rerecrosNov 01, 2007 18:11:51 | Pretty sure that Archer hit it on the head with Artificer rocking too hard to need high stats. Although, it'd be best for an Artificer to have a nice high charisma score to pump up that UMD. Can't exactly craft the uber magic items if they can't succeed in their checks to emulate spell effects. But other then that, they can just simulate good stats with magic items. |
| #9Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 18:14:03 | Necropolitan Venerable Human:
Total points used: 10 (10 point buy !) You'll need corrupted wild shape Libris Mortis to make it work and it's completely unplayable at levels 1-5. Also note that you should avoid melee and focus more on casting/summoning. |
| #10archerpwrNov 01, 2007 18:14:30 | Pretty sure that Archer hit it on the head with Artificer rocking too hard to need high stats. Although, it'd be best for an Artificer to have a nice high charisma score to pump up that UMD. Can't exactly craft the uber magic items if they can't succeed in their checks to emulate spell effects. But other then that, they can just simulate good stats with magic items. Yep. Worst case artificer is just a bit more in line with the rest of the party. Also: Venerable? You're kidding me. The dex of 2 is suicide. +1 to dcs is not that important. Middle aged at max. |
| #11Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 18:18:06 | Single attribute dependant. That 18 is f***ing everything to those classes. What bard doesn't want to sing? i was joking about SAD ^^ There are ways around that 18, like 12-headed hydra, polymorph and arcane strike :P All bards want to sing, it's party member bards who want to make a difference :P |
| #12Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 18:18:57 | Yep. Worst case artificer is just a bit more in line with the rest of the party. wild shape to the rescue ? |
| #13archerpwrNov 01, 2007 18:24:02 | wild shape to the rescue ? No such thing as a necropolitan druid. Gishes are more MAD than standard wizards. The caster wizard is perfect SAD. |
| #14Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 18:37:29 | No such thing as a necropolitan druid. why :P? racism? Seriously, corrupted wild shape, same book with necropolitan. |
| #15archerpwrNov 01, 2007 18:39:35 | why :P? racism? Druids shall not burn feats. Druids also need HP to melee unlike wizards, who don't melee. |
| #16Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 18:43:14 | Druids shall not burn feats. Who cares? The point is that it's playable with little to no resources, desperate times call for desperate measures. Check the thread title again :P |
| #17archerpwrNov 01, 2007 18:54:15 | Who cares? The point is that it's playable with little to no resources, desperate times call for desperate measures. Seriously DM... Druids have 2 stats: wis and con You're not allowed to get rid of one of your most important stats. |
| #18Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 19:14:22 | Seriously DM... Druids have 2 stats: how much con will you have at venerable, even old age? 14? 15? And that's if you start with a 18. average d12 = 6.5 average d8 + 2 = 6.5 same. Don't start on why druid's shouldn't come to this in the first place, because i absolutely want to play a druid in 15 point buy campaign :D. |
| #19archerpwrNov 01, 2007 19:15:33 | how much con will you have at venerable, even old age? 14? 15? And that's if you start with a 18. Compendium: A guide to low scores 18-6=12 No such thing as a venerable druid before level 15 either. |
| #20phaedrusxyNov 01, 2007 19:16:30 | Seriously DM... Druids have 2 stats: Sure you are, if you're not even using it (i.e., an undead or construct). Surviving to level 6 might be a ***** with 2s for all physical stats, though. :D |
| #21surrealNov 01, 2007 19:19:55 | My experiences have shown Con to be overvalued unless you expect to really be in a lot of melee and are the sort that enjoys getting your hands dirty. For non melee types, I find a Con 14 to be reasonable. Oh sure there are always times I wish I had more hp, but I just as equally wish I had more Str, or a better reflex save, or more skill points, etc, and many of those situations have been life or death as well. For a necropolitan, you have an "effective" hp boost switching to d12s (for druids this is like a Con 14, for Wizards it's like having a Con 18). Oh sure, you folks make the argument again that buying stat boosting Con items will make it more worthwhile in the longrun, but money fixes everything. You could take that money and bump your cloak of resistance up another notch or two or a nice staff or perhaps an armoir of endless harems. By the time you get to high levels, I find Con rather moot unless you're well into the high 20's or up. The hp buffer against death gets smaller and smaller as enemies become stronger. |
| #22archerpwrNov 01, 2007 19:22:48 | Stuff. I'm specifically talking about druids. Druids are known to get into melee and have the bite of XXX spells before anyone else. |
| #23Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 19:27:23 | Compendium: A guide to low scores That was my point in the first place. You get more HP by going necropolitan. Also you don't actually lose feats, since you can take augment summoning from initiate of malar instead of getting first spell focus (conjuration). Of course, you will have some problem with rashemi elemental summoning, but malar fits thematically, too. Sure you are, if you're not even using it (i.e., an undead or construct). Surviving to level 6 might be a ***** with 2s for all physical stats, though. :D Yup, that's a real pain. I guess you can use HP enhancers probably and retrain later, after the transformation. Or, you know :P start adventuring at level 6 :P My experiences have shown Con to be overvalued unless you expect to really be in a lot of melee and are the sort that enjoys getting your hands dirty. For non melee types, I find a Con 14 to be reasonable. Oh sure there are always times I wish I had more hp, but I just as equally wish I had more Str, or a better reflex save, or more skill points, etc, and many of those situations have been life or death as well. i definitely go for con, but this is a special occasion :P I'm specifically talking about druids. Druids are known to get into melee and have the bite of XXX spells before anyone else. druid casters are not unheard of. You can play a summoner and skip the melee part. //edit: anyway, this is just a stub, anyone knows about stuff to add in the first post? I have yet to cover class features, feats, spells, etc. Items should be interesting. |
| #24phoenixinfernoNov 01, 2007 19:28:28 | Oh sure, you folks make the argument again that buying stat boosting Con items will make it more worthwhile in the longrun, but money fixes everything. You could take that money and bump your cloak of resistance up another notch or two or a nice staff or perhaps an armoire of endless harems. I would totally buy one of those. |
| #25operation_shoestringNov 01, 2007 19:29:23 | I would like to point out that Dumping STR down to 2 will end with you unable to carry anything or wear armor. Though if your DM allows backpackwarrior, STR can be safely dumped down to 2. |
| #26Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 19:36:26 | I would like to point out that Dumping STR down to 2 will end with you unable to carry anything or wear armor. :S Wild Shape into virtually anything and carry your armor. At 6th level you can be wild shaped 12 hours (+8 sleep), only 4 hours in 2 STR. At 7th level you can stay all day wild shaped 21 hours (5 of which you'll probably be sleeping). |
| #27archerpwrNov 01, 2007 19:46:57 | druid casters are not unheard of. You can play a summoner and skip the melee part. The counter I've been waiting for. If there is a disclaimer to come with advice it should be given. |
| #28Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 19:53:24 | The counter I've been waiting for. If there is a disclaimer to come with advice it should be given. it's obvious that this is a special case, i think that anyone playing a caster with so low ability scores wouldn't expect to fulfill all his roles perfectly. |
| #29archerpwrNov 01, 2007 19:58:11 | it's obvious that this is a special case, i think that anyone playing a caster with so low ability scores wouldn't expect to fulfill all his roles perfectly. Obvious to you and me maybe, but for a guide I'd like to just be able to just drop a link for a noob. |
| #30Dictum_MortuumNov 01, 2007 20:01:46 | Obvious to you and me maybe, but for a guide I'd like to just be able to just drop a link for a noob. i added a disclaimer to make things easier. |
| #31zarzakNov 01, 2007 20:13:49 | The scores you are talking about seem artificially low. A lot of players roll for stats, and going by that method you get to reroll unless you have at least a 13. And with a 13 you'll be a fine caster (wizard, cleric, whatever); w/a +6 item you'll get 9th lvl spells on time. |
| #32phaedrusxyNov 01, 2007 20:22:07 | The scores you are talking about seem artificially low. A lot of players roll for stats, and going by that method you get to reroll unless you have at least a 13. And with a 13 you'll be a fine caster (wizard, cleric, whatever); w/a +6 item you'll get 9th lvl spells on time. Do you mean an average of 13? We used to use that, too. |
| #33zarzakNov 01, 2007 20:37:46 | If your ability adjustments = 0 or lower, of if your highest score is 13 or lower you get to reroll. Which means even with my horrible roll (13, 10, 10, 9, 9, 8), which I could've rerolled, I can still make a decent caster. If you have a 14, 10, 10, 10, 10, 8 (I guess the worst roll you can have without needing to reroll) you will be fine for any type of caster ... |
| #34surrealNov 02, 2007 0:46:45 | I would totally buy one of those. Heh, I was wondering if someone would catch that ![]() |
| #35elephant_jackNov 02, 2007 2:10:32 | Some points...
Other then that: Another nice thread by Mr. Mortum EJ EDIT: You should provide examples for "low-point buys" or standard/elite-arrays... Plus: The worst stats I've rolled don't list a single score higher then 14; I think it's not very challenging to compensate for low point buys if you're allowed to a) LA buy-off, b) be venerable, c) cherry-pick undead-templates. No offense, but I've not played a single game where all of those rules were allowed, in most of them all were banned (and my DMs are quite liberal with "new" stuff)... /EDIT |
| #36Dictum_MortuumNov 02, 2007 6:20:43 | You are right guys, the least scores you can have are probably 14, 10, 10, 10, 10, 8. But i realized that this stuff is useful not only to characters that suffer from bad rolls, but to those that are extremely low on a specific score, too (necropolitan for low con, or altering yourself for str and dex). However we have payed a lot of attention to druids, venerable characters and undead, when the most prosperous field to increase your ability scores is probably spells! |
| #37jameswilliamogleMar 26, 2008 21:41:26 | Just noticed this thread linked to another recent one. I thought its worth a special mention: I've seen some fairly convincing arguments that the Necropolitan's d12 HD only applies to racial HD, not HD derived from class levels. I think its worth a note next to the Necropolitan template. |
| #38archerpwrMar 26, 2008 21:48:44 | Just noticed this thread linked to another recent one. That would really suck. |
| #39nntpMar 26, 2008 22:53:57 | Master of Many Forms Prc I believe deserves mention. If you aren't using the erratad wild shape, it has NAD. No Attribute Dependency. If you are, it needs Single Attribute Dependency. There was a thread a long while back talking about a character with 8's across the board, and consensus was MoMF was the only way to go. |
| #40archerpwrMar 26, 2008 22:58:12 | Master of Many Forms Prc I believe deserves mention. If you aren't using the erratad wild shape, it has NAD. No Attribute Dependency. If you are, it needs Single Attribute Dependency. There was a thread a long while back talking about a character with 8's across the board, and consensus was MoMF was the only way to go. Warlock is more NAD than that. |
| #41vicen_korelMar 26, 2008 23:36:09 | Heck warlock, Fey heritage, Maybe some Sorc in there to go Eldritch Thuerge. Use your Sorc spells to boost what you need and rely on DR to see you through melees, most things I have faced can't get through that DR -/cold iron becuase they don't want to pay the extra GP to get cold iron enchanted. Dump Wis with that as it's not needed, Str can go too for obvious reasons. Keep decent Cha, and anything else can even out Dex, Con and Int to 10's as spells can boost AC. |
| #42nightwyrmMar 27, 2008 0:14:21 | Dragonfire adapt is probably more NAD than warlock. The only stat that really matters is con and even then you can get by with low a con for awhile since the breath weapons usually have an effect even if the enemy saved. You never make an attack roll, so str doesn't matter. 4+ skill pts so int isn't crucial. If you don't take invocations that requires saves, cha doesn't matter. Both fort and will saves are good so a low wis is not deadly. Low dex sucks but the DFA provides natural armor. There's no armor prof, but since you don't make attack rolls and if you don't take combat invocations, then you can basically wear any armor you want. |
| #43vicen_korelMar 27, 2008 0:17:21 | Where's the Dragonfire Adept from? |
| #44nightwyrmMar 27, 2008 0:21:13 | Where's the Dragonfire Adept from? Dragon Magic. It's basically a draconic flavoured warlock. Combined with the entangling exhalation feat from Races of the Dragon, it's one of the strongest battlefield controller outside of pure casters. You can check out the DFA handbook here: http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=780301 |
| #45carnivoreMar 27, 2008 5:17:29 | if you have Very low scores..... just Play a Pixie.... even with 10,10,10,10,10,10 for attributes... a Pixie makes them: 6 Str(10- 4 Racial) 18 Dex(10+8 Racial) 10 Con(10) 16 Int(10+6 Racial) 14 Wis(10+4 Racial) 16 Cha(10 +6 Racial) with free Weapon Finnesse .... you can play virtually Any Type of Character with ECL 5 :D |
| #46Dictum_MortuumMar 27, 2008 5:22:05 | hey carnivore, what happened to that pixie handbook :P? |
| #47carnivoreMar 27, 2008 5:23:36 | i am still finishing up some builds and getting the first few posts formated ... its comming , but im slow, and havent had a lot of time to work on it the last few days :D |
| #48Treantmonklvl20Mar 27, 2008 6:47:25 | Classes that depend on two or more attributes (constitution excluded) are right out. So naturally favored souls, spirit shamans, warmages and most martial classes are bad choices. Typically you can't go wrong with: Spirit Shaman would be one of my first picks if my attributes were crappy. I would put my best stat in Con, and my second best in Wis. Dump the rest. Yes, I would dump Cha - no question. Then I would focus my spells on two themes - healing and summoning. Neither of which rely on saving throw DC's. This way you can stay out of the action - have your summoned animals take the beating for you - and you can summon LOTS (way more than a druid of equivalent level). Your HP would be pretty good (d8 + decent con) so you would be survivable - and once you get a ring of the beast, greenbound and rapid spell - you are one of the more powerful members of your party. Or at least that's my take on it. Watched a friend play a Spirit Shaman once and came to this conclusion. Through the campaign I do not think he cast a single spell requiring a saving throw - so his high CHA was a complete waste for casting (in his case he was our diplomacy expert - so the CHA did have use - but not for casting) I decided at that point that should I ever play a Spirit Shaman I'll dump CHA, and be singular attribute dependant on top of the best spell advancement chart in the game. |
| #49Dictum_MortuumMar 27, 2008 7:43:25 | okay, nice thougths, but why not do that with druid instead :P? |
| #50ninjarabbitMar 27, 2008 8:32:57 | No love for the UA wildshape ranger? You could literally play that class with all 10's or 8's as you ability scores. |
| #51skydragonknightMar 27, 2008 8:48:16 | if you have Very low scores..... just Play a Pixie.... even with 10,10,10,10,10,10 for attributes... a Pixie makes them: Pixie Warlock. If they don't have Fast Healing, point and shoot until they die or run away. Or just fly past them invisibly entirely. |
| #52elephant_jackMar 27, 2008 10:20:11 | Mh, why pixie? A petal with the same base scores (10@everything) gets Str 2, Dex 20, Con 14, Int 14, Wis 10, Cha 18 - better at "warlocking" at 3 important stats (Dex, Con and Cha) and a level adjustment of +2 (2 lower than a pixie). Ah, you're one size smaller (better hit and AC); sure, you've got no invisibility (d'oh, of course you do: You're a warlock) but you retain some cold iron damage reduction. In 9/10 games I'd chose petal over pixie. EJ |
| #53surrealMar 27, 2008 10:38:41 | Because there's still the debate of petal being a legal pc race since the monster entry says Cohort+2, not LA+2. edit: fixed |
| #54ChristopherGrovesMar 27, 2008 10:51:03 | Isn't the Pixie now LA+4? http://www.d20srd.org/srd/monsters/sprite.htm#pixie |
| #55carnivoreMar 27, 2008 11:20:01 | Mh, why pixie? A petal with the same base scores (10@everything) gets the main reason ..... Logistics: a Pixie is simply a Small creature..... but they are Tiny and are so Weak... with -8 Str .... if they had a Str of 2 they cant carry anything: 2 Str = Light load: 6 lb. or less , Medium load: 7–13 lb., Heavy Load:14–20 lb. a regular clay Pitcher weighs 5 lb, and almost puts them under a Medium load.... even if they had: "Handy Haversack: A backpack of this sort appears to be well made, well used, and quite ordinary. It is constructed of finely tanned leather, and the straps have brass hardware and buckles. It has two side pouches, each of which appears large enough to hold about a quart of material. In fact, each is like a bag of holding and can actually hold material of as much as 2 cubic feet in volume or 20 pounds in weight. The large central portion of the pack can contain up to 8 cubic feet or 80 pounds of material. Even when so filled, the backpack always weighs only 5 pounds. While such storage is useful enough, the pack has an even greater power in addition. When the wearer reaches into it for a specific item, that item is always on top. Thus, no digging around and fumbling is ever necessary to find what a haversack contains. Retrieving any specific item from a haversack is a move action, but it does not provoke the attacks of opportunity that retrieving a stored item usually does. Moderate conjuration; CL 9th; Craft Wondrous Item, secret chest; Price 2,000 gp;Weight 5 lb. " where as the Pixie has: 6 Str = Light Load: 20 lb. or less , Medium load: 21–40 lb. Heavy load: 41–60 lb. not to mention Greater invisibility.... that alone is a Huge benifit .... Because there's still the debate of Petal being a legal pc race since the monster entry says Cohort+2, not LA+2. fixed :D |
| #56walking_dreamMar 27, 2008 11:22:52 | I think Surreal meant Petal, not Pixie, since Petals are the ones with a listed LA of "Cohort: +2". |
| #57Treantmonklvl20Mar 27, 2008 12:56:19 | okay, nice thougths, but why not do that with druid instead :P? Easy - look at a Druids spellcaster progression chart, then look at the Spirit Shamans. Not that the Druid option doesn't work (it is actually a good choice because of wildshape) - but it is a different flavor. It will rely more on wildshape and less on summoning. Merely pointing out that Spirit Shaman is a good choice for weak stats. |
| #58andyjamesMar 28, 2008 2:50:51 | Items built for smaller creatures weigh less. A Tiny haversack should weigh 1/4 of the norm or 1.25lb. The line merely means that the backpack doesn't change its weight even when full (i.e., full or empty, it weights 5lb). Anyway, the real reason I'm posting: Why is the Spirit Chaman stat independent? I thought it was a dual stat caster? |
| #59brainpiercingMar 28, 2008 7:36:08 | If you want to be a meleer with a crappy roll use the Tauric Template and replace your physical scores with something nice (and the CON works, unlike wildshape). Racial HD aren't bad, because you'll be a monstrous humanoid with full BAB, some skills and feats - and some possibly unique abilities. Just don't do this with a caster. |
| #60awaken_D_M_golemMar 28, 2008 15:40:47 | Constitution of 2 (or less): works if you max out Vigor all the time, and max out Concentration checks, especially with cheap items. Just fall a Fort save every now and then. Easily fixed by being Warforged, or gaining lots of immunities. Can't get raised much ... Yawn. |
| #61Dictum_MortuumMar 28, 2008 15:48:33 | vigor? |
| #62awaken_D_M_golemMar 29, 2008 15:11:03 | http://www.d20srd.org/srd/psionic/powers/vigor.htm Best approach would be Wilder 1 - choose Vigor - all feats + flaw feats into extra power points. 2pp class + 2pp hi cha bonus + 2pp 1st psi-talent feat + 3pp 2nd + 4pp 3rd + 5pp 4th = 18 pp Wilder's wild surge gets 2/1.05 pp efficiency increase = ~34 pp of Vigor every day = 170 temporary hit points. That'll cover 1 hit point rather well, and most early failed Fort saves. |
| #63carnivoreAug 17, 2008 19:28:53 | ![]() :D |
| #64admusAug 18, 2008 6:25:00 | wildshape ranger/master of many forms with the steadfast determination seems like constitution based only. if you feel confortable, take champion of the wild at 4th level! ![]() |
| #65bergtannAug 18, 2008 11:57:58 | I made a build once which to a certain degree fixes low ability scores. Half-elf with the Human Heritage (RoD) feat starts as a Human Paragon (UA), does Half-Elf Paragon and finally Elf Paragon through the divided ancestry feature. (Note that the use of Human Heritage to get Human Paragon first and stack all 3 paragon classes relies on shaky sematics. Still, if you can get away with it, it is not overpowered.) It allows you to rebuild your ability scores, as you get +8 to them over the first 10 levels. Add a level of Wizard at level 2, and you also get spellcasting as wizard level six, medium BaB and lots of bonus feats, etc. You can also drop Elf Paragon and Wizard for Bard 4. It gives +6 to your abilities over the first 10 levels and you can go Sublime Chord + the PrC of your choice after level 10. You don't have that much to contribute before Sublime Chord, though. Edit: Simply playing a half-elf (or Half- Orc) with the Paragon Classes can let you do some rebuilding. Half-Elf 1/Any spellcaster 2/Half-elf Paragon 3/Human Paragon 3 gives + 6 to apply to your ability scores, 2 bonus feats, 5 spellcaster levels and BaB +5 over 8 levels. From there on you should be able to qualify for most PrCs. |
| #66jameswilliamogleMar 23, 2009 19:42:52 | Oh, hey, bump to prevent archivalness, and just a little self plug (Low Powered Core Teams, in sig). |
| #67ymuckluckMar 24, 2009 2:15:42 | You could put your lowest stat in con. If you're packing fearless destiny and tempting fate, along with great fortitude I don't really know what you'd need con for. |
| #68EndarireMar 24, 2009 18:03:29 | There's a new thread for X Stat to Y Bonus. |
| #69Dictum_MortuumApr 03, 2013 15:20:10 | Bump! |