Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 Endarire Nov 05, 2008 23:11:00	Seems like it should be.
#2 PlzBreakMyCampaign Nov 06, 2008 0:25:28	Same source stacking (same enhancement on same weapon)? Something tells me no...
#3 snex Nov 06, 2008 0:27:42	even though its probably not RAW, i dont see any reason to disallow houseruling it. i mean if a player wants to spend exponential amounts of gold per d6 of crappy fire damage, let him go for it.
#4 Senevri Nov 06, 2008 7:21:43	no different than getting flaming, shocking, freezing enchantments, I think. Maybe not RAW, but as long as you stick to WBL, I don't see a problem.
#5 muertog Nov 06, 2008 13:50:49	There used to be a rule from somewhere that you could not stack multiple effects upon the same weapon. I think it is an offshoot of the "spells of same effect overlap, not stack", since enchanting the sword with the flaming ability requires a spell. I am a little lazy, and don't have the time to look for where that exact rule comes from.
#6 xraal Nov 06, 2008 15:50:57	Have they even released creating magic item rules? - Other than the specific ones in the books? (Well, and wands)
#7 jaronk Nov 06, 2008 15:53:41	Yes, in the DMG. JaronK
#8 countmrvhs Nov 06, 2008 15:57:13	Houserule it to be legal, but make the player who uses such a weapon always refer to it as a "fa-LAAAAYYM-ing sword".
#9 xraal Nov 06, 2008 16:09:42	Silly me... I'm in the 3.5 forum!!