| Post/Author/DateTime | Post |
|---|---|
| #1archerpwrNov 15, 2007 21:55:58 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #2squashmonsterNov 15, 2007 23:25:34 | An idea that has been in the back of my mind for a while is to either polymorph or wildshape into some type of wolf. They get a free trip attempt with successful attacks... does that work with Improved Trip to give you a bonus attack? If it does, I think a gish or druid lockdown character could get back the damage output that lockdown characters normally lose. (Another note if it works: an Arcane Hierophant's companion familiar can eventually become a lockdown fighter in its own right, which is quite a terrifying prospect.) Gish-lockdown characters seem like a good way to go about multiclassing a lockdown, in general. Enlarging spells and strength buffs can both increase reach and make the save DCs for your Stand Still go up. The other thing that comes to mind is that some DMs let you use Cleave on trip attempts. This involves a very weird reading of the rule, but if your DM is one of them, Greater Cleave belongs in any trip-lockdown build. |
| #3allarianNov 16, 2007 0:34:24 | Stand still plus a lot of bonus damage on it? It is more reliable then triping and is the core of the lockdown build that you are refering to. Now that the damage isn't doubled we need another way to make massive reflex saves. |
| #4glendwyrNov 16, 2007 2:05:57 | Stand still plus a lot of bonus damage on it? It is more reliable then triping and is the core of the lockdown build that you are refering to. Now that the damage isn't doubled we need another way to make massive reflex saves. We can just use the decisive strike variant on flurry of blows to get that same double damage effect, albeit with a -2 to hit at this level. Just need to find a special monk weapon with reach. Or just pick up a little extra natural reach one way or another, which isn't too hard. |
| #5yogoNov 16, 2007 2:28:55 | Pole Master feat from Secrets of Sarlona lets you flurry with a reach weapon. |
| #6stickboy2323Nov 16, 2007 2:31:38 | You might think about replacing the Crusader levels with Swordsage levels. Swordsage gets you Setting Sun maneuvers, a lot of which work as trip attempts, but deal lots more damage. Also, I like Karmic Strike and Defensive Throw on tripper builds. Trip 'em if they hit or miss. It's a beutiful thing. |
| #7squashmonsterNov 16, 2007 13:10:43 | This one requires a cohort. This can be somebody else in your party, or a cohort from the leadership feat. Raise the level or take a Fighter dip if you need leadership. Beyond having a level of Swordsage and a few key feats, your cohort can be built any way. If your cohort is another party member, he can focus on being a Swordsage-style damage machine, making you a very scary team. Strongheart Halfing Rogue 12: Feats: Exotic Weapon Proficiency: Spiked Chain, Abberant Blood, Inhuman Reach, Combat Reflexes, Stand Still, Swarmfighting Cohort: Strongheart Halfling Swordsage 6: Feats: Exotic Weapon Proficiency: Spiked Chain, Abberrant Blood, Inhuman Reach, Swarmfighting Maneuvers: All that matters is Island of Blades. You and your cohort stand in the same square, and he is in the Island of Blades stance at all times. Thus, everything you reach (20') is flanked, and is subject to Sneak Attack at all times. 5d6 of Sneak Attack provides you with the bonus damage to make Stand Still reliable. |
| #8snizorNov 16, 2007 14:00:36 | We can just use the decisive strike variant on flurry of blows to get that same double damage effect, albeit with a -2 to hit at this level. Just need to find a special monk weapon with reach. Or just pick up a little extra natural reach one way or another, which isn't too hard. Doesn't the Ki Focus weapon enhancement (SRD) do this? |
| #9CantripNNov 16, 2007 14:26:41 | A Monk weapon with reach? Spinning Sword. It's even Spiked Chain-esque reach. |
| #10archerpwrNov 16, 2007 15:24:00 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #11glendwyrNov 16, 2007 16:05:22 | I updated the build a little. Improvements? This is pretty theoretical right now. CantripN: mind giving a little info on how I'd need to modify the build to use decisive strike and reach? Don't have access to secrets of sarlona right now. Decisive Strike works just like Overpowering Attack, except:
I don't have access to Secrets of Sarlona either, but given that the spinning sword is a monk weapon with reach, that should be all we need, unless a feat is required to use it or something. Couple of other suggestions/comments:
|
| #12archerpwrNov 16, 2007 16:11:23 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #13archerpwrNov 16, 2007 16:29:25 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #14allarianNov 16, 2007 17:31:01 | Decisive Strike would have been my first choice but it doesn't work, the attacks in Decisive strike get double damage but AoO's don't if I remember correctly. |
| #15archerpwrNov 16, 2007 17:34:55 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #16glendwyrNov 16, 2007 17:36:48 | Build has been tweaked. It's got all the feats lockdown has minus the wpn focus chain and Close-Quarters Fighting. Not sure that we need close-quarters fighting with monk unarmed damage and PW buffs. Sure, at high levels grappling's not a problem. If nothing else, we can always use psionic freedom of movement to get around that. Early in the build, though, I'd worry a bit more, since being grappled breaks the lock. It might be worth picking up CQF with, say, the level 6 feat and retraining it into deft opportunist later? Decisive Strike would have been my first choice but it doesn't work, the attacks in Decisive strike get double damage but AoO's don't if I remember correctly. I don't remember that being the case, but I don't have PH2 handy to check either. |
| #17archerpwrNov 16, 2007 17:41:08 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #18glendwyrNov 16, 2007 17:54:48 | I only barely get access to level four powers. For the filler one, I'm thinking lion totem barbarian (clashes with monk, so not good). Know of any full bab class that grants one of the feats I'm already taking at first level? I can't think of anything off the top of my head. There's feat rogue, but of course that's not full bab. I'm pretty sure that there's a ranger combat style in Dragon magazine that would let you snag power attack at ranger 2, for what it's worth. |
| #19grendylNov 16, 2007 18:02:16 | Pointing out a couple of things : I believe Pierce Magical Concealment has Blind-Fight as a pre-req feat. Also, I don't know many DMs that would let the Mage Slayer feat chain not reduce manifester level as well as caster level (-12 levels in your build). |
| #20archerpwrNov 16, 2007 18:03:18 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #21grendylNov 16, 2007 18:17:17 | Are you worried about XP penalties for multi-classing? If ToB is allowed, hopping around and grabbing more of that goodness is probably advisable. |
| #22archerpwrNov 16, 2007 18:21:34 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #23allarianNov 16, 2007 18:28:32 | Nope. AoOs get double damage as well. Nevermind then. Has anyone given thought to Shadow Sun Ninja? |
| #24archerpwrNov 16, 2007 18:30:37 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #25CantripNNov 16, 2007 18:34:46 | A Spinning Sword is an Exotic Weapon... Still, it's worth it, as it's a One Handed Finessible Monk Weapon with reach like a Spiked Chain (1d6/19-20) and can't be used two-handed. It's well worth the feat if you can fit it in. Personally, I'd drop Improved Trip. With your serious damage from Decisive Strike, Standstill works just as well. I'd also try to fit in Deep Impact (for use with Stormguard Warrior) by dropping Combat Expertise and Imp. Initiative or make sure to take Emerald Razor and keep it. And it's Robilar's Gambit. |
| #26grendylNov 16, 2007 18:37:45 | Looks pretty good, maybe go ahead and pick a couple levels of swordsage in place of 2 warblade levels, but stagger them so you take the 2nd swordsage level closer to the end to grab a higher level maneuver/stance? This could depend on your stat distribution (wis v. int) and how your DM interprets the swordsage AC bonus ability (does it stack w/monk, can you only use it in light armor as opposed to no armor?) Loosing a BAB kinda sucks, which you could make up for if your weapon was a possible target for discipline focus, but if you are using spinning sword that is out (unless you make it an aptitude weapon...hmmm). Swordsage helps shore up your saves and gets +1 init as well. But if you are using a lower point buy for stats this may not be an attractive option. You may also want to work in Adaptive Style if you go this route. |
| #27archerpwrNov 16, 2007 18:38:04 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #28ninjarabbitNov 16, 2007 18:53:23 | Funny, I was actually thinking of another lockdown-type build, a gish-based version that channeled anti-magic field Lockdown Version 3.0 fighter2/wizard6(UA variant that gets fighter feats instead of metamagic/item creation feats)/spellsword5/eldritchknight7 17 BAB, 15 CL I'll do the feats later but I am getting 6 bonus feats from this build, I won't use the mage slayer feats so I won't screw over my spellcasting. |
| #29archerpwrNov 16, 2007 18:59:16 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #30CantripNNov 16, 2007 19:00:34 | Don't forget the Stormguard needs Ironheart, Robilar's needs Reflexes and +12 BAB and that Defensive Sweep needs +15 BAB. EDIT: Okay, final version only doesn't qualify for Defensive Sweep... Looking good, though. BTW, I'd prefer to see Stormguard sooner, just for general damage. Also, PMP doesn't work with Decisive Strike as it's a Standard Action. |
| #31archerpwrNov 16, 2007 19:04:48 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #32CantripNNov 16, 2007 19:13:11 | Probably a good call. As I demonstrated with Gaon, Warblade has NO dead levels. I'd have PMP and Stormguard Warrior trade places, alond with Blindfight and Ironheart Aura, though - PMP removes what, 8 AC at best? 10? Stormguard is a font of cheese... |
| #33archerpwrNov 16, 2007 19:17:11 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #34CantripNNov 16, 2007 19:18:46 | Iron Will or Great Fortitude are never bad, I guess... |
| #35archerpwrNov 16, 2007 19:19:35 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #36glendwyrNov 16, 2007 19:23:06 | Did they errata Mage Slayer? Looking at it now that I've got my books in front of me, and it says some nonsense about requiring BAB +3, I fear. Not a big issue, but you'll need to rearrange feats slightly if that's the case. |
| #37CantripNNov 16, 2007 19:23:19 | Are you gonna add a maneuver progression to that? It's an integral part of being a Warblade... And if you can fit in Rapid Counter and Dancing Blade Form, it could be nice. |
| #38archerpwrNov 16, 2007 19:28:29 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #39archerpwrNov 16, 2007 19:36:43 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #40CantripNNov 16, 2007 19:47:57 | Screw it. I'll just drop a link off since I suck with ToB. If I have the time, I might do it tomorrow... I'd just finished making a Warblade 20, so I'm clear on how to go about it. |
| #41archerpwrNov 16, 2007 19:49:12 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #42glendwyrNov 16, 2007 20:13:19 | In the original Lockdown thread, one of the prospective holes that came up was foes with cover. There any reasonable way to fit in a level of exotic weapon master to plug that hole? With a DM kind enough to let you take the exoticist fighter variant, what I have below ought to work - assuming I haven't made any mistakes, anyway. Given that it relies on a generous DM, and one would have to play as a human (or give up Improved Init), I wouldn't suggest this as anything more than a potentially useful footnote, but still: Human Exoticist Fighter 1/ Invisible EyeUA Monk 1/ Warblade 1/ Crusader 1/ Feat rogueUA 2/ Warblade +1/ Crusader +1/Exotic Weapon Master 1/Warblade +11 Level Feats: 1) Stand Still 3) Power Attack 6) Deft opportunist 9) Pierce Magical Protection 12) Stormguard Warrior 15) Robilar's Gambit 18) Pierce Magical Concealment Bonus feats: 1 Human) Improved Initiative 1 Fighter 1) Exotic Weapon Focus (Spinning Sword) 2 Monk 1) Combat Reflexes, IUS 5) Feat Rogue 1) Mage Slayer 6) Feat Rogue 2) CQF 12) Warblade 5) Ironheart 16) Warblade 9) Blindfight 20) Warblade 13) not much good here. Alternative class features: decisive strike (PH2) |
| #43archerpwrNov 16, 2007 20:20:05 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #44tshernNov 16, 2007 20:25:16 | Doesn't Stone Dragon or White Raven have a few maneuvers that can prevent people from taking actions for a round or two? If the victim can do nothing for two rounds or more, it might synergise well with this Lockdown... |
| #45glendwyrNov 16, 2007 20:25:58 | Preicise strike ignores anything less than total cover. Do you think that's enough? I was just gonna say - now that you've managed precise strike, EWM doesn't have much point, since it doesn't let you ignore total cover either. Added in preview: Or, you could have edited while I was replying. Oops! |
| #46archerpwrNov 16, 2007 20:26:33 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #47tshernNov 16, 2007 20:30:25 | If you are ready to go down the path of cheese, you might get an item of Heroics and get Imp. initiative that way and try to cram in Precise strike that way. However, it'd require you to actually use a continuous item of Heroics. |
| #48archerpwrNov 16, 2007 20:31:30 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #49tshernNov 16, 2007 20:34:02 | I'm not ready for that yet. I suppose the situation will never go that bad. |
| #50archerpwrNov 16, 2007 20:37:40 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #51tshernNov 16, 2007 20:50:28 | Improved sunder is always an option, but it is hardly viable at those levels anymore since most monsters use natural weapons. Very often if I have open feats, I like checking out soulmelds, for example Gorgon mask and Behir gorget would improve your defense against charging/bullrushing/tripping. |
| #52glendwyrNov 16, 2007 20:52:09 | On a lighter note, I managed to shuffle the feats to get precise swing in. Now there is an open feat at 18. Ideas? Well, at one point you'd taken Supernatural Instincts. Being a simple soul, I'd probably just be inclined to take a martial study and snag an extra 7th level maneuver, but I'm sure there are better uses out there. |
| #53aelryinthNov 16, 2007 23:43:38 | Credit for this idea primarily goes to aelryinth for his great lockdown build: Some commentary: Your choices of manuvers will be very important, as they are going to form most of your offensive punch. Note that you've chosen a one-handed weapon with reach. That means no extra Str bonus and no ability to Power Attack. You might want to just take Longspear, the Eberron fear that allows it as a weapon for monks, and then Short Haft... You have to play human or you have multiclass xp penalties. Not so good. Your Psychic Warrior levels gives you two feats, but costs you a BAB and you don't have an effective manifester level. Some of the best feats you could possibly take with a build like this are, however, based on your psychic focus (Deep IMpact, notably) which doesn't actually require that you have a manifester level. Your MAD is all over the place. This is a Dex build, requires high Wis for AC since it can't use a Shield, high Int to max out Warblade optionals (esp for AoO), and has no Str synergy to speak of. Without really high stats, there could be problems. Your total BAB is 17. For a primary melee combatant, this is not very good, especially since you don't get access to the best warblade abilities because of the cross classing. There are gishes that do better. I freely admit there's ways to duplicate the number of feats a fighter gets...but not without at least some cost, at least in this build (wiz,rogue and psy war levels.) It looks to me like your damage is going to suffer, and you can't use all those Warblade manuvers as dmg to make your Lock. This looks more like an AoO build to channel Stormguard Warrior then a Lock build. It's hard to picture it doing the appropriate amount of dmg. AC looks okay, but no shield option (Lockdown at least has the animated Shield optional). I'm trying to see what the build has that really makes it cool, and not really seeing it as something that stands out to me. You'd probably have to go more indepth on skills and tactics to see where his strength is and where he'd shine. He's definitely got a little bit of everything, however. ===Aelryinth |
| #54archerpwrNov 17, 2007 0:10:48 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #55glendwyrNov 17, 2007 1:00:09 | Note that you've chosen a one-handed weapon with reach. That means no extra Str bonus and no ability to Power Attack. You might want to just take Longspear, the Eberron fear that allows it as a weapon for monks, and then Short Haft... Why can't he use Power Attack? If the spinning sword's a light weapon, then of course he can't, but if it's a one-handed weapon, he's good to go - though admittedly he doesn't get the same power attack multiplier. I fear I don't have Secrets of Sarlona, so I don't know whether it's light or one-handed. Serpent Strike is the feat for longspear you're thinking of, and it was my first thought, but... technically, he doesn't qualify for the feat. To take it, he would need to have the flurry of blows class ability, and it's been swapped for decisive strike, so that sinks that idea, barring DM kindness. Your MAD is all over the place. This is a Dex build, requires high Wis for AC since it can't use a Shield, high Int to max out Warblade optionals (esp for AoO), and has no Str synergy to speak of. Without really high stats, there could be problems. I worry a bit about the MAD also. I'm not sure that he can't use a shield, though - there's nothing in the decisive strike text to say that one loses that ability when one would lose flurry, though I don't think it would be an unreasonable thing for a DM to rule. Personally, while higher Int is always better, I'm comfortable dumping it somewhat. Your total BAB is 17. For a primary melee combatant, this is not very good, especially since you don't get access to the best warblade abilities because of the cross classing. There are gishes that do better. Well, he picks up 8th level maneuvers, anyway, though he does miss out on the very top end, yes. Still, I don't think 8th level maneuvers are terribly shabby. BAB is a bit lower than it could be, but hardly terrible. I freely admit there's ways to duplicate the number of feats a fighter gets...but not without at least some cost, at least in this build (wiz,rogue and psy war levels.) It looks to me like your damage is going to suffer, and you can't use all those Warblade manuvers as dmg to make your Lock. Yeah, he's not going to pump out as much damage in his AoOs as the fighter version. Still, given that he manages double damage on the AoO, I should think that the damage ought to be at least respectable enough to lock down a large subset of opponents. For the rest, he can fall back on maneuvers. That's not ideal, but eh. Let's see... comparing builds, and with the same stats... Your build had the weapon spec tree, which gave you +6 to damage, and used a two-handed weapon, for another +5 from Str. So a back of the envelope calculation suggests that the save DC for stand still here is 20-25 points lower with decisive strike up. And admittedly, that's a problem - quite possibly, in an AMF we're not succeeding with the lock. archerpwr, one thing that strikes me is that, having taken the mage slayer feat chain all the way through, all the psywar levels do is give you a few bonus feats. Earlier, you had a build up with some decent manifesting, modulo the mage slayer feat chain. Might it be worth playing around with that approach more and just dumping pierce magical concealment/protection? |
| #56MomarNov 17, 2007 1:53:01 | Are we sure precise swing allows for making an AoO against an opponent with cover? The way the feat's worded ("when making a melee attack") sounds to me like it would let you ignore the cover bonuses when you attack but does nothing to prevent the fact that you never get to make an AoO in the first place. Has this been addressed by WoTC in some form, is it irrelevant because the feat is being used for some other reason, or is my reading just off (and for this option a quick explanation would be very much appreciated)? |
| #57CantripNNov 17, 2007 3:34:13 | Pierce Magical Concealment needs Blindfight, which you only get 4 level later. Juggling all that is an eloborate puzzle...] Anyhow, let me know when you're done so I can do the maneuvers; They're kinda dependant on level (also, try to make it so the Warblade levels are staggered and spread throughout the build so he has level appropriate stuff at every point). |
| #58archerpwrNov 17, 2007 11:01:49 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #59aelryinthNov 17, 2007 12:08:03 | Is defensive sweep worth two fighter levels? I dropped it in favor of more warblade. Defensive Sweeps power is that once the opponent is Locked, you are guaranteed to do more dmg to them, since you get an AoO if they don't move. I left it as the last feat because it's situational, and getting max dmg out of the build was not a priority. Against spellcasters in an AMF, however, it's a nice way to guarantee at least one additional hit per round. ===Aelryinth |
| #60CantripNNov 17, 2007 12:38:15 | Are Supernatural Instincts really needed? It doesn't interrupt the ability, and it doesn't work on Swift Actions anyway, since those don't provoke. I doubt it would see much use, nor have much effect. |
| #61glendwyrNov 17, 2007 14:40:20 | Hmm. A part of me almost wants to say that you might want to drop PMP/PMC/supernatural instincts for focus/specialization/melee weapon mastery. Not that those are good feats, but with decisive strike up, it's a +8 to the stand still DC, or a +14 if you can power attack away the +3 to hit you'd get from mastery and weapon focus. Not sure that the sacrifice would be worth it - I suppose that depends on the kind of DCs you want. Also, Momar brings up a good point, though I don't know the answer. |
| #62archerpwrNov 17, 2007 16:18:34 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #63CantripNNov 17, 2007 16:21:17 | PMC is far better. Miss Chances suck, and with Stormguard Warrior and Boosts, your damage will be enough for a Lockdown. |
| #64archerpwrNov 17, 2007 16:22:00 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #65CantripNNov 17, 2007 16:26:22 | I think the levels are set then. I'll do the maneuvers on the morn, then. |
| #66CantripNNov 17, 2007 16:33:41 | BTW, am I to read it that you start with a 1st level Stance at your first level of Warblade/Crusader? Cause that's 2 lame stances, realtively speaking. |
| #67archerpwrNov 17, 2007 16:41:16 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #68Midnight_vNov 17, 2007 18:42:12 | Which is great as it's a nod to making it playable at every level and not "only after it get trick x" or whatever gear;) |
| #69archerpwrNov 17, 2007 18:50:07 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #70aelryinthNov 17, 2007 23:04:19 | Hmm. A part of me almost wants to say that you might want to drop PMP/PMC/supernatural instincts for focus/specialization/melee weapon mastery. Not that those are good feats, but with decisive strike up, it's a +8 to the stand still DC, or a +14 if you can power attack away the +3 to hit you'd get from mastery and weapon focus. Not sure that the sacrifice would be worth it - I suppose that depends on the kind of DCs you want. He's using a finesse weapon...he can't Power Attack with it anyways (the spinning sword) nor would he get the double bonus from Power Attack. He'd have to shift to a longspear or other weapon. ====Aelryinth |
| #71phaedrusxyNov 17, 2007 23:06:34 | He's using a finesse weapon...he can't Power Attack with it anyways (the spinning sword) nor would he get the double bonus from Power Attack. He'd have to shift to a longspear or other weapon. Nothing prohibits you from using power attack and weapon finesse at the same time, nor getting the 2x power attack multiplier while doing so. I'm not familiar with the weapon itself, so I don't know if it is legal to do this with, but you can certainly do it with things like a spiked chain. |
| #72CantripNNov 18, 2007 1:23:26 | You can use it for Power Attack, just not x2. Finesse has nothing to do with it (You can't wield Light Weapons in two hands. That's it.), it just has the same clause as the Rapier: You can’t wield a Spinning Sword in two hands in order to apply 1½ times your Strength bonus to damage. |
| #73CantripNNov 18, 2007 5:31:35 | Okay, I'd like you to trade Feat Rogue 1 with where Warblade 1 is, and then trade Deft Opportunist with Mage Killer in places. That's the only simple way to do this with no power loss... Warblade Maneuvers: Warblade 1 - Action Before Thought, Wolf Fang Strike, Sudden Leap Warblade 2 - Emerald Razor Warblade 3 - Iron Heart Surge Warblade 4 - Wolf Fang Strike => White Raven Tactics Warblade 5 - Lightning Recovery Warblade 6 - Action Before Thought => Rapid Counter Warblade 7 - Iron Heart Focus Warblade 8 - Sudden Leap => Moment of Alacrity Warblade 9 - Insightful Strike, Greater Warblade 10 - Emerald Razor => Quicksilver Motion Warblade 11 - Scything Blade Warblade Stances: Warblade 1 - Punishing Stance Warblade 4 - Roots of the Mountain Warblade 10 - Press the Advantage Crusader Maneuvers: Crusader 1 - Foehammer, Mountain Hammer, Stone Vice, Tactical Strike, Douse the Flames. Crusader Stances: Crusader 1 - Martial Spirit Crusader 2 - Thicket of Blades |
| #74archerpwrNov 18, 2007 13:10:17 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #75tshernNov 18, 2007 13:41:22 | I don't agree with the amount of MAD. Certainly intelligence is not utterly needed for the build and charisma is a complete dumb stat and wisdom does not have to be that high. So you've got dexterity, strength and constitution and intelligence to a degree, does not sound that bad. |
| #76prosedragonNov 18, 2007 13:46:18 | This is probably a dumb question, but does Thicket of Blades let you take AoOs when enemies tumble? Also, how do you get around enemies who use Spring Attack and the like? |
| #77tshernNov 18, 2007 13:48:11 | There is no official ruling about that, but I think it is something of a general consensus that Thicket of Blades works against tumbling. |
| #78CantripNNov 19, 2007 2:50:55 | I feel obliged to point out exactly what the benefits of some of the maneuvers are, as I was asked: Sudden Leap/Moment of Alacrity/Quicksilver Motion are used to approach without losing the ability to make a Decisive Strike. Lightning Recovery means your Decisive Strike won't miss. Rapid Counter is 2 AOOs for one provoking action. Scything Blade actually lets you make another attack when making your Decisive Strike, also at double damage! |
| #79archerpwrNov 19, 2007 14:39:12 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #80aelryinthNov 20, 2007 17:03:36 | Just a Note: Under your assumptions on the build, list the fact that you consider Decisive Strike as applying in armor, despite the fact that Flurry of Blows, which it replaces, does not. Secondly, the TH penalty for Decisive Strike goes away at the same rate as flurry, so at level 20 you do not have a TH penalty. Note also that relying on the casters for your buffs is one of the 'weaknesses' of the fighter, pearls of power or not. It's also a subtle way of freeing up level cash for other benefits, used a lot by Arena builds. It's also why my original build actually owns a +7 effect sword, and not a +1 Sword with lots of goodies. A decent choice of manuvers, and the warblade recovery method. I'd specifically list out the manuvers you have ready as a default as a guide to playing the build, and the ones that are optional for specific situations. The warblade only has a limited amount available during a fight, remember! Lastly, give the defenses and base saves to give people a better foundation idea for the class. Thought about S-blocking my original post, which is really, really long, but ah well. I'd leave open some of the core data just so people can look at the original build at a glance, and go poking for more information if they want it. Just a style thing. ==Aelryinth |
| #81archerpwrNov 20, 2007 17:17:33 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #82JanusJonesNov 21, 2007 10:46:54 | Excellent stuff. Fun and emphatic battlefield control - since tactical fighting and massive damage are the melee monster's only options in d20, all in all an impressive build! I'm steering my party's Crusader/Stand Still lockdown melee thug here for advice. He could use it! |
| #83Omen_of_PeaceNov 21, 2007 11:52:16 | Nice ! I'll try taking some time later to think of improvements/criticisms. Nitpick : Deft Opportunist is not a Fighter feat in CAdv (latest printing). Switch it with PA. |
| #84archerpwrNov 21, 2007 12:06:21 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #85aelryinthNov 21, 2007 22:25:58 | Keep in mind that the base ability to hit things of this build is frankly not very good. He's also using a finesse weapon, so he gets minimum utility out of Power Attack. Trading off a lower ability to hit for an even lower ability to hit for some extra dmg is generally not something you want to have happen for any form of a primary melee in the party. You want him to hit and to deal damage without having to resort to either. a feat that ups his base ability to hit or do dmg would probably make a better choice. Deft Opportunist is supremely useful for this build because it adds a major bonus to hit. Note that this build hits marginally better then the Core Lockdown's third iterative. It's giving up a lot for Decisive Strike early. Deft opportunist should definitely be in the build. ===Aelryinth |
| #86archerpwrNov 21, 2007 22:31:43 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #87orenmirNov 22, 2007 2:38:35 | Instead of Stand Still, I'd choose Large and in Charge (granted you are a large race). Your AoO still does damage, and you should almost always win the strength check. |
| #88CantripNNov 22, 2007 4:03:14 | I'd just reread Stone Dragon, and it seems Crushing Vice has no save! I though it did, so I didn't add it, but with no save it's just too good to be true. I'll edit it in. |
| #89CantripNNov 22, 2007 5:12:58 | Warblade Maneuvers: Warblade 1 - Action Before Thought, Wolf Fang Strike, Sudden Leap Warblade 2 - Emerald Razor Warblade 3 - Iron Heart Surge Warblade 4 - Wolf Fang Strike => White Raven Tactics Warblade 5 - Lightning Recovery Warblade 6 - Action Before Thought => Rapid Counter Warblade 7 - Iron Heart Focus Warblade 8 - Sudden Leap => Crushing Vice Warblade 9 - Moment of Alacrity Warblade 10 - White Raven Tactics => Quicksilver Motion Warblade 11 - Scything Blade Warblade Stances: Warblade 1 - Punishing Stance Warblade 4 - Roots of the Mountain Warblade 10 - Press the Advantage Crusader Maneuvers: Crusader 1 - Foehammer, Mountain Hammer, Stone Vice, Tactical Strike, Douse the Flames. Crusader Stances: Crusader 1 - Martial Spirit Crusader 2 - Thicket of Blades There. Better now. |
| #90nexisNov 22, 2007 10:41:40 | Stone vise does require a save, its a fortitude 12 + str to negate. |
| #91CantripNNov 22, 2007 10:44:17 | Stone vise does require a save, its a fortitude 12 + str to negate. Crushing Vice, not Stone Vice. |
| #92archerpwrNov 22, 2007 10:48:37 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #93archerpwrNov 22, 2007 16:59:27 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #94tsuyoshikentsuNov 22, 2007 21:57:43 | Got your PM, and I'm honored. ![]() The #1 problem I see is that I can't find where the swinging sword is a Monk weapon. I may very well be wrong, but if not here's what I'd do: Instead of the Invisible Eye variant monk, take the Martial Monk variant from Dragon 310 and ditch EWM 2. Get proficiency with any exotic polearm that trips and you have no net loss of abilities. Pole Master at 9 makes it flurry-able and because of the extra bonus feat from Martial Monk you can take it without a net feat or BAB loss. Bad news is, though, that if you want Short Haft, you'll have to commit to Human, take flaws, or lose Power Attack. |
| #95archerpwrNov 22, 2007 22:03:50 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #96aelryinthNov 22, 2007 22:47:30 | Deft opportunist is in the build. It's the level three feat. I agree that deft opportunist is really important. That's why I tried to put it in as early as possible. I can power attack with the spinning sword; just not very well. It just feels wrong to not have power attack in a melee build. If all you want are the feats, there are builds that will get them even faster then yours. You also have to look at the BAB you are giving up to get the feats...part of the core Lockdown is having that 20 BAB, and including the 'signature' fighter feats, even as optional, to up that ability to hit. He can reliably pound down even the oldest red dragons, his TH is so high. The build also doesn't have to footsie around with tons of multi-classing and possible xp penalties. So, there's tradeoffs. I imagine if I got rid of the WS tree and JUST concentrated on getting feats fast, there wouldn't be a lot of difference...but it wasn't a concern, anyways. ===Aelryinth |
| #97aelryinthNov 22, 2007 22:53:36 | I just realized that pierce magical protection is completely incompatable with decisive strike... I ended up dropping the last two fighter levels, precise swing, PMP, and PMC for two Exotic Weapon Master levels, weapon focus, defensive sweep, exotic reach, and exotic trip. Thoughts? Blindfight is almost as good as PMC. Pierce Magical Protection is taken as an action...it's like a Dispel Attack. You come in as a standard attack, and instead of just hitting him and doing damage, you hit him, do damage, ignore all his magical defenses, AND strip him of magical defenses. In short, it's how you spend a standard attack action any time you have to make one and can't get off a full attack. In short, there's no penalty for using PMP whenever you have a Standard Action to take. But, PMP and PMC should be optional...they are mainly anti-spellcaster, and if you don't want that kind of focus, swap them out. I also don't know the pre-reqs for EWM off the top of my head. Relying on a weapon from Secrets of Sarlonna might be pushing stuff for some DM's, but YMMV, as always. ===Aelryinth |
| #98archerpwrNov 22, 2007 22:59:28 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #99CantripNNov 22, 2007 23:51:30 | I never said it can be used to Trip. It can't. EDIT: Dude! Stop messing with the levels! I don't have the time to redo the maneuvers every Monday. |
| #100archerpwrNov 23, 2007 0:08:30 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #101CantripNNov 23, 2007 0:21:57 | *smacks forehead* What for? Soft Cover doesn't apply against Reach weapons, and it's not a Spiked Chain, so no Flurry. The only option is to use a Large Spinning Sword (It becomes a Two-Handed Weapon for wielding) and take Uncanny Blow, but this is cheesy as hell. |
| #102archerpwrNov 23, 2007 0:37:36 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #103CantripNNov 23, 2007 1:06:13 | Warblade Maneuvers: Warblade 1 - Action Before Thought, Wolf Fang Strike, Sudden Leap Warblade 2 - Emerald Razor Warblade 3 - Iron Heart Surge Warblade 4 - Wolf Fang Strike => White Raven Tactics Warblade 5 - Lightning Recovery Warblade 6 - Action Before Thought => Rapid Counter Warblade 7 - Iron Heart Focus Warblade 8 - Sudden Leap => Crushing Vice Warblade 9 - Moment of Alacrity Warblade 10 - Emerald Razor => Quicksilver Motion Warblade 11 - Scything Blade Warblade Stances: Warblade 1 - Punishing Stance Warblade 4 - Roots of the Mountain Warblade 10 - Press the Advantage Crusader Maneuvers: Crusader 1 - Foehammer, Mountain Hammer, Stone Vice, Tactical Strike, Douse the Flames. Crusader Stances: Crusader 1 - Martial Spirit Crusader 2 - Thicket of Blades Apparently, you can trade a requirement for a maneuver at the same level you get it, so I opted to keep WRT. Will update again if the levels (and IL) change. I'd love to add Stance of Alacrity, but you simply lack the IL... |
| #104archerpwrNov 23, 2007 10:30:12 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #105CantripNNov 23, 2007 10:53:45 | I just realized I can add in one more warblade level. I may be able to get it in. Doesn't help, unless you can get IL 15 by level 18 and grab it with a feat. Otherwise, you simply won't get a Stance to match your improved IL. What's the point of EWM, btw? Ignoring Cover? I can't say I'd ever encountered any, except Soft Cover (people), and you ignore that anyway. |
| #106archerpwrNov 23, 2007 10:57:27 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #107CantripNNov 23, 2007 11:05:34 | It's not really a problem for you, though. If you encounter someone with Cover, you use Crushing Vice. The more Warblade IL we have to play with, the more tricks he can do... |
| #108archerpwrNov 23, 2007 11:08:58 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #109CantripNNov 23, 2007 11:13:00 | So, just rely on the maneuver? So far I've tried to keep the readied maneuvers uncritical. I'll drop the EWM level if you think it's better. Adding Warblade levels and not relying on maneuvers is like taking Fighter 20 and saying feats don't matter. |
| #110archerpwrNov 23, 2007 11:17:00 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #111CantripNNov 23, 2007 11:36:45 | I'd prefer to trade one level of Warblade for a non-Warblade one. If you did, you'd be manage IL 15 just as you reach Warblade 10 and get Stance of Alacrity. Or any of the other nice 8th level Stances, such as Supreme Blade Parry... |
| #112archerpwrNov 23, 2007 11:52:48 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #113CantripNNov 23, 2007 11:55:51 | Witch Slayer 2 is handy, netting you Mettle, +3 Fort, +3 Will and 2 semi-useless Smite attempts. It even has 4+ Skill Points. |
| #114archerpwrNov 23, 2007 12:05:46 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #115CantripNNov 23, 2007 12:18:50 | Once again, in order to get Sudden Leap early, you need IL 3 at your first level of Warblade. And if you were to add one more level of non-Warblade somewhere and put one of the Fighter levels at level 20, you'd be able to pick up Martial Stance (Stance of Alacrity). Since you use a lot of Swift Actions (Boosts) and Immediate Actions (Counters), you'll want this. It also improves the Warblade maneuvers in general slightly. |
| #116archerpwrNov 23, 2007 13:11:01 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #117CantripNNov 23, 2007 13:12:27 | Okay. Except Monk 2 is better than Witch Slayer 3. It grants you Lightning Reflexes and Evasion (trade this for an ACF), too. |
| #118archerpwrNov 23, 2007 13:40:11 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #119aelryinthNov 23, 2007 13:40:16 | Once again, in order to get Sudden Leap early, you need IL 3 at your first level of Warblade. And if you were to add one more level of non-Warblade somewhere and put one of the Fighter levels at level 20, you'd be able to pick up Martial Stance (Stance of Alacrity). Since you use a lot of Swift Actions (Boosts) and Immediate Actions (Counters), you'll want this. It also improves the Warblade maneuvers in general slightly. One fo the problems with a warblade is the number of manuvers readied he has. Sure, he might KNOW a dozen manuvers, but if he can only access 5 at a time, it really cuts down on his 'ubahness', especially if they are counters and buffs he keeps tearing through. This is a very deliberate weakness of the warblade, having to use every 3rd rd or so to refresh his manuvers and go to a default attack. Once you start adding up the cool buffs and defenses of the warblade, their offensive power starts falling by the wayside. They start running into a Fighter problem...they can't have enough manuvers readied to satisfy all their needs! ===Aelryinth |
| #120archerpwrNov 23, 2007 13:42:00 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #121CantripNNov 23, 2007 16:58:09 | Hmm... Wouldn't you prefer Stunning Fist over Imp. Grapple? You can deliver it using your Spinning Sword if it's a Ki Focus weapon, and the DC is decent. |
| #122archerpwrNov 23, 2007 17:09:58 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #123CantripNNov 23, 2007 17:11:41 | Well, since wis is a dump stat, the DC is pretty low. Know anything that I could use that replaces the first monk bonus feat? Can't you take Fiery Ki feats from PHB 2 or something like that? |
| #124archerpwrNov 23, 2007 17:21:19 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #125CantripNNov 24, 2007 2:35:02 | Okay, keep Improved Grapple! I think I can fit Wolverine Stance in there, meaning you can use your Spinning Sword in a Grapple! I even think you can use Strikes while you're there (you can Attack or cast a Standard Action spell, after all)... Sadly (?), I had to give up on White Raven Tactics. I figured you already have so many Swift/Immediate Action maneuvers that you wouldn't get to use it, and I can only reasonably fit it in at a high level, when you have other options. Can we do a level order of: Feat RogueUA 1/ Monk 2/ Fighter 1/ CrusaderToB 1/ WarbladeToB 1/ Fighter +1/ Crusader +1/ Warblade +3/ Feat Rogue +1/ Warblade +1/ Witch SlayerToM 2/ Warblade + 5 ? Maneuvers Crusader 1 (IL 3): Stone Bones, Mountain Hammer, Foehammer, Shield Block, Crusader's Strike. Warblade 1 (IL 3): Rabid Wolf Strike, Sudden Leap, Action Before Thought. Warblade 2 (IL 5): Iron Heart Surge Warblade 3 (IL 6): Emerald Razor Warblade 4 (IL 7): Rabid Wolf Strike => Lightning Recovery Warblade 5 (IL 9): Rapid Counter Warblade 6 (IL 11): Sudden Leap => Crushing Vice Warblade 7 (IL 12): Iron Heart Focus Warblade 8 (IL 13): Action Before Thought => Quicksilver Motion Warblade 9 (IL 14): Scything Blade Warblade 10 (IL 15): Emerald Razor => Avalanche of Blades Stances: Crusader 1: Martial Spirit Crusader 2: Thicket of Blades Warblade 1: Punishing Stance Warblade 4: Wolverine Stance Warblade 10: Stance of Alacrity |
| #126tsuyoshikentsuNov 24, 2007 3:47:54 | ...Guys, I'm seriously not seeing where Spinning Sword is a Monk weapon. |
| #127CantripNNov 24, 2007 4:57:10 | ...Guys, I'm seriously not seeing where Spinning Sword is a Monk weapon. If that's correct, then we may have a problem... EDIT: Seems to be.We can use a Hook Sword with another 2 feats (WF: Hook Sword and Flying Tiger), I guess... I'm hoping there's something more cost-effective. That said, Close Quarters Fighting is not needed anymore, since you can fight just fine in a grapple. Power Attack can also go away, as you don't really need damage if it means you miss. Would Abberation Blood (instead of EWP) + Inhuman Reach (Instead of CQF) do? You can then take Starspawn if you wish, too. Also, the maneuvers are done. I considered putting Wolf Climbs The Mountain in there, but decided not to. |
| #128archerpwrNov 24, 2007 11:30:57 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #129tsuyoshikentsuNov 25, 2007 3:57:14 | I'd rather have improved evasion, but that's a personal thing. |
| #130CantripNNov 25, 2007 4:05:03 | I'd rather have improved evasion, but that's a personal thing. Nobody's offering it. Only Master Thrower can stack Evasion like that. Flying Tiger requirements: DEX 15, EWP, WF, TWF or Monk, BAB +1. This is not a Fighter bonus feat, however, and the feat is written in a very annoying manner: It says "When taking a Full Attack action, you may hook 2 Hook Swords together as a Free Action... while hooked... act as a Reach weapon that also threatens adjacent". Can we use it with Decisive Strike (It's a Full Round Action, not a Full Attack)? Does it have reach outside your turn? It's not amazing, either way. |
| #131CantripNNov 25, 2007 4:47:44 | darned double posts... move along. |
| #132archerpwrNov 25, 2007 10:04:42 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #133CantripNNov 25, 2007 10:08:09 | You can just give up Short Haft. You're a Monk, remember? BTW, it means that Wolverine Stance is of no use anymore (it's not a one handed weapon), so you might as well bring CQF back and pick another stance... |
| #134archerpwrNov 25, 2007 10:26:35 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #135CantripNNov 25, 2007 10:36:32 | WF requires +1 BAB... Luckily, Power Attack doesn't (even though you can't use it!). |
| #136archerpwrNov 25, 2007 10:45:14 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #137CantripNNov 25, 2007 10:56:09 | Very nice! Personally, I prefer Blind-Fight over Imp. Initiative, though. At level 19, you can just carry an Eager Dagger. Got any particular (up to 4th level) Stane you want? Any 8th (or lower) level maneuver? Want Wolf Climbs The Mountain for +4 AC, assured AOO and no AOOs on you? |
| #138archerpwrNov 25, 2007 10:58:28 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #139glendwyrNov 25, 2007 11:02:31 |
The one thing we should note is that I'm not sure that technically we can do this, although your DM would have to be pretty cruel to disallow it. After all, Serpent Strike requires the flurry of blows class feature and lockdown 2.0 doesn't have it. |
| #140tshernNov 25, 2007 11:02:35 | I'd personally suggest either Roots of the Mountain or Pearl of Black Doubt. However, I love all the 3rd level stances, I hate myself for not being able to take them all. Edit: Hamstring strike would be nice too. Kinda eliminates most of the dexterous foes... |
| #141archerpwrNov 25, 2007 11:07:22 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #142CantripNNov 25, 2007 11:21:22 | Not really. I'm using warblade for maneuverability. I'm gunna trust your judgement on what is best. In that case... Roots of the Mountain instead of Wolverine Stance. As for the 8th level maneuver, I'm not sure... There are no 8th level maneuvers you really need... Avalanche of Blades would allow you to utilize Stormguard Warrior when you need to, Iron Heart Endurance would allow you to heal 30 HP as a Swift Action, Adamantine Bones would give you DR 20/Adamantine for a round, Diamond Defense is +15 to a save... I think I'll go with Avalanche, just in case... |
| #143archerpwrNov 25, 2007 11:26:22 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #144CantripNNov 25, 2007 11:33:10 | Quite. |
| #145archerpwrNov 25, 2007 14:27:20 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #146CantripNNov 25, 2007 14:38:49 | I suspect it's because he'd already taken most of the flak. Also, this is much better. Besides, he's an IDEA - the actual build doesn't matter. As for the "other options", if you want Pounce, we can easily put Pouncing Charge in there; There's not much point as per RAW, but we can. |
| #147archerpwrNov 25, 2007 14:49:13 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #148CantripNNov 25, 2007 14:59:41 | I wouldn't put it in the default build just because of the RAW issues. What maneuver would it replace if it went in so I can note it in the other options area? You'd give up Roots of the Mountain for some Tiger Claw Stance (Hunter's Sense @1 and Absolute Steel Stance @4, possibly), take Pouncing Charge instead of Rapid Counter, take Rapid Counter instead of Crushing Vice, take Crushing Vice instead of Iron Heart Focus, and take Iron Heart Focus instead of Avalanche of Blades. Essentially, you push some maneuvers back and don't get Iron Heart Focus until level 20. You don't get Avalanche of Blades. |
| #149archerpwrNov 25, 2007 15:03:57 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #150pfootiJan 09, 2008 15:03:03 | Is there a reason you take Feat Rogue over Psychic Warrior? Both provide 2 bonus feats in 2 levels, but Psywar gives you a tiny number of psionic powers, whereas feat rogue just gives you evasion for the second time (unless I missed something, you get evasion from monk and rogue). |
| #151CantripNJan 09, 2008 15:17:24 | Is there a reason you take Feat Rogue over Psychic Warrior? Both provide 2 bonus feats in 2 levels, but Psywar gives you a tiny number of psionic powers, whereas feat rogue just gives you evasion for the second time (unless I missed something, you get evasion from monk and rogue). I seem to remember some sort of issue with Magekiller and ML. Personally, I don't think it's a problem. |
| #152archerpwrJan 09, 2008 15:18:25 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #153pfootiJan 09, 2008 15:33:27 | Yeah, transparency, that'll do it. No point in having powers if your ML is zero, heh. |
| #154NiteCyperFeb 03, 2008 0:01:48 | Honestly curious. It IS better than this? Don't hit me! I can get 3 reactions: 1. Stop posting to up your post count, ya ****. Rabble, rabble, rabble. 2. Why, no it isn't, thank you. 3. It is (, here's why...) |
| #155archerpwrFeb 03, 2008 0:16:36 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #156adslahnitMar 22, 2008 3:31:17 | Sorry to raise this thread back from the dead, but I was thinking about it for quite a while, and I just figured that there had to be a better weapon than the longspear.Pole Master Duom: The duom is a longspear with a standard spearhead, as well as two blades curved so that they point backward along the shaft. The weapon has reach, allowing you to strike opponents 10 feet away with it. Those proficient with the duom can also attack adjacent foes with the reversed heads using a practiced “reverse thrust.” Apply a –2 penalty on the attack roll if you use the duom to attack a second, adjacent opponent in the same round you attacked the first opponent. The duom is a two-handed polearm that deals 1d8/ |
| #157adslahnitMar 22, 2008 9:54:24 | Also, I know that this build refrains from any Dragon Magazine material, but the rope dart/meteor hammer is worth taking a look at:Rope Dart |
| #158archerpwrMar 22, 2008 20:00:18 | Since I don't care to stop misinformation on a forum that bans you frequently and doesn't give you the option to lock your own threads I'm deleting all of my CO works. They might remain up at BG, but I'm tired of IDIOTs. |
| #159awaken_D_M_golemJan 30, 2009 14:50:42 | bumpo |
| #160tshernJan 30, 2009 15:01:40 | bumpo Read the OP before bumping. |
| #161true_shinkenJan 30, 2009 20:53:44 | Gee, we lost archer :/ |
| #162tshernJan 31, 2009 6:12:51 | It's been a while too. I stored this build somewhere, it's floating probably at around page five on the main page. |
| #163lenchJan 31, 2009 10:48:33 | We didnt lose Archer, his ego grew to planet size and he drifted off the planet....he'll come back down once he is out of his teens ![]() |
| #164emansdrawkcabFeb 01, 2009 0:28:05 | We didnt lose Archer, his ego grew to planet size and he drifted off the planet....he'll come back down once he is out of his teens He's still around, occasionally. I really don't see how that escalated to him leaving, it really wasn't that bad. None of it. |
| #165jaeradJul 29, 2009 3:53:00 | See post #53 for a quote of the OP. |
| #166archerpwrJul 30, 2009 3:36:01 | We didnt lose Archer, his ego grew to planet size and he drifted off the planet....he'll come back down once he is out of his teens I'm still at TGD. I just rarely check this forum anymore. Sometimes I go to BG when I'm bored to argue with JaronK. |
| #167awaken_D_M_golemJul 30, 2009 17:08:37 | Why yes, yes you do. I don't go to TGD, except to browse. The weenie filter I post through, disallows the adult language; boo, tough beans. |
| #168magmer1Jul 31, 2009 13:43:14 | So TGD is? |
| #169archerpwrJul 31, 2009 15:13:25 | So TGD is? www.tgdmb.com It's a bit rougher than WotC. |
| #170awaken_D_M_golemJul 31, 2009 16:20:57 | The CO-board is definitely Not one big happy family. One of the early on exiles was Frank Trollman ... demons cackle , old ladies scream , etc ... google: The Wish and The Word hopefully it hasn't been White Screen of Death'd. Along with the Hive, it's one of the pre- pun-pun builds. Fun. |