Shared from Morrus' post on EN World.
Sales for 5e are still strong 1 year after launch. Congrats to the Wizards team on your 1 year birthday! 
http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/games-and-activities/list.html
Very cool! Interesting to see that the MM is also on that list, but not the DMG.
Nice....
Glad as well for the books selling well and that Xun hasn't come into this thread to do his usual WoTC bashing! Win win for us all!!
EthanSental wrote:
Mistwell wrote:
On a serious note, if anyone from WOTC reads these ... thanks for making the game fun again. May we have many more years of "I magic missile the darkness." 
So 4 out of the top 6 books are for Minecraft....did not really expect that.
The market is there. Wizards just needs to release good products.
Must be selling well, the core books are completely unavailable over here in London (UK), and prices on AmazonUK are exorbitant.
I should have picked up the DMG the day it came out, like I did with the PHB and MM, now I have to wait for the suppliers in this city to get more!
OoftaMeg wrote:
joeburgos wrote:
Brock_Landers wrote:
I'll chip in a tankard of ale as well to celebrate a fine edition that has me playing more since I picked it up in November, fun stuff and good times!
EthanSental wrote:
I am in two games every week. That hasn't happened in...uh...since 1986? Best since then had been once a week.
It's off to a great start, but there is more work to be done. D&D has its main audience, who know all about it and what they want. Those people seem to have accepted the new edition, but what about new people who never played D&D before? That's where WotC should put its attention, even if it means promoting and publishing simpler versions of the game such as a D&D Board Game.
2 Games a week, nice! I'm in 2 groups, one is once every 2 weeks, the other every 3. Not quite as much RPG goodness and Mist but quite a bit more than 2 years ago.
It really doesn't mean a whole lot since the NY Times list only compares to books in the same category. D&D being one of the two big dogs in the fields means that most of what it releases will be on the "best seller" list for a long time. The number you need to sell to make the games category is much lower than the number you need to sell to make the fiction/non-fiction category. Please note, I'm not trying to put D&D down. I'm just saying that the NY Times list doesn't mean as much as people often make it out to be.
Spinny spin spin spin. Can anyone here get a book on the NYT best seller list?
It's an accomplishment to be on it. Especially for a whole year. In any category.
Don't be a hater.
Kudos to WotC!
Yeah, even if just trying to add in some realism. Kind of a Debbie-downer. Especially in a thread like this, but it was bound to happen.
Orethalion wrote:
Orethalion wrote:
Mistwell wrote:
ChrisCarlson wrote:
OoftaMeg wrote:
Orethalion wrote:
Orethalion wrote:
Orethalion wrote: