Post/Author/DateTime	Post
#1 Kravell Jun 08, 2015 10:28:37	http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/errata   The link currently goes to a blank page which is actually nicely ironic.
#2 BoldItalic Jun 08, 2015 10:32:27	Some content on its way, perhaps. Not expecting much new but nice to see it codified.
#3 Xeviat-DM Jun 08, 2015 13:06:57	The link goes to the main page now.
#4 kikidmonkey Jun 08, 2015 16:20:42	Obviously this means the game is perfect and no errata is needed
#5 Coredump00 Jun 08, 2015 19:16:04	Kravell wrote:
#6 SleepsInTraffic Jun 08, 2015 19:52:30	They screwed up today and put a bunch of articles up (at least on their mobile site). Like the unearthed arcana wasn't supposed to be out till the 11th I don't think. At least that was it's listed publishing date, and since today is the 8th...
#7 BoldItalic Jun 09, 2015 0:20:43	Coredump00 wrote:
#8 RCanine Jun 09, 2015 21:34:38	Interestingly, the link above now redirects to a new URL and that URL is a 403 forbidden. Seems like something is there and their CMS just keeps users out until they decide to publish it. It's probably locked down for internal review.
(Reply to #8) Reinhart	RCanine wrote:
#10 mellored Jun 10, 2015 7:58:20	Did anyone notice a date on it?
#11 Brock_Landers Jun 10, 2015 10:35:22	I thought there was to be no errata, just optional substitutions?
#12 MechaPilot Jun 10, 2015 10:48:18	Brock_Landers wrote:
#13 kalil Jun 10, 2015 10:50:22	Brock_Landers wrote:
#14 MechaPilot Jun 10, 2015 10:54:03	The article that mentions it can be found here.  It is an older article, 06/23/14, but it explains their position on making 5e a "living rules set."
#15 Brock_Landers Jun 10, 2015 10:55:01	MechaPilot wrote:
#16 Dwarfslayer Jun 10, 2015 11:20:34	Brock_Landers wrote:
#17 MechaPilot Jun 10, 2015 11:22:42	Dwarfslayer wrote:
#18 Brock_Landers Jun 10, 2015 11:57:44	MechaPilot wrote:
#19 Farmer42 Jun 10, 2015 14:47:27	Am I reading the Tinned clarification right in that you can now no longer twin AoE spells or spells like Magic Missile?
#20 iserith Jun 10, 2015 14:49:41	PH Errata is up: http://dnd.wizards.com/articles/features/ph_errata
#21 kikidmonkey Jun 10, 2015 15:30:40	Well I sure am glad that Way of the Four Elements got some powers nerfed, can't let those powerhouses continue running around.
(Reply to #21) Xeviat-DM	kikidmonkey wrote:
#23 GladiusLegis Jun 10, 2015 16:03:33	So Evokers and Gold/Red Dragon Sorcerers got their Scorching Ray novas nerfed (Elemental Affinity and Empowered Evocation apply to just one damage roll now) ... but Agonizing Blast remains completely untouched. Pfffffffffffffft.   Also, Weird and Phantasmal Killer are actually functional. Woo. (Which means Weird is now only just a waste of a 9th-level slot instead of a stinky massive epic fail of a waste of a 9th-level slot. It'd probably be OK as a 5th-level or thereabouts, though.)
#24 BoldItalic Jun 10, 2015 15:54:02	I might buy a 2nd printing of the PHB when it appears in the wild. The pages are starting to fall out of this one
#25 GladiusLegis Jun 10, 2015 16:24:31	Oooooooh, big one: Since unarmed strikes no longer count as weapons, that REALLY messes up Monks, who now need a weapon to use Stunning Strike. Ouch.   Battle Master maneuvers and Paladin's smites/smite spells don't work with unarmed attacks anymore, either.
#26 mellored Jun 10, 2015 16:45:57	odd they didn't fix simulacrum.
#27 GladiusLegis Jun 10, 2015 16:58:39	GladiusLegis wrote:
#28 pukunui Jun 10, 2015 17:06:45	mellored wrote:
(Reply to #27) randl	GladiusLegis wrote:
#30 Nesian42Ryukaiel Jun 10, 2015 17:39:28	What's wrong with the Basic Rules player's side? The file size is seriously messed up... (almost 50MB...)
#31 pukunui Jun 10, 2015 17:40:43	Also: "@pukunui81 Unarmed strikes never should have appeared as weapons, hence the correction. The monk is barely affected."
#32 mrpopstar Jun 10, 2015 17:52:05	The Reach property clarification complicates my brain's ability to nail gridless combat. I wish it only applied when attacking; like the Two-Handed property.   That's my only gripe.
#33 FFSAA Jun 10, 2015 18:23:42	GladiusLegis wrote:
#34 CCS Jun 10, 2015 18:53:03	As usual any errata given by the company will be taken with at least a grain or three of salt in the groups I play with.
#35 pukunui Jun 10, 2015 19:35:54	CCS wrote:
#36 RCanine Jun 10, 2015 19:50:45	Did you guys catch this one:   Weapon Master (p. 170). The chosen weapons must be simple or martial.
#37 guachi Jun 10, 2015 20:22:55	There will be weapons that aren't simple or martial?
#38 pukunui Jun 10, 2015 20:25:24	RCanine wrote:
#39 FFSAA Jun 10, 2015 20:35:37	guachi wrote:
#40 RCanine Jun 10, 2015 21:02:17	guachi wrote:
#41 moonbeast Jun 10, 2015 21:14:29	Well I was planning to buy a second hardcopy of the 5e PHB.  How am I suppoed to tell if I am ordering/buying the Errata edition?  Do the books say somewhere like "Second Printing" or "Revised 2015 Edition"?
#42 kalil Jun 10, 2015 21:46:40	Where are you guys getting the information that they will put these errata into the printed version?
#43 pukunui Jun 10, 2015 22:13:04	Magic Initiate (p. 168). The feat’s limit on casting the 1st-level spell applies only to the casting given by the feat.
#44 kalil Jun 10, 2015 22:11:15	pukunui wrote:
#45 pukunui Jun 10, 2015 22:20:14	kalil wrote:
(Reply to #35) CCS	pukunui wrote:
#47 pukunui Jun 10, 2015 23:03:54	CCS wrote:
#48 JohnLynch Jun 10, 2015 23:14:54	Nothing ground breaking here. It all seems to be common sense rulings with a couple of "that seemed to good" benefits cut down. I'll be happy to continue DMing without regard to this errata, applying common sense rulings instead. If any of the nerfs actually become a problem in my game then I've got a suggested way in which to tone them down. Glad to see there weren't any "OMG we really need to fix this" stuff (ala 0 day errata for the Pathfinder Paladin and the 0 day errata for DCs in 4th edition). Looks like all that extra work paid off.   I will be applying the slight boosts to the beast companion though.
#49 BoldItalic Jun 10, 2015 23:18:32	moonbeast wrote:
(Reply to #42) Coredump00	kalil wrote:
(Reply to #43) Coredump00	pukunui wrote:
(Reply to #22) DoctorBadWolf	Xeviat-DM wrote:
#53 Enevhar_Aldarion Jun 11, 2015 1:26:04	pukunui wrote:
#54 mellored Jun 11, 2015 5:17:08	RCanine wrote:
#55 Rya.Reisender Jun 11, 2015 5:19:09	Is it really that much of a problem when some of your players have an older PHB version? They can all just print out the errata page and place it inside their outdated PHBs.   Like, the sling is 100% reloadable onehanded, in every universe not governed by the rules of DnD.
(Reply to #47) CCS	pukunui wrote:
#57 Arithezoo Jun 11, 2015 6:07:09	So as far as I can tell, the clarification that unarmed strikes aren't weapons is just to prevent you from using spells like Magic Weapon.  Though, honestly, I don't see the harm.   As clarified by Jeremy Crawford, the monk can certainly still use Stunning Strike.  Likewise, all of the Battle Master maneuvers say "weapon attack" or "melee weapon attack", meaning that they too would work with unarmed strikes.   I also just noticed that Parry and Riposte say, "melee attack" rather than "melee weapon attack", meaning that they would work against melee spell attacks.
#58 mrpopstar Jun 11, 2015 6:38:09	Arithezoo wrote:
(Reply to #43) Reinhart	pukunui wrote:
(Reply to #53) CCS	Enevhar_Aldarion wrote:
#61 ChrisCarlson Jun 11, 2015 7:33:32	CCS wrote:
(Reply to #33) MightyZehir	FFSAA wrote:
(Reply to #59) Coredump00	Reinhart wrote:
(Reply to #63) Reinhart	Coredump00 wrote:
(Reply to #64) Chameleon-X	Reinhart wrote:
(Reply to #54) randl	mellored wrote:
#67 DemoMonkey Jun 11, 2015 11:17:21	"I think this would also prevent proficiency with throwing stuff like Holy Water, acid flasks, or Alchemist Fire."   Those are all improvised weapons. Tavern Brawler gives you proficiency with them.
(Reply to #67) randl	DemoMonkey wrote:
(Reply to #43) Azzy1974	pukunui wrote:
(Reply to #44) Azzy1974	kalil wrote:
#71 Shasarak Jun 11, 2015 13:39:49	ChrisCarlson wrote:
#72 LordCorwin Jun 11, 2015 17:46:47	Shasarak wrote:
(Reply to #55) DoctorBadWolf	Rya.Reisender wrote:
(Reply to #73) The_White_Sorcerer	DoctorBadWolf wrote:
(Reply to #74) CCS	The_White_Sorcerer wrote:
#76 arnwolf666 Jun 12, 2015 23:25:45	Boy, our party dragon sorcerer is going to be ticked.  And we checked in detail with many people to see if we were doing it right.  We even called wizards directly about the twinned spell ruling.  Elemental Affinity will really tick him off.
#77 joeburgos Jun 13, 2015 10:26:30	BoldItalic wrote:
(Reply to #76) CCS	arnwolf666 wrote:
#79 jaelis Jun 13, 2015 11:19:11	arnwolf666 wrote:
(Reply to #76) OoftaMeg	arnwolf666 wrote:
#81 moonbeast Jun 15, 2015 13:49:45	joeburgos wrote:
#82 SleepsInTraffic Jun 15, 2015 14:08:12	Hmm maybe this is why all of the sellers were having crazy deals on the core 3 because they knew their current stockpiles would not be useful once they had to switch to selling the erratad books.
(Reply to #82) Coredump00	SleepsInTraffic wrote:
#84 Brock_Landers Jun 16, 2015 10:07:14	Coredump00 wrote:
#85 Mistwell Jun 16, 2015 11:27:54	Coredump00 wrote:
(Reply to #85) Coredump00	Mistwell wrote:
#87 Shasarak Jun 16, 2015 23:49:17	CCS wrote:
#88 Mistwell Jun 17, 2015 10:12:14	Coredump00 wrote:
#89 ChrisCarlson Jun 17, 2015 10:14:24	Mistwell wrote:
#90 Brock_Landers Jun 17, 2015 10:26:34	ChrisCarlson wrote:
#91 BoldItalic Jun 17, 2015 10:57:34	Brock_Landers wrote:
#92 ChrisCarlson Jun 17, 2015 10:53:01	All it takes for the internet to win is for good people to do nothing!
#93 BoldItalic Jun 17, 2015 11:02:11	See, this is why errata are so important.
#94 Brock_Landers Jun 17, 2015 11:10:31	BoldItalic wrote:
#95 ChrisCarlson Jun 17, 2015 11:19:13	If a particular piece of errata is reaming you, ignore it. At least, that's what my great grandpappy always used to say.
#96 Brock_Landers Jun 17, 2015 11:45:53	ChrisCarlson wrote:
#97 DemoMonkey Jun 17, 2015 12:34:34	It doesn't have to be "either/or" on how the errata timing was planned. It's perfectly reasonable to assume the conversation went something like this:   Q: When should we release errata?   A: How about a year from now? That will give us time to get feedback, take another pass at the rules, and also let most of the first print run sell through.         ... You may now continue to divide into armed camps and argue about the correct number of stars on thars.
(Reply to #88) Coredump00	Mistwell wrote:
#99 Mistwell Jun 18, 2015 19:49:49	DemoMonkey wrote:
#100 Mistwell Jun 18, 2015 19:51:33	Coredump00 wrote:
#101 PlotThickens Jun 18, 2015 20:10:44	So was it only the Player's Handbook that got errata?   I just bought all three books... but I don't see it being a problem since it's just one page.
(Reply to #100) Coredump00	Mistwell wrote: